Controversy as Alonso wins manipulated race

2010 German Grand Prix reviewPosted on | Author Keith Collantine

Fernando Alonso claimed his second win of 2010 in the German Grand Prix – but only after team mate Felipe Massa was ordered to give him the win.

The change of positions has already drawn widespread criticism and both drivers were clearly subdued on the podium afterwards. The stewards are investigating what happened.

The pair took the lead at the start as both overtook Sebastian Vettel. But Vettel’s attempts to keep Alonso behind let Massa through into the lead ahead of his team mate.

Pinched between the Ferraris, Vettel slowed held up Jenson Button. That allowed the McLaren driver’s team mate to pass him as well as Mark Webber.

Vettel was the first driver to pit, his team smartly taking advantage of a small gap in the traffic behind.

Alonso reacted, pitting before Massa, but after his team mate pitted Alonso was still behind. Lewis Hamilton came in too and was briefly stuck behind Robert Kubica when he came back out.

But Mark Webber came off worst in the first round of pit stops, ultimately losing fifth place to Jenson Button. Button stayed out late and came close to getting ahead of Hamilton as well as Webber.

That left the Ferraris first and second, with Felipe Massa struggling to begin with after he switched to hard tyres.

At first it looked as though Alonso might be able to pass his team mate. He made a concerted effort when when was briefly held up behind Bruno Senna but Massa held the inside line for the hairpin and Alonso’s attempt to pass failed.

After that Massa began to pull away, building up a gap of over three seconds over his team mate. Later Alonso began to bring the gap down again and came within range as Massa hit more traffic.

It was at this point that Rob Smedley got on the radio to Massa with a message that has already become infamous. It was clearly a coded instruction to Massa telling him to let Alonso by.

Later Ferrari’s press officer Luca Colajanni defended the decision saying the team were concerned about the threat of third-placed Vettel:

If Felipe would have struggled more Vettel could have joined Fernando and that could have been a danger for the team.

When you are on the pit wall you have to think about all the potential scenarios. Vettel could have joined them and maybe in last ten laps of the race we could have been in trouble.
Luca Colajanni

However he denied Massa had been told to let Alonso by, saying:

We didn’t let Fernando pass. It was a driver decision. We inform the drivers about situation. We didn’t give any instruction at all to what they have to do. It was his own decision.
Luca Colajanni

Even when Massa slowed after being passed, Vettel wasn’t able to do anything about the Ferrari, and followed him home in third. But afterwards the stewards summoned Ferrari to explain themselves raising the possibility that Vettel may yet gain more places.

The McLaren drivers had a quiet race to fourth and fifth. They might have been pushed harder had Webber not developed a problem with high oil temperature, meaning he had to drop back from them.

Kubica took seventh ahead of the Mercedes duo, Nico Rosberg leading home Michael Schumacher after getting past him via the pit stops. Vitaly Petrov claimed the final point ahead of Kamui Koabayashi’s Sauber.

The two Williams drivers fell out of the points having started in the top ten and came home 12th and 13th.

Pedro de la Rosa ran a long first stint on the hard tyres but ultimately finished where he started in 14th.

The two Force Indias finished 16th and 17th behind Jaime Alguersuari after a terrible race for the team. Both cars were in for repairs at the end of the first lap.

The only two drivers of the new teams to finish were Timo Glock and Bruno Senna.

Alonso’s win means he is still fifth in the drivers championship but is now within 13 points of the Red Bull duo – assuming the stewards allow him to keep his win.

2010 German Grand Prix

Browse all 2010 German Grand Prix articles

Image (C) Ferrari spa

275 comments on “Controversy as Alonso wins manipulated race”

Jump to comment page: 1 3 4 5
  1. Ferrari would still have got the same points with Massa winning, surely the team’s focus is the WCC, and then if their drivers fright for the WDC all the better? That way we have no team orders becuase it is a team focus. More focus on WCC…….

  2. Please, Keith, could you give some evidence in favour of these statements in the article:

    1) … as Massa hit more traffic.

    2) Even when Massa slowed after being passed…?

    Just to prove your unbiased approach…

  3. This was just shameful. As a Massa fan, I feel ashamed, and HE should too.
    To see the footage of Alonso ‘celebrating’ the victory was revolting. Absolutely absurd, as was Alonso’s complains to to the pit because Massa didn’t let himm pass in the first half.
    As nikki Lauda said about Alonso’s remarks after the race, about he being faster than Massa: “I never heard a pilot talking such ********”.
    Even as as Massa fan AND a Ferrari fan, I truly hope the whole team is severely punished, well beyond the cash fine.

  4. I like Brazilian just have to say: total Indignation! In Brazil on Sunday woke up at 9:00 in the morning, rest day to see this farce …. while the FIA not to adopt the method by a pilot team that will not change.
    Santander boss at Ferrari, that is the question ….

  5. I would have liked to see this title in this article of yours written in 10 May 2009 instead
    “Did Brawn deliberately give Barrichello a poor strategy to let Button win?” ( does thit suggest that you are implying team orders)
    the title could have been
    “Controversy as Button wins manipulated race (Spanish Grand Prix review)
    wasn’t that a team order?
    what do you think after one year Keith and after all this fuss the ferrari team orders are causing?

    1. To everyone who’s pointing to other situations where team orders have been used, I think this is somewhat missing Keith’s point.

      There’s the concept of team orders and their application.

      Clearly, in this instance they were applied unjustly.

      1) Alonso missed his chance to pass Massa’s through Alonso’s mistake and Massa’s defensive skill.

      2) While Alonso may have been a shade quicker, we’re not talking drastically faster by any stretch.

      3) Alonso’s chances of winning the title are very slim.

      4) If Alonso still has a mathematical chance of victory, by logical extension Massa still did too. They have completely killed Massas chances to boost Alonso’s.

      5) The chance to see their pilot win a race on the anniversary of his accident obviously means nothing to them.

      1. 1) Alonso’s chances may well be very slim, but are the only chances of Ferrari. You must take that into account, I guess. “Logical extensions” are very very tricky.

        2) Anniversaries mean nothing to business people or, say, professionals.

        3) By now, everybody knows who is faster in Ferrari. Don’t you?

  6. still love ferrari,its motor racing,ferrari have one shot at this years title and it rests with alonso,if people really think massa can win this years title they really must be living in a dream land,massa is a brilliant driver but it means all the top 5 drivers need to all finish out the points or way down behind him for the remaining part of the season…ferrari aint the only team to have team orders,FACT,….fernando is faster than you can you confirm the message…where on earth did you hear alonso is ahead in the title now move over,maybe my tv missed that bit out then,i will admit it was not fair for massa but he let alonso pass,if he didnt agree i guess he didnt have to,if you was the big boss of your team and you was in this scenario most people would do the same but just not admit it,i think it would nice to see alonso fight for this title and even massa gettin in there,would make things more interesting near the end of the season….

  7. all this happened because massa did what it did in a very thick way. it was thick like a 12 ” wall what he did and he wanted to make it known ” I am doing you a big favor alonso”
    don’t ever forget what ferrari have done for Massa. and this is the way he is paying back
    ferrari should get rid of him
    it wasn’t a team order.
    it was a driver choice executed very bad after a very polite suggestion from the team

  8. if he did feel like the team was wrongdoing him he shouldn’t have let alonso pass
    or you do it properly or you don’t do it at all
    he is a jerk

  9. The problem with F1 now is the marketing is more important than winning. Team orders ban was really a marketing, not a technical thing and really hard to force. Ferrari is better than McLaren and Redbull in term of their traditional vision of F1. Ferrari has a great brand image, they do not need a figure to help boost their sales. They only need good driver and good teamwork. Marketing is not priority since it take care itself. McLaren and Redbull need to work on figure too, and we can see that from their drivers now (yes they are popular and has good smiles and pretty girlfriend – compared to Massa and Alonso) – their drivers also good on press conference and diplomatic speech, of course you dont want to mess up with press and drop that popularity. It is way different with Ferraris, they are naturally competitive driver with less popularity yet direct in conversation. The team orders for Ferrari is basically to win the championship, while team orders for the others is also for increasing sales and popularity. For me it is not proper to compare Ferrari with these two teams since they are different in value and vision.

  10. just trying to work the quotes

    I hope it worked

    1. damn still didn’t work

      how about now

  11. I don’t know how to close a quote

    may like this

  12. damn again

    or like this

  13. To me, this whole mess is a good opportunity for F1 to put to rest that nonsense about you being faster so you should be allowed to pass. THIS IS A RACE, fercrisssake!!!!! Are you fast? Overtake the car in front of you. As simple as that. Oh, you can’t overtake? Don’t complain, this is what racing is about: it is NOT about being fast, it is about being the first to win the race. Yes, to be the first normally involves being fast, but NOT the other way round.
    I am completely, absolutely fed up with Alonso’s complains that he was faster than Massa but was looking at Massa’s exhaust pipes. Well, if Massa is ahead of you, maybe it is because he was racing better than you. And if you are faster you must overtake him.
    The idea of ordering Alonso in first because he was being faster than Massa defeats the idea of racing. As a principle, is the death of racing.

  14. alonso could’ve just made a move on massa and taken them both out like vettel did to webber in turkey and have the team blame massa saying he was in the wrong for not allowing room and defending his race lead. LOL.

  15. Team orders should be OK,
    unless the Drivers contract do include individual terms and conditions regarding teamorders.

  16. The truth of all this is that Formula 1 is run by British and being English is that something may be illegal but it has to be concealed. Ultimately, THE FORMS ARE PUNISHED BUT NOT ETHICS. I prefer the Latin style is more honest.

  17. what a farce,as it is a current rule not to use team orders, it is blatant cheating and robbed the fans watching on tv and at the track of a spectacle. but there is one or two teams who think they are above the law, and the fia seem frightened of them, but they should remove there points and ban them for one race. there would be probably be a lot of people with money on massa to win, i wonder if anyone will sue.if they are serious about not wanting cheating, there are a few teams now wanting to come into fi, let them come in and let teams only have one car. i have watched the sport a lot of years on tv, and i was disgusted in 2002, but i gave it a second chance, but i will do something else on a sunday afternoon now until something changes

  18. I’m as SO bored of listening to constant talk of tyres through every race weekend, I don’t watch F1 for tyre strategy. Its such a big part of the racing and,to me, just so dull that I’d like to see it taken out of the equation comletely.

    I’m not so technically minded as many out there so please put me right but could the teams not be given 1 tyre that will give them lots of grip for the full duration of the race, and more. The whole weekend even.

    Also, the prospect of any tyre war just fills me with tread.


  19. I feel this is one of the so much important information for me. And i am satisfied studying your article. However want to observation on some common issues, The site style is perfect, the articles is in reality excellent : D. Just right job, cheers

Jump to comment page: 1 3 4 5

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

All comments are moderated. See the Comment Policy and FAQ for more.