Michael defends Barrichello strategy

Posted on | Author Keith Collantine

Williams technical director Sam Michael said he was happy with the team’s decision not to pit Rubens Barrichello during the safety car period in the Hungarian Grand Prix.

Barrichello was ninth before the safety car came out and ended the race tenth, having fallen behind team mate Nico H???lkenberg, both Saubers and Jenson Button.

Michael explained the decision not to pit Barrichello:

Our prime reason for not pitting Rubens when the Safety Car was deployed was to avoid doing 55 laps on the softer, Option tyre which, at that stage, we didn’t think would last for that amount of time.

More importantly, if we had stacked both the cars in the pitlane, Nico would have significantly lost out. The strategy we chose maximised the points we collected.
Sam Michael

Barrichello was one of few drivers who started the race on hard tyres. Sebastien Buemi did too and he did pit during the safety car period, but his lap times on his new super-soft tyres dropped off before Barrichello’s did on his original medium tyres (see the fastest lap chart to compare).

Michael also expressed satisfaction with H???lkenberg’s performance following his best result of the year so far:

Nico drove a solid race. He was on the correct tyre given the safety car situation, which was a result of him qualifying well on Saturday.
Sam Michael

2010 Hungarian Grand Prix

Browse all 2010 Hungarian Grand Prix articles

29 comments on “Michael defends Barrichello strategy”

  1. “Michael defends Barrichello strategy”

    A misleading headline!

      1. My brain immediately added ‘Schumacher’ after ‘Michael’. Maybe just me. :)

        1. Then it would be “Schumacher defends Barrichello strategy”. And you’d have to wonder why he would care about Barrichello’s strategy!

          1. Well, for me, I automatically jumped to what Schumacher did with Barrichello. Maybe you should write Sam Michael just to clear it up. Because it appears lots of people get confused to begin with at least until they go into the article

          2. Apologies, the headline in itself is not misleading but the all the interest in Barrichello and Schumacher’s incident make it a little unfortunate, as Jarred says.

          3. In all honesty, whenever you hear pit radio everyone, Mercedes or otherwise, refers to him as Michael, and it was what I immediately thought as well, it’s not wrong, just misleading given the events of the weekend ;)

          4. But Keith, you have to admit that immediate mental associations with specific names/words in F1 are quite normal. I too was drawn in by the words you used, and had a bloody good laugh at my own gullibility !

            I think we’re all still just a bit gob-smacked by the move MSC pulled on Barrichello and what the consequences might have been. That was just too damn close.

            Doesn’t Sam Michael always sound rock-solid on strategy. What a guy to have running your F1 team.

          5. This has come up before! Ha!

        2. I always think of Schumi too whenever it’s (Sam) Michael

          1. I also thought it was about Schumi. :D

          2. As do I.

            I’d like the FIA to ban people with two ‘first names’ in 2011.

          3. As soon as I clicked the link my brain clicked too as I remembered Sam Micheal :P

      2. Because of Michael Schumacher… (lolo, that would have been fun!)

        1. Yeah, it’s not just you…

          1. MouseNightshirt
            3rd August 2010, 20:47

            Ditto, I was intrigued by the headline until I came into the story, then it all made sense!

          2. Lol, yeah me too.

          3. Yep, I thought that too.

          4. Yeah I too thought that it was Schumacher.

            Williams are doing good job in the last couple of races & if they continue then they may have a good fight with Force India & Sauber for the 6th place in the championship.

          5. Can I join the club, too?

          6. And me! I was already thinking, that damn Schumacher can’t even apologise with dignity…

          7. So did I haha! Glad I wasn’t the only one

          8. Just to be clear: I don’t refer to drivers, team principals, etc… by their first name alone. Even if they have long surnames which makes writing headlines trickier (of which Schumacher and Barrichello are both examples!)

  2. Well, at least race strategy has not died since refueling was banned. Barrichello and Webber have proved that in this race.

  3. As Webber showed us, those tyres could run for 50 laps from the start with heavy fuel(44 race laps, the lap to the grid and installation lap as well as a outlap, 2 fast laps and a inlap in Q3).

    But i like their reasoning, that it would hurt the Hulk to much and hardly anybody would have betted on those tyres lasting.

  4. I really like that teams are getting a bit braver with strategies as it can add excitement in later parts of the race. Kobayashi in Valencia and Barrichello in Hungary were fine examples of benefit that comes from taking a different direction with strategy.

    1. Yes, but getting rid of that annoying tyres rule (of using the 2 compounds) would be nice too. In the case of Kobayashi in Valencia, we would have been robbed of 2 overtaking manoevers, but that very late pitstop kind of ruined his race…

  5. AGAIN, Keith, it happened again – and this time it’s much more relevant :P I could almost think you’re doing it on purpose :D

  6. well it got me to open the article,otherwise i probably wouldn’t have bothered. most of us readers thought it had to do with the ( michael )schumacher incident…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

All comments are moderated. See the Comment Policy and FAQ for more.