F1 Fanatic round-up: 11/8/2010

Posted on | Author Keith Collantine

We’ve already got F1 Fanatic T-shirts on sale and soon they should be followed by F1 Fanatic mugs too – have a look at this picture of an early prototype by Luke of Unlap.

Here’s today’s round-up:

Links

Practice Makes Perfect – McLaren’s Pitstop Team at MTC pre-European Grand Prix (Youtube)

Splitters Explained (Scarbsf1’s Blog)

“One of the explanations for the low wing ride height on the RB6 are suggested to be the splitter is allowing lower ride height by deflecting. Certainly trackside images suggest the Red Bull and the Ferrari are running significantly more rake in the set up at speed (i.e. nose down). Other teams suggest that this level of rake and low front wing ride height cannot be achieved with normal rear ride heights. But do not suggest how the car may be able to run that low. But the inference is that the splitter is in some way deflecting to allow this. I?ve not seen the detail of Red Bull’s splitter mounting, but I doubt they are able to deflect the splitter without any obvious compliance in its mounting or undue wear to the skid blocks.”

First major truck racing event held on Russian soil (RT)

Hermann Tilke’s new track in Russia has opened with a round of the European Truck Racing championship. The video below includes comments from FIA vice president Graham Stoker:

Comment of the day

Has to be bosyber for the inspired phrase ‘downforce monster’:

Red Bull already have a downforce monster, they made the trade-off with the extra drag that produces leaving them down on top speed themselves. Renault themselves do not have a problem with their engine, after all.

So far Red Bull’s choices gave them the car on the grid that got round almost all tracks the fastest. I don?t resent them for that, I think it is good work by the team. They clearly made the right development choices there, others have to catch up. But they are now, again, asking to have that downside to their winning choice eliminated ?ǣ why would anyone else want to oblige?

And what purpose would it serve? To make them truly invincible, apart from engine failures due to the tinkering? What is in it for the FIA, for the FOTA, for the general F1 fans? Engine freeze was a practical matter, not an attempt at creating a spec engine. Everyone gets to work with what they have got ?ǣ they can try to request permission for changes, as Ferrari has managed to obtain, sure why not, but if other teams decline to give that permission, no one should force them to, for some imaginary single engine spec, which does not exist. Red Bull should learn to live with their package as others have been forced to.
bosyber

From the forum

TomD11 asks an interesting question about the 1982 F1 race at Long Beach.

Happy birthday!

Happy birthday to Glue!

On this day in F1

Happy birthday to Lucas di Grassi too, who is 26 today!