Belgian Grand Prix fastest laps

You need to upgrade your Flash Player

View interactive chart full screen

Tick/untick drivers? names to show their laps, click and drag to zoom

Rank Driver Car Fastest lap Deficit to fastest lap
1 Lewis Hamilton McLaren-Mercedes 1’49.069
2 Mark Webber Red Bull-Renault 1’49.395 0.326
3 Robert Kubica Renault 1’49.807 0.738
4 Felipe Massa Ferrari 1’50.111 1.042
5 Adrian Sutil Force India-Mercedes 1’50.477 1.408
6 Sebastian Vettel Red Bull-Renault 1’50.868 1.799
7 Vitaly Petrov Renault 1’51.175 2.106
8 Fernando Alonso Ferrari 1’51.374 2.305
9 Jaime Alguersuari Toro Rosso-Ferrari 1’51.576 2.507
10 Nico Rosberg Mercedes 1’51.688 2.619
11 Kamui Kobayashi Sauber-Ferrari 1’51.749 2.680
12 Nico H???lkenberg Williams-Cosworth 1’51.864 2.795
13 Michael Schumacher Mercedes 1’51.914 2.845
14 Vitantonio Liuzzi Force India-Mercedes 1’52.267 3.198
15 Pedro de la Rosa Sauber-Ferrari 1’52.537 3.468
16 Jenson Button McLaren-Mercedes 1’52.879 3.810
17 Sebastien Buemi Toro Rosso-Ferrari 1’52.966 3.897
18 Jarno Trulli Lotus-Cosworth 1’55.103 6.034
19 Timo Glock Virgin-Cosworth 1’55.268 6.199
20 Sakon Yamamoto HRT-Cosworth 1’55.484 6.415
21 Lucas di Grassi Virgin-Cosworth 1’55.705 6.636
22 Heikki Kovalainen Lotus-Cosworth 1’55.797 6.728
23 Bruno Senna HRT-Cosworth 2’16.767 27.698

2010 Belgian Grand Prix

Browse all 2010 Belgian Grand Prix articles

Advert | Go Ad-free


17 comments on Belgian Grand Prix fastest laps

  1. In know Fernando was all over the place with setup and then tyres so these flaps mean a little less this weekend but I am pleased to see Felipe so high. Hamilton was insanely quick.

  2. Marco said on 29th August 2010, 19:15

    Laptime differences between some teammates are really shocking… Especially Alonso was extremelly slow compared to Massa…

    • Calum said on 29th August 2010, 19:46

      Alonso crashed though, so wouldn’t have been able to give a lap on the lightest fuel weight.

      • Calum said on 29th August 2010, 19:47

        In see what you mean now, lap by lap he was generaly slower. Was this not because Alonso was set up for rain yesterday.

        • Marco said on 29th August 2010, 20:07

          I checked the times from, and Fernando s fastest lap was 1,263 slower then Massa s… Looking on average racelaps, Alonso was 0,295s slower then Felipe… So, it was definitely Alonso s worsest race in terms of pace comparing to Massa… (I compared 30 laps of both, not those spent behind the SC, or in and outlaps for pit or the first lap of the race)

          • Keith Collantine (@keithcollantine) said on 29th August 2010, 21:35

            But Alonso spent most of his race in traffic, with a car that must have had some damage from the Barrichello collision. It’s hardly a fair comparison.

          • Marco said on 29th August 2010, 23:11

            He wasn t ALWAYS stucked in traffic… He had also clean air, but with no extraordinary times… It definitely wasn t his weekend…

        • plushpile said on 30th August 2010, 7:11

          He didn’t crash until they put the wet tyres on, so he wouldn’t have posted a faster lap anyway.
          But as Kieth said his car was damaged at the end of the first lap too…

    • nelly said on 29th August 2010, 20:21

      It might have something to do with Massa having a lower-downforce rear wing compared to Alonso for quali and the race or it might just have been the set up. I find it hard to believe Alonso would just keep losing time to Massa though. Maybe he was just having a poor race.

    • Ads21 (@ads21) said on 29th August 2010, 21:31

      Alonso had a rear wing the size of Luxemburg and was in traffic during the fastest part of the race. In clear air he was on the pace of the leaders in the dry even with a wet set-up

  3. adam23 said on 29th August 2010, 19:31

    I cant believe the new teams are still around 3 seconds slower than the back of the established teams

  4. John H said on 29th August 2010, 19:34

    Sakon with a respectable time!

  5. When track was best for the fastest laps (=before the late rain) Alonso had some 25 laps with his tyres while Massa about five. I think that explains part of the gap between him and Massa, but not all of it.

  6. US_Peter said on 29th August 2010, 23:17

    Interesting that the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th, and 5th fastest laps came from the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th, and 5th placed finishers, in that order exactly. Wonder how often that’s happened before.

Add your comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

All comments must abide by the comment policy. Comments may be moderated.
Want to post off-topic? Head to the forum.
See the FAQ for more information.