F1 Fanatic round-up: 5/10/2010

We’re looking for volunteers to help run the live blogs for the Japanese Grand Prix this weekend.

If you’d like to get involved please get in touch by emailling me, using Twitter or leave a comment below.

Here’s the Tuesday round-up:

Links

Branson backs call to remove blue flags (Autosport)

Earlier this year 61% of F1 Fanatic readers said the blue flag rule should be relaxed or abolished.

Comment of the day

Some interesting thoughts from Sean on the always-controversial topic of team orders. Head over to the article page to read the full comment:

I think many drivers can and will put in solid, consistent performances within a few tenths of theirs and the car?s capability, regardless of the bigger picture. But as you get into the rarefied zone of the last hundredths and the ability to really nail a qualifying or in-lap, or string together a series of killer laps when the chips are down, it?s a highly complex mental zone where knowing you can actually go out and win the thing is a prerequisite. Without it, any driver is potentially defunct and for this reason I refuse to judge Rubens on his performances at Ferrari when he had that contract, or Massa on the basis of his late 2010 performances, because he?s effectively driving with lead weights attached to his head.
Sean

From the forum

NicktheGeek wants to knows about the Alonso hand thingy.

Happy birthday!

Happy birthday to Cholle and Yorricksfriend!

On this day in F1

The last ever United States Grand Prix at Watkins Glen was held on this day 30 years ago.

It was the last race of the 1980 and Bruno Giacomelli impressed by leading for Alfa Romeo in the opening stages. The team, which had seen driver Patrick Depailler lose his life earlier in the season, were knocking on the door of their first win in almost 30 years.

Sadly it wasn’t to be. Giacomelli’s electrics packed up after 31 laps, letting newly-crowned world champion Alan Jones through to win.

Advert | Go Ad-free

51 comments on F1 Fanatic round-up: 5/10/2010

  1. Charles Carroll said on 5th October 2010, 3:45

    Bruno Giacomelli is one of the all-time greatest race names.

    That is officially my fourth son’s name, as of now.

  2. Joey-Poey said on 5th October 2010, 4:58

    I absolutely support the idea of the blue flags being laxed or removed

    • felipe you need to drop back a lap and block webber

      • HounslowBusGarage said on 5th October 2010, 8:14

        Excellent point.

      • LewisC said on 5th October 2010, 8:46

        Can you confirm you understand?

      • Magnificent Geoffrey (@magnificent-geoffrey) said on 5th October 2010, 8:51

        White visor, otherwise I connot see anything!

        Oh, sorry. Wrong joke.

      • COTD joe! Because that’s what will happen if blue flags will be removed.

      • UneedAFinn2Win said on 5th October 2010, 9:46

        How does removing blue flags remove no blocking rule?

        • sato113 said on 5th October 2010, 11:58

          felipe is fast enough to just drive consistenly infront of webber for many laps, doesn’t need to block.

      • Icthyes (@icthyes) said on 5th October 2010, 9:48

        I like the assumption that no matter what we do to the rules Ferrari will find a way to cheat.

        • Electrolite said on 5th October 2010, 10:29

          Abolishing the blue flag just brings in more complications and opens up so many loopholes for teams to exploit. At a time when we’re supposed to be making team orders clear I think this would be a very bad move.

          • Icthyes (@icthyes) said on 5th October 2010, 10:40

            There’ll always be avenues though. Ferrari could fuel Massa ridiculously light, get him ahead of Webber, slow him down, Alonso wins, Massa retires halfway with an “electronic glitch”.

            Admittedly it would be a lot easier to drop back a lap when the situation demands it than such a convoluted plan, but I doubt anyone would be impressed with such a blatant manipulation and there’d be probably be rules against it, if there aren’t already.

          • Icthyes (@icthyes) said on 5th October 2010, 10:46

            Oh, plus there’s nothing to stop a driver slowing down now and then crashing into his team-mate’s rival (like Coulthard at Spa 1998, but on purpose) except the rules, so like I say rules could be made to cover it if they haven’t already.

          • Imagine this: Alonso leads, Webber is second but catching him, Massa drops down and lets Fernando pass but forces Webber to gamble to pass him before Alonso has dissapeared.

            Or Toro Rosso are slow and gets lapped by the Red Bulls easily but forces Alonso and the McLarens to lose time.

  3. dragon said on 5th October 2010, 5:13

    There are so many things wrong with the idea of blue flags being removed, I don’t know where to start.

    If you’re slow enough to the point of being lapped, then it’s simple – get out of the way. The idea of losing time behind someone who has no right to be racing you doesn’t make any sense whatsoever.

    Just because a backmarker is considerably slower doesn’t make overtaking easier, especially if they’re allowed to position their car to defend. Being vulnerable to attack from behind or having all your hard work of trying to catch leading drivers ruined by a backmarker, who will have no influence on the final outcome, is a stupid injustice.

    • Prisoner Monkeys (@prisoner-monkeys) said on 5th October 2010, 6:37

      The idea of losing time behind someone who has no right to be racing you doesn’t make any sense whatsoever.

      If you can put a car on the grid, then you have every right to race. Go back twenty or twenty five years, when cars that were five or six seconds off the pace of the leaders was not the exception, but the rule. Did you ever hear Prost and Senna complain about it? Maybe – but they never demanded those cars be denied the opportunity to race.

      If a driver cannot lap a car that is five or six seconds than he is, then maybe he is the one with no right to race since he obviously can’t drive too well.

    • Magnificent Geoffrey (@magnificent-geoffrey) said on 5th October 2010, 8:50

      I read Brenden’s comment below yours first, but I also completely agree with you.

    • Icthyes (@icthyes) said on 5th October 2010, 10:49

      Except it would be the same for everyone. But no, it’s not a perfect idea and would need to be tested thoroughly. And to be honest in a few years when the new teams catch up the justification for removing them altogether will be gone. But relaxing them might add a new element of skill into things without the dire consequences of abolition.

    • Mark Hitchcock (@mark-hitchcock) said on 5th October 2010, 11:01

      It’s a perfectly valid point, but I’m not sure the backmarkers would actually put up any sort of a fight. They just want to run their own race without being slowed even further by blue flags.
      Keep blue flags to alert the slower driver that he’s about to be lapped, but don’t make it mandatory that he pull over before he passes 3 of them, let him decide when to pull over.
      Defending the position would slow them down just as much as pulling over does now, but if they could pull over when the faster car is actually on their gearbox instead of 3 seconds behind, then they lose less time without having too much of an impact on the faster car’s race.

    • claudioff said on 5th October 2010, 13:49

      l would like to add that there are many circuits where is virtually impossible to overtake, like Monaco and Valencia. Do you remember Enrique Bernoldi (Arrows) vs David Coulthard GP (McLaren and pole position) during Monaco 2001?

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UZWPBNVZKdc

      • bosyber said on 5th October 2010, 17:12

        But Coulthard was fighting for position there, so blue flags wouldn’t feature regardless, wasn’t it?

        • Skett said on 5th October 2010, 21:32

          Thats not the point. The point was that despite being in a much faster car, he couldn’t pass because of the narrow circuit. So in actuality the fact that there are no blue flags IS the point

  4. Brendan said on 5th October 2010, 5:38

    I agree, removal of the blue flag rule is a stupid idea thought up by people who’s teams are at the back of the pack and desperate for a few more minutes on TV. The race leaders have done all the hard work and should not have to deal with slow cars and bad drivers more than they already do.

    • Prisoner Monkeys (@prisoner-monkeys) said on 5th October 2010, 6:42

      Were you watching the Singapore Grand Prix? Only ten drivers finished the race on the lead lap. Of the rest, only two of them – Lucas di Grassi and Heikki Kovalainen (technically) – were running at the end of the race. Yet I don’t see you calling for the scalps of Renault, Mercedes and Toro Rosso, since Vitaly Petrov, Jaime Alguersuari, Sebastien Buemi and Michael Schumacher were all at least a lap down.

      And I don’t think those drivers who did not finish on the lead lap can reasonably be classified as “bad”. Jean-Denis Deletraz was a bad driver, but is Timo Glock? No, he’s not – he’s just in a car that is yet to be fully developed. I wholly expect Virgin and Lotus to be fighting the other teams by the end of next season at the latest.

      • BasCB (@bascb) said on 5th October 2010, 20:18

        Fully agree with you on this PM! Look at the laptimes of these guys, the first lap they lose because they are slower, but then they lose loads of time just by getting waved the blue flags at them slowing them down even further.

        So it does not even work for the front runners, as they get to pass these cars even more often with the blue flags.

    • Magnificent Geoffrey (@magnificent-geoffrey) said on 5th October 2010, 8:48

      I completely agree with that. Blue flags could be seen to be a form of punishment for being too slow. Drivers should not be punished for leading a race or for being fast by having to deal with traffic that are laps behind them in the race.

  5. Lotus are to to use red bull gearboxes and hydraulics next season. Via @MyLotusRacing on twitter

  6. Rucknar (@superted666) said on 5th October 2010, 7:18

    The idea of axing blue flags at first didn’t sit well.
    But… after some thinking on the subject i do believe it will create better racing.

    If a car is being lapped the other car clearly has a large advantage in speed on either the straights or the corners. The only instances i see problems is either on tracks like monaco where it’s impossible to overtake, or if teams begin blocking certain people passing and not others to favour teams.

  7. I can’t understand the arguments for keeping the flags as they are.

    Dragan says that if you are slow enough to be in a position to be lapped you are automatically too slow and should get out of the way: considering that at some circuits you can be in this position by the end of a race merely by lapping 1.5 seconds slower than the leader, does this mean that anyone not in the top 3/4 teams falls into this category? This also ignores a leader going off-track and/or having to pit for a new nose for example – are they automatically ‘slow’? All the hard-work will only be ‘ruined’ by a backmarker if the driver isn’t good enough to negotiate them – it sounds like rallying is more up your street, outright pace unimpeded by other drivers or having to overtake (maybe Vettel has missed his true calling!).

    This also brings me to Brennan’s argument that leaders shouldn’t have to ‘deal with’ ‘slow cars’ and ‘bad drivers’. Apart from the fact that it isn’t just bad drivers and slow cars that get lapped, it stands to reason that they should be easy to negotiate if they are that terrible (and maybe if they were allowed to it might let the backmarkers show their skill) and if a driver isn’t aggressive enough to get past them without having mummy tell the nasty man to let them through then maybe they don’t deserve to win.

  8. Dan Thorn (@dan-thorn) said on 5th October 2010, 8:18

    Well it wouldn’t be an Alfa if something didn’t go wrong at a critical time!

    • codesurge said on 5th October 2010, 15:25

      Especially the fabled electrical “reliability”..

      Okay, I’d best not jinx myself into being stranded by the road shoulder tomorrow morning!

  9. Maciek said on 5th October 2010, 8:23

    Absolutely agree with relaxing, but not axing, the blue flags. Drivers in exponentially faster cars should not havde much trouble lapping backmarkers. If a driver does have trouble with it – it’s a skill to develop. I say relaxed, because you still need to have a measure of insurance against lapped cars purpousefully blocking the leaders, but I see no good reason why backmarkers have to compromise their already difficult races for the sake of making life easy for the leaders.

    I’ll bet anything that the nays and yays in this debate will follow the same lines as the ban on refuelling debate last year – age groups. People who remember F1 without blue flags will want them removed because blue flags took something away from the sport that was a test of driver skill and often added to race intensity.

    • Icthyes (@icthyes) said on 5th October 2010, 10:43

      Relaxing is the way to go, even if it’s just a stepping stone to total abolition. Blue flags could be increased to one lap, then two laps the next year, etc. and exceptions could be made for street circuits.

  10. Dan Thorn (@dan-thorn) said on 5th October 2010, 9:09

    It’s also José Froilán Gonzáles’ birthday today, who I think I’m right in saying is the oldest living Grand Prix winner.

  11. Icthyes (@icthyes) said on 5th October 2010, 9:54

    Brilliant COTD, I’ve been saying much the same with the whole “Massa was too far behind” argument for justifying the switch at Hockenheim. It’s not exactly proof that it’s wrong but many don’t even consider the possibility. Confidence is massively important to an F1 driver.

    I still find it amusing some will say that Massa wasn’t good enough to go for the championship and that the team orders ban is unenforceable on the very same weekend when Massa developed race-winning pace and the ban was enforced for the first time!

  12. Meander said on 5th October 2010, 9:56

    Great COTD from Sean. I fully agree that a driver who knows his ambitions are capped upfront can never achieve his full potential.

  13. Tango said on 5th October 2010, 9:57

    http://www.gpupdate.net/en/f1-news/243967/under-the-spotlight-comparing-the-points-systems/

    Now that’s weird. The former point system would actually give a tighter spread for the top 5

  14. Oliver said on 5th October 2010, 9:58

    Racing is actually moving from one point to another. It doesn’t matter if its over a hundred meters or a hundred kilometers.
    The impracticality of staging a race over a hundred kilometers forced the designing of race circuits.
    Which brings me back to the point. If you are already ahead of someone, will you still encounter him again, if you were racing in a straight line?

  15. Bartholomew said on 5th October 2010, 10:39

    I think that the proposal of Branson is a good one.
    I also wish he would also buy the Liverpool Football Club – there will be a fire sale in a few eeks and he would get it at a good price!

Add your comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

All comments must abide by the comment policy. Comments may be moderated.
Want to post off-topic? Head to the forum.
See the FAQ for more information.