Korean International Circuit: your verdict

Posted on | Author Keith Collantine

Grid, Korea, 2010

Despite months of doubt over whether the race would actually go ahead, and in spite of a downpour on race day, the Korean Grand Prix did take place and produced a race to remember.

So what’s the verdict on F1’s newest circuit? Is the Korean International Circuit a worthwhile addition to the calendar?

The drivers were largely positive about the new venue, albeit with some reservations over the pit lane entrance and exit.

But we should take their views with a pinch of salt – they tend to toe the PR line of praising new tracks and many were gushing in their praise before they’d even driven it.

An interesting layout

The track’s configuration is a cut above some of the bland recent additions to the calendar – particularly Yas Marina and Valencia. Turns 7/8/9, 11/12 and 17/18 were all being tackled at impressive speeds and showed off the capabilities of the cars.

The latter part of the lap was all the more interesting for being enclosed by barriers with limited run-off – though Mark Webber would surely have wished that wasn’t the case at turn 12.

The track also boasted the standard long straights bookended by tight hairpins designed to facilitate overtaking. Due to the race conditions on Sunday the jury is still out on whether they would provide overtaking opportunities in dry weather.

Of course the biggest problem with the track was that it wasn’t entirely ready. On Friday night walls were moved and kerbs raised but the concrete wasn’t fully set on the latter come practice on Saturday morning.

On top of that the drivers had to grapple with a track surface that offered very little grip. Having been laid just days earlier, the surface was oily, and dust from the ongoing construction work made matters worse.

Half a race

Already facing a tricky new track with an unpredictable surface, the drivers really didn’t need was the addition of water.

But it arrived by the bucket load on Saturday night. This caused a long and frustrating delay to the start of the race.

As happened at Fuji three years ago, Charlie Whiting in race control decided to leave the cars circulating behind the safety car for over a quarter of the race distance at the start.

Postponing a race start because of rain is one thing, but was it really necessary to waste that much time behind the safety car? You have to wonder if it was a plan to ensure the race got to at least 75% distance, allowing full points to be awarded.

Almost half the entire race distance – 26 of the 55 laps were spent behind the safety car. If the “75% race distance” rule applied to green flag running, this would have been a half-points race.

For many of those laps it seemed the track was not as wet as it had been during other recent wet races – Shanghai in 2009 and Silverstone in 2008 spring to mind.

The drivers struggled with poor visibility, which some blamed on the walled-in sections at the beginning and end of the lap. During the safety car period Jenson Button told his team:

Because of the way the track is with the walls and the stands the water isn?t going anywhere.
Jenson Button

To those watching the race who were unaware of the organisers’ master plan to erect buildings around the ‘street track’ portions of the lap it must have seemed rather strange that this brand new circuit was ill-equipped to cope with the rain.

A lot to like

But for all the problems caused by the late completion of the circuit and the dreadful weather on Sunday, there’s a lot to like about Korea’s F1 track.

The organisers have said the track will be in better shape next year but I feel that could be a mixed blessing. Even without the rain, the low-grip surface promised to make Sunday’s race an exciting one.

Will it still be there next year? Or will the surface have matured and the circuit polished into another of the sterile affairs that blight the modern F1 calendar? I hope not.

Did you go to the Korean Grand Prix? Tell us about your experience here: Korean International Circuit ?ǣ spectators? experiences

Korea International Circuit, 2010 Korean Grand Prix
Korea International Circuit, 2010 Korean Grand Prix

2010 Korean Grand Prix

Browse all 2010 Korean Grand Prix articles

Images ?? KAVO

70 comments on “Korean International Circuit: your verdict”

Jump to comment page: 1 2 3
  1. I think it’s better than most Tilke efforts. It doesn’t feel quite so overdesigned like Abu Dhabi, Valencia and Singapore.

    It’s quite interesting that the three sectors challenge the cars in different ways. Having the walls in places there as opposed to acres of run off and a white line is definitely a nice change, we want to see the drivers being punished for mistakes – but it does seem a bit “if you build it they will come” by building the “street circuit” and then hoping the streets will actually become streets afterwards.

    Pit lane entry was stupid, though – really obvious the drivers weren’t going to like that.

    On a separate note I totally agree about these “Safety Car Grands Prix”. One day we’ll run a full “distance”, whether it be 50% or 75%, and crown a race winner without a green flag lap, or at best only a handful of laps. The sport would be better off running a race the next day than trying something like that – the PR would surely be as bad as the US GP farce if they just went round behind the SC long enough to call it a result.

  2. I think we’ll truly know on a dry race day, but I think we’ve got a great track on our hands. Layout is brilliant.

  3. HounslowBusGarage
    27th October 2010, 17:53

    I was surpised to see how bumpy the circuit appeared to be. Perhaps though, the cars seemed to being thrown about a bit more than they really were becaus eof the head-on shot on the main straight.
    There needs to be a serious re-examination of the pit entry and the pit exit.
    What is the extra hairpin at turn 5 actually for?
    Is it to limit the accelaration of the cars and to try to keep their speed down as they come to 7?
    After all, the tarmac for the ‘proper’ route from 5 straight to 7 is ready and waiting for use, as per the original layout.
    I had deep reservations about the walls and I suspect that Webber and Petrov dislike them too, interesting to read Button’s comment that the walls stop the water vapour from being disipated – just like the forest at Spa or Hockenheim.
    Moving the walls back to increase runoff when the ‘cityscape’ has been developed around the final sector may not be possible.
    But the major problem with the cityscape has yet to become apparent. Not even the Koreans can build a marina and a huge development instantly, so assuming the construction gets going on this area before next October, there will be at least two more (possibley three) races where part of the lap is affected by dust, dirt and debris from the surrounding construction.

    1. Chris Yu Rhee
      28th October 2010, 15:49

      HBS, I think you’ve seen my comments on the development of the area in other threads, but this is one of the remotest parts of Korea.

      “We have successfully held the F1 event by building one of the finest circuits in the world in South Jeolla, which is one of the most underdeveloped areas in Korea,” he (Governor Park Joon-yung) said.” (bold added)

      Successfully? 거지말쟁이! (liar) Apologies for the Korean if it’s not right, it’s not my first language.

      As to the walls, they should be taken down before next year, if not sooner. They won’t be needed anytime soon.
      NO ONE in their right mind would build that “city” they show in all of the pretty pictures the architect drew up, especially right now. I live here, and have for a LONG time. The real estate market, both residential and commercial, is flat in the major cities, so who in the heck would invest in something that is over 400km from Seoul?
      Just pretty pictures…

  4. I think it’s a great circuit. A modern track with elements of some classic venues.

  5. Overall it is a good track I think. It gave us one of the best qualifying session this year. Maybe that was because it was a new track, but I do not think so. It is all about courage and trusting your car in the last sector, and Vettel drove his car right to the edges, which is very hard.

    The race was destroyed by rain though and the spray was making visibility poor. I think though that this was because of the lack of wind. Buildings around the track wont help.

    My proposal with the bridge still stands. It would really be spectacular!

  6. For me the race was seen through jaded, sleep deprived eyes due to getting up so early. I will reserve my opinion until Korea 2011 and when it is not a wet grands prix. All I have to say is that is appears alot better than Valencia, but then running the cars down aisle 2 of your local Sainsbury’s would be more interesting than that!

  7. Agostini Diego
    27th October 2010, 20:54

    I really like this circuit.

  8. SF Bay Area F1 Fan
    27th October 2010, 21:09

    It is really unacceptable that a brand new track had such poor drainage. I admit that the terrain is flat, but then so are most freeways and motorways. The design feature employed by civil engineers is a 1.5% – 2% cross slope on straights to help the storm water to “run off” the pavement. Who feel asleep while designing the roadway profile? What a shame!

    1. Chris Yu Rhee
      28th October 2010, 16:04

      No one fell asleep. The construction/paving company probably didn’t think about it, or didn’t follow the specifications Tilke wrote.

      If Samsung, LG, or Daewoo had built the track, there wouldn’t have been any problems.

      Remember, this is the land of “almost right.”

      Singapore spectacle vs. Korean debacle.

      Going to Incheon airport there are several speed camera sites on the freeway, except there are either: 1. only two cameras for a four-lane road, or 2. the cameras are all grouped over one or two of the four lanes.

      The entire track was unacceptable. They can’t blame the rain because it rains about the same time every year, and it is possible to do construction in the rain. (duh)

      It’s just a shame all-around.

      BTW-My dad’s from San Mateo. I love S.F.! Is Ghiradelli’s still there? It’s been a long time since I’ve been stateside.

  9. Like others have said, I’ll hold my verdict until we get a dry race.

  10. It was good. I expected some parts to be less flowing. Instead also some curves of the middle part are quite fast and demanding.
    What I don’t like is the infamous curve 10 (too short and slow, to me) and the slow 5 and 6, that didn’t inspire that much.
    Overall it is thumb up, absolutely.
    I think that this lay out can work to a exciting race evel if whether is dry.

  11. The circuit itself is the best of the Tilke Drome only thing that was missing was a Turn-8. This is it’s first year so yes when it comes around in 2011 many will have a tough time to recognize it.

    How can one can make a low grip surface?

  12. Track is not bad overall. A dry race will be a better benchmark.

    Will there be a big problem of a very dusty track for the next 4 years because of massive construction, as the city around the circuit will only be completed in 2021.

  13. Why is it that Tilke is the only track designer? It’s like the same old, same old. I’m sure there are other designers that would bring some different creativity to the party. It’s time to start thinking out of the Tilke box.

    1. That’s a question we’ve asked for years, here. No reply…

      1. CarsVsChildren
        28th October 2010, 14:01

        A guess would be that he has a kickback arrangement with Bernie.

    2. Mostly because Tilke doesn’t just design tracks. His company is usually the one that constructs them too. And of his construction projects, they’ve all been delivered on time and with quality (unlike Korea…)

      1. Chris Yu Rhee
        28th October 2010, 15:21

        “And of his construction projects, they’ve all been delivered on time and with quality (unlike Korea…)”

        And I thought that I was the only one that noticed this…

        Does anyone think that they should move the safety walls on the left side of the track just before the main straight? I was completely stunned to see the drivers going up on the curbs right next to the wall. Someone’s gonna hit that wall hard eventually.

  14. its very exciting and intresting circuit for both drivers and fans.

  15. As I said to my father after the race, I think the rain deprived us of an interesting race.

    No, the rain helped give us the great race! I loved it but I was worried concerned about the lack of fans until 20 minutes after the race began.

  16. I love the first three straights and the last three corners. The rest… not so much.

    Yeongam is the Asian Magny-Cours. Some corners based on details from other tracks, produces some pretty good racing, but will struggle being in the middle of nowhere.

    And if you’re wondering why the stands were full on raceday – students were given free tickets and government employees were required to sell tickets.


    1. Chris Yu Rhee
      28th October 2010, 15:35

      The race could have been a great chance for Korea to show off, but instead became an embarrassment.

      “The event was plagued by ticketing chaos, clueless volunteers, shoddy infrastructure and a shortage of hotels in the area that forced employees of Mercedes-Benz to sleep in love motel rooms for which they were charged $310 per night. (The normal rate is 30,000 to 50,000 won, or $26.80 to $44.70.)”

      Unfortunately, this is what I expected. I’ve lived here too long to expect anything different.
      Hearing stories about hotels “letting out” their paying guests’ rooms during the day, and having their guests find the resultant used condoms etc. in their rooms when they get back at night.

      Uncle Bernie should have pulled the plug in August, September at the latest.

      I live here, and decided to go camping instead and record the race on my VCR.

      My LazyBoy recliner was so comfortable, I could pause the race for “pit stops”, fast forward through the laps led by the safety car, and I wasn’t getting rained on…

      Maybe next year I’ll go. Maybe.

      1. One question, did you actually get to record the complete race with the delays and all?

        1. Chris Yu Rhee
          1st November 2010, 5:51

          I ran out of tape on the live broadcast, then my satellite went on the fritz when I tried to record the second broadcast, but finally recorded the third broadcast the following Wednesday @ 2:30AM. I had to avoid all news sources and all my F1 e-mails until I watched the tape.

          It was ok because I actually didn’t have time to wath the race until Thursday night anyways… LOL

          1. Wow, quite an adventure there :-D

            Good thing you got several chances for taping it! I hope you enjoyed it after zapping past the first 16 laps, I think it was well worth the trouble.

  17. Good track. Er, the track was great. The drivers said so too.

  18. Well, I was there and I have to say, beside of the weather condition, the chaos on Saturday when we try to leave the track, the lack of infrastructure, I like the track. We had a fantastic view from our Grand Stand. I have to admit that for the 1st. GP Korea was not really ready. Some thought they are going to an Opera with wearing high heels -:)or they brought their 1 year old baby to the track. Well, lets hope this will change in 2011. I am sure that the Korean will do everything to improve the conditions.
    Overall it was a good weekend and race, at least for me.



  19. Turns 5 and 6 ruin the first sector, but the rest of the track is epic:D

    Turn 17/18 could probably become as iconic as Turn 8!

Jump to comment page: 1 2 3

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

All comments are moderated. See the Comment Policy and FAQ for more.