The engine situation with two races to go

Your questions

Sebastian Vettel, Red Bull, Korea, 2010

Sebastian Vettel, Red Bull, Korea, 2010

Tom Hogan wrote in to ask:

I have been trying to get my head around the engine situation among the championship contenders. Sebastian Vettel?s Korean engine was on its third race, Mark Webber has (barely) used his last engine.

How many does Fernando Alonso have left as he blew a few in the beginning of the year?

On a personal note thank so much for all your work this year you have made following F1 in Australia far more enjoyable than ever.
Tom Hogan

First thing first: you can find an up-to-date list of how many new engines each driver has used on the statistics page here: New engines used.

Drivers can use up to eight engines in a season without a penalty. Once they use a ninth engine they get a ten-place penalty. All five championship contenders have used all eight of their new engines.

But, as Tom points out, Alonso hit the magic eight much earlier than the others:

Driver Round when first used eighth engine
Fernando Alonso Monza (round 14)
Lewis Hamilton Suzuka (16)
Jenson Button Suzuka (16)
Sebastian Vettel Suzuka (16)
Mark Webber Korea (17)

Remember that drivers can use their engines in any order and we don’t have a complete picture of who used which engine in which session (when asked for the data the FIA responded “This kind of information is confidential between each team and the FIA.”)

Therefore Alonso’s engine situation may not be that bad. Remember his engine that was replaced at Bahrain (along with Felipe Massa’s) was later used again in Shanghai. Alonso lost another engine at Malaysia.

Also keep in mind the following regulation ahead of the final race at Abu Dhabi next week:

If an engine is changed in accordance with Article 34.1 the engine which was replaced may not be used during any future qualifying session or race with the exception of the last Event of the Championship.
FIA Formula 1 Sporting Regulations Article 28.4 (e)

As for Sebastian Vettel, his Korean engine had also done race distances at Germany and Belgium (minus one lap) and the failure was traced to the con rod in the number four piston, according to Peter Windsor.

His Brazilian Grand Prix engine is the same one he used for the Monaco and Singapore Grands Prix – both circuits which do not stress engines too much (a lap of Singapore is 48% full throttle, Monaco 42%, Interlagos 63%).

Got an F1 question? Send it in using the contact form.

F1 technology

Browse all F1 technology articles

Image ?? Red Bull/Getty images

Advert | Go Ad-free

77 comments on The engine situation with two races to go

1 2 3
  1. Chris P said on 2nd November 2010, 13:34

    Without knowing which engine did which race and for how long, it is hard to say who needs to go easy on their engines.

  2. Im really worried about Ferni. But I think if he wont blew it in practice or race, all will be ok

  3. Lustigson said on 2nd November 2010, 13:46

    So, basically, it’s anyone’s guess, if it’s not disclosed who used which engine where?

    • I think so.

      It would be good if the FIA would publish information on engine usage. It would be really simple to do as well. A simple table for each car, with the number of each engine in one column, and then the kilometres travelled with each engine in the next column. When an engine blows up the number of kilometres travelled for the particular engine is simply changed to “Engine Destroyed”.

  4. Johnny86 said on 2nd November 2010, 13:48

    A german site reported that he’ll use the monza engine for this weekend. For abu dhabi he’ll use the engine that was changed after quali in bahrain.

    • Richie said on 2nd November 2010, 13:58

      The bahrain quali engine expired in china free practice I believe, and the bahrain race engine expired in the malaysian race.

    • Feynman said on 2nd November 2010, 15:48

      It is my limited understanding that once an engine has been run in anger, the clock is ticking on degradation. Modern F1 engines are like soft fruit, they simply cannot sit on the shelf for 8 months and then be switched on again and forced to race, they can’t and won’t take it.

      So although the rules say the Bahrain FP engine ‘can’ be used, unless Ferrari are really desperate, chances are that particular lump is now being measured-up to be turned into a coffee-table.

      It is the more recent vintage engines that will have to be stretched to the last race (and last lap), by careful lifetime management and I’d imagine reduced FP running.

      • I find it very doubtful that the current engines (ones with 4 races required) are going to suffer any significant degredation by sitting on a shelf without fluids for 6 months. Most useful alloys are pretty stable (5 years *might* be an issue for particularly unstable precipitation hardened aluminum alloys, it is known that most aircraft aluminum needs to be replaced every 20 years due to over-aging). If the engine sat with all of the oil/coolant/grease/fuel/[insert other organics here] in it, maybe there would be an issue, but not with proper engine care and maintenance. Now if you were talking about the one trick pony engines of old that were replaced every time the cars went out on track, those engines were usually useless after race or qualy and had visible, large cracks (described by one person cracks large enough to see light coming through) throughout the block. However, requiring an average of ~2.5 practice+qualy+race distances for each engine makes things a little more tricky and I seriously doubt ANY team would be willing to take that kind of risk.

        • bananarama said on 2nd November 2010, 20:24

          Aso, they don’t just put them on a shelf and don’t look at them anymore. I once visited a BMW production site and they had a big empty room with one giant window and in it you saw 3 engines that were being connected to electro engines and to computers and engineers were monitoring the data while the parts of the engine were slowly being moved. It looked awesome, like in a science fiction movie.

      • The Bahrein engine has been used the practices, and as long as I know it was the one broken in Intelagos.

    • DaveW said on 2nd November 2010, 17:15

      The engine run mostly flat out at Monza, most of the time direclty in Button’s exhaust plume, cannot still be fresh as a daisy.

  5. Well, if any of the drivers need to change an engine, im sure they r better off doing it in brasil than abu dhabi. Brasil is a good track for overtaking…however the weather looks like it is going to have a big say too

  6. Alex Bkk (@alex-bkk) said on 2nd November 2010, 14:09

    It really boggles the mind when I think of the way F1 engines used to hand grenade on a regular basis and now they are getting 3 races from one and still going damned fast at that.

    Anyone know how many engines have been lost this season?

    • Dutch Alex said on 2nd November 2010, 17:35

      The Ferrari engines are pretty solid for the last 10 years , the (mugen) Honda engines on the other hand…:P Sato in monaco comes to mind.

  7. Icthyes (@icthyes) said on 2nd November 2010, 14:13

    In those statistics pages, comments go much further to the right of the page then they do in the articles. Is this something you’re going to implement for all articles in future, or is it just a glitch?

    That stats page is great btw.

    • Richie said on 2nd November 2010, 14:21

      It’s not which engine was used at which race. The numbers are just the total amount of engines that have been used over the course of the season at each race. Their source is http://www.vivaf1.com/engine.php (Click the engine tab)

      • Clockwork Kitty said on 2nd November 2010, 14:42

        How embarrasing! Sorry

        At vivaf1 there is another interesting piece of data: FA’s engine #1 was used only in Bahrain’s free practice quali and maybe in free practice afterwards, but not in any race. It can be used however in Abu Dhabi without penalty.

        Assuming that the engine is as good as it should be (almost new) there is no reason for Ferrari to use a new engine for Abu Dhabi and assume the 10P grid penalty, even if they get a good result at Interlagos.

        • Richie said on 2nd November 2010, 14:51

          The bahrain quali engine expired in China free practice.

          • Clockwork Kitty said on 2nd November 2010, 14:57

            Well, I did it again!

            Then it is true that FA situation is a lot worse than I thought and that it could be wise to get a new engine for the last race, penalty and all. We’ll see.

          • Bahrain GP:
            Ferrari made a precautionary engine change for both Felipe Massa and Fernando Alonso after the qualifying session. Engine 1 may now only be used for free practice sessions and the final event in Abu Dhab

            Wasn’t engine two the blew in China FP not engine #1

    • Keith Collantine (@keithcollantine) said on 2nd November 2010, 14:39

      I believe those tables shows how many new engines each driver had used at each point in the season. Otherwise Pedro de la Rosa/Nick Heidfeld used the same engine for five races in a row which seems unlikely.

    • I reckon vettel will blow his engines in Brasil and Abu Dhabi due to his engines status and reckless driving.

  8. Engine mgmt is one of very complex thing like many things in formula one. It seems they evaluate throttle requirement for each race & does plan accordingly (and adjust if there were any failures). It seems everyone used new engines for each of spa & monza (webber didn’t use new engine in monza). So i believe alonso has to run atleast one engine for four races. So hope it stands out!!

    • Engines are half of the bill of the teams.

      Since the 18k rev limit and the “no more evolution” are pretty solid, being Renault the worst and the Cosworth the less powerful.

      Alonso will use a 2 raced engine as long as I know.

  9. kaoru said on 2nd November 2010, 14:38

    Alonso’s 1st engine replaced at Bahrain before the race under Parc-Freme condition blew up already in FP1 of Shanghai, which you can read from FIA Technical Reports issued in first four races.

    Since ‘low-mileage’ 3rd engine blew up at Sepang, Ferrari had just two engine – 1st engine used at Bahrain until the qualifying and 2nd engine used from Bahrain race to Sepang FP2 – when arrived Shanghai.

    Unfortunately, Ferrari blew up “a” engine in FP1 Shanghai but nevertheless stuck to the another one from FP2 to race without unboxing and firing up 4th power unit.

    That’s why you can see the broken engine at Shanghai is 1st engine allowed to use in just free practice by article 28.4, so Alonso’s engine situation is undoubtedly on the ropes.

    • Keith Collantine (@keithcollantine) said on 2nd November 2010, 14:42

      Forgot his Shanghai engine went in practice. It’s a bit worse than I thought, then.

      Under the circumstances, spending half the Korea race behind the safety car at low revs wasn’t so bad. Perhaps that’s why he was saying the conditions were the worst he’d ever seen!

      • Scribe (@scribe) said on 2nd November 2010, 17:19

        Hadn’t thought of it that way, they’ve always got an agenda huh?

        If it goes anywhere it’ll be in Abu Dhabi, they seemed to fix there engine woes comming back from the flyaways so Brazil should be within it’s capabilities, full race distance at Abu Dhabi especially with those two long straights looks difficult.

        Oh Please, let my McLaren go.

  10. Mc Phisto said on 2nd November 2010, 14:42

    I’m really ignorant on this topic, so, can a blown or used engine be repaired? In case this can be done, how many parts or percentage of the engine can be replaced/repaired??

    • cacarella said on 2nd November 2010, 15:13

      Blown engines can not be replaced.
      Used engines can continue to be used but never can they be refurbished, rebuilt, or touched in any way.

  11. DaveW said on 2nd November 2010, 14:52

    Ferrari is the only engine manufacturer to get a “reliability” allowance this year to change their engine design, for the pneumatic system issues. I’m sure they took the opportunity to stretch the related changes to the max to improve both power and reliability.

    • According to Ferrari themselves, the issue wasn’t a pneumatic system. And yes, they confirmed that the first engine of FA didn’t have the issues they thought, so it will be used in the last GP, as allowed. Which should probably mean that he will not push that hard in Brazil, but instead focusing on finishing the race on 3 to 6-th place.

  12. It’s like the old days almost, when we didn’t know if a particular car would get to the finish or not. And engine blow ups were a real threat.

    I like it.

  13. alexf1man said on 2nd November 2010, 15:30

    I think Vettel will finish 2nd in Brazil, if it’s anything engine based or letting Mark Webber win the race because he was 2nd in Monaco and Singapore

1 2 3

Add your comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

All comments must abide by the comment policy. Comments may be moderated.
Want to post off-topic? Head to the forum.
See the FAQ for more information.