2011 Lotus-Renault livery

Renault will also become Lotus-Renault in 2011

2011 F1 seasonPosted on | Author Keith Collantine

2011 Lotus-Renault livery
2011 Lotus-Renault livery

There could be two teams named Lotus-Renault on the F1 grid in 2011 as Renault announce a sponsorship deal with Lotus Cars.

According to the Daily Telegraph, Renault have agreed a $100m title sponsorship deal with Lotus Cars which will see the team renamed Lotus Renault GP from next year.

The deal will see Renault sell the remainder of its shares to Genii Capital, which bought 75% of them last year.

They will clash head-on with Lotus Racing, who brought the famous name back to F1 at the beginning of this year and recently signed a deal to use Renault engines in 2011.

Making matters even more confusing, both teams are planning to use black-and-gold colour schemes next year, evoking memories of the company’s iconic John Player Special Livery.

Lotus Racing recently concluded a competition for fans to design their black-and-gold 2011 livery. In a clear reference to that, here’s how Lotus-Renault described their livery design for next year:

This livery, which has been on the drawing board for over two months in order to reinterpret its iconic graphic signature to suit modern media requirements, is sure to strike a powerful chord with the sport?s enthusiasts around the world.

Lotus Racing team principal Tony Fernandes had previously announced the team would revive the historic Team Lotus name in 2011. But he faces opposition from Lotus Cars and the dispute will go before the High Court in the new year.

Lotus Cars have already announced a sponsorship deal with GP2 team ART, who will be known as Lotus ART in 2011. Fernandes’ airline Air Asia will have a GP2 team of its own called Team Air Asia.

Full statement from Renault:

Genii Capital and Group Lotus plc today announced the creation of Lotus Renault GP, the successor to the Renault F1 Team that will contest the 2011 FIA Formula One World Championship. This exciting announcement is made in the context of a strategic alliance between the two companies that will provide Group Lotus with significant technological and commercial opportunities for its range of road cars.

Following the return of the Lotus name to Formula 1 in 2010, under licence from Group Lotus, this historic announcement marks the complete return of the Lotus manufacturer to the sport, with the full backing of its parent company Proton. Group Lotus plc will become a major equity partner of Genii Capital in Lotus Renault GP, and the two parties have concluded a title sponsorship agreement that will run until the end of the 2017 season. With the continued support of Renault as a supplier of engines and technological and engineering expertise, Lotus Renault GP enjoys a strong, stable platform for future success.

Gerard Lopez, Chairman of Renault F1 Team, commented: ??We are delighted that we can now go public with the news that we will be racing as Lotus Renault GP in 2011. It is extremely exciting to begin a new era for the team in partnership with Group Lotus, and we will continue to enjoy a strong relationship with Renault over the coming seasons. It is a tribute to the excellent work this year by the team in Enstone that we have been able to attract both major sponsorship and new investment for a very bright future.??

Group Lotus CEO Dany Bahar said: ??I can think of no better platform for automotive brand communications than motorsport and F1 is the very pinnacle of open-wheel racing. We?re well aware that there has been a lot of controversy around the usage of our brand in F1 and I?m delighted to be able to formally clarify our position once and for all: we are Lotus and we are back.??

The new partnership has been enabled by Renault selling its remaining shares in the team to Genii Capital. Group Lotus plc will subsequently become a major equity partner in Lotus Renault GP, which it will co-own with Genii Capital.

Renault will continue its strong support of the team with which it won the 2005 and 2006 world championships, as a supplier of engines and technological and engineering expertise. Reflecting this technological support, Lotus Renault GP will continue to compete with the Renault chassis name and Renault will enjoy pre-eminent brand exposure on the livery.

For 2011, the Lotus Renault GP cars will race in a new interpretation of the iconic black and gold colours that were last used when Lotus and Renault joined forces in the 1980s. This livery, which has been on the drawing board for over two months in order to reinterpret its iconic graphic signature to suit modern media requirements, is sure to strike a powerful chord with the sport?s enthusiasts around the world.

The team scored a strong fifth-place finish in the 2010 constructors? championship, which included three podium finishes for Robert Kubica. Next season, Lotus Renault GP is aiming to take another step forward which will see it competing regularly with the most prestigious names in Formula 1.

Gerard Lopez, founding partner of Genii Capital, endorsed the deal, saying:

For Group Lotus, access to Formula 1 opens up new marketing opportunities and a major platform for business exchanges and development. In this regard, Genii Capital possesses shareholdings in, and direct access to, cutting edge companies in the automotive industry. Our tie-up with Group Lotus and Proton, which will enable its future road car ranges to take advantage of significant new technologies, is a natural step.
Gerard Lopez

Renault CEO Carlos Ghosn added:

This multi-partner alliance will bring a new dynamic to the team and enable it to compete with the sport?s best from next season.
Carlos Ghosn

Update: Fernandes believes the news strengthens his hand in his efforts to win the rights to use the Lotus name. He said on Twitter:

Dany Bahar has done us a favour. Never felt better about our future and Team Lotus. Looks like [they’re] trying to hijack our black and gold idea.
Tony Fernandes

Lotus naming rights row

Browse all articles on the Lotus naming rights row

Image ?? Renault/LAT

185 comments on “Renault will also become Lotus-Renault in 2011”

Jump to comment page: 1 2 3 4
  1. Two teams.

    Both are to be known as “Lotus Renault”, or some variation thereof.

    Both are planning to run black-and-gold liveries.

    Both are locked in a bitter custody dispute over the name.


    This isn’t over. There’s no way the FIA are going to let this slide.

    Situation assessed.

    1. The FiA getting involved would be far to sensible a situation.

      1. I’m pretty sure there are provisions for name changes that allow the FIA to intervene:

        1) A team’s name must be an actual word. This is why Hispania are known as HRT – the FIA did not recognise the word “Hispania”.

        2) A team’s name must not reflect negatively on another team. I cannot create a team and call it “Ferrari Sucks”.

        3) Teams cannot have identical or similar-sounding names. This is for the purposes of identification on timing sheets and for spectators. Red Bull and Toro Rosso get away with it because while they both mean “Red Bull”, they sound nothing alike. But as we now have Lotus-Renault F1 and Team Lotus-Renault, they sound too similar (and they’re not owned by the same people). Especially since they plan on running similar liveries. It will be too difficult to differentiate them.

        As Group Lotus is now Renault’s title sponsor, I’d say Team Lotus will have to forgo their claim to the name if the FIA intervenes. Money changed hands, with Group Lotus buying a 25% stake in Renault. The FIA cannot simply undo that.

        1. Jarred Walmsley
          9th December 2010, 20:09

          So, if Team Lotus (Fernandes) changed their name to say Pasukan Lotus (Team Lotus in Malay) would this be acceptable or would it not be acceptable as Lotus is still in the name

    2. Errrr… that is exactly what i was thinking And im somewhat surprised that I had to slide all the way to page #2 of comments before anyone mentioned it.

      First and foremost, this “Lotus – Renault” fairy-tale name will have to be approved by the FIA, who will undoubtedly reject or reassess the approval. You can not just make up a name and call it whatever. There needs to be a unique identity, and as PM has outlined below, surely this will not be approved.

      1. If I were Jean Todt, I’d reject both claims to the Team Lotus name, regardless of who the courts decided had won. The Group Lotus team would become known as something like Gravity Lotus, whilst Lotus Racing would become Fernandes Lotus. That’s the only way I’d allow them both to run with the Lotus name: with a unique identifier attached to it.

        There’s not much that can be done about similar liveries, but I seriously doubt Bernie Ecclestone is going to let that one pass by. Like I said, Red Bull and Toro Rosso can get away with it because they’re the same company. Group Lotus and Lotus Racing are at each others’ throats.

  2. There’s no Russian sponsorship on that car yet.

    1. which means Heidfeld or Hulkenberg for car no. 10!

      1. It means nothing. Nick Heidfeld has conceded that so long as Vladimir Putin is a fan of Formula 1, Vitaly Petrov’s seat is safe. After all, the dude was a KGB agent. You don’t want to mess with that.

        As for Nico Hulkenberg, he’s being strongly linked to Force India or a Mercedes test role. He was never seriously considered by Renault.

        Neither of them deserve it, anyway.

    2. What’s your point? Vyborg Shipyards, Lada and Flagman Vodka were all sponsors that came with Petrov. Petrov has not yet been re-signed to the team, though he is expected to be. Renault have no reason for keeping his sponsors on the car just now.

      1. I know. I’m just playing. :P

  3. I would just love if Lotus Renault-Renault built a car to rival their 2009 offering, whilst Team Lotus-Renault pulled a BrawnGP and built a race-winning car after spending a large chunk of this year on it.

    Not likely to happen, but would be nice!!

    As an aside, people don’t have an issue with having 2 Red Bull teams, sure one has an Italian name, but they’re essentially the same name and their liveries are fairly similar. I suspect people would get used to having 2 Lotus teams on the grid, only Lotus Renault-Renault will still get called Renault…

    One other question this raises, as Renault are no longer a share-holder in the Renault F1 team, will they start to treat Red Bull Racing as their primary team?

    1. How do you say lotus (as the flower) in italian?

      1. HounslowBusGarage
        8th December 2010, 12:50

        Fiore di loto.
        Not very impressive, is it?

    2. Good point about the red Bull liveries – although the team names are sufficiently different (in spelling and pronunciation at least), the cars are sometimes difficult to distinguish. Though it has been slightly easier this year with the cars themselves no longer being identical.

  4. I don’t like either, the Malaysian Lotus was a joke to begin with…

  5. Worse still, will companies want their name on the Lotus at the front, or the Lotus at the back somewhere?

  6. PushTheButton
    8th December 2010, 10:50

    4 cars that will look very alike on the grid this season, adding to the existing 4 of Red Bull and Toro Rosso. Guess the only way you can tell them apart is by the position they’re running in.

  7. Here’s what I want to see: Team Lotus ditches the plan to use gold/black and goes for Camel yellow instead. The ultimate switcheroo!

    1. I think that would be the best thing to do.

  8. This is absurd. To have entered as Group Lotus is one thing, but to then plan to use the same livery as Fernandes’ Lotus just smacks of Bahar being bitter about the whole thing. I’m not too worried as this isn’t over – They both wont be Lotus-Renault and I’ll be amazed if they have the same livery.

    The sad thing for me is that if one does have to change it’s likely to be Fernandes’ Team Lotus. Ok so neither are the real Lotus, but Tony owns the rights to the Team Lotus name, has the blessing of the Chapman family and seems to embody the spirit and the history of the original Team Lotus. What more could he do? Bahar is just in it to make a quick buck which is very sad.

  9. I can only assume the target is to get the name “Lotus” onto the podium as quickly as possible, so am I suspecting a similar tactic being deployed by Tony Fernandez as to the RedBull entrants (RedBull Racing and Torro Rosso).
    By having ownership in two teams despite their individual differences, this would assist with the appropriate investment and direction that needs to be taken in the years following 2011, using 2011 as a guide for that.
    It would guide the brand name “Lotus” into the most appropriate position, whilst using the other team as another ‘advertising billboard’ and a team to bring in new drivers, engineers and mechanics.

    1. i think you are misreading this situation. If it were about having two co-owned teams then this wuld be a different conversation altogether.

      please re-read.. the dispute is over two SEPERATE entities both believing they have the right to the name and the livery…

  10. Danny Bahar is a disgrace to the historic Lotus name and it’s wonderful history. Team Lotus died in 1994 but Tony Fernandes has brought it back from death and re-created the spirit and soul of what was great about Team Lotus.

    For the details everyone should read up on the Team / Group split before making up their own mind but there is only one team with the soul of Champman and that’s the one I will be supporting.

    1. Chapman obviously!

  11. One person who has stayed quiet in the Lotus-Lotus-Team-Group-Renault-Renault saga so far is Mr. E. I’m sure Bernie will have something to say about the whole situation eventually. Given his comments about Tony Fernandes’ operation being the only one of the new teams to bring anything positive to F1 in 2010, I wouldn’t write off the Team Lotus project just yet.

    1. Relating to Ecclestone, it’s only because he doesn’t want to say something that might make him an attack target again :( btw I have absolutely nothing to do with the violence towards Mr E :)

  12. Is it only fans of the sport who think this is a ridiculous situation? Why can’t these two groups take a step back, realise they are acting like 5 year olds, and move forward.

    Apart from that, I feel sorry for casual fans of the sport and TV commentators, because commentary is going to be impossible next year. “That’s Kubica in the Lotus Renault GP coming up to lap Trulli in the Team Lotus Renault”. Or if Team Lotus get into the midfield next year “its amazing that Kovalainen in the Team Lotus Renault has managed to split the two Lotus Renault GP cars.”


    1. Now THAT would be some interesting commentary! If, as it’s been predicted, Fernandes’s team makes a big leap next year with Red Bull tech and Lopez’s team slides back with the loss of support from the Renault factory we might see four Lotus Renaults (add hyphens, prefixes and suffixes as needed) dicing for places on track!

  13. May I have your attention please?
    May I have your attention please?
    Will the real Team Lotus please stand up?
    I repeat: will the real Team Lotus please stand up?
    We’re gonna have a problem here …

    1. I’m Team Lotus, I’m the real Team Lotus
      All you other teams Lotus are just imitating…

      1. So won’t the real Team Lotus please stand up?
        Please stand up?
        Please stand up?

        1. With one of those fingers on each hand up…

  14. Dany Bahar – isn’t she the hot TV presenter off of the 1990s?

    1. Hahaha! Perhaps she had a sex change?

  15. Renault’s suspended ban should be put to effect now because with this shenanigan, they are bringing the sport into direpute, and not only that, they are confusing the fans.

    if the ban is served in 2011, it will not cause Renault to leave the championship since it has left it already as a manufacturer… so i advise the FIA to act now, or forever be held responsible for 4 near identical looking cars racing.

    1. They HAVE to now make a clause banning two teams from having similar colour schemes. It’s the only way forward.

  16. Where are sports authorities, FiA, anyone? This is as much damaging to the sport as MM sex scandal, 2009 politics or LH lying to the stewards.
    And its proves how desperate Genii Capital are, to get involved in that fighting between Proton and Fernandes… just to get money. Disgusting. Im not going to support this team next year, even if Kubica remains with them.

  17. I propose a duel to resolve this. Or a fistfight, or something.

    Whatever, the winner gets to keep the Lotus name and the loser has to call his team Team Fartswallop. That should sort it out.

  18. From reading through these commentd I think we’re unanimous in thinking this Lotus situation is an absolute joke.

    Also, those red Total endplates look awful with the black and gold livery….

    1. Thanks for saying it, that livery really looks like someone took maybe 5 minutes of photoshop time to produce something, and his target was “black and gold, but don’t forget about Total – they get the red or our car doesn’t get oil”.

  19. I can only hope that Fiat don’t decide that they also need their own F1 racing team.

    Certainly the 2013 engine regs would be more favourable to Fiat rather than Ferrari.

    But like a non-F1 supporter friend once said when he was looking at a close up of the nose cone of a red F1 car on TV: “I didn’t know that Fiat were in F1!”

    What’s in a name, eh?

    1. Not really the same though as Fiat own Ferrari…which your friend obviously didn’t know.

      1. True. But it’s perception that matters. What people believe. They (casual viewers) know that Ferrari are in F1, but what’s that other red car with the ‘Fiat’ badge on its nose?

        They will possibly (but unlikely IMO) see a Lotus beating a Ferrari next season.

        It also can’t be lost on anyone that Dany Bahar is also Ferrari’s marketing man. Although why he would want to put the Lotus name further up the grid to become serious challengers to Ferrari is beyond me.

        1. That’s exactly because of having been the Ferrari marketing man.
          After they dropped him (kicked him out?) he wants to show them!

        2. Jarred Walmsley
          9th December 2010, 20:57

          Well, if Badoer was still in the Ferrari then we would have had a HRT beating a Ferrari!, so who says its all in the car?

  20. … Hey! Red goes with EVERYTHING!! …

    1. Is that the whole car or just bits of it because there was a lengthy period when red didn’t go with anything.

Jump to comment page: 1 2 3 4

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

All comments are moderated. See the Comment Policy and FAQ for more.