Montezemolo still wants three-car teams

F1 Fanatic round-up

Luca di Montezemolo repeats his demand F1 for three-car teams in Formula 1.

Links

Season?s greetings and surprise presents. Fiorano hosts the Italian F1 media dinner (Ferrari)

“We hope next year will be as good a season as this one and not one like 2009, when the championship seemed to be drugged. The small teams? Honestly, I feel it would be better to have the opportunity of running a third car rather than seeing cars that would struggle even in GP2: it?s an idea we will put forward again strongly for the future.

“On the subject of the new circuits, I have to say it would be better if more thought was given to the races with an increase in overtaking opportunities with less effort going into beautiful architecture.

“Then we must unblock this absurd limitation on testing. Formula 1 is the only sport in which there is no chance to train. It is like asking Real Madrid, Milan or Inter to play with smooth soled boots in the rain or not to warm up before a Champions League game.”

FIA Gala 2010 – F1 Season Highlights (Youtube)

The Abu Dhabi Grand Prix race video edit is also now available on F1.com.

F1 2011 Technical Regulations ?ǣ Detailed and Explained (Scarbs F1)

“The driver adjustable front wing is now deleted from the rules and instead the rear wing is now driver adjustable. This is because the expected benefit of greater front wing angle never provided the driver with more grip when following another car.”

Soft Pauer launch 2011 Timing and Track Positioning App (F1)

Eighteen quid seems very expensive from what I’ve seen of this. If you’ve got it tell us what you think of it in the comments.

Lotus legacy unclaimed – Gerard Lopez (BBC)

“We are sure to be called what we are going to be called and I’m not sure they will be called that way. It’s pure speculation that there might be four cars using the same name.”

McLaren Group achieves carbon trust standard (McLaren)

“This achievement makes McLaren the first and only Formula 1 team to be officially recognised by the Carbon Trust for taking action on climate change.”

Liuzzi: Force India seat is safe (Autosport)

“Each time a driver is said to interest Force India, looks like it’s always me the one who has to move over. This is obviously just what part of the media says, because on my part I’m very calm.”

Comment of the day

Luca di Montezemolo’s got nothing on our Steph:

??For this Felipe gets seven minus.?? Is that his grade or what he lost at Germany?
Steph

Site updates

Some people have been reported difficulty accessing the forum. If you’re among them please get in touch by emailling me or leaving a comment below explaining which browser you’re using and what the exact nature of the problem is.

Happy birthday!

Happy brithday to steph90!

On this day in F1

One year ago today Virgin announced it had taken over the team entered by Manor Motorsport, and confirmed Lucas di Grassi as their second driver alongside Timo Glock.

Image ?? Ferrari spa

Advert | Go Ad-free

89 comments on Montezemolo still wants three-car teams

  1. Force Maikel said on 15th December 2010, 20:20

    that man just doesn’t seem to understand te meaning of the word No, wich i thought was simple.

  2. melkurion said on 17th December 2010, 9:23

    There are offcourse pro’s and con’s for running 3 cars per team.

    One of the biggest pro’s would offcourse be that there would theoreticly be more more competative cars on the grid. However this is also a double edged sword if you ask me, what is to stop lets say HRT from getting a thrid car and hiring it out on a race by race basis to various pay drivers?

    One of the biggest con’s would be that the smaller and midfield teams would struggle even more to get points, and therefor a smaller portion of the end of year pay outs.

    However I have always thought that there would be an easy compromise to this. What if, when a team enters or is in F1, the FIA says it has to run two cars, but has the option to sell/rent out the rights to one of their grid slots to another team….

    This would allow bigger teams like ferrari or Mclaren to run a third car, which the would pay a smaller team for, which in turn has more money to focuus on just the one car, so fewer costs as well. This would allow them theoreticly to built a more competative car, as they now have more money and can spend their recources on develloping and maintaning just one car.

    The big teams , although they have bigger budgets, do net have unlimited budgets, so this option would cost them a chunk of money. and would therefor potentially mean the can develop their car slightly less, also because they would have 3 different drivers with presumably different drivingstyles, so it would be tougher to make a car that suits them all.

    This would in my oppinion bring the teams closer together in terms of speed. And luca can have what he wants :P

    This would work even better if a budgetcap was introduced, but still works well under the recource restriction agreement currently in place..

    thoughts?

    Con

Add your comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

All comments must abide by the comment policy. Comments may be moderated.
Want to post off-topic? Head to the forum.
See the FAQ for more information.