BBC and other channels to show F1 in HD in 2011

2011 F1 season

Sebastian Vettel, Red Bull, Bahrain, 2010

Sebastian Vettel, Red Bull, Bahrain, 2010

Formula One Management has confirmed that all F1 broadcasters will receive high definition feeds in 2011.

This will give F1 broadcasters the choice of offering HD footage to viewers.

Sky Germany announced yesterday it will broadcast in high definition and Australian broadcaster OneHD announced on Twitter its F1 coverage will be in HD.

British host broadcaster BBC is yet to reveal whether it will show F1 in HD but it is likely to having previously indicated it would as soon as FOM offered the feed.

Further details about its 2011 plans are to be published following the change to the commentary team announced yesterday.

Many other mainstream sports have been available in high definition for several years. NASCAR, America’s most popular racing series, has been in HD since 2005.

Has your local broadcaster announced it will broadcast in HD? Let us know in the comments.

Update: BBC announce they will broadcast F1 in HD in 2011. They also confirmed Eddie Jordan will remain on the coverage team.

BBC’s Head of F1 Ben Gallop said:

It?s fantastic that Eddie is rejoining the team, and this year in a more expanded role. He?s such a core character with his outspoken views, unrivalled contacts in the sport and his ability to unearth the stories from the paddock. We?re also delighted to be broadcasting in HD, something we know fans have been waiting for and it will really add something extra to our coverage for 2011.
Ben Gallop

Read more: F1 in HD ??not until 2011???

Advert | Go Ad-free


111 comments on BBC and other channels to show F1 in HD in 2011

1 2 3
  1. sw6569 (@sw6569) said on 12th January 2011, 14:08

    What can I say other than this:


  2. Felipe said on 12th January 2011, 14:11

    Great news!

    What about the onboard camera…

    will it be in HD too?

  3. JWRPayne said on 12th January 2011, 14:12

    Come on BBC, do us proud!

  4. Dan_the_McLaren_fan (@dan_the_mclaren_fan) said on 12th January 2011, 14:22

    No news about the belgian TV. But I don’t like about it, is altough the channel is a free one, you have to pay the see the shows in HD.

  5. Shaun Field said on 12th January 2011, 14:23

    Well, finally, but worth noting that NASCAR is once again ahead of F1 in terms of coverage:

    (not that i think 3d is anything more than a gimmic still)

    • There are a couple of things I would like FOM to adopt which has been common in NASCAR for a while:

      a permanent display showing the gaps between cars updated more regularly (although this is easier to engineer on oval circuits I think I remember seeing it at Watkins Glen where the times updated every few seconds rather than at the end of each sector)

      picture-in-picture so that the action on the track can still be followed while showing cars pitting. And also this would allow viewers to see who was pitting faster between two cars fighting for position rather than having to rely on Martin Brundle looking out of the window and waiting to see another car flash past the camera in the pit box!

      Bernie may have been around during the stone age but it is criminal that nobody involved in the sport has taken him to task for keeping the TV coverage there.

    • BasCB (@bascb) said on 12th January 2011, 15:43

      Getting your eyes to hurt during the endles races wearing goggles is not my idea of a nice afternoon!

      I think HD is great though.

  6. vjanik said on 12th January 2011, 14:33

    i hope this will not slow down the streaming on I-player? BBC should compensate once they start broadcasting in HD, otherwise there will be frame rate issues when watching online.

    • The Flash player behind iPlayer always adapts to show the best quality it can, based on your line speed. Much like YouTube does.
      It’ll be fine, though there is a toggle on iPlayer (and hidden in the YouTube settings) if this is important to you.

    • Charlie said on 12th January 2011, 17:22

      iPlayer offers SD versions of HD shows

  7. Felipe said on 12th January 2011, 14:39

    If you want, i got the news of Rede Globo here

  8. Valandil said on 12th January 2011, 14:39

    All the shows on iplayer that were filmed in HD are also available in SD, theres a link below the video to change between HD and SD

  9. dstroya (@dstroya) said on 12th January 2011, 14:41

    Supersport is broadcasting F1 in HD to South Africa and Africa in 2011 too….

  10. SparkyJ23 (@sparkyj23) said on 12th January 2011, 14:59

    “A higher bit-rate will not automatically deliver higher picture quality.” comes from the head of BBC HD so don’t get your hopes up for F1 in full HD.

    Don’t expect full HD on FReeview BBC HD – 1440×1080 at 9.7Mbs instead of 1920×1080 at 17Mbs from the satellite

    I’m sure FOM will supply the feed in full HD. What the bbc will do with is it is anyones guess.

    • BasCB (@bascb) said on 12th January 2011, 15:44

      That might just be a bit of a warning not to expect to much from it.

    • Wificats said on 12th January 2011, 15:58

      No one broadcasts in “Full” 1080p HD anyway, as it uses too much broadcast bandwidth. Although it would be slightly more possible online, it would still be too expensive for the BBC to want to bother.

      They are mooting the possibility of using the extra bandwidth given by the digital switchover to broadcast Freeview in 1080p, but that is for the future I guess.

      FOM may or may not use Full HD cameras, depending on how cheap they’re feeling, because it won’t matter on the broadcast although a season review Blu-Ray would probably warrant Full HD.

      • Well anyone with a 40 inch or smaller set will not notice the difference between 720p and 1080p anyway and even some of those with bigger sets will find it hard to notice so it is only the truly giant sets that would benefit and not many people have those.

        • nickthegeek said on 12th January 2011, 19:46

          Not if you have a good tv there is a real different. is 46 inch though.

          • SparkyJ23 (@sparkyj23) said on 13th January 2011, 2:55

            No one transmits HD at as low a bitrate as the bbc you mean. This is a fight that’s been going on since they dropped the bitrate from 16mbs to 9mbs in August 2009 while claiming it made no difference to the picture and the thousands of people complaining were just imagining it.

        • pSynrg said on 13th January 2011, 7:55

          @Lee: You can’t make such a sweeping statement for a topic that is in many ways subjective.
          Discernible quality has nothing to do with physical screen size. It is more to do with the characteristics of the flat panel display and the technology used.
          ‘Some’ people may not notice any difference between (1280 x)720p, (1920 x)1080i or (1920 x)1080p but some will, based on many factors.
          If you really can’t discern a difference between 720p & 1080p the problem is ‘probably’ not with your perception but with the display characteristics.

          What we are likely to get from the BBC is something better than SD. But it certainly won’t pass for HD on most of my displays. But I’ll take it!

          • pSynrg, you may have forgotten the most important criteria = viewing distance.
            No idea what you refer to by “display characteristics” but a pixel is a pixel, it’s either there or not but the human eye needs to be able to see it. With 10/10 vision, the human eye can’t physically discern any additional details than 720p at 10ft on a 50inch for instance, regardless of the TV.
            More details here

          • pSynrg said on 14th January 2011, 0:44

            That’s one way at looking at particular variables.

            I’m thinking more along the subjective.

            A higher quality image will always be a higher quality image. Be from that 3ft or 30ft.

          • As wificats says though nobody broadcasts in 1080p anyway, Sky/Virgin/BBC etc all broadcast 1080i on their HD channels.

          • paul barton said on 18th March 2011, 11:30

            I’ve been renting ‘hd’ movies from appleTV (720) – how I have bluray (1080) – there’s a big difference to my eye.

      • SparkyJ23 (@sparkyj23) said on 13th January 2011, 3:03

        The BBC replaced the encoders which process HD pictures in August 2009.
        The replacement encoders work at a bitrate of 9.7Mbps (megabits per second), while their predecessors worked at 16Mbps, the standard for other broadcasters.

        So while you say no one uses full HD the BBC are using just over half the bitrate of the HD standard and you don’t think that might be a problem with the fastest cars one the planet?

        • The cars are not moving on TV so their speed is irrelevant, it’s the camera that moves and the background, it’s called panning.
          Totally agree on the BBC low HD bitrate scam/scandal, the pre-August 09 picture was signigicantly sharper.

  11. wasiF1 (@wasif1) said on 12th January 2011, 15:13

    Great news but can anyone in Asia confirmed whether Star Sports will show F1 in HD in 2011?

    • ESPN HD showed F1 in upscaled SD last year, so I fully expect them to show it in HD this year. Note that this is a different channel to Star Sports, so as ever, check with your local cable operator for details. :)

      • Jay Menon said on 12th January 2011, 23:54

        Cant wait for a True HD broadcast on ESPN HD!

        Too bad Steve Slater will still be there..and Alex Yoong as well…crap!

        I just saw an ad for for footy matches on ESPN HD 3D! Wonder when F1 will venture into that

  12. Rucknar (@superted666) said on 12th January 2011, 15:19


  13. Will HD be available to stream online? I ask because I don’t have an HDTV.

  14. James said on 12th January 2011, 15:40

    Next step 3d, although that’s probably another 10 years away at this rate! Imagine seeing Jaime Algusuari’s smash from Suzuka last year in slow mo 3d, all the pieces of carbon fibre and polystyrene going everywhere!

  15. BasCB (@bascb) said on 12th January 2011, 15:45

    Everyone is commenting on the great news of the HD feed. The other issue I feel is a bit more controversial, is Eddie Jordan having a “more expanded role”. Hope it’s not going to be him for the grid walks :-(

    • Scribe (@scribe) said on 12th January 2011, 16:37

      Basically he is now both EJ and DC. EDCJ if you will.

      God I hope they get another pundit to balance him out. EJ’s great but your right, lets not get ahead of ourselves, part of his charm is he can be entirley baffling or massive tool from time to time, don’t think saturation will do him any favours.

      • Brundle has to do the grid walks, even if we don’t get to see them in Australia (OneHD you will pay for this) and it means he’s late to the commentary booth. Big deal, I’m sure DC will live. His grid walks are just great.

1 2 3

Add your comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

All comments must abide by the comment policy. Comments may be moderated.
Want to post off-topic? Head to the forum.
See the FAQ for more information.