Virgin MVR-02

Virgin MVR-02 launch – first pictures

2011 F1 carsPosted on | Author Keith Collantine

Virgin have launched their 2011 F1 car, the MVR-02.

The car was launched at BBC Television Centre in London.

As last year, the car was designed entirely using Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD), without using a wind tunnel.

Following the arrival of Russian sports car company Maurssia as an investor the team are now registered under a Russian licence. The air intake on the front of the MVR-02 is designed to resemble the one on Marussia’s B2 road car.

The car will run for the first time in the Jerez test later this week. Some of the car’s internals, including its hydraulics, were already run on the VR-01 at Valencia last week.

Designer Nick Wirk confirmed the MVR-02 has not been designed to use KERS, citing the expense of developing the technology as a reason for its absence.

2011 F1 cars

Browse all 2011 F1 cars articles

185 comments on “Virgin MVR-02 launch – first pictures”

Jump to comment page: 1 2 3
  1. an ugly car with more sponsors… maybe not so bad.

  2. Brilliant looking thing. Not really the livery, that is not the best in the world, but the shape is fantastic. I like the low nose, it makes the car look faster and more like a racing car. Not sure how different it looks from last years car, but they have probably focused more on reliability then anything else.

  3. Looks good how much stake does Maurssia own in this team.

  4. I really want to like the car, but the first thought that came into my mind was “Platypus” when I saw it.

    Not the prettiest F1 car for this year, but if they all looked the same we’d get bored in the off season.

    I just hope it competes this year with others rather than challenges itself.

  5. HUUUUGE question…

    Look at the front brake ducts

    They are hiding behind the top flap of the front wing. How is that supposed to be affective? The amount of turbulence between the wing and the duct would be so bad that an insufficient flow could get in and cool the brakes subitably.

    1. I imagine the gap between the top and middle element would act to channel the air into the ducts. Or maybe the middle and bottom, I can’t tell from the raised angle.

      1. I seem to think that some other cars were launched with brake ducts in pretty much the same place.

        1. Near to the brakes…..

          Now if Ferrari or whoever can come up with something that doesn’t have them situated near the brakes, then maybe that would really be something. :)

          1. baboom tish! ;)

  6. My gosh, the car seems designed with a ruler.

    1. during a kick-off party on a napkin

  7. Scarbs is reporting that the exhaust setup may be able to be changed from track to track to suit different requirements.. the exhausts may be in one location for a high downforce track, and another for low downforce track.

    That’s pretty clever if it’s true, I take it all back!.

    Manor’s history in racing suggests it’ll take them about 3 years to get up to speed. So this slow evolution of the car is apparently how they do it. It’s worked for them before.

  8. It’s easy to say Wirth is being pound-foolish by relying on CFD. But when you see that the mega teams, even with CFD AND modern wind tunnels, still end up having to look at flow-vis, and often fit aero updates that fail completely, you wonder at the real value of the windtunnel for a car that is still way down the aero optimization curve.

    I’m happy to yield to whoever has real experience here, but my perception is that the windtunnel is used to verify design and data, to evaluate trick aero mods creating marginal gains. Teams are not starting with clay bucks and molding them for repeated wind tunnel runs. Besides Newey, who begins with a pencil and paper according to legend, everyone begins with the computer anyway.

    Also, the cost of renting tunnel time, hiring people dedicated to running the sessions and evaluating data, must be enormous.

    So considering that his main tasks are to get reliable hydraulics and gearbox performance, and other basics like suspension design and lowering CofG sorted, I tend to agree that eschewing the wind tunnel may be a good idea for Virgin now.

    1. Given that there is so little track testing available now, it’s important that each team gets its numbers right with whatever method it chooses to do its aero programme. CFD, used on its own, is less likely to throw you a curve ball when you least expect it.

      Apparently there are more and more software programmes being produced to make CFD ever closer to wind tunnel testing, and more and more people wondering why F1 teams are wasting so much electricity in wind tunnels just to make fast cars go a bit faster.

  9. keith, the Force India launch is not visible in the google calendar. (I think)

  10. I wonder how far off it is that the F1 cars has to weight one metric ton. The virgin looks like it is already there.

  11. Every time I see this car, I’m going to think of Sesame Street – because the MVR-02 is brought to you by the letter ‘Q’. It’s got sponsorship from Quantel, QNET and Quick … how many more Q-named sponsors can they get?

  12. I think it’ll be Wirthless…

  13. Gee, so many negative comments, if this pulls a 15th you will all be eating your words.

Jump to comment page: 1 2 3

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

All comments are moderated. See the Comment Policy and FAQ for more.