Whitmarsh defends late test for new McLaren

F1 Fanatic round-up

Martin Whitmarsh says using the old car for the first test was the best approach for McLaren.

Links

Top F1 links from the past 24 hours:

Q&A – McLaren?s Martin Whitmarsh (F1)

“In the case of the MP4-26, one of the most significant performance factors facing every team for 2011 was the introduction of the new Pirelli tyres – a variable that, by running at Valencia using last year’s car, we felt we could more richly evaluate in isolation, on a platform that we already knew and understood. In actual fact, that first test proved extremely beneficial in providing us with rich, raw tyre data that we’ve been analysing ever since. So, while I admit that the introduction of the MP4-26 has been affected by a few reliability issues, we still stand by our decision to defer its introduction by one test.”

Toro Rosso on Twitter

“Over the past two days, we’ve done a total of sixty pit stops!”

Via the F1 Fanatic live Twitter app

Mercedes update ‘will hit target’ (Autosport)

Ross Brawn: “I think we will be pretty respectable in Melbourne, but I honestly don’t know where people are at the moment because I don’t know what fuel loads people are running.”

Felipe Massa, the workaholic of Montmelo (Ferrari)

“More or less all of us drivers are agreed that there is a need to improve the rain tyres so that they give more grip: if we were to have another race like the one last year in Korea, it would be tough to get to the finish.”

Silverstone sees profitable future and growth (Reuters)

“Silverstone managing director Richard Phillips told Reuters on Wednesday that the former World War Two airfield, owned by the British Racing Drivers’ Club, made a profit of more than 2 million pounds ($3.24 million) in 2010.”

Red Bull to charge down Orchard Rd (Channel News Asia)

“Former driving ace David Coulthard will demonstrate short sprints, burnouts, donuts and engine breaks in a one-hour event along a 1-kilometre stretch from Orchard Link junction to the Buyong Road intersection near the Istana.”

Thanks Adaptalis for the tip!

Highcrosft’s HPD ARX-01e revealed (Highcroft Racing)

“The new car features a heavily revised aerodynamic and suspension package design and built by HPD?s partner, Wirth Research.”

Follow F1 news as it breaks using the F1 Fanatic live Twitter app.

Comment of the day

Klon thinks Jaime Alguersuari’s prediction of HRTs overtaking Ferraris may not be so unrealistic:

Well, of course this may sound ridiculous. On the other hand, though, if you?d said a Super Aguri could overtake the world champion in an open battle back in early 2007, most people would have laughed. So it?s not like this hasn?t happen before.
Kloen

From the forum

Work continues on the overtaking statistics project – come and join in!

Happy birthday!

No F1 Fanatic birthdays today. If you want a birthday shout-out tell us when yours is by emailling me, using Twitter or adding to the list here.

On this day in F1

The non-championship Syracuse Grand Prix, held in Sicily, was won by Luigi Villoresi, driving a Ferrari.

Advert | Go Ad-free

43 comments on Whitmarsh defends late test for new McLaren

  1. Oliver said on 11th March 2011, 13:22

    Tyre data and aerodynamic data are two different things.
    Downforce is not created by the tyres. If your car is a skunk, tyre data or no tyre data, its still a skunk. I mean your engineers should have been aiming for a certain percentage of downforce relative to last year. If they don’t archieve their target downforce level, then your car will be slow regardless of if you compared the new tyres with last years car or previous years.
    Sauber didn’t use their old cars this year, their engineers already knew what they were looking for from their new car and knew they had found it.

    So Mr. whitmarsh, tell us why your car is presently slow and unreliable, and not why you have quality tyre data you are analysing endlessly.

  2. Oliver said on 11th March 2011, 17:11

    By all means, I donnot believe it is a dog. However, Withmarsh takes pleasure intalking about abstract things.

    Back to the car though, if they aimed at 2010 downforce level, which already Mclaren was a bit behind RBR and Ferrari, it doesn’t mean they attained it or even came close.
    A car may be slow but if it has good downforce, you will know.

Add your comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

All comments must abide by the comment policy. Comments may be moderated.
Want to post off-topic? Head to the forum.
See the FAQ for more information.