Glock doubts Virgin will reach midfield in 2011

2011 F1 season preview

Virgin

Virgin MVR-02
Car: MVR-02
#24 Timo Glock
#25 Jerome d’Ambrosio
Form 2006-2010: n/a, n/a, n/a, n/a, 12
2010 points: 0

Virgin are the third of the ‘sophomore teams’ looking to catch up to the midfield this year.

But having driven the new MVR-02 Timo Glock has doubts about their chances of catching the likes of Sauber and Toro Rosso.

Speaking to Reuters yesterday he said: “I think we will have to wait for the bigger upgrade which comes to Turkey where everyone will bring an update.

“As far as I see it at the tests, we are still away from the midfield teams and [getting into] Q2 will be difficult. Especially Toro Rosso picked up quite a lot of speed over the winter and they look very strong. Sauber as well.

“They were all the teams where I thought we could catch up a bit more but they made quite a big step and we still have to make a big one. It looks like we are a bit behind the target at the moment.”

Glock was unable to drive the car in the final test of the year as he was recovering from surgery but he should be on the grid in Melbourne.

Another year toiling away at the back of the field would have an obvious effect Glock’s morale. He drove some excellent races last year but never even had a sniff of a points finish.

He’s joined by new team mate Jerome d’Ambrosio this year, who impressed the team in his Friday practice appearances last year.

Jerome d'Ambrosio, Virgin, Barcelona, 2011

Jerome d'Ambrosio, Virgin, Barcelona, 2011

While the MVR-02 may be lacking in performance, the reliability of their car looks more promising than it did 12 months ago.

Reliability was a serious problem last year for Virgin, who had more mechanical failures in races than any of their rivals.

They seem to have improved on that front heading into the new season, having covered almost the same distance with their new car in testing as Lotus did, despite not running it at the first test.

The absence of KERS, though not good for performance, could help them ensure early-season reliability.

Virgin are manufacturing their own transmission, as they did last year, while fellow 2010 entrants Lotus and HRT have switched to Red Bull and Williams units respectively.

What is also unchanged is the team’s radical approach to car design. Technical director Nick Wirth continues to shun wind tunnels and develop the car entirely using Computational Fluid Dynamics – a significant cost saving for the team.

While he retains a high level of confidence in the approach but other teams (the wealthiest of which split their development work 50-50 between CFD and wind tunnels) remain sceptical.

Virgin have attracted increased backing from Russian sports car firm Marussia Motors, who have invested in the team. Marussia president Nikolai Fomenko is named as Virgin’s ‘engineering director’.

This will hopefully put this team of modest resources on a sounder financial footing. That may prove important, as their prospects of finishing in the top ten this year, and therefore earning prize money, already look quite slim.

2011 F1 season preview


Browse all 2011 F1 season preview articles

Images ?é?® F1 Fanatic, Virgin Racing

Advert | Go Ad-free

30 comments on Glock doubts Virgin will reach midfield in 2011

  1. BasCB (@bascb) said on 15th March 2011, 9:43

    Looks like Virgin really is on a long term project there. I take it there prime consern was reliability, as that is the only thing that might bring them far enough to finish ahead of anyone in the championship.
    But it sounds like Glock summed up their speed pretty well there, it might be coming in Turkey!

  2. nackavich (@nackavich) said on 15th March 2011, 9:52

    I think the Toro Rossos are looking good, obviously aiming to distance themselves from those at the rear of the grid. And apparently the Saubers look tidy on track according to Barrichello. Lotus aswell might be a mid-field contender. The mid-field battle this year is going to be a cracker.
    And i guess its always interesting to watch those at the back of the pack sometimes have more interesting and overtaking filled races than those at the front.

  3. Prisoner Monkeys (@prisoner-monkeys) said on 15th March 2011, 10:09

    Virgin’s best chance lies with reliability. It’s what they focused on for 2011. So while Team Lotus might have a faster car, it’s not going to be for much if the car keeps breaking.

  4. They’ve also managed to snag CNBC as “Business Media Partner”. So they’re really working on the long-term survival as much as anything. Good for them.

  5. wasiF1 (@wasif1) said on 15th March 2011, 11:10

    Joining of Marussia Motors is good for the team as we can see that in 2011 we will have 2 teams who will have the backing of car manufacturer which may be a good sign for 2013 when new engine rule is applied.But still using CFD is the worst of the idea.They need to get over it.

  6. S.J.M (@sjm) said on 15th March 2011, 11:54

    If they’re bringing in backers, it could mean that they’re able to spend that bit more this year and id fancy they bring a few more upgrades then last year. Team Lotus seem to have pulled away from Virgin although its a case of speed against reliability at the moment, and the winner is whoever manages to amend their short-comings first. I think in that respects its Lotus who will remain the best of the ‘new’ teams, but id fancy Virgin to be ahead of HRT come seasons end. But we’l see.

    Good luck to them.

    • Todfod (@todfod) said on 15th March 2011, 12:22

      They better be in front of HRT at the end of the year. HRT is a disaster of an F1 team, and if they lose to them 2 years in a row, then it will be hard for F1 fans to take them seriously.

  7. Shiro said on 15th March 2011, 12:24

    Seems to me that relying solely on CFD technology is hampering them badly. It may be cheap, but it’s certainly not as effective.

    • Don Mateo said on 15th March 2011, 13:31

      Sooner or later they’ll reach a critical point – either the CFD-only approach is working and helping them move forward, or it isn’t and they’ll have to move to a more conventional approach if they ever want to move forward.

  8. AndrewTanner (@andrewtanner) said on 15th March 2011, 13:55

    After the monumental mistake of not designing a big enough fuel cell last year I hope they will be on a more even playing field. I can’t see things at the back being a whole lot different between these and HRT but at least if they’re closely matched it will be a battle within itself.

    One thing that springs to mind…all the front running teams have KERS so with this in mind could we be seeing alot more blue flags this year when that extra 80bhp (I think?) is deployed?

  9. Andy C said on 15th March 2011, 14:50

    The one thing I was interested in, all three teams suffered issues with the transmission and hydraulics last year.

    So HRT have gone with williams (one of the most solid units out there), Lotus have gone with Redbull, and Virgin havent changed.

    I am yet to be convinced they wont suffer the same problems this year too.

  10. SoerenKaae (@soerenkaae) said on 15th March 2011, 17:03

    They will have a better car this year, and a better pace of development. This I say on the basis of the interview with Wirth at Autosport International in january.
    He said that CFD would only become better as time progresses. Furthermore he told that Virgin had now gathered enough data from the track to know what to think about the numbers that the CFD gives them. This leads to more accurate and better results using the technology.

    • Oliver said on 16th March 2011, 0:59

      A race circuit isn’t neccessarily a reliable environment to gather data for CFD as their are so many factors that can affect your data, such as wind speeds and direction, temperatures and pressures. And these can change over a single lap and several laps.

  11. judo chop said on 15th March 2011, 17:53

    CFD is just a tool for testing the potential benefits of new designs, it’s up to designers to invent worthwhile things to test. Using the Met Office’s supercomputer to CFD a brick won’t make it more aerodynamic.

  12. Baremans said on 15th March 2011, 19:44

    Virgin and HRT both applied for the sport and were assigned a place on the grid, when there was still talk about that Budget cap. Both teams had their finances based on that. Apart from Lotus, both Virgin and HRT are simply still lacking the necessary funds to close the gap to the midfield.
    The moment either of those two teams finds the necessary funds, we’ll see them improve their laptimes and overall performance. Until then, it will remain a struggle at the back of the grid for both of them.

  13. Wind tunnels have become modern day dinosaurs. They are very large and very expensive to run, and have little use for anything else except for what they currently do.

    Do you have to inform your local power station every time you want to turn your fan on?

  14. Don Mateo said on 15th March 2011, 20:57

    I really hope that driving for Virgin doesn’t damage Timo Glock’s career. He really should be in a better car anyway, and the danger of another year stuck at the back is that he could get forgotten about by the bigger teams.

  15. manatcna said on 16th March 2011, 0:35

    I’ll be watching the Mid to back of the grid battles mostly this year, I think.

Add your comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

All comments must abide by the comment policy. Comments may be moderated.
Want to post off-topic? Head to the forum.
See the FAQ for more information.