Mark Webber, Lewis Hamilton, Istanbul, 2010

FIA confirms DRS zone details for Istanbul

2011 Turkish Grand Prix

Mark Webber, Lewis Hamilton, Istanbul, 2010
Mark Webber, Lewis Hamilton, Istanbul, 2010

The FIA has set the zone for the Drag Reduction System for the Turkish Grand Prix.

Drivers will be able to activate their systems in the race from shortly before turn 11. The systems will remain open until they reach the braking zone for turn 12.

Significantly, the FIA have again not given drivers the full length of the longest straight on the track to use the devices, in a bid to keep it from making overtaking too easy.

The DRS detection point will be in the braking zone for turn nine (click to enlarge):

DRS zone for the Turkish Grand Prix
DRS zone for the Turkish Grand Prix

As usual, drivers will have free use of the system in practice and qualifying.

What do you think of DRS? Vote here: Drag Reduction Systems: Your verdict

2011 Turkish Grand Prix

Browse all 2011 Turkish Grand Prix articles

Image ?? Red Bull/Getty images

78 comments on “FIA confirms DRS zone details for Istanbul”

      1. Yeah, it looks like they get measured, then have the first half of the straight to put their KERS into line and then open the DRS to blip past.

        Only very big difference will be, that at previous instances where it was on the pit straight both drivers had fresh KERS seconds at their disposal for the end of the straight (after passing to the start/finish line), something they won’t have here.

    1. Me too. Personally I would have had the detection zone into Turn 7 and activation out of 8. That way cars can keep close but they’ll never overtake. then that can follow into 9-10 and make a normal overtake into 12.

  1. Glad to see it not too big like the whole straight would have been. Hopefully that will keep cars close but not give us too many obvious unexciting ‘passes’.

    I would say Im worried the FIA keep choosing places that have seen quite a bit of overtaking anyway which seems silly to me but looking at the circuit map I cant see any alternatives in Turkey.

  2. Quite a good spot to choose I think. The start-finish straight isn’t really long enough for an overtaking zone and keeping it relatively short on the back straight is the best way of keeping overtaking skilled.

    Also, it’ll put the cars out of shape into the start-finish straight (i.e. side by side as we saw with Hamilton and Button last year) so hopefully we could see some action on that straight too!

      1. Yes, but that’s with no DRS deployed and thus the extra downforce at the rear. I’m just speculating whether having DRS deployed will disrupt the cars balance through the kink enough to force drivers to wait before afterwards to use it.

          1. At the sort of speed they do through that kink, the car will have plenty of downforce from the diffuser and beam wing to get through if they open the DRS before the kink. The problems will arise if they hit the switch in the middle of the kink as the sudden load reduction whilst the car is in yaw will unsettle the car quite a bit.

        1. Maybe just a bit for the gutsy drivers to open it first?

          Some might go for it at the end of the kink, some after the apex and some will go on it immediately to gain maximum advantage.

          1. I was thinking precisely the same thing. This is a clever area for DRS activation as it will allow drivers to take the risk (assuming they are even in the zone) of taking it flat with DRS letterbox open. Itll be interesting to see who is able or daring enough to attempt it on full tanks first.

          2. I don’t think it’s a risk at all to be honest, the kink isn’t nearly sharp enough to cause issues…. Unless, Vettel tries to overtake Webber.

  3. “The DRS activation point will be in the braking zone for turn nine”. I think you mean detection point, Keith

    I think this could work out well if an activated DRS significantly effects turn 11… Drivers will need to find a compromise between downforce and speed at the risk of spinning out.

  4. Surely they should stick the detection point a little bit after turn 9, because if they pass at turn 9, stick it down to the activation point they will get a pretty good advantage.

  5. To be honest I would prefer if the DRS was available from the last corner as I think that would lead to great racing and not artificial in my view.

    However, I think the FIA have probably got it right this weekend and we will see a good bit of genuine overtaking.

    Let me know what you think.

    1. Yeah there definitely wont be a ridiculous amount of China/Malaysia style DRS overtaking in this race. I think it will be good to see some genuine overtaking this weekend. The only thing that bothers me is Red Bull might seriously dominate this weekend.

      1. Indeed, Turn 8 last year was Red Bull in a nutshell. If they get great drive of it as expected I can see everyone else being out-with the one second gap come turn 9

    1. no turn 9 and 10… turn 11 is just the kink in the straight, which is flat.
      The left and then right uphill nature of turns 9 and 10 give them the name Faux Rouge (like a mini eau rouge)

  6. If you can DRS through the kink on this track then you can DRS though the tunnel at Monaco, it’s just a hell of a lot more dangerous if you mess it up in the tunnel!

  7. why does this have to be different for every circuit? it smacks of result manipulation if you ask me. wouldn’t it be easy to say (for every circuit): DRS zone is the entire length of the longest straight, or capped at 900m, and the detection zone is 2 corners prior?? moving goal posts every event is stupid.

    1. Isn’t that what they are doing? The straight from turn 10 to 12 is easily the longest straight on the track. It just has a little kink (turn 11) on it, but if it is easily flat with the DRS applied then it will effectively be a straight line.

      1. i’m talking more about the fia waiting until 3 days before the event to announce the details. why not make it standard for every race? the only answer is that it allows them to control who will benefit the most, race by race. ridiculously artificial…

        1. I don’t see how they can do that. All cars have DRS. I don’t see how where it is placed can benefit one team over the other. And even if it can benefit one team over the others, they could also do that if they decided it weeks before the race.

          1. yes, they all have DRS, but they don’t all have the same straight line speed, or the same gear ratios, or the same rear wing. every team has their own philosophy in terms of compromise across all of the car’s design details. these differences make a longer DRS zone more attractive to some teams.

            now if the specifics of the DRS zone was outlined at the start of the season, all the teams could incorporate that information into their design. but having it outlined individually before each event is completely artificial and means that through sheer luck (or fia manipulation) one team will benefit over another.

          2. You have got a point there, but the teams can always change the gear ratio. But if the distance is standardized on all tracks it might be more fair, but then it would sometimes prove way too hard to overtake and sometimes be too easy. When FIA can adjust the rules accordingly they are able to create better racing, instead of ruining it. All the teams know how the DRS is used so they need to design a car that works with it. The distance or where it is can’t change much.
            I don’t think FIA uses it to favor some team over the other, i just think they are trying to make it easier to overtake.

    2. Here is my question. Why do the regulators not block KERS from being used as a defensive measure in the DRS zone? If the point of the DRS is to create passing, it’s stupid to permit KERS to thwart it. People who will watch only because of more passing will not give a rat’s behind about whether a wily driver saved up his KERS to create a non-pass in the DRS zone, where spectators will have been conditioned to salivate on cue when the wing pops open.

      1. Why do the regulators not block KERS from being used as a defensive measure in the DRS zone? If the point of the DRS is to create passing, it’s stupid to permit KERS to thwart it.

        I hope Charlie Whiting doesn’t read that one…

        DRS has already made overtaking too easy in a lot of cases. The last thing we need is another gimmick making it even easier.

        They should go in the exact opposite direction to what you’re suggesting, and remove the restriction on drivers using DRS defensively during races.

        1. They should go in the exact opposite direction to what you’re suggesting, and remove the restriction on drivers using DRS defensively during races.

          but then surely we’re back to square one…?

          1. No, because we have the Pirelli tyres:

            Teams now pursue different, conflicting strategies that produce great racing.

            They no longer have the luxury of being able to time a pit stop to bring their drivers out away from other cars – solving one of the major obstacles to better racing of recent years.

            Inevitably the controversial Drag Reduction System has attracted a lot of attention. But Sepang and Shanghai showed us that while DRS helps drivers make straightforward passes on straights, it’s the tyres that allow them to get close enough to race each other in the corners. All the best passes so far this year happened outside the DRS zone.

            Why Pirelli deserve credit for F1′s terrific start to the 2011 season

  8. i think its perfect. u can either pass b4 turn 12 or we’ll see who can brake later. more excitement. no driver has won there more than Felipe, he will win if the car is fast enough.

  9. the choice for the detection point is a bit weird; what if there is an overtake at turn 9, after the detection line, does the car who will have gotten in front get to use the DRS and scamper away?

        1. Hmmm perhaps but they don’t like running in the dirty air. The cars have moved on but remember how Vettel got stuck behind Button in 2009 even on less fuel? Even last race Vettel suffered in the dirty air of the McLarens.

          1. So then it would not be used at all?

            You are righ about the RB not being great when running in dirty air. It was part of Webbers success in China that he did long runs in clean air and then passed cars.

  10. It’s a bit of a joke that they put the DRS zone in the area where they will have an empty grandstand. You can’t buy tickets for the stand overlooking the prime overtaking spot. I really wanted to go, but that put me off. Still fancy going next year, but last week’s news has maybe stymied that – wish they’d warned us about the shaky future a bit earlier…

    On a separate note, the FIA need some imagination in placing the DRS zone, rather than just making what was already a good spot for overtaking far too easy, instead place it on the trickier pit straight, so that they can battle to and fro all the way from turn 10 to turn 1, like the Mclarens last year. Or hell, put a little DRS zone on both straights. I find it so patronising when they say that more than 1 zone will be too confusing for spectators. If the spectators care about the technicalities, they will quickly grasp such an apparently unfathomable rocket science, and for those who just want to see overtaking, they will carry on not caring (and enjoying the racing)… Where is this ‘confusion’ problem?

    1. Cant you even get there with GA tickets? That would really be a shame.

      Or maybe a signal, they expect the DRS to work only for keeping the cars close for overtaking moves in the first sector of the lap.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>