Even longer DRS zone for Spanish Grand Prix

2011 Spanish Grand PrixPosted on | Author Keith Collantine

Nico H?â??lkenberg, Force India, Barcelona, 2011

The Spanish Grand Prix will have one of the longest zones for the Drag Reduction System seen so far.

The circuit’s official Twitter account said the zone where drivers can use DRS during the race will be 830m long. It is expected to be situated on the start/finish straight.

The FIA reduced the length of the DRS zone at the Chinese Grand Prix from 902m to 752m after concerns were raised that it would make overtaking too easy.

Concerns were also raised at the frequency of overtaking in the DRS zone during the Turkish Grand Prix, and the ease with which drivers could overtaking using their adjustable rear wings.

The Circuit de Catalunya has a reputation for being one of the most difficult F1 circuits to overtake on.

Update: The FIA have produced an image showing where DRS can be used during the race.

Drivers will be able to activate it as they cross the start/finish line, providing they are within one second of another car at the detection point between turns 15 and 16:

DRS zone for the 2011 Spanish Grand Prix
DRS zone for the 2011 Spanish Grand Prix

2011 Spanish Grand Prix

Browse all 2011 Spanish Grand Prix articles

Image ?é?® Force India F1 Team

123 comments on “Even longer DRS zone for Spanish Grand Prix”

  1. Possibly they’re factoring in the fact that it’s possible to counter attack on the following bends.

    I do think they’re pushing this in the wrong direction though.

    1. no, because with a DRS zone of that length, the overtaking car will complete his overtake well before turn 1.

    2. This is not good. This probably means automatic overtakes and no racing.

      1. better than no overtakes and no racing like we usually get here

        1. I have doubts about that.

          If it’s better, then only slightly.

          1. Slightly is a start. Lets hope they manage to get the DRS zones fine tuned ASAP

        2. It is exactly the same, but with an artificial bit of overtaking added in. Not a recipe for a good race, IMO.

          Guess they made it extra long to make sure there would be overtaking, loosing sight of why we want more overtaking opportunities, namely, to see fights for position. They should have checked if a shorter zone would have allowed for an opportunity into the next corner instead.

    3. I agree. Hopefully they may have a look at things in practice and modify it on the day. They should probably have a few teams test out the distances first to gauge how long it should be.

  2. Tbh the straight is a long one – do we really need the longest DRS zone here?

    A standard size would be much more apt imo. It’ll definitely create overtaking. I think it’ll be quite similar to Turkey the way things are now.

    1. But a standard size would not make sense with each circuit’s characteristics being a bit different. And it would not allow fine tuning the DRS’ effectiveness.

    2. Tbh the straight is a long one – do we really need the longest DRS zone here?

      Wasn’t the DRS zone in Melbourne 867m? Look how much overtaking that produced.

      One of the reasons why Catalunya is so popular with teams during winter testing is because of all the circuits on the calendar, it’s about as middle-of-the-road as you can get in terms of set-up. It’s the jack of all trades and master of none, which is why it’s a good benchmark for testing. The downside is that this makes overtaking very difficult – and because so much testing is done there, the teams are already incredibly familiar with it. So a longer DRS will be a good thing.

      I think it’ll be quite similar to Turkey the way things are now.

      Not even close. The main straight in Barcelona is almost perfectly flat. In Turkey, the DRS activation zone was at the bottom of one of the steepest climbs on the calendar. When a racing car with such a heavy reliance on aerodynamics goes uphill, it effectively becomes lighter because there is less downforce pushing on it. So the cars already had a natural speed advantage as they went up the hill. And that particular hill is funny because the initial climb is steeper than the crest. So the car in front will feel the full effect of downforce – and hence drag – a moment before the car with DRS activated did, which is why we saw cars suddenly go from a second behind to on top of the car they were attacking.

      1. Nice to see you explain just why the DRS stretch turned out to be such a large advantage.

        As you say, its very circuit dependant, what its effect is.

      2. You’ve given me the hope we’ll not see too many overtakes, although I still think we will.

      3. Okay, that does sound like a convincing argument to explain what we saw in Turkey, thanks. Still makes you wonder why the FIA didn’t factor that in though.

        Let’s hope you are right that the extra length in Barcelona doesn’t translate to an equal advantage as it would have at some other tracks.

      4. could you pls explain how an f1 car “effectively becomes lighter” ,when travelling uphill,pls pm. cant visualise this 1,surely the downforce will be the same because the car is still traveling paralell with the track-into the airstream? or is it something 2 do with the angle of attack of the wing ,while travelling uphill?????????? ;) .

        1. Robbersdog49
          16th May 2011, 13:31

          No, yoiu’re right. The car doesn’t become lighter. The car going up-hil or down-hill makes no difference. Think about it this way, if the downforce makes the car heavier, then a bigger wing would be faster downhill. But it’s not, so we can safely forget about it.

          I know it sounds like a good reason why the cars in Turkey seemed to make so much ground up but it’s not. You can’t change physics.

          The situations where onbe car seemed a lot faster tended to be between cars on different stop strategies, meaning different tyre grip levels and different speeds exiting the turn onto the straight.

    3. the corner that follows isn’t a harpin, tho… so it’s always going to be a bit more difficult than at Istanbul or China.

      It’d be a bit like Melbourne, and that didn’t go as easily for the drivers.

  3. Seriously they need to get rid of this crap. It’s so frustrating to see these ridiculous overtakes happen. It’s just no fun at all and driving seems to come in second hand here. It’s all about who has the fastest car and not a moment about overtaking or defending skills.
    I’m so disappointed that all the seem to do under these “test” races is make it easier and easier for the push-to-pass-button-gifted drivers to just carry on with their race rather than battle and make an overtake they are proud of.
    Since I am a Vettel-fan, obviously this season is not al lcrap for me. But had I been a fan of just about anyone else, I would stop watching just because of DRS.

    1. Geordie Porker
      11th May 2011, 14:04

      I really wasn’t a fan at first, but actually, I think the problem is the reliance on aerodynamic, which cannot be easily undone – especially now that ground effect won’t come in; this upsets me, but heigh ho!
      So, what to do. In Turkey, you’re right: DRS made the passes a joke. In the other races, it seemed about right to me – it was still difficult to pass, but not impossible. I actually think that DRS needs to have different levels of activation at each circuit, not different lengths of zone. So your 15kph (max) difference in tope speed is sometimes only 8kph.
      In the end though, F1 has made overtaking impossible over the years because the regs get increasily restrictive so there’s no really innovation possible and the reliance on aero increases. DRS was meant to be a cheap way to counteract that, and I applaud them for it. But give FOTA/FIA a chance to work together on it to give us some racing where the REAL difference is the tyres (strategy is important) and the driver in front’s ability to defend (driver skill is important).
      Oh, and where appropriate, have 2 or three DRS zones per track, not just one where the grandstand is!
      But that’s just my opinion(s)!

      1. Oh, and where appropriate, have 2 or three DRS zones per track, not just one where the grandstand is!

        I kind of understand this but it just wouldnt work.
        Picture this; a mclaren overtakes a ferrari in DRS zone 1.. unless the ferrari makes a big mistake by zone 2, it is highly likely they” be within the 1 second window.. possibly leading to the ferrari retaking in DRS zone 2… and then repeats at zone 3.

        its hard enough to pull out a one second gap on someone after a whole lap, let alone within a third/half of the lap.

        1. Geordie Porker
          11th May 2011, 20:32

          I know what you mean, but if DRS was set up with the right level of improvement for the circuit, you’d only be able to overtake if you were much faster (tyres or ‘red bull v HRT’), so at the second DRS, you’d only get a re-take if the cars were very evenly matched.
          Also, if the difference made by DRS was reduced, then the better driver would be able to defend.
          I don’t know – I’m no expert, I just know what I want to see on the track, and that’s not the turgid races of ’09!

    2. Sorry, but I really disagree with this argument against DRS, mostly because I don’t feel that the “purist” argument makes any sense, especially when the same people turn around and argue that it should be all about the tires.

      I dont see a legitimate reason why an overtake by a driver with much newer, faster tires is “real” whereas an overtake by a driver with DRS is “fake”… both involve a technical performance advantage used to get past a driver without the same advantage. I don’t see why driving on newer tires past someone with worn tires showcases driver skill so much more than DRS does, especially when DRS is done right, as it was in China.

      The only way to make an overtake purely about driver ability is to have a spec series where drivers all have the same equipment, the same tires, the same fuel load.

      Anyone want to hazard a guess how much on-track action we would see then?

      1. Because the guy in front can’t use DRS. And that’s unfair.

        And, well, they’re all on the same tyres, no?

        A spec series? Sure, check out GP2. Best racing you’ll ever see.

  4. Who knows, the FIA might just shorten it again on Friday, like they did in China to react to first impressions they have or discussion, or whatever.

    But the effect of the zone certainly depends on the corners before it being fine to keep relatively close and position onself for an overtake as well as the corner following the straight.

    With Barcelona being one without much overtaking at all lately, I guess it makes sense to go the whole stretch here.

    1. Barcelona is the years nadir when it comes to the dirty air effect. Often talked about as being the most important pole of the year behind Monaco.

      So, even if it makes the overtaking too simple, at least we’ll see on track action! I always took it as a badge of F1fanatic commitment that I invariably watched Barcelona despite it’s interminably dull nature.

      1. I always took it as a badge of F1 Fanatic commitment that I invariably watched Barcelona despite it’s interminably dull nature.

        Sounds about right :-)

      2. HaHa Scribe, I agree with that!

        What makes you a real F1 Fanatic … if you actually watch the whole race in Barcelona! Sadly so.

  5. We always get overtaking into turn one anyway. Why not put it somewhere else? Like the straight before the hairpin in the middle of the lap?

    1. You speak the truth! Put DRS in non-obvious places! Actually quite smart. If they gonna have this crap, make it useful in a fun way. Worth a try.

      1. Since I thought it was designed to get MORE overtaking tries, not definite success in the one try per lap you get sort of. I still hate it, but if they’re gonna have this, this is they I would like to see it.

      2. What I was saying guys was that Turn 1 was the most common place to see an overtake in Barcelona. The rest of the track is about keeping close to make turn 1 work for you (see Button and Schumacher last year).

        People do try overtakes there, it often doesn’t work, my point was to encourage overtaking elsewhere on the track so its not a wait for turn 1 like always.

        1. i agree coolbeans, its going to be just like australia… everyone focusing on turn 1 the whole race because of how the circuit is. oh well

      3. This is definitely the way to go. There’s no reason to have the DRS zone be at a part of the circuit that already leads to overtakes. We saw what happened in Turkey when they placed it in the spot where most of the overtakes occur — and some of the passing took place before they’d even started up the hill! Everyone agrees that’s no fun.

        So place the DRS zone at each circuit so that it’s possible to overtake, but not guaranteed. You know, like the spots that Lewis and Kamui manage to overtake people, but most drivers don’t. ;) Add a splash of DRS, and bang, instant excitement.

    2. We always get overtaking into turn one anyway

      err, no we don’t because of the last corner before the straight, it might happen there but any overtake it very rare in the Spainish races.

    3. You havant obviously been watching the same Spanish Gps a i have over the last few years. Turn 1 creates very few overtaking opputunities even though it is a massive straight leading up to it. DRS is definataly needed on the main straight.

      1. What I was saying guys was that Turn 1 was the most common place to see an overtake in Barcelona. The rest of the track is about keeping close to make turn 1 work for you (see Button and Schumacher last year).
        People do try overtakes there, it often doesn’t work, my point was to encourage overtaking elsewhere on the track so its not a wait for turn 1 like always.

        1. Well, I think that since the turn 1 overtake is so rare, it can do with some DRS before it, to make it just a bit more likely.

          But I can also see an argument to use a DRS zone somewhere else to make that “keeping close to try at turn 1” a bit more effective, and even allow for another attempt somewhere else in the lap under the right circumstances.

    4. Agreed, i’d put it right in between 9 and 10.
      Those 500m might be too short though.

      1. Exactly, the DRS zone would be wasted there as the fast chicane and the fast right hander before hand would make it hard for cars to follow closely. This wont allow for cars to take full advantage of the DRS on the straight.

        1. And by full advantage I suppose you mean, well, pass?

          1. At least get some sort of run at the car in front. The straight you are on about is tiny.

          2. Yes it is. Might as well bin the DRS? Now THAT’S a good idea innit!?

          3. Yup, as the last few years races have been such stunners there is clearly no reason to want to balance out the major disadvantae a chasing driver gets from the turbulent air somewhere on this track is there?

          4. Anything that promotes overtaking in Spain can only be thing. Im sick and tired of watching a procession when F1 hits this circuit every year.

          5. ‘a good thing’ it should read. That will teach me for getting distracted by work :)

    5. @SirCoolbeans. No we bloody don’t, the corner going in prevents it, the cars are too far behind an we get no tow. Barcelona has been a horrible track for years because of this.

      I’m all for this, hopefully the cars are close by the time the time they reach turn 1 and not past. But if they are past, meh they’ll fix it next year.

    6. You mean like all what … 2 overtaking moves in the Barcelona race?

  6. I can understand the arguments agaisnt DRS and in Turkey, it was a bit too much at times but at a track like Catalunya, we need something like DRS just to enable people to make a move.

    The tyres, DRS and KERS means that we actualy might have a decent race in Spain rather than 2 rubbish ones.

    1. Agree, if there’s one race that needs DRS it’s this one. I have been watching F1 15 years and this track has nearly always been a boring merry go round follow the leader.

  7. lame, bin this tosh

  8. Here’s an idea. No DRS zone at all? I would say that KERS and degrading nature of the Pirelli tyres will provide enough entertainment. The FIA must consider doing this ,if only for one or two races, to see whether the races would be just as entertaining, if not more. The DRS was bought in to make the racing more entertaining, so maybe they should be scientific in their approach and see whether having no DRS makes the racing any better.

    1. Mark Hitchcock
      11th May 2011, 12:40

      They’re always doing that. Bringing in numerous changes to improve the racing, so we never really know which one made the difference.

      Like in 2009 when they changed the wings, introduced KERS, and reintroduced slick tyres.

      DRS undoubtedly increases overtaking. But recently (especially in Turkey) it’s been living up to the fears expressed before the season that DRS overtakes would appear to be too easy.

    2. Yes! Exactly, James. Any team will tell you when you experiment with something, you change one thing at a time, but this time we got Pirellis + KERS + DRS + small diffusers + no more f-ducts (and then the other non-mandated innovations like throttle-less systems to charge the underside, front-facing exhausts and so on).

      I warmed to DRS after first thinking it was way too arbitrary and half baked to be real, but the nagging thought still occurs that the tyre approach might be enough on its own, or that the races would actually be even better with just the tyre changes.

      As far as I know there’s no rule that says every track has to have a DRS zone. If it is kept, it would be cool to have circuits with 0,1,2 or 3 zones, depending on what works. In that context I wouldn’t even mind the odd “track position” race like we used to get. In a world where engineering excellence and restrictive rules (both probably inevitable) dial out performance variability, then more variability has to be the name of the game.

  9. Had DRS been around pre-2008, when we didn’t have the chicane before the final corner, I reckon they wouldn’t have made it such a long zone, as the two final sweeping corners were effective at differentiating between more and less grippy cars. But with the cars of today, it’s very rare, bar perhaps cars with differently worn tyres, to fundamentally close up on someone immediately with out-of-corner traction alone, especially with the engine equality between teams we have today.

    I reckon they’ve made it this long as a pragmatic decision based on what the track is like. But as said, they can easily change it if it becomes silly.

      1. Yeah, my bad. Realised next time I read through it. Life goes on.

  10. Electrolite
    11th May 2011, 12:01

    To be fair it won’t be like Turkey, but more equivalent to it’s effect in Malaysia. The turn in before the zone is a lot slower than it used to be. Sure, if Catalunya still had that high speed last corner then it would raise questions, but I think it’ll be alright.

  11. I predict that this race will actually be one of the best one’s of the season. There are plenty of overtaking spots and the difference in speed between fresh and old tyres are quite extreme. Add in DRS and KERS and it’s looking good!

  12. Considering the awful effect that chicane has on overtaking, they’ll probably need it.

    The problem is one of perception. When you have new tyres v old tyres, the DRS magnifies the advantage and people think it’s too easy. yet if you isolate the overtakes that were between cars on the same strategy, you see close battles, proof that something like the DRS is needed with the current aero rules.

    Personally I think would be better down the back straight. The home straight will see plenty of overtaking between cars on different tyres, whereas the back straight isn’t preceded by a traction zone, so the DRS won’t magnify traction-assisted overtakes but ensure following drivers on the same strategies will have a decent chance to pass.

    1. Then again the preceding corner is pretty aero-dependant, so the DRS might not be enough there.

      1. disagree. the last corner is approached at a much slower speed than before, so aero doesn’t come into it that much.

        1. Slower than before they messed it up yes, but it is still one of the fastest corners leading onto any straight (discount Monza)

    2. Very good point.

  13. Everywhere but the main straight would be good.

    1. i think DRS would be better placed on the shorter back striaght after turn 9.

  14. Robert McKay
    11th May 2011, 12:24

    Actually I think we’ll need a long DRS zone here because it’s harder for the car to stick close behind going onto that straight than it is in China.

  15. About 830m too long in my opinion.

    1. Well the track is 4655m to long ;-)

      1. LOL, to damn right.

      2. COTD! Loved it..

    2. I’m inclined to agree.

  16. NickTheGeek
    11th May 2011, 12:55

    an obvious fix would be to reduce the slot size, from 500mm down to say… 300mm to reduce the impact opening the wing up has. Thats what I would do, should be an easy fix for the teams I would of thought?

    1. Redesigning a critical part of the car’s aerodynamics is never going to be an “easy” (or cheap) fix.

      1. Could be something to think about for seasons going forward though. I must admit this idea makes sense.

        1. We could try to sort out DRS for ‘seasons going forward’, but I’d prefer to spend that time, money and effort on working out how we could remove the need for it.

          I’ll admit it’s a useful temporary solution, but I’ll be very disappointed if it becomes an intrinsic part of F1.

      2. surely all you’d have to do is make those curved openings in the sides of the rear wing shorter…?

        so change the maximum opening to 30mm from 50mm
        http://www.formula1.com/news/technical/2011/0/824.html

  17. Even with that large zone, overtaking here will be very hard.

  18. The amount of testing that goes on here, there’s enough data to know exactly what’s needed. This might be the most balanced DRS so far.

    Also it’s traditionally one of the worst races of the season, so that might have also been factored in.

  19. HounslowBusGarage
    11th May 2011, 13:08

    Does anyone know where the ‘One Second Measurement Point’ is going to be? Before, during or after the final chicane?

    1. I would hazard a guess that it will be on the way in, as the yo-yo effect is at its greatest (in terms of closeness) going into a slow zone.

      1. Snow Donkey
        11th May 2011, 20:18

        The yo-yo effect does not affect time split. A car with a better braking performance could gain time under braking or one with better traction on exit, but all things being equal they are closer because of slower speeds, thus less distance covered over 1 second.

  20. The processions of the past were a bad situation but with DRS we could end up with something that is different but no improvement, ie. processions with orchestrated overtaking.

    People are defending DRS because, quite rightly, they don’t want to go back to the previous situation.

    Those of us that criticise DRS don’t want to go back to that either, we just want a better solution than DRS.

    Defend DRS all you want but realise that if enough people support it we will be stuck with it for good.

    I think we should keep DRS for now, but each driver should be allowed to activate it, up to 20 times, at any point on the circuit. But, we should also make changes for the future, to the aero rules for example, that will allow DRS to be ditched as soon as possible.

    1. DRS has enabled something F1 was sorely lacking for many seasons: the ability to gain places by making an extra stop.

      Before, you would cruise up to the back and get stuck. Now, you breeze past.

      The Pirellis have had just as big an influence because their fast-degrading nature means the difference in tyre performance will be bigger than between the Bridgestones in the past.

      The tyres have been the bigger influence on the new F1 as they have allowed multiple stops to be a viable option, as well create large differences between the tyres depending on age. But for drivers on the same strategy, as we saw with Massa and Button in Australia and Massa and Rosberg in Turkey, the DRS is still sorely needed. Unfortunately adding a “only if having made the same amount of tyre stops” would be a ridiculous complication to the rule, so it’s up to the viewers to recognise the context of an overtake. Sadly the commentators saying “that’s too easy” when tyre wear was key but not saying “he had to work for that” when it wasn’t doesn’t help much.

      (Yes, there were some examples, like Webber on Rosberg when they were on the same strategy and it was too easy, but again, context – the Red Bull was simply superior. We can’t legislate for every eventuality and have to look at things on balance, instead of using one situation as proof the whole thing is flawed).

      1. @ Icthyes

        Quote: “Before, you would cruise up to the back and get stuck. Now, you breeze past”

        Surely we can do better than that.

        Quote: “look at things on balance, instead of using one situation as proof the whole thing is flawed”

        DRS, in its current implementation, on balance and in all situations, is not only flawed but totally misconceived.

  21. Would there be any merit in the FIA running a couple of independent cars on the Thursday to gauge the DRS effect and help them set the length and positioning?

  22. In years past we’ve always complained that cars can get within a certain distance of another car, but cannot overtake and that something needs to be done about this. In my view, with the current aerodynamics, DRS is a good solution for the time being.

    Maybe the activation interval should be less than a second, which would give the following car less of an advantage.

    I definitely agree that it’s artificial and wish F1 didn’t need it, but I’m thoroughly enjoying the races this year!

  23. Doesn’t anyone else think that producing tyres that degrade and are not as high quality as they could be just as gimmicky as the DRS? I find everyone saying that DRS is too gimmicky and not needed with the new tyres, but I don’t see too much difference between them.

    I don’t have a problem with either really as the racing has been better this year in terms of number of battles at least. My stance on DRS is that as long as it just negates the disadvantage of following another car’s dirty air – produced by over-dependance within the sport on aeros – then it is a positive thing. In Turkey however, this was not the case.

    Unless F1 takes a radical approach on limiting aeros, then I can’t see a better solution to the problem. And even if this happened, you would be limiting performance in the aid of overtaking which, in my opinion, is just as gimmicky as the current solutions (seeing as F1 is supposed to be the pinnicle of car development).

    1. Doesn’t anyone else think that producing tyres that degrade and are not as high quality as they could be just as gimmicky as the DRS?

      I say no – here’s why:

      Why Pirelli deserve credit for F1′s terrific start to the 2011 season

      Drag Reduction Systems: Your verdict

    2. NO!!

      The Pirellis is the best thing that could of happened to F1.

  24. So many people on here have a problem with DRS and how its is perceived as “artificial” but you could say that about anything in F1…Thw tyres being made to not last so long…the regulations restricting in some area and not others… for me that argument doesn’t stand up.

    DRS, KERS and tyres have all made overtaking and races alot of fun to watch! China was just a classic race, DRS helps balance out the wake and no chance of overtaking.

    Spain is a BOREFEST pretty much every year so make DRS as long as possible so that we can see some exciting racing!!!

    1. I disagree for the reasons explained in the articles I just posted in response to the previous comment.

      1. Keith I respect your site and your professional journalism. However I disagree, I think your a purist when it comes to F1 which I love aswell. Ever since I was 4 I have been watching pretty much every race watching Nigel Mansel win…Hill finally beat Schumacher and Hamiltons last corner championship.

        But Chine was the best race I have ever witnessed since Ive been alive. Alot of people here hate DRS but what about the turbo boost button they used to have in the 80’s? it all gets forgotten. DRS works well with the other combination and helps simply remove the turbulence effect.

        You might not like it Kieth but the figures for viewing dont lie…and the races don’t lie…Been the most exciting racing in such a long time!

        1. A lot of people here hate DRS but what about the turbo boost button they used to have in the 80′s? it all gets forgotten.

          No it doesn’t.

          This comparison between DRS and turbos – which a lot of people seem to be making – doesn’t hold water. Turbo boosts were never used in the way DRS is at the moment, in that an attacking driver is allowed to use them but a defending driver isn’t.

          I’m not jumping to the conclusion that DRS is the only cause of increased viewing figures (or, indeed, that the increase will be sustained beyond the short term).

          However I do think that F1 should be able to produce exciting races without resorting gimmicks like DRS.

          We’ve seen excellent racing we’ve outside of the DRS zone thanks to the new tyres and the return of KERS. And two excellent GP2 races also on Pirelli tyres in Istanbul.

          This is all proof that exciting racing, free of unfair gimmicks like DRS, is possible.

          1. The tyres have been more responsible for the good racing this year than DRS. Turkey could have been one of the most epic races ever if those DRS overtakes had been a fair fight.

          2. who says its unfair?! its the same for everyone. The attacker has the defence of turbulence coming from the rear of his car DRS helps to balance that out.

            You dont like it “gimmick” but alot of other people do especially new people to the sport. again figures dont lie! I hope DRS is here to stay.

        2. seriously? the best race ever?? can you explain why?

          the best race i ever saw was 2005 san marino, alonso’s defensive driving against schumacher was pure genius and, for me, much more entertaining than “some race” with 63 passing moves.

          1. Here’s the thing: how each of us defines “the perfect race” will always be different. It will vary from person to person depending on what they’re looking for. Some want to be entertained with lots of overtaking, others want to see a pure competition of offense and defense. F1 will never please all the fans all the time.

          2. tjs i the interpretation of best race ever will go from person to person depending on what you like to see. For me it had everything and kept me on the edge of my seat! how many races do you get where the leader gets overtaken in the final few laps? not many it was just good from start to finish, but of course the best race you will have to decide for yourself. one thing is for certain China race was brilliant no doubt.

    2. Agreed 8) Barcelona is normally a uneventful race. With the pirelli tires and DRS it should be interesting.

    3. I think a lot of people are moving away from the “artificial” argue (which I don’t think I’ve personally ever made BTW) and are now saying overtaking in the DRS zone is too easy with little skill involved, it certain was Turkey. OZ was about right.

  25. Just thinking about all this DRS lark, would it not be acceptable for the defending driver to make one defensive move in the zone? While they certainly couldn’t react in a sensible manner for such a fast paced chasing car coming up behind them this may be negated by the fact you can almost guarantee an over-take move in the zone and prepare accordingly. I’m thinking specifically Istanbul Park here and potentially Circuit de Catalunya?

    I guess alot of this boils down to whether or not you have tried to defend your position to the attacking driver already thus being wary of weaving.
    I appreciate this could be seen as bad spirting practise but just a thought…

  26. i feel kers is better because it doesnt allow to pass the non-kers car straight away…one more thing…a driver who is getting past can defend by using kers..kers can also be used anywhere on the circuit which makes racing exciting.

    Iam not happy with the tyres either.Pirelli looks good on the caps and the golden and silver lining doesnt look bad either but im not happy with the tyre performances at all.ill be happy to see durable bridgestones back.Add refuelling and keep Kers…dont publish the fuel before the race and bring in Mid-season testing..

    Bring Back = Re-fuelling , Dont publish amount of fuel, Mid-Season Testing Remove= DRS, Pirelli Keep=kers …..

  27. So far the FIA has got the Chinese GP DRS zone length perfect.I think the one in Turkey was too long.This will again produce some artificial racing.

    Can anyone update on the DRS zone length so far in the first 4 round of the F1 season?

  28. InfiniFC (@)
    12th May 2011, 5:51

    I’ve spent the whole morning watching races from 1991, of which I have quite fond memories. I have to say that there are a lot of terrible aspects to these seasons, not least the usual outcome being only four or so cars finishing on the lead lap, such is the performance disparity. It has however inspired me to think about what I’d like for the 2013 regs, given that I am an vociferous opponent of DRS. I like the other regulation changes made for this year, but I think DRS is a step over the line.
    It is stating the obvious to say that there have been massive technical changes in the last 20 years, but despite that, last year’s fastest lap was 2 seconds slower than Patrese’s 1991 fastest. Admittedly, active suspension and computer aids make a large part of that difference, but what strikes most when watching those videos is how close the cars are able to follow (something remarked upon regularly).
    Consequently I would propose for 2013 a return to 2000mm wide track, greater restriction on wings i.e. no front wing cascades, and an increse in the height of the diffuser (still mandating flat floors between the axle lines).
    I like the new regs, and I think that the best way to make overtaking easier is further minor tweaks to the Aero/Mechanical grip balance without adjusting total grip level. Clearly the cars are not too fast, since the lap times are no faster today. Of course the qualifying lap in Spain is going to be mental because of the unrestricted DRS, but arguably the changes I’ve proposed would increase safety by reducing the top speeds in Quali.
    Finally, if anyone saw Craig Scarborough’s tweet of the Renault steering wheel, perhaps they’d also be inclined to vote for a return to mechanical gear linkages too…
    Perhaps this is a tad too unrelated to this article, but think of it as my anti-DRS manifesto.

  29. Comparing last year’s fastest lap time with 1991 is pointless as the chicane at the end of the lap wasn’t there.

    Before the chicane was added in 2007, the 2006 fastest lap time was over 6 seconds faster than 1991. In 2005 it was 7 seconds faster.

    1. InfiniFC (@)
      12th May 2011, 10:12

      Well played. I had COMPLETELY forgotten that. I was trying to use the example of a track that was unchanged since ’91, you can’t use most of them because they either aren’t on the calendar anymore, or have been altered – Montreal, Monaco, Spa, Silverstone, Hockenheim, Budapest, etc.
      I’ll try that comparison again for Interlagos (although I feel that’s slightly revised too – can’t be bothered to check, sorry), 1’20.436 (1991) vs. 1:13.851 (2010). Ouch.
      Still, I feel like the basic one-sidedness of the DRS is an anomaly in F1. Would like to see other ways around the problem introduced.
      Deregulating floor development somewhat (a long way short of allowing sliding skirts) is the answer in my view.
      I have to say that I think the regs this year wouldn’t be far off perfect without it anyway, just wouldn’t mind a little more restriction on aero from the top surfaces of the car.
      Instead of DRS, one could always mandate that giant flaps pop out of the top of the sidepods on straights to induce a huge slipstream behind all the cars. That’s just stupid though.

  30. Scuba_Maldives
    12th May 2011, 8:39

    The DRS is a move forward, however the attacker has no suprise element on the attacked.

    I would like to see a system/scheme where the drivers have a set number of activations to use where and when they like. But a limited number in the race.

    When they use it and where is up to them. This will force drivers to be on their guard around the track not just in one area.

    Thoughts?

    SM

    1. Yes, fully agree. I always thought the same with KERS when it was initially brought in. ie.. 40sec’s of KERS per race to be used whenever you want.

      I wouldnt be suprised if your way of thinking is made reality if we are to see DRS being used in seasons going forward.

    2. If we have to have DRS then that is how it should be done. Totally agree. It would create some interesting strategic decisions also, because you could use it to put in fast laps, around pit-stops for example, at the risk of being vulnerable to overtakes later on.

  31. They should use FP1 to get the DRS right. If the car behind passes the car in front before the corner, then they should make it shorter so they are wheel-to-wheel by the corner.

    1. Agree with that. I think it was FP2 in Melbourne where they used the last 30 mins to analyse DRS, putting the cars under race conditions.

  32. The only way to solve it is let the drivers have a limited usage allowance per lap where they can choose to use it anywhere on the track. That way say if there is two straights like at barcelona the defending will not know when the attacker is using it

  33. What about this idea lol? Teams have got two options, option 1.to have use of drs or option 2.allowed a new set of tyres for the grand prix. We would see some interesting choices. Who thinks this is a good idea? Lol

    1. lol, dont get this lot started :)

    2. The drivers opting for new tyres would wear them out in next to no time trying to defend or catch those with DRS!

  34. They should issue the drivers with ten banana skins to throw at the cars trying to overtake then. Mario Brother’s race isn’t it? Mickey Mouse Tilke circuits, boost button (KERS), another boost button (DRS), so why not let them throw things at each other? Perhaps they could catch golden rings by the side of the track too. Formula one used to be like fine wine, you had to learn how to appreciate it and the pleasure was on the subtleties. But the typical fan nowadays seems to prefer grape juice with loads of sugar so that’s what we get…sigh…

  35. i feel that all the silly gimmicks this year have all devalued overtaking.

    In the past, Sure we had less overtaking but when we did see an overtaking move it was exciting to watch.

    I can run off a real long list of overtaking moves from the past decade & I can remember them because they were special & because they were truly exciting to watch.

    This year I’ve not seen that, passing because of DRS isn’t exciting & passing because the car your racing against has tyres offering so little grip he can’t do anything to defend also isn’t exciting to watch.

    Its like Nascar now, Passing is expected & there’s so much of it that it doesn’t mean anything when you see a pass.

    Too much passing makes passing so common-place that its no longer exciting when you see a pass happen.

  36. I think with the Pirellis we would get overtaking on the main straight without DRS if they would leave out the chicane as the performance of the tyres would allow drivers on fresher tyres to take more speed out of the final corner.

  37. Look at lastyear between button and Schumacher, there is no need for drs. Overtaking is a certainty using this blasted equipment!!

  38. Lately in F1 it is notoriously difficult to follow an F1 car once you get into the “dirty air”. You are immediately disadvantaged and even if you have better pace it is extremely hard to pass. In the last 10 years (despite the rule changes) the level of downforce went through the roof adding to the above problem.

    Think of DRS as a cheap way of countering this disadvantage that chasing cars have, by giving them an advantage. In other forms of motorsport where you can follow someone through the corners and slipstream on the straights, there is more overtaking. In Moto GP sometimes it is a disadvantage for you to be leading into the last corner if there is a long start/finish straight, because you will almost surely be passed.

    A better solution than the DRS would be to overhaul the “formula” and put more emphasis on mechanical grip rather than on aerodynamics. But this is very costly and takes time. Hopefuly the 2013 regs will address that. But in the meantime I would not be so negative about DRS as a temporary solution to a problem that F1 has had for years.

    As for the tyres. The problem is having just one tyre supplier. If there is no competitition, nobody is pushing Pirelli to improve the tyre. If we had 4 tyre suppliers we would see even more possibilities for race strategies. Tyre companies would constantly have to provide more grip AND durability at the same time (hard to do – compromise needed) We could see tyres designed especialy for qualifying etc.

    This is of course dream territory as there is a reason for stopping the tyre war and that is cost. Same goes for engine development freeze, banning testing etc. of course in a perfect world we would have all these things but in todays economic climate its impossible.

    So given that, i prefer what Pirelli have done to what Brdgestone was doing. A tyre that lasts the whole race andf a rule telling you you must use both compounds was worse that what we have now. teams made a pitstop only because there was a rule telling them to. Now the racing is more pure in my oppinion in terms of tyres. (given no tyre war)

    At the end of the day it all comes down to money.

  39. They’ve put it after the chicane? After the thing that spaces the cars out and made overtaking nigh-on impossible in Spain? Really?

  40. Overtakes vs. no overtakes at all ? Well, I think the zone is too large, it would be very easy for a drivers with tires 5 laps old, close enough.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

All comments are moderated. See the Comment Policy and FAQ for more.