The Making of Senna part 8: The Death of Ayrton Senna

Interview

1994: San Marino Grand Prix

1994: San Marino Grand Prix

When it came to composing the scenes of Ayrton Senna’s death, the filmmakers had a clear idea what they were trying to do – and what they were keen to avoid.

The film’s writer Manish Pandey explained: “We had certain rules. We were not going to move anything from one date to another. It?s like that all the way through the film but at Imola we were really rigorous about it”.

He stresses their first priority was to “tell the truth” and “leave as many opinions as you can out of it until you?re out of Imola”.

Blame

“We always got this slight sense from Williams of ‘are you trying to do this investigative thing on what killed Ayrton Senna?’”

He makes it clear were “absolutely not interested” in doing an investigative piece:

“He died because of bad luck, a combination of circumstances which were terrible.

“We were very clear on [this] fact. I?m not an engineer, nobody?s apportioning blame, but what we needed to do was at the same time give the audience a range of options as to what might have gone wrong.

“The only thing that we felt adamant about ?ǣ and it was good because Richard Williams felt the same way, Ron Dennis felt the same way ?ǣ was that it wasn?t a driver error. That was the only thing we wanted to make completely clear. He did not go into, basically, a left-handed kink and make some kind of mistake.

“I remember after he died some of the rubbish rumours going around: ‘he was holding his breath’, ‘he passed out’”.

A “cursed weekend”

Pandey described the events of Imola in 1994 as a “cursed weekend”.

“That?s the only explanation I have for it. I?ve missed four races since I was 13 years old and I?ve never seen, and I hope I never will see, anything like that.

“I?ve been watching some old footage of the fifties recently and the closest thing to Imola, for me, is Mike Hawthorn?s massive accident at Le Mans in ?55. I find that impossible to watch”.

The team were also quick to rebuff any questions about how much detail Senna’s death would be shown in:

“The other thing ?ǣ which I could look Bernie and the family in the eye about and say was we are not going to do anything graphic around the death. No way.

“First of all the footage doesn?t exist. Second, if you tried to give it to me I?d shove it back in your face, or down your throat.

“That?s not what this was about either: here, come and have a gawp. No way.

“This was the death of somebody that we, in the last 80 minutes, came to understand and came to love. And it?s sad enough that he?s going to die and you?re going to see the aftermath of that: what his death meant to Brazilians, his family, to people who weren?t his family.

“We were absolutely adamant that we were not going to make it graphic.

“It?s one of the few mercies, I think, that no-one had a camera on the inside of the corner. Tamburello is a long shot, so you don?t have to see anything”.

“He knew these things could happen”

At the same time, they were aware that presenting F1 as being anything other than a potentially dangerous sport would be misleading.

Pandey said: “Formula 1 is dangerous. Things happen. Senna knew that when he went into a car for the first time, and he knew that when he went into a car for the last time.

“He had some big accidents: he had the Mexico ?91 accident which we show in the film, he had one a week later at Hockenheim which was worse: the car was thrown five metres into the air because of a tyre failure at the first chicane.

“So he knew these things could happen”.

“I felt his soul had departed”

Part of the voiceover is supplied by Professor Sid Watkins, the neurosurgeon who spent over two-and-a-half decades as the FIA safety and medical delegate. A close friend of Senna’s, it was Watkins who tended to Senna immediately after the crash.

Pandey said that without his input the death scene would have been handled differently:

“If we hadn?t had Sid Watkins? words, we wouldn?t have shown [the resuscitation]. But Prof makes that human. When he saw that for the first time he cried.

“He?s 80 years old, and he?s seen some stuff ?ǣ he?s a neurosurgeon, he?s seen head injuries. But just hearing the emotion in his voice and understanding that it?s such a deep loss but he had to be a doctor in that situation”.

“We used to have the official announcement ?ǣ the guy who tells you: ‘I?ve just received an announcement from Maggiore hospital: Roland Ratzenberger has succumbed’ – we had him, and we felt it was just too much.

“Once Prof has said: ‘I?m not religious, but I felt his spirit had departed’, you didn?t need to know any more”.

Pandey concludes:

“We knew we?d have footage, we knew we could have gone a graphic way with this, we knew we could have gone a ??pointing fingers? way with this, but all of that would have been to the absolute detriment of Senna, and all the great people who helped us.

“Because the truth was, it was just bad, bad luck. And that?s the story we tell”.

The concluding part of “The Making of Senna” will be published tomorrow.

To ensure you don’t miss an instalment subscribe to F1 Fanatic for free via RSS, Twitter or our email subscription service. Click here for more information.

See the official website for more information on the film and the official Facebook page for a list of cinemas that are showing it.

Senna movie

Browse all articles on the Senna movie

Image ?? Williams/LAT

Advert | Go Ad-free

34 comments on The Making of Senna part 8: The Death of Ayrton Senna

  1. Mick said on 6th June 2011, 23:20

    I thought it was in poor taste that Manish Pandey and Asif Kapadia decided to include footage of Ayrton Senna’s twitching head in the FW16. Not once but twice.

    Very poor taste.

    • AndrewTanner (@andrewtanner) said on 6th June 2011, 23:41

      In all fairness, what did you expect? It wasn’t graphic, it wasn’t blood-thirsty. Senna knew what he got himself in to and he knew that should his end come in an F1 car it would be a very public end.

      • Mick said on 8th June 2011, 14:40

        In reality that is the most graphic footage that exists of the accident. The only more graphic image are the pictures taken by Orsi that will remain unpublished.

        When Watkins performs the tracheotomy there is nothing graphic, Senna’s upper body is hidden under blankets.

        The only reason that is there is to gawp at. It doesn’t add anything to the film.

        The fact that Senna knew if he died it would be public does not mean he must be stripped of what dignity he had left by filmmakers. I just think it was inappropriate.

  2. AndrewTanner (@andrewtanner) said on 6th June 2011, 23:39

    What Sid Watkins said at the end of the film really, really hit home. I could imagine exactly what was happening which was equally disconcerting yet warming. To be that close to someone in their final moments must be reassuring to all parties concerned.

    I’ve never felt my heart beat so fast when the yellow Imola 1994 text came up on screen in the cinema. Literally, never so fast.

  3. I may be unpopular on this, but I actually wanted to see footage or close-up photos from the inside of Tamburello and also of Ayrton in his cockpit soon after the crash with the mangled helmet and visor. I wanted to get a close-up shot of that moment till the medical staff arrived. I don’t understand why we should not seek to see such shots. Just how Massa’s close-up shot soon after the accident (with one eye open and the other closed and the damamged visor) gave a firsthand idea about how brutally dangerous motor racing this, Senna’s close-up shots should also have been available. I don’t think there is anything wrong in wanting to see it.

  4. I wish he’d stayed with McLaren

Add your comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

All comments must abide by the comment policy. Comments may be moderated.
Want to post off-topic? Head to the forum.
See the FAQ for more information.