FIA reminds drivers about anti-doping rules

2011 F1 season

Start, Melbourne, 2011

Start, Melbourne, 2011

The FIA has written to drivers competing in all its events advising them on how to ensure they do not taken banned substances.

The governing body distributed its 2011 Prohibited List to all competitors, including F1 drivers.

F1 drivers are included on the FIA’s International Registered Testing Pool, which requires them to comply with the World Anti-Doping Agency’s International Standard for Testing.

It reminded them: “You are responsible for any substance that enters your body, regardless of whether or not the substance has been taken or administered intentionally.

“If you need to use a medicine which is normally prohibited (because no permitted medicine can be used instead), you must fill in a Therapeutic Use Exemption request and send it to your National Anti-Doping Organisation (or directly to the FIA in certain cases specified in the regulations) for approval.

“The content of a specific drug can vary from one country to another, so try to bring with you any drugs you need to use while you are abroad.

“Even apparently benign drugs such as eyes drops, nose drops or throat pastilles can contain prohibited substances. Nutritional supplements do not always mention all the substances they contain. So always make sure that you know what you are taking”.

Although there have been many high-profile cases of competitors breaking anti-doping rules in other sports such as cycling and athletics, there have been few examples of the same in motor racing.

One of the most famous involved Tomas Enge, who was an F1 driver with Prost in 2001. The following year Enge was disqualified from his victory in the Formula 3000 race at the Hungaroring after testing positive for cannabis. The ten points he lost would have made him champion at the end of the year.

Last year International GT Open driver Christos Niarchos was given a six-month ban after also testing positive for cannabis.

The FIA’s anti-doping campaign “Race True” can be found here.

2011 F1 season


Browse all 2011 F1 season articles

Image ?é?® Red Bull/Getty images

Advert | Go Ad-free

101 comments on FIA reminds drivers about anti-doping rules

  1. Shaddix (@shaddix) said on 15th June 2011, 12:42

    Isn’t Alonso a friend of Alberto Contador? :D

  2. BasCB (@bascb) said on 15th June 2011, 12:44

    Looks like these drivers are all heavily into drugs!

    Seriously, will they have to announce their training programs and whereabouts for random checks, like other athletes have to do (cycling, athletics, ice skating, … )?

    • timi said on 15th June 2011, 17:34

      I can picture Massa and Lewis having a doobie after every race.
      Also, I see no problem with drivers taking drugs, so long as they’re not performance enhancing..

      • NDINYO said on 16th June 2011, 2:12

        how would a performance enhancing drug help in F1?

        • TheBrav3 said on 16th June 2011, 8:08

          You can get drugs made to do anything focus the mind, quicken reflexes or make you stronger. The ones who took canabis are pretty stupid though that’s just giving everyone else in the field an advantage over you because it does the opposite of the effects of performance enhancers.

          • Timi said on 16th June 2011, 11:26

            Yeah, the brav gets it. But what if a driver wants to go to Amsterdam for “recreational activities”. I personally think they should be allowed, as long as it’s not within a day of them getting in the car

          • bosyber (@bosyber) said on 16th June 2011, 21:33

            In that sense, taking Cannabis isn’t really a problem, I can’t imagine that improving your performance in a car. Reading about that punishment again, I still found it silly.

            But then, thinking about it, it would seem pretty dangerous to drive with hallucinogenics in your blood, not just for yourself, but also for everyone else on the track.

          • US_Peter (@us_peter) said on 16th June 2011, 23:58

            I agree. Alcohol doesn’t enhance their performance either and it’s not banned.

          • Mike said on 17th June 2011, 9:01

            I think your best bet is to write to the FIA explaining how drivers should be allowed cannabis. I’m sure it will work! :D

            In the end, it is a drug, illegal in many countries… Do you really think it’s a good idea for Motorsports top athletes being an advertisement for it?

        • Movement said on 16th June 2011, 9:09

          it may enhance performance…

        • DMC said on 17th June 2011, 16:02

          Speed!

    • The F1 drivers have had to announce whereabouts (but not training program details) since 2009.

  3. Is this action of reminding the drivers simply routine, or has someone been taking something they shouldn’t have?

    • AndrewTanner (@andrewtanner) said on 15th June 2011, 12:50

      I imagine we would have heard about it.

    • Keith Collantine (@keithcollantine) said on 15th June 2011, 12:56

      It seems like they’re being more vigilant about testing and so on. A positive test for an F1 driver would reflect badly on F1 (or any other kind of motor racing where it took place) and there’s been a lot of it in other sports.

      I understand NASCAR extends the tests to crew members and has suspended some who were tested positive, including one as recently as May. Someone who follows NASCAR can probably fill in the details…

      • BasCB (@bascb) said on 15th June 2011, 17:24

        I think this is a warning shot, that the FIA will start to work systematically agains drug use in motorsport.

        It seems they have been critisized by others for having no clear procedures and random tests

        • TheBrav3 said on 16th June 2011, 8:29

          From what I have heard the fias anti doping agency are pretty teutonic. They check anyone anytime anyplace that they desire, even if it means literaly dragging you naked kicking and screaming out of your bed at 2 am.

          This reminder may have come about due to a few kg’s of cannabis and a handgun being found in one of the motogp team trucks.

          • Movement said on 16th June 2011, 9:11

            I think it was World Superbike, Kawasaki in particular, rather than MotoGP.

  4. David-A (@david-a) said on 15th June 2011, 12:48

    *the collective sound of drivers hiding needles*

  5. AndrewTanner (@andrewtanner) said on 15th June 2011, 12:52

    They’ll all be filling up test bottles with apple juice!

  6. F1Yankee (@f1yankee) said on 15th June 2011, 13:00

    haven’t rally co-drivers been illegally taking anti-nausea drugs for ages?

    heaven forbid someone want to light up a joint on their own time. didn’t someone win le mans while grabbing a fresh bottle of champagne at every pit stop?

    also, i miss kimi :(

    • GeeMac (@geemac) said on 15th June 2011, 13:43

      Maybe that’s why Kimi really went to rallying… ;-)

      • James_mc (@james_mc) said on 15th June 2011, 22:28

        Which is also run by the FIA… ;-)

      • NDINYO said on 16th June 2011, 9:12

        Surely abusing alcohol is not taken as doping is it? I mean, the entire pitwall will have to be suspended – lets start with Lewis, Sutil and Eric Lux in China!

        • Excessive alcohol in-competition (defined as being from 12 hours before a competition to the point where it finishes) is taken as an anti-doping violation.

          • bosyber (@bosyber) said on 16th June 2011, 21:37

            And a good thing too. As I said above about Cannabis, I think for safety it is pretty important to have drivers sober and alert.

            Safety (and health) seem to me personally to be a more important reason to battle doping than performance enhancing which in theory every one could (would?) do, if allowed.

          • US_Peter (@us_peter) said on 17th June 2011, 0:05

            A very good thing, but like alcohol, I don’t see the harm of drivers using cannabis if it’s outside the window of effect when they are in the car. It’s certainly not performance enhancing.

  7. Icthyes (@icthyes) said on 15th June 2011, 13:07

    Forget performance drugs, the FIA should be making sure the drivers don’t drink any of that horrible Red Swill or other horrible energy drinks, for their own good ;)

    • F1Yankee (@f1yankee) said on 15th June 2011, 13:15

      i second that.

      i don’t know about UK/EU, but here in the states “supplements” are totally unregulated, being neither food nor drugs. you can brew up any damn crap you like and claim absolutely anything, especially when you have endorsements by very questionable doctors.

      • Vettel is so energitic… He is drinking it for free..

      • Supplements are regulated in the UK if health benefits are claimed for them or if significant danger is proved regarding them. Red Bull is classified as a drink because taurine is considered no more dangerous than, say, caffeine, and the stimulating benefits are claimed for the drink as a whole rather than any one ingredient.

    • bennie said on 15th June 2011, 16:32

      Its illegal in france so thats one race they cant drink it in.

    • AndrewTanner (@andrewtanner) said on 15th June 2011, 18:12

      Red Bull is pretty grim stuff to drink.

      • djdaveyp87 said on 15th June 2011, 20:00

        Red Bull gave me a caffeine intolerance, I used to live on the stuff as I used to work 18 hour days sometimes. Now if I touch anything with caffeine in it I get very bad side effects. I blame Red Bull!

        • hey (@hey) said on 15th June 2011, 20:16

          I’m on a passive boycott of RedBull after what they did to Austria Salzburg. Not that I drink energy-drinks anyway :)

        • IceBlue said on 16th June 2011, 2:11

          Perhaps you should blame yourself for your caffeine intolerance since I doubt Red Bull held you down and forced their product into your throat. Voluntarily drink any coffee as well? You, and no one else is responsible for your own actions.

          • Acquisition of caffeine intolerance isn’t something one can predict prior to getting it. Food intolerances are an inexact science at this point, so blaming hey for it is wrong, IceBlue.

      • GeeMac (@geemac) said on 16th June 2011, 10:27

        It’s great with Jaegermeister though… ;)

    • TheBrav3 said on 16th June 2011, 8:41

      The thing is energy drinks aren’t actually bad for athletes if taken before/during an event or training. It’s only if you sit on your back side playing world of warcraft till 6am drinking 2×6 packs of redbull that you have a problem. *Then* you’re asking for a heart attack yes.

      • TheBrav3 said on 16th June 2011, 8:44

        Not nessicerily IceBlue, you have warnings on alcohol and tobacco but nothing on energy drinks or even your standard fizzy drinks. To be honest if abused they will do damage quicker and most people simply don’t realise that.

  8. Klon (@klon) said on 15th June 2011, 13:16

    So F1 drivers are supposed to use less … speed?

    I’m so sorry for that one.

  9. electrolite (@electrolite) said on 15th June 2011, 13:17

    If Enge took cannabis I can imagine it would have relaxed his nerves but if anything it would have been to the detriment of his performance and sharpness behind the wheel? Anti-doping is a bit ironic here ;)

    • Todfod (@todfod) said on 15th June 2011, 15:09

      Agree. I really doubt any amount of weed is an advantage behind the wheel, there is no way your reflexes are going to be as sharp, or your focus that intense with cannabis in your system.

      Gotta feel bad for Enge there, losing a WDC for smoking some weed with friends, will have to be really heartbreaking.

      • BasCB (@bascb) said on 15th June 2011, 17:27

        The biggest problem with measuring cannabis use (and coke is the same) is that you can tell someone used it, but the test are nearly worthless for telling you when in the last fortnight – 1 month it was.

        And that is aside from the point that cannabis is not at all performance enhancing and perfectly fine to use in several countries.

      • electrolite (@electrolite) said on 16th June 2011, 11:17

        The only thing is that you could be potentially a danger to others on the track, but if this were the case then you’d have had to have literally be completely baked mid race which of course is completely unlikely.

        • bosyber (@bosyber) said on 16th June 2011, 21:41

          Well, I do think that’s a valid reason to not allow it, personally. Just like you wouldn’t want drivers to use one of those products that say you shouldn’t be participating in traffic until several hours after it stopped working while on track.

  10. explosiveface (@explosiveface) said on 15th June 2011, 13:18

    That is ludicrous.

  11. Nullius said on 15th June 2011, 13:31

    Athletes – and anyone else really – can be legitimately tested for performance-enhancing drugs (if there are any for drivers) and drug use which might pose a danger to others, but beyond that it is ridiculous. They don’t even test for alcohol…

    Do the engineers get tested? How about marshalls? Why just the drivers?

    • MinusTwo said on 15th June 2011, 15:23

      Totally agree. Drivers should not:

      1) Be intoxicated or otherwise impaired by anything at all when they are at the track, for saftety reasons.

      2) Take performance enhancing drugs, for sporting reasons.

      Beyond that, I dont think it’s anyone’s business what drivers do away from the track.

      I want to make it clear – I am not advocating recreational drug use for anyone, least of all athletes. I just dont like when employers reach into their employees personal lives without a bona fide reason.

    • bosyber (@bosyber) said on 16th June 2011, 21:46

      Well, Alianora remarked above that actually, they aren’t allowed to use large amount of alcohol before the race – and they could quite clearly test that, even if so far they haven’t done that reguarly.

      Then again, I don’t think teams and sponsors would look kindly on a driver drunk during a weekend, if they already didn’t like seeing Kimi having an ice cream after an early race finish, so it might pretty self regulating so far.

  12. beneboy (@beneboy) said on 15th June 2011, 13:33

    I’d have a great deal more respect for the anti-doping organisations if they stuck to their original remit of preventing the use of performance enhancing drugs and stopped acting as an arm of the puritanical movement.

    Cannabis is legally available in several European nations and in several other places around the world and therefore, in my opinion, banning someone for testing positive for Cannabis is as ridiculous as banning someone for testing positive for alcohol.

    Obviously they shouldn’t be getting stoned before they go out in the car just as they shouldn’t be getting drunk before getting in the car but how they choose to get high during their own time is of no concern to me and is irrelevant to sport.

    Last time the motoGP was at Donnington half of the people in the grandstand I was sitting in were smoking Cannabis and there were more illegal recreational drugs being passed around the campsite than at Glastonbury.

    • Todfod (@todfod) said on 15th June 2011, 15:11

      Obviously they shouldn’t be getting stoned before they go out in the car just as they shouldn’t be getting drunk before getting in the car but how they choose to get high during their own time is of no concern to me and is irrelevant to sport.

      +1

  13. nemo87 (@nemo87) said on 15th June 2011, 13:35

    no wonder kimi left.. hahaha

  14. Fer no.65 (@fer-no65) said on 15th June 2011, 13:59

    I’d love to see the full list of the prohibited sustances and then look for them in a Red Bull can…!

    • McLarenFanJamm said on 16th June 2011, 9:16

      There is a website called GlobalDRO (Global Drug Reference Online), where you can search for any kind of drug and see whether it is banned depending on your sport and place the drug was purchased (different drugs have different ingredients depending on the country they’re sold in). Only problem with that is that you need to know the name of the drug you’re looking for. But that’s the closest I’ve found to a list of banned susbstances being available on line.

  15. Fer no.65 (@fer-no65) said on 15th June 2011, 14:04

    Back in the 1950s, five time champion Juan Manuel Fangio is believed to have used yerba mate, a legal (but strong) drug, to improve his stamina.

    Just seen this in the article related to this one. Mate is like drinking coffee or tea. It’s not that strong either…

Add your comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

All comments must abide by the comment policy. Comments may be moderated.
Want to post off-topic? Head to the forum.
See the FAQ for more information.