Let’s get one thing clear up front: I am a Sky Sports subscriber.
Does that mean I’m happy with the deal announced on Friday which will split live F1 coverage in the UK between the BBC and Sky? Far from it.
The worst time to leave the BBC
For the second time in three years, Britain’s host F1 broadcaster decided to abandon its existing F1 deal two years before it was set to expire. First ITV in 2008, now the BBC.
While ITV wanted out of their deal to spend money elsewhere, the BBC has been forced to make cuts since the government ordered it to freeze the licence fee for six years at the end of 2010.
The upshot of this is a new deal which will see half the races broadcast live on the BBC, the other half on Sky Sports. Exactly how much money the BBC has saved isn’t clear.
Could a deal have been struck to keep F1 on the BBC at a lower price? Or did Bernie Ecclestone seize the opportunity to seal a more lucrative deal with Sky?
Whichever is the case, it couldn’t be a worse time for F1 to leave the BBC. Viewing figures grown in recent years, aided by the better quality racing seen this year, BBC’s excellent standard of coverage, and the success of Britain’s drivers and teams.
Almost five million people watch the British Grand Prix. Over 6.2m saw the rain-hit Canadian Grand Prix – even more viewers than the 2010 season finale attracted.
The Monaco Grand Prix saw a 15-minute peak of 6.1m viewers – a ten-year high. Just this weekend the Hungarian Grand Prix was the most-watched programme on any channel.
But with half of next year’s races on a subscription sports channel, this growth will not be sustained across an entire season’s racing.
F1′s core audience at risk
Looking at the figures in detail, F1 in Britain enjoys a core of three to four million regular viewers, with audiences numbers fluctuating between the most significant races and those which are shown early in the morning.
The Sky deal risks compromising the core of F1′s popularity. Live football matches only attract around 1.4m viewers on Sky.
But there is much reasonable objection from fans to the potential damage it will do to F1′s popularity. And, naturally, to the extortionate cost of watching the ten missing live races in 2012.
?é?ú61 per race
To see those ten races live and in HD, as all F1 races have been broadcast on the BBC this year, viewers will have to fork out a staggering ?é?ú610* – that’s ?é?ú61 per race.
(It would be interesting to know from F1 Fanatic readers outside the UK how much they pay to see F1 races live.)
The deal will split F1 fans between those who will pay the extra to watch live, those who will be content to watch delayed, edited highlights – and those who will just stop watching.
But with real-time coverage increasingly popular in all forms of media, the prospect of watching postponed coverage will not be appealing for many. Especially given the difficulty of not discovering the result beforehand.
“For sure there are going to be a lot more people viewing,” reckons Ecclestone. Perhaps, but I suspect many will be watching illegal online video feeds.
I’m not going to jump to positive or negative conclusions about what Sky’s coverage will be like. They certainly have the budget and resources to do a good job, and the news that they will show the races without adverts is an encouraging sign.
But that is almost besides the point when so few fans will be able to afford it in the first place.
Update: Since this article was published further details of Sky’s subscription service and how it affects F1 viewers have been announced. See here for more.
*Based on a minimum 12-month contract Sky Sports HD subscription. ?é?ú48.70 per race for standard definition.
- Don’t want double points? Tell the teams that matter
- Ecclestone hates them but F1 needs its new engines
- F1 demeans itself with double points gimmick
- After 50 races, DRS is killing my passion for F1
- Why after 12 years F1 is ‘off my radar’ for Webber
- Bungling the tyre row will give F1 a tainted title fight
- Button’s complaint shows we need more team radio
- The pay driver debate needs to move on
- Fewer races and more testing? No thanks, Alonso
- Why Ferrari would do better with “two roosters”
Browse all comment articles