Vitaly Petrov, Renault, Interlagos, 2011

Lotus develop device to lower front ride height

F1 Fanatic round-upPosted on | Author Keith Collantine

In the round-up: Lotus are believed to have a new device to aid braking stability.


Top F1 links from the past 24 hours:

Has Lotus Renault found this year?s must-have gizmo? (James Allen)

See a diagram of the device in the original article here.

Skiing and relaxing on the slopes in Campiglio (Ferrari)

Keith Collantine via F1 Fanatic

A special welcome to @benracing1 who?s our 4,000th member* on F1 Fanatic! (Active members in the last three months.)

Car Livery Designed for Force India 2011 (Behance Network)

Pictures showing how Force India’s livery for 2011 was designed. (Thanks @PJTierney for the tip.)

Overall overhaul – race suit evolution (F1)

“A racing driver?s work clothes of 60 years ago couldn?t have been more basic. They usually consisted of: lightweight cotton trousers and a T-shirt, and thin skinned leather/suede shoes, often with rubber soles – an outfit topped off by a flimsy fabric skullcap.”

Elroy Road to be widened, but not before first F1 race (Austin-American Statesman)

“Travis County and Circuit of the Americas have resumed negotiations over how to split the $5 million to $6 million cost of repairing and expanding about a mile of Elroy Road, a bumpy two-lane county road that leads to one of the [Circuit of the Americas] site’s two entrances.”

F1 Fanatic via Twitter

“I wonder what Ferrari will call their F1 car this year. Fiesta? Mondeo?”

Follow F1 news as it breaks using the F1 Fanatic live Twitter app.

Comment of the day

Rob Haswell misses the old Renault livery of 2010:

I?m happy to see the old bumblebee on my screen again. That paint job was (and is) by far the best on the grid.
Rob Haswell

From the forum

Happy birthday!

No F1 Fanatic birthdays today. If you want a birthday shout-out tell us when yours is by emailling me, using Twitter or adding to the list here.

On this day in F1

Happy birthday to Adrian Sutil who is 29 today!

111 comments on “Lotus develop device to lower front ride height”

Jump to comment page: 1 2
  1. Colin Chapman is probably roling over on his grave due to the lack of secrecy of this new inovative ride height device.

    And if it was RedBull who created it, I’m sure the FIA would of banned it!

    1. Why?, what have they banned the RBR have ‘created’, if you put Mclaren (f-duct) or Brawn (DDD) in place of RBR I could understand you point.

      If you mean blown diffuser that might have been RBR first but Mclaren were also running it at Spa 2010 who knows, same with the OTBD… who was first it is an obvious evolution.

      The more you think about RBR have had less banned (front wing anyone/) than any of the top teams, including Ferrari who may say the FIA favour.

      1. I feel that FIA chases down the front running teams. They don’t want them to retain their competitive advantage because it makes the sport duller to the viewers.

  2. So I wonder which is the the other team that have already submitted their version to the FIA.

  3. I think this device is a testing tool, not for race use.

  4. From Allen’s article:

    It will come down to the judgement of the FIA’s Charlie Whiting. In the past few years he has allowed some new technologies and banned others.

    If an idea is interesting, not excessively expensive to copy and not environmentally offensive then it has a chance. It’s certainly a talking point in the run up to the new season and that’s good for F1.

    This is what annoys me. None of those things should be relevant when assessing whether a device is legal or not. You check the letter of the rules, and if it doesn’t contravene them, it’s allowed.

    1. But the rules aren’t black-and-white. The rewrites and amendments – usually introduced to ban certain technologies and devices – often create small loopholes, and many of the new pieces of equipment fall into them because the teams go looking for them.

  5. This device is a clear breach of article 10

    “10.1.2 The suspension system must be so arranged that its response results only from changes in load applied to the wheels.”

    The load is applied directly to the brakes and suspension adjustment is proportional to braking torque and not the indirect load applied to the wheels.

    “10.2.3 No adjustment may be made to the suspension system while the car is in motion.”

    No way around this one! Any adjustment be it automatic, semi-automatic, driver or magic wand controlled is ILLEGAL.

    If it’s declared legal I’ll give up watching F1 for good.

    1. I don’t see which part of that regulation this device would violate. The response does indeed result only from changes in load, and there are no adjustments made whilst the car is in motion. Both regulations are satisfied.

Jump to comment page: 1 2

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

All comments are moderated. See the Comment Policy and FAQ for more.