Lotus technical director James Allison says he is confident the team has solved its chassis problems.
The team was forced to abandon its testing at the Circuit de Catalunya last week after discovering a fault with its second E20 chassis.
Allison said: “We arrived in Barcelona with a brand new chassis, the E20-02. We completed installation laps on Tuesday morning then Romain [Grosjean] left the pits for his first run of the day.
“As soon as he touched the brakes before turn one on his first flying lap, he felt that something was wrong. He told us on the radio that he was aborting that run and returning straight to the pits.
“We saw immediately that we had a problem with the mounting of the upper front wishbone rear arm.”
Allison said the chassis has now been strengthened, which has increased its base weight by around 1kg. It has not had to complete a new crash test.
The team will resume testing tomorrow with Grosjean at the wheel of the repaired chassis 01. Allison added: “Of course, missing four days of testing is not ideal.
“We need mileage at this stage of the year, as does any other team. That said, there are reasons to remain optimistic. First of all, we completed many trouble-free laps in Jerez and gained a good understanding of the car.
“Also, some of the small issues we identified in Jerez needed to be fixed, and the parts were not available last week. On Thursday, the car will run with all the required redesigned parts. We’re looking forward to being back on track.”
2012 F1 season
- Which was F1’s best down-to-the-wire title fight?
- Hulkenberg’s missed win should have been “high point” for Force India
- Kubica reveals he almost withdrew from fateful 2011 rally – and had 2012 Ferrari F1 deal
- 2012 F1 season Blu-Ray “Victorious Vettel” reviewed
- 2012 F1 season DVD “Victorious Vettel” reviewed
- New team radio reveals Vettel’s penalty protests
- The complete F1 Fanatic 2012 season review
- What F1 Fanatics thought of 2012: The year in polls
- The drivers and cars of 2012
- F1 Fanatic’s 50 article highlights of 2012
Browse all 2012 F1 season articles
Image © Lotus F1 Team/LAT
OmarR-Pepper (@)
29th February 2012, 13:32
They had better will, if not there might be like that every-year promise that Renault (Lotus) will come back to the top, to only see setbacks and delays, wrong setups and drivers changes in the middle of the season
KeeleyObsessed (@keeleyobsessed)
29th February 2012, 13:36
Try saying that when you’re drunk…
dennis (@dennis)
29th February 2012, 13:40
Uppfron’ shishboon veerum.
electrolite (@electrolite)
29th February 2012, 16:34
Say WUHH?
Hare (@hare)
29th February 2012, 21:43
Would probably offend a nearby lady.
dennis (@dennis)
29th February 2012, 13:42
I’m surprised the chassis made the crash test, but cracked after a couple laps on Barcelona. Different forces in different directions, sure… But still interesting stuff.
Scootin159
29th February 2012, 14:24
I think that’s exactly it – different forces in different directions. These chassis aren’t built to be “universally strong”, they’re just built just strong enough to meet all of the required forces – and very little more. I would fully expect that the layup of the composites in the chassis are different around all four of the suspension pickup points (on each side), optimized specifically for the forces that each arm places on the chassis.
Fixy (@)
29th February 2012, 14:53
I may well be wrong, but in crash tests they analyse how the car destroys on impact and whether the cockpit is safe, so in a frontal impact both suspensions are broken and it doesn’t matter whether they’re well fixed; the suspension failure happened when the car was fully operational and withstanded heavy G-forces.
Hola
1st March 2012, 4:10
+1
OOliver
29th February 2012, 13:59
This confirms my suspicion that the chassis needed reinforcement and not just mounting point inserts.
topdowntoedown (@topdowntoedown)
29th February 2012, 14:05
Well I for one hope they have a cracking year.
Robbie (@robbie)
29th February 2012, 15:11
Me too.
Boomerang
29th February 2012, 15:37
+1
cobbs (@cobbs)
29th February 2012, 15:44
Let’s hope they improve on what, so far, has been a fractured testing program.
MahavirShah (@mahavirshah)
29th February 2012, 21:07
Yeah, or else it may lead to fissures developing within the team.
cjpdk (@cjpdk)
29th February 2012, 21:37
These jokes are making me crack up!
matt90 (@matt90)
29th February 2012, 22:08
My sides are splitting.
electrolite (@electrolite)
29th February 2012, 16:35
At least they got loads of mileage before the hold up. Not only that, but they looked pretty handy on pace, too.
Pedro Garcia
29th February 2012, 16:43
1kg of composite material is a lot of material. I really don’t believe that to reinforce a mounting. Roughly 1kg of carbon fiber is 5 sq meters… it’s too much for a reinforcement in a mount. They propably had to reinforce more than that.
matt90 (@matt90)
29th February 2012, 17:27
Certain;y sounds like more than the extra few layers of carbon fibre people were predicting.
BasCB (@bascb)
29th February 2012, 21:36
Or maybe they had to add some internals from steel to make sure its rigid and at the same time flexible enough
AndrewTanner (@andrewtanner)
1st March 2012, 22:00
@BasCB I think you’re probably right on that one.
Richard F150 - I am not a truck
29th February 2012, 17:35
Well whats that quote.
“If your sure the car can complete the race then its too heavy” – or something
Tom Haxley (@)
29th February 2012, 18:18
Well Colin Chapman would say make it lighter until it breaks, then make it lighter again
Remy
29th February 2012, 18:00
if Lotus had a chassis problem then how come Kimi was fastest in jerez test. and how come he didnt find the issue with the car in Jerez, beats me.
Robbie (@robbie)
29th February 2012, 18:08
As I understand it, Jerez didn’t offer big enough loads on the part of the chassis in question to reveal the problem. They only found the problem once they immediately hit the track at Barcelona.
javlinsharp (@javlinsharp)
29th February 2012, 19:29
Kimi was fastest because he holds the chassis together with sheer power of will ;-)
Welcome Back Iceman, now get on with the thrilling heroics.
caci99 (@)
29th February 2012, 20:28
@Remy Because they brought a new chassis in Barcelona? They did it without the permission from Kimi?
Mads (@mads)
29th February 2012, 18:42
So where is that exactly?
On the front of the car, but not the foremost, or is it the foremost on the rear of the car?
javlinsharp (@javlinsharp)
29th February 2012, 19:35
The wishbone is roughly shaped, as a Y, oriented with the double legs mounted to the chassis, and the single leg on the wheel hub, and there are two per front corner (Top and Bottom).
It seems the faulty area was the rear facing section of the upper double leg (which mounts to the chassis), as opposed to the front facing leg, or the lower wishbone.
Chris (@flash52)
29th February 2012, 22:25
yes because that simplifies it
Ral
29th February 2012, 19:39
I have to say, it took me a couple of attempts at reading that to figure it out myself. I had to break it down.
Front wishbone means the wishbone at the front of the car. Rear arm then must be the arm at the back of the front wishbone.
Dave (@davea86)
1st March 2012, 2:30
The only bit of info they left out was if it was on the left or right side of the car although if he was braking into turn 1 at Barcelona then you’d have to assume it was the left side, unless it failed purely under braking and without any lateral load.
Mads (@mads)
1st March 2012, 6:52
Thanks for the explanation everyone!