Less than a second covers 2012-spec cars in Catalunya test

2012 F1 testing

Jenson Button, McLaren, Barcelona, 2012

The teams have looked close in pre-season testing

The ten teams running new cars were covered by less than a second in pre-season testing at the Circuit de Catalunya.

Over the eight days of testing at the track 0.902s covered the fastest laps set by the ten 2012-specification cars.

Although not all the teams will have revealed the full potential of their cars yet – notably Red Bull – it bodes well for the competitiveness of the season ahead.

In testing at the same circuit last year the top ten were covered by 2.3 seconds, with one second covering the fastest six.

Toro Rosso chief engineer Laurent Mekies said: “It is going to be very tight in the midfield and being at the front or the back of that group will be down to very small differences between the car packages.”

Fastest laps Circuit de Catalunya in 2012 testing

Here are the fastest times for each car in the eight days of testing at the Circuit de Catalunya:

Team Driver Time Gap
1 Lotus Kimi Raikkonen 1’22.030
2 Sauber Sergio Perez 1’22.094 0.064
3 McLaren Jenson Button 1’22.103 0.073
4 Toro Rosso Daniel Ricciardo 1’22.155 0.125
5 Ferrari Fernando Alonso 1’22.250 0.220
6 Williams Bruno Senna 1’22.296 0.266
7 Force India Nico Hulkenberg 1’22.312 0.282
8 Caterham Heikki Kovalainen 1’22.630 0.600
9 Red Bull Mark Webber 1’22.662 0.632
10 Mercedes Nico Rosberg 1’22.932 0.902
11 Marussia Timo Glock 1’26.173 4.143

2012 car testing mileages

This table shows which cars have covered the most distance in pre-season testing:

Team Model Total laps Total distance (km)
Williams FW34 1163 5,329.55
Ferrari F2012 1087 4,994.04
Sauber C31 1072 4,922.74
McLaren MP4-27 1065 4,881.87
Force India VJM05 1045 4,794.33
Toro Rosso STR7 1000 4,583.27
Caterham CT01 990 4,527.18
Red Bull RB8 939 4,308.74
Mercedes W03 835 3,886.93
Lotus E20 772 3,501.95
Marussia MVR-02 338 1,568.74
Mercedes W02 348 1,540.94
HRT F111 108 0,478.22

McLaren have covered a third more distance with their new car this year than they managed last year. The troubled MP4-26 logged 3,601km in last year’s tests.

Caterham also ran longer than they did in 2011, managing 800km more. This was despite the teams having fewer days available for pre-season testing last year.

No-one got close to the near-7,000km Ferrari covered in 2011.

The busiest driver was Nico Rosberg, who did almost 3,000km. However some of that was in Mercedes’ 2011 car.

Lewis Hamilton did the most distance exclusively in a 2012 car, with 2,662km, 9km more than Felipe Massa managed in his Ferrari.

The teams will have a further three-day test at Mugello in May.

2012 engine testing mileages

Renault, who are supplying four teams this year, logged the most engine mileage.

However Cosworth, who are supplying just two teams, neither of which have run their new cars yet, covered less than 500 laps in testing.

Engine Total laps Total distance (km)
Renault 3864 17667.419
Mercedes 3293 15104.07
Ferrari 3159 14500.049
Cosworth 446 2046.959

2012 F1 season

Browse all 2012 F1 season articles

Image ?é?® Pirelli

Advert | Go Ad-free


60 comments on Less than a second covers 2012-spec cars in Catalunya test

  1. Force Maikel (@force-maikel) said on 4th March 2012, 21:00

    I wouldn’t mind Red Bull having some troubles, it is escential for the other teams to break the Red Bull/Vettel dominance. Not that i don’t like them but i just can’t live with another 2011 season. That would be like watching a re-run.

    • Dom (@3dom) said on 4th March 2012, 21:33

      While I enjoy learning about the aero & mechanics of the cars and want to see innovation from the engineers, I am really glad that field seems to be more close this year. It means that we have the possibility of closer, more exciting racing, where driver skill and/or strategy can really make a difference. And it will still allow all the ppl at the factories to scramble to gain more precious tenths of a second, as if they do, there could be massive rewards. Now surely as F1 fanatics, that’s what we all want.

    • AndrewTanner (@andrewtanner) said on 5th March 2012, 13:37

      @force-maikel I wouldn’t say one season of dominance is representative of what’s to come. 2010 was incredibly close and 2009 RBR only really started to hit the ground running. IT’s a fact of the sport that some years, one team/driver will truly break the mould.

  2. matemik said on 4th March 2012, 21:03

    Will you post the race simulation comparison between the cars like last years?

  3. Cyclops_PL (@cyclops_pl) said on 4th March 2012, 21:12

    If I was supposed to guess the pecking order I would say it’s something like Red Bull with McLaren very close, then a bit of a gap, Lotus, Ferrari and Mercedes (the former I think is not as bad as some say, the latter is not as good as people see it to be) with Force India very very close. Then I’d put Williams on par with Sauber and Toro Rosso and Caterham a bit behind, not as much as last year, not as close to regularly take the fight to the midfield in normal circumstances. Then Marussia and HRT, provided the latter will actually start the season.

    • Lee1 said on 5th March 2012, 11:18

      I would tend to agree with most of that. As we saw last year with Maclaren and Ferrari, although they had terrible cars at the beginning they were still fast enough to compete for podiums. I therefore do not think Ferrari will be falling into the midfield very easily although they may find it very hard to keep up with Maclaren and RB and will possibly be struggling to beat Merc. Currently it looks like Maclaren may have the fastest car but it is too hard to tell for sure as no one knows what Maclaren and RBs test configurations were, but it does look like RB are playing catchup on the rear end design judging by their complete redesign for the last 2 days (an not really running for one of those days).

      I would be massively excited about the coming season if it were not for Sky :-(

  4. Dan said on 4th March 2012, 21:32

    I would like to think that it is going to be close and that at least two teams (would be great to have more) car performance are evenly matched say RB and Mclaren, . (Like season 07 & 08 when the ferrari and mclaren were pretty even)

    But honestly I still think RB will be out in front, Im expecting them to lock out the front row come Aus. I know testing is hard to read but many are saying the RB still the team to beat which they are bound to be. (RB have had the best car for 2 half years)
    Will be well unhappy if RB have a car advantage again just want it to be a real close battle,

    I hope im wrong about RB would be great for first race to have some other team on pole

  5. Kabs said on 5th March 2012, 8:27

    I think its just too early for anyone to speculate. Last year we saw Ferrari being very positive about their pace and race wins etc and Mclaren looking gloomy. Its a little different this year in testing but the times and laps dont tell us anything. Also, last year we did see Renault then hitting the top of the time sheets with Ferrari right up there as well.

    Ferrari’s statement in fact comforts me a little (Ferrari fan). There is a little discrepancy between what Pat is saying and what the drivers have said thus far. During the Schumi/Brawn/Todt era, they use to play down their times significantly. Only the race, and not even qualifying mattered. I’m hoping that mentality has returned.

    However, all this speculation is fun and it keeps you desperately on the edge of wanting to watch the first race. I only hope that this season becomes something of what we saw in the 2007, 2008 and 2010 seasons where a number of drivers were fighting for the top post and it boiled down to the last race as a decider.

    • Robbie (@robbie) said on 5th March 2012, 15:54

      I wonder if at Ferrari what we are seeing/hearing is that with this departure of a car from last year’s, it’s ‘simply’ that they need more time to truly understand it. They’ve tried to follow what Red Bull is currently doing with their exhaust and aren’t yet that happy with the result, so may have to revert back to the exhaust they had.

      But all in all my point is I wonder if the pessimism we might be sensing at Ferrari is just coming from the fact that they appear not to be able to topple Red Bull quite yet. That may have been their ultimate goal with this departure of a car, not just to progress from last year. So to them that might be disappointing. But they might well still be starting this season stronger than they did last year, even if they are internally disappointed that they have found time to be their enemy for now and haven’t had a better handle on the car out of the blocks. Doesn’t mean to me that they won’t get a handle on it.

      They might be looking at it as being a close season amongst perhaps 6 teams so starting off on one’s hind foot can be more detrimental than some other years, and therefore they are disappointed not to be a little further along with a little more understanding of what they have. They will still be learning a lot on Friday in Australia whereas some teams may already know somewhat moreso what to expect.

      I just can’t imagine that they didn’t expect a few more headaches in dealing with a car that is a departure, and could only have hoped but not necessarily expected that it would have been easier to understand it quicker, and what team doesn’t always hope and find much greater ease when a car is great right out of the box. But that is usually the exception, not the rule.

  6. JamieFranklinF1 (@jamiefranklinf1) said on 5th March 2012, 9:13

    Obviously it’s very difficult to read anything into testing, as there is very little information to go on. But if I had to take a guess, then my pecking order would probably go something like this:

    1. Red Bull/McLaren
    2. Ferrari/Mercedes
    3. Lotus/Force India
    4. Sauber/Toro Rosso
    5. Caterham/Williams
    6. HRT/Marussia

    I’ve grouped them together for the sheer fact that I think they’ll be too close to call. I’m sure I have probably got it wrong, and it will no doubt change over the course of the season, but some things do look right.

    For example, Ferrari do look a little worse for wear in testing, and Mercedes are looking a bit better (despite tyre wear issues). McLaren look stronger than last year, and seem to have a solid base to mount a full challenge.
    Force India (although having a bad start last year) have improved year on year, and if their drivers can be consistent, I expect them to challenge Lotus – who have lost out on valuable testing time.

    To me, Sauber and Toro Rosso are a bit unknown. I have a feeling that Sauber could have some reliability issues this year, but both could well spring a surprise.

    Williams, even though it would be nice for Senna to have a good car (I don’t care for Maldonado), I don’t think that they’ll have a significantly better car this year. Whereas, Caterham will benefit from the banning of EBD, and bringing KERS to the team, so I wouldn’t mind betting that they are challenging for Q2, and getting their best results yet this year. It could well be a tough fight for 9th and 10th in the Constructor’s.

    I think it’s obvious that HRT and Marussia will be at the back. No testing on their new cars, and I will be surprised if they make the 107% in Melbourne. I’m not in any way negative towards these teams – what they are doing is great, but it’s going to be a tough year for them.

    • Robbie (@robbie) said on 5th March 2012, 15:39

      I think I agree quite a bit with your pairings. I think if you are wrong it will not be by much and as you say may change throughout the season, but I don’t think it will by much.

      I think Ferrari will be no worse than 3rd and they will potentially only get stronger the more time they have with the car. And I think Merc should be at least a strong 4th if not a weak 3rd. Lotus and Force India have shown ‘strength’ too, in that at least they have not been hovering at the bottom of the time sheets, so there seems potential there too, as in, closeness…

  7. I’ll start to believe Lotus can challenge RB this year, or is it?

  8. JamieFranklinF1 (@jamiefranklinf1) said on 5th March 2012, 14:25

    The Marussia has finally unveiled its car…and it does not have a stepped-nose. With the technical partnership with McLaren, it doesn’t seem like a coincidence.


  9. Saiesh said on 5th March 2012, 14:43

    With a lot of people believing the field is going to be a lot tighter this year I can’t wait to see the effect of DRS. Imagine 2 maybe 3 drivers over taking each other lap after lap through out the race. Only because they are evenly matched and just get the advantage of DRS when they are behind. Or maybe 4 drivers. Could be fun and could call for ban on DRS becouse it could get pointless and funny as well as some drivers may just follow closely waiting to pounce on the last lap. But wait then the guy in front may go slower to allow guy behing to go ahead so he can pounce on the last lap. It just may happen.

  10. That's right said on 5th March 2012, 14:44

    1. McLaren
    2. Redbull Racing
    3. Mercedes
    4. Lotus
    5. Ferrari
    6. Scuderia Torro Rosso
    7. Force India
    8. Williams
    9. Sauber
    10. Caterham
    11. HRT
    12. Marussia

  11. themagicofspeed (@) said on 5th March 2012, 15:36

    This is going to be another year to forget for Ferrari. Even Pat Fry has said they are nowhere near where they expected to be. The drivers were gagged at the last test, members of the team are admitting (if you read between the lines) that the new car is slow, over complicated garbage. They have spent all winter trying to come up with a car as radically different as possible but instead have ended up with a car that is radically slow, riddled with ‘innovations’ and ‘aggressive developments’ that even they dont understand, and dont work, and a woefully under-developed car. Oh dear oh dear. Unfortunately their efforts to build a good car have only amplified their incompetence for all to see. As a Ferrari fan, i’m not surprised as all i have come to expect since Schumacher retired is constant dissapointment, and thats what ive got. Sadly i’m not at all bothered about the first race, or indeed the whole season.

    These are my 10 predictions for this season:

    1. Vettel will repeat his snore-fest from last year and the championship will practically be signed and sealed by Monaco.
    2. Ferrari will be an embarrasment to themselves (again) and will sink lower into the midfield.
    3. Williams will fall apart at the seams as a result of lack of sponsors, and Frank Williams relinquishing more control of the team to some spanner called Adam Parr.
    4. Raikkonen’s comeback will be not even a tenth as good as he expected it to be, leaving him demotivated and at loggerheads with Eric Boullier.
    5. McLaren will once again be the only team who can stop Red Bull winning every race, as the most competent of the ‘also rans’ behind Red Bull.
    6. Mark Webber will have another lacklustre season and will retire, having been totally destroyed by Vettel for the second season in a row.
    7. HRT will continue in their role as the laughing stock of the grid.
    8. Williams will regret not keeping Barrichello as they sink further into anonymous oblivion.
    9. The Bahrain Grand Prix will go ahead, although boycotted by western fans.
    10. The US GP will be cancelled and re-arranged for next year due to the americans being too interested in suing each other to get on with building a racetrack.

    • Robbie (@robbie) said on 5th March 2012, 16:25

      Wow…seems to be a lot of reading between the lines with a lot of pessimism when you say “members of the team are admitting (if you read between the lines) that the new car is slow, over complicated garbage.”

      “They have spent all winter trying to come up with a car as radically different as possible but instead have ended up with a car that is radically slow, riddled with ‘innovations’ and ‘aggressive developments’ that even they dont understand, and dont work, and a woefully under-developed car.”

      Sure maybe this departure of a car hasn’t been a Red Bull trouncer right out of the box like some may have hoped for, but I think it is more normal for a departure of a car to require that some kinks be ironed out.

      And I’m not sure the alternative might have been any better, nor kept their critics at bay, that being to try to further develop a car that was obviously lacking last year. Seems to me a few safe tweeks of last year’s car was not going to do anything, and I’m sure they are looking at Red Bull as a competitor that has required that they attempt a leap in performance, not just a slight improvement of last years 3rd place in the WCC.

      So anyway, as unhappy as you seem that Ferrari didn’t do the rare thing of making a departure and nailing it right out of the box, I think sitting on their hands and trying to somehow make last year’s car into a 2012 Red Bull beater would have garnered as much if not more criticism from the likes of yourself.

      • JamieFranklinF1 (@jamiefranklinf1) said on 5th March 2012, 17:57

        I agree. If Ferrari had of made an evolution of last year’s car in a ‘safe’ way and not been as quick as Red Bull or McLaren, then the critics would have been all over them.

        So instead, Ferrari have tried their best to throw everything at bringing something new and innovative to see if that works. We don’t know as yet if it is good or bad, but if it is bad, then it’ll just be a continuation from last year.

        The bottom line is that Ferrari probably needed to do something different, but from doing that, they’ve probably learned a lot, and will continue to learn a lot about what does and doesn’t work for the future.

        We know that Ferrari were a little behind on the Aero side, and although this might not be a Championship winning car this year, it might help them towards making the right steps in future.

        • Robbie (@robbie) said on 5th March 2012, 18:37

          Also agreed…I think they at least deserve more time, especially since it keeps being hammered home that we shouldn’t put too much stock in the testing times and I am going to assume that they made the decisions they made for very good and sound reasons that saw them move away from last year’s car completely and look to the future. Again, and as we both have said, I think they had no choice but to start with a clean slate for this car…no way last year’s car was going to be tweeked to beat a 2012 Red Bull, nor a 2012 Mac. Otherwise, all we are seeing here is that F1 is hard, and you don’t just snap your fingers, redesign a car, and start winning immediately. Not usually anyway. Ferrari fans, especially the one’s who saw them go through a 21 year WDC drought, should know that of all people. MS/Ferrari, the last time themagicofspeed wasn’t disappointed in Ferrari, took five years to win the WDC.

  12. adzz36 (@adzz36) said on 5th March 2012, 18:18

    I just read the analysis on the Sky Sports website and it sounds as if we’ve got a really good season in store. As long as Red Bull haven’t been sandbagging all pre season.

    They reckon, with good reasoning that we’ve got
    Red Bull
    Mclaren very close behind
    Toro Rosso/Force India

    Absolutely buzzing, hurry up Melbourne!

Add your comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

All comments must abide by the comment policy. Comments may be moderated.
Want to post off-topic? Head to the forum.
See the FAQ for more information.