Maria de Villota joins Marussia as test driver

2012 F1 season

Maria de Villota, John Booth, 2012

Maria de Villota, John Booth, 2012

Marussia has announced Maria de Villota has joined the team as a test driver.

De Villota, daughter of former F1 driver Emilio de Villota, drove a Renault F1 car at Paul Ricard in France last year.

The 32-year-old raced in Spanish Formula Three from 2001 to 2005, recording a best finish of fifth. In the last three years she has raced in Superleague Formula for Atletico Madrid as well as in Spanish GT racing.

Team principal John Booth said de Villota will get to drive the team’s car later this year: “We are pleased to welcome Maria to our test driver programme, which will enable her to be integrated into a Formula One team environment and gain a vast amount of experience that will be useful to her career progression.

“We will also provide Maria with the opportunity to sample F1 machinery later in the year, further adding to her racing credentials”

De Villota said: “This is a fantastic opportunity to work closely with a Formula One team and gain important experience to help me progress my career, including the chance to drive the new car later in the year at the Abu Dhabi test.

“I will be joining the team trackside so I?m looking forward to working alongside them at the first race next weekend and this can only help my future ambition to step up to Formula One racing.”

2012 F1 season

Browse all 2012 F1 season articles

Image ?? Marussia

Advert | Go Ad-free


119 comments on Maria de Villota joins Marussia as test driver

1 2 3
  1. robk23 (@robk23) said on 7th March 2012, 16:17

    At the age of 32, isn’t it a bit late for her to get into F1 when the current trend is for very young drivers?

  2. coefficient (@coefficient) said on 7th March 2012, 16:30

    I think we can dismiss this as a publicity stunt. I don’t want to resurrect any old sexist bickering but this girl just isn’t F1 quality. She has competed in 133 races spread across Formula 3, Ferrari Challenge Europe, WTC, Spanish GTC GTA, Superstars Championship Italy, Euroseries 3000, Superleage, and FPA and only achieved 1 race win. If the boys have to win everything they enter to get into F1 (unless Daddy is paying of course) then so should the girls.

    • Mike (@mike) said on 7th March 2012, 17:57

      Agreed. Simply put, there are more talented female drivers out there. However, as it is more than likely a publicity stunt/paid drive, then it doesn’t matter too much.

    • BasCB (@bascb) said on 7th March 2012, 20:37

      Yeah, Virgin (now Marussia) has been chasing the tought of having a female driver on the team in some capacity all since Branson touched the team. Now they made it.

      That said, I think it’s good as this shows there are female drivers in the world, bound to help get rid of preoccupations against them.

      • Hare (@hare) said on 7th March 2012, 20:57

        might be the first of many. Like you said, it’s raise people’s awareness that there are female drivers in the world of motor racing. It’ll encourage other girls to get involved, or stick with it if they are already involved.

        • Flying Lobster 27 said on 8th March 2012, 14:29

          Sure it promotes the fact that women racers exist, but sincerely, I’d almost say “anyone but de Villota”. As said, she hasn’t impressed many in lower formulae. Elsewhere, there is a certain number of women who have climbed the ladder in to IndyCar normally: Legge, Patrick, Beatriz, de Silvestro all had to good results in F.Atlantic or Indy Lights, and were rightfully promoted to IndyCar. Any one of those looks better on paper compared to de Villota, even if Indy stars usually fail in F1 – and I think at least Danica Patrick would, as her best results have come on ovals.

          @BasCB: it’s “bound to help get rid of preoccupations against them”. Er if de Villota is as poor as her predecessor Amati, it isn’t.

          • BasCB (@bascb) said on 8th March 2012, 18:10

            Well, @flying-lobster, you might be right about bad performance of de Villota potentially scaring away other teams from trying a driver. But that would be true only if there was any chance in the world anyone would actually expect her to perform on track or would give her an outing in a friday session or test day.

            The reality is, that teams sign test drivers for various purposes. Just look at the whole football team of Renault test drivers in the past years.
            She will be part of the team, and will probably be present at several races.

            And I am sure that when she gets her time in the car it will be properly used to show how forward looking Marussia is. And the team will make sure that the times won’t be abhorrent, at least to the outside world. Because its Good Promotion

    • DVC said on 7th March 2012, 21:09

      Talent seems to only be one of the credentials needed these days. Being related to a former F1 driver apparently also counts for something, though money is as huge today as it has ever been.

      However, this is a testing drive not a race drive. She’s driven a lot of stuff and has a fair bit of experience, maybe that makes her a good choice as a tester.

    • David said on 8th March 2012, 1:48

      Why did you say ‘girl’? I’m sure you wouldn’t say 32 year old boy.

    • I think this is money-oriented. There is nothing in her career that suggests she is worthy of an F1 drive, but perhaps her time with Marussia will groom her.

    • Jonathan189 (@jonathan189) said on 10th March 2012, 14:04

      “I’m all for women in motorsport, but sadly this particular woman is clearly not up to the required standard.”

      This line of reasoning is standard in any male-dominated profession. The trick, of course, is to find some justification for applying it no matter who the ‘particular woman’ happens to be.

      The problem is that it shows no understanding of the massive obstacles women face trying to break into the male-dominated world of motorsport. The culture needs to change, everywhere, from the grass roots level to the very top. Getting more women into the top formulas can only help in the long-term.

      So maybe de Villota is unlikely to be successful, given her record. So what? Give her a chance. If she does well, it would be a brilliant thing.

  3. JamieFranklinF1 (@jamiefranklinf1) said on 7th March 2012, 16:31

    I knew it was only a matter of time before we had another female F1 driver, and I’m glad to see it. Not because there should be equality for the sake of it, but if she is talented enough to be in F1, then why not?

    Amidst come of the controversy that is always surrounding F1, I think that this can only do the sport some good. It may be a little strange for someone to join a team at the age of 32, but we’ve seen on countless occasions that young drivers aren’t necessarily the best, and some years ago, 30 was considered a driver’s peak age.

    I really hope that we see her in some practice sessions this year, and that it inspires new interest in the sport.

  4. verstappen (@verstappen) said on 7th March 2012, 16:33

    Does she need to have a superlicence? Or is that something she can work on during this year?

    I’m doubting if she will help women gain a spot in racing, because of the simple fact that we haven’t heard of her setting the racing world on fire with her performances.

    To add some perspective about ‘others-than-white-males-in-race-cars': Nobody driving these cars is a slouch, but Kartikeyan and Hamilton are from a different league and I think this lady is more from the same league as Kartikeyan.

    At the end of the day I’ll be double minded: I think everybody should be in F1 on merit, but I make an exception for my fellow country men. So maybe I should do the same for women.

    • BasCB (@bascb) said on 7th March 2012, 20:38

      As far as I remember, a test driver can gain their superlicences by doing some 500 km of testing in an F1 car.

    • Superlicence is only needed for those testers driving on Fridays. Otherwise, anyone can do it (including, in theory, people with newly-minted National B licences).

    • Solo (@solo) said on 8th March 2012, 2:17

      Kartikeyan can make rounds around this chick. She’s more like from the same league as Yoong. This whole thing is a joke.
      She’s there simply because she’s a woman and Marussia think that is good publicity along with some money.

      And i don’t even get why women “need” to gain a spot in racing, In most western countries women are very much equal now so no one is stopping them and their families from throwing money in karting and stuff so they can get there. They ain’t there because simply they ain’t many women that like racing and those who do haven’t been good enough.
      I don’t get this desperation of finding a woman. If a good woman driver that can follow the same foots as the other drivers appears then she’s welcome but other than that i don’t understand why we “must” find a woman.
      Acting so desperate for a female racer only resold in some low talented female getting a position that she would never have if she had balls between her legs.

      No, i don’t WANT a female driver but i have no problem accepting one. If none appears i care not, if it appears then i care as much as i care about any driver that shows talent.
      So stop looking for women. Just let the door open and may the capable one pass threw. If there isn’t any just go with your business.
      Drivers should simply be drivers, no female or male drivers. Just drivers.

  5. realracer (@realracer) said on 7th March 2012, 16:41

    After looking at her records, she is not F1 material, I think this is a gender issue thing, i’m not opposing to female F1 drivers, being part of a minority i’m all for equality and diversity, but there are drivers more deserving of this role, If a women is to make to F1 she has to deserve it like every, other driver not because she is a women, that can be classed as sexist towards a man he can’t get the role because a women needs to be given it because of gender issues, cue the feminist……

  6. And in the same publicity stunt vein why not Ricardo Teixeira sure he DNQ’d in GP2 where you all drive the same car but the last time an African was longer ago than the last woman in F1.

    • Prisoner Monkeys (@prisoner-monkeys) said on 8th March 2012, 3:19

      Ricardo Teixeira was actually a test driver for Caterham last year. He’s not actually Angolan, but Portuguese-Angolan (Angola was a Portuguese colony until 1975). He started racing under an Angola licence when he moved to Formula 2 in 2010, because Angolan state-owned oil company Sonangol was sponsoring him. The livery actually looked pretty good, too. When he raced for Trident in the 2009 GP2 and 2008-09 GP2 Asia series, Teixeira competed with a Portuguese licence.

  7. coefficient (@coefficient) said on 7th March 2012, 17:00

    Karthikeyan is not as slow as you think. Given half a chance he could do a good job with a midfield team I think. He kept Liuzzi honest last year when given the opportunity and he was pretty exciting to watch at Jordan and scored 5 points back in the days when you only had 10 for a win instead of 25 and Jordan were abysmal.

    He has generally finsished in the top 5 in the other championships he has contested and won races. He drove an Audi R10 at Le Mans and finsihed 7th so I think he is a solid driver. Ok he’s no Hamilton or Alonso but he has much stronger results historicaly than Maria.

    Also, Williams praised his contribution as Test Driver so he probably gets unfair press which is inevevitable when you put yourself in the same arena as some of the sports absolute living legends. I still think he’d run rings around Maria in any car going on career stats alone.

    I would say Danica Patrick is more worthy of a shot at F1 but she’s too comfy in the states. Someone needs to dangle a Mclaren and a few million dollars to prise her out of her cushy little number as the darling of NASCAR/IRL.

    The current financial climate makes such gambles unimaginable and i dare say a top team would only consider it if they could run a 3rd car or test extensively.

    • Fer no.65 (@fer-no65) said on 7th March 2012, 17:10

      He kept Liuzzi honest last year

      No he didn’t.

      scored 5 points back in the days when you only had 10 for a win instead of 25 and Jordan were abysmal

      Because just 6 cars competed that race. It was hard not to score a point, really. AND he lost in the start to one of the Minardis AND he was beaten by his team mate who wasn’t a “champion” either.

      He isn’t fast. He’s racing because of TATA’s money… in the same way that de Villota joined Marussia, as a marketing move only.

    • foleyger (@foleyger) said on 7th March 2012, 17:14

      in fairness Karthikeyan got 5 points from a race in which 6 cars raced. tis like saying Monteiro was unbelievable for getting that Jordan on the podium.

    • Zecks (@zecks) said on 7th March 2012, 17:14

      I agree. Does anyone remember when British F3 was shown on domestic TV? There were some pretty useful drivers when he did it, so to finish 3rd in 2000 is not a fluke.

      Maybe Danica will do a practice session at the US GP this year, but i doubt it will be McLaren as they will be (hopefully) fighting a championship.

    • marspeed8 (@marspeed8) said on 7th March 2012, 17:24

      I think Simona De Silvestero would be a much better choice than Danica if people want to see a properly quick woman in an F1 car.

    • Denis 68 said on 7th March 2012, 22:10

      Kept Liuzzi honest? Liuzzi out qualified him every race they were team mates for. Stop kidding yourself he’s racing because of TATA money and TATA money only.

      • Solo (@solo) said on 8th March 2012, 2:27

        He might have been out-qualified but he hadn’t drove in F1 for 5 years and is not like Luizzi was a second faster or anything. So yes he has the seat because he pays but not just because he pays.
        If he was a lot slower than Luizzi even paying wouldn’t have gave him the seat. I doubt HRt will give me a seat even if i payed twice the money as Narain.
        His there because he pays and his reasonably good for F1 not simply because he pays. `

      • coefficient (@coefficient) said on 8th March 2012, 9:38

        Absolute rubbish, for someone who stepped into F1 machinery for the first time in about 6 years and with no testing he was remarkably close to Liuzzi who had been recently racing in F1. Liuzzi should have been miles down the road but he wasn’t. If anything Liuzzi was exposed as the kind of driver he is by Karthikeyan, ORDINARY!!!

        Also, you’re ignoring the the fact that the rest of Narain’s career, whilst not overwhelming has been pretty solid whereas Maria’s has been an unmitigated disaster bankrolled by Daddy.

        Narain is a cut above this girl, no doubt.

        Put you’re Liuzzi claws away, he had his chance several times. No harm in giving Narain a fair crack at it.

        The mentality of some people on this site is ridiculous. It’s clear that some people have taken an automatic dislike to Narain. He hasn’t had the opportuity to settle into a team and get up to speed so its not fair to slag him off. Most Rookies get a couple of consecutive years before the hammer falls, give him this season to see what he can do.

        • MEmo said on 8th March 2012, 10:24

          Oh yes: Karthikeyan is way better than de Villota. But she is soooo bad that it doesn´t mean anything!!!

        • @coefficient

          If someone compares Narain to de Villota, it’s probably because:

          a: they are biased against Narain (for whatever reason – perhaps his lack of efficient PR)

          b: they’ve never followed his career and have no absolutely no idea what they’re talking about

          Unfortunately, whatever proof you provide, this attitude isn’t gonna change and personally I don’t think it is worth arguing with such people about it. They just won’t change their mind.

          Narain did have some question marks in his motivation and wasn’t exactly someone who’d be noticed during his post-F3 years. So people pass judgements based on the little they see. The fact is he hasn’t had the right machinery to prove himself in F1 and he isn’t gonna get in the future too (unless something radical happens). So I’m afraid this attitude will stay forever.

        • Denis 68 said on 8th March 2012, 22:35

          I just don’t understand how being outqualified by your team mate every single race means you kept your team mate honest.

          But that being the case then, I guess Webber and Massa kept Vettel and Alonso honest last year as well.

  8. lewisfan said on 7th March 2012, 17:13

    I think that this is a pay to drive situation, probably bringing much needed money to MaRussia team.

  9. Joel Holland (@jholland) said on 7th March 2012, 17:29

    Right, de Villota is utterly useless. She shouldn’t be in an F1 car. This is not sexism – I think IndyCar’s Simona de Silverstro is very talented, as is 2010 Formula Renault BARC champion Alice Powell and plenty of others. They compete on their own merit, not because of their gender, and do so well.

    But de Villota has never, and I repeat never, been anything other than slow and, at times, dangerous in a racing car. She was useless in Superleague Formula, and the overall quality of that field was patchy. It was frightening watching her plummet down the field from reverse grid pole, or holding up cars lapping her, or driving out of the gravel and into another car.

    She’s undoubtedly paying big, big bucks for this seat. I’m just concerned that, with the way things are going, she’ll have a race seat next year.

    Because if she races in F1 she will set the female driver cause back years because she will fail to qualify in a Marussia. No question, she can’t do it. And then people will assume that all women are incapable of racing in F1, which isn’t true.

    I think I’ve made my feelings pretty clear but I will repeat: this is a bad thing for Formula One.

  10. snowman (@snowman) said on 7th March 2012, 17:30

    This is a sad state of affairs. At least before when someone was getting a test in F1, no matter how much money they brought they still had substantial talent.

    There is no way De Villota would be anywhere near an F1 car with her credentials if she wasn’t a female and wasn’t bringing loads of cash.

  11. Anders said on 7th March 2012, 17:35

    Oh no this beyond low! A perfect test driver would be Robert Wickens as they tested before. Of course money is involved but there must be other solutions rather than this desperate move! She has proved utterly useless i other categories ( She was completely out of her league in Superleague)
    Timo, the only quality driver get out of this team now!

  12. Bigbadderboom (@bigbadderboom) said on 7th March 2012, 17:54

    What bothers me most about these pay drivers (and sex is not even an issue here) is that these are taking opportunities from genuine young talented drivers with all the potential. Formula 1 should be moving away from being a rich persons play thing, by any standards de villota is a journeyman driver with little acheivements, if a team cannot exist without having to sell it’s test programme off then surely the whole ventures a waste of time. It’s so short sighted they are simply trying to exist in the moment from day to day, with no real eye on true future development or long term plans. And the worst thing is little consideration for the image of the sport they claime to “love”……..rant over!!

  13. Damoor Valentino said on 7th March 2012, 18:20

    It’s all russian oil money behind her.

    • Joel Holland (@jholland) said on 7th March 2012, 18:27

      Really? What Russian oil money?

      • Postreader said on 7th March 2012, 19:02

        The one who comes from Russia based on oil incomes.

        • Prisoner Monkeys (@prisoner-monkeys) said on 8th March 2012, 6:55

          And what connection does de Villota have to the Russians or to oil? Nikolai Fomeko might be the Russian in charge of Marussia, but he did not make his fortune buying up oil reserves during perestroika.

          No doubt there is money involved in this deal – but I very much doubt that it is coming from the Russian oil oligarchs. They tend to support their own first and foremost.

  14. StephenH said on 7th March 2012, 19:01

    If there are categories for women in Golf, Tennis and Football, then why not have a Women’s World Championship ??

    For example, each team could either run one of last year’s cars or one modified to current regs, and who is to say the quality of 12 female racers would be any worse than 24 male racers.

    That way they can be judged purely on thier racing skills and not thier looks and how much sponsorship they can attract.


    • Keith Collantine (@keithcollantine) said on 7th March 2012, 20:20

      why not have a Women’s World Championship ??

      Because it isn’t needed.

      Motor racing isn’t a simple test of human strength or speed like weightlifting or the 100m sprint. It requires a blend of abilities both physical and mental.

      While the physiological differences between men and women make putting them side-by-side in some sports unrealistic, I don’t believe that’s the case in motor racing.

      So instead of copying the gender divide in other sports, motor racing should embrace the opportunity to be a truly mixed competition and put men and women on the same playing field.

      It’s the smart thing to do from a business point of view as well. There are a lot of female sports fans out there and potentially a lot more for a sport where women are seen to be competing as equals alongside men.

      • US_Peter (@us_peter) said on 7th March 2012, 20:32

        I agree @keithcollantine, motorsport is one of the few sports where a gender divide is not required. It would be great to see a really talented femal driver make it into the sport, and preferably with at least a midfield team.

      • javlinsharp (@javlinsharp) said on 7th March 2012, 21:08

        It is indeed scientifically proven that women have superior reaction times when compared to men. In motor racing this is demonstrated by the inclusion of success of Women in Top-Level Drag-Racing in the US. For that motorsport form, reaction time is really the most important factor.

        Further, women to be smaller/lighter, this helps is weight distrobution, dont we hear frequent stories about this or that driver working to drop kilos to enable improvments of weight distrobution in the cars.

        If it were not such a mis-matched gender role, it could be said that women are actually better suited to auto racing then men are.

        • Alan Dove said on 7th March 2012, 21:54

          … and I am pretty sure it’s been proven that racing drivers don’t have abnormally high reaction times so i doubt that is a feminine advantage.

          The simple fact is we’ll see a female driver in F1 when there is a one good enough. We see very few because at any given race meeting only .5% of competitors are female. The talent pool is sooooo tiny.

          My hunch is that Beitske Visser has what it takes but there aren’t many other female drivers at the moment who could get to F1 on merit. I am sure though with the right motivation and skill there is certainly a real possibility.

        • Mallesh Magdum (@malleshmagdum) said on 7th March 2012, 22:07

          @javlinsharp @AndrewTanner It’s quite the opposite actually. Women have higher reaction times and the majority aren’t good at vehicle control (ofcourse there are exceptions). Most road accidents involving women happen at lower speeds because of low reaction time and lack of control.
          Thats why most Airforces do not recruit ladies as fighter pilots.

          After analysing numerous road accidents in my city, I found out that “When men crash, Its because they are rash. When women crash, Its because they can’t control their vehicles”

          • Mike (@mike) said on 7th March 2012, 22:25

            I think road accident causes are a lot more complicated than that, and I don’t think, what would be a rather small difference, if any exists at all, between the reaction times of typical men and woman have a significant effect on the issue at all.

            I disagree with you as well, even ignoring that reaction times are only a small aspect of the traits required by high-performing drivers. The argument that women’s lower weight is beneficial is still significantly secondary to them having the talent and physical ability to drive an F1 car competitively.

          • Simon said on 7th March 2012, 23:13

            The difference in reaction times between males and females is relatively minor – between one and four hundredths of a second, depending on reaction trigger (light, sound, touch ect).

            Gender reaction time difference to visual stimuli is typically around one to two hundredths of a second, a difference of around 4-10%.

            Dehydration has been found to accelerate male reaction times marginally, while cutting female reaction times by up to 5%. An important factor in an F1 cockpit.

            Curiously, female test pilots have been shown to react more quickly and predictably than their male counterparts while under stress. High levels of stress in male test pilots resulted in slowed reaction times, probably as a result of higher testosterone production. Female test pilots were also found to be more accurate on target tests than male test pilots while under stress.

          • javlinsharp (@javlinsharp) said on 8th March 2012, 19:24

            So since F1 drivers do not have significantly better reaction times than normal people, what is this “talent” you speak of?

            Is it Gender based? Can an F1 Driver be MADE? What does a man have that a woman does not have? What does an F1 driver have that non-F1 drivers dont have and is that Gender-specific?

            To blame the absence of women in motorsport on anything else but sociological influnces is nothing short of bigotry.

            Shall I play my own bigotry card and say that all Indian men are sexist? Doesnt feel good, does it?

            in case your wondering, I am a man and have no daughters.

      • AndrewTanner (@andrewtanner) said on 7th March 2012, 21:17

        @keithcollantine Totally agree. Women are generally of a lighter build than men so it would actually beneficial as far as weight goes!

      • Ral said on 7th March 2012, 22:01

        Logic hasn’t ever stopped people splitting up competitions by sex though. Just a couple of examples:

        Horse riding
        Shooting (your weapon of choice really, guns or bow and arrow)

        I’m not saying it should be split up, just that logic has never stood in the way of that decision before and actually, racing seems to be pretty progressive in that respect.

        • DVC said on 7th March 2012, 23:06

          Most horse-riding competitions aren’t split on gender lines.

          Chess isn’t split on gender lines either.

          Where separate competitions have been organised in these sports it has been for reasons other than inherent ability.

          • Ral said on 8th March 2012, 22:37

            Oops about the horse-riding, bad example.

            But chess players are rated different by sex, regardless of whether they ever play each other or not.

            Anyway, the examples themselves weren’t really the point. The point is, logic has never really had any place in the decision on whether to separate by sex or not.

      • DVC said on 7th March 2012, 23:01

        Well said Keith. Completely agree.

        Another sport where women and men compete against each other is equestrian. There also, the mount and your ability to control it is the important thing, and physical differences not the deciding factor.

        I’m involved in radio control car racing, and it like all forms of motorsport has women and men competing on equal terms.

        The reasons we don’t see so many women competing in motorsport at the top level are cultural.

      • coefficient (@coefficient) said on 8th March 2012, 9:41

        What about the weight advantage a female would have? Would we end up with a complicated system of weight compensation or a minimum driver weight which would have to be made up with ballast for the women and trained down to for the men?

        • bosyber (@bosyber) said on 8th March 2012, 18:57

          But @coefficient, the same weight advantage is there for short, skinny drivers over tall big ones already, only perhhaps in a somewhat smaller degree (compare Vettel to Webber). That’s why there’s a minimum weight limit.

          F1 drivers aren’t all like jokeys in horse-racing, and even there the skinniest isn’t the one who wins; it depends on skill, the car/horse, some luck, and seeing/taking opportunity. Otherwise the championship wouldn’t be very interesting.

      • Jonathan189 (@jonathan189) said on 10th March 2012, 14:23

        Sounds great. So what can we do make it happen?

        Obviously, there are limits to what a blog can do. But Keith, you could certainly use the blog to highlight the achievements of women in lower formulas, and to criticize some of the more egregious examples of sexism in F1 — e.g., the pit lane girls. You do have some influence.

      • PT (@pt) said on 13th March 2012, 5:36

        Agree with you @keithcollantine, but I think it would make sense to have a junior level single seater series of, FRenault, F3 or F2 cars in which each team must field a male and a female driver. That would give the female drivers a lot more opportunity to assess themselves while teams can help polish their skill and racecraft.

        F1 or GP2 teams’ observers can gauge how the women are perfroming with respect to their male counterparts in the series. In fact this is probably the only way where many girls, who’d normally turn to other career lines after karting, can be made to try it out. A championship with ten teams could have ten female drivers from which at least two or three (if they’re good enough) could get a chance to move to higher levels such as WSR or GP2. This means that every year or evey two years there will be new female drivers ready to get into these feeder series (if sponsorship and talent permit).

        What such a junior level championship does is give the potentially talented girls out there a greater window of opportunity.

    • Matty No 2 (@mattynotwo) said on 8th March 2012, 3:50

      “why not have a Women’s World Championship ??”

      Exactly, that is the only fair thing to do.

  15. Girts (@girts) said on 7th March 2012, 19:01

    I believe that this is great news. Welcome to the club, Maria!

    De Villota might not have the CV that one would expect from a promising F1 rookie but the same could be said about a lot of male drivers that have been participating in F1 as race or test drivers so far. And the ‘old’ age doesn’t matter too much. Allan McNish started his F1 career with Toyota when he was exactly the same age as de Villota now and we are having two drivers on the 2012 grid that are already over 40.

    While I have never wanted to see teams hiring female test drivers just because of PR reasons, everyone has to understand that there are female racers who have the potential to outperform many of the current F1 male drivers in the same equipment. I hope that de Villota’s deal with Marussia will help to open the door for these women.

    • Joel Holland (@jholland) said on 7th March 2012, 19:44

      But de Villota does not have the ability to out-perform the current F1 grid: every one of them is fundamentally better than her. She is there on money alone, not talent, and that does nothing for the promotion of female racers.

      And to compare her with McNish does him a huge diservice.

      • Girts (@girts) said on 7th March 2012, 19:53

        I didn’t intend to say that de Villota is as good as McNish, just said that 32 years of age ain’t enough reason to reject an F1 rookie.

        You might be right about her skills but I would compare this story with the one of Vitaly Petrov and Russia. While Vitaly hasn’t set the world alight and is mostly regarded as a pay driver, his presence in F1 has definitely increased the popularity of F1 in Russia.

        • Joel Holland (@jholland) said on 7th March 2012, 20:41

          I’m sorry, I know you weren’t comparing her de Villota and McNish as drivers.

          The difference with Petrov is that he, whilst no world beater, had proven himself more than capable in GP2 (race wins, championship runner-up). She’s nowhere near that level. She’d get eaten alive in GP2, and it’s a poor quality field.

          I do take your point to a degree about increased visibility, but women watch F1 anyway – it’s a huge global sport. Those who do tend to be intelligent in their approach to it. For example, F1 in Spain it’s very popular anyway and I’m sure plenty of Spanish women cheer on Alonso (and non-Spaniards too). They don’t need Maria to tell them it exists. Moreover, if they pin their hopes on her they will be disappointed.

    • celeste (@celeste) said on 7th March 2012, 20:33

      I´ll agree that it will be interesting too see woman in F1, but I wpuld rather have a promising woman as driver than Villota, right now everyone knows is a commercial reason, trying to get sponsor…

      I will rather not have a woman driver at all…

    • Jay said on 8th March 2012, 2:05

      @Grits..I dont think the problem here is age…its ability. You cant compare Alan Mcnish to this lady!..McNish was a proven winner in Le Man and Sport Cars!

      If Seb Loeb switched over to F1 next season, he would be a 39 year old rookie..I wouldnt mind..hell nobody would!

      This looks like a PR stunt. People should reach F1 on merit, but hey, look at the drivers everywhere! I guess we should accept this, its a test role to say the least.

    • coefficient (@coefficient) said on 8th March 2012, 9:53

      Well, it seems to me that the old fashioned overlords of F1 just stick a crap female in the spotlight every now and then just to take credibility away from the idea of introducing female drivers.

      Giovanni Amati was the last one and she set the female cause back 20 years because she was slower than my granny. The only way to get F1 to take women seriously is to get a team like Mclaren to manufacture a female version of Lewis. If she then came into F1 and kicked butt we would have the impetus for other girls to be inspired and join the junior ranks.

      The problem is the lack of females on the ladder, there are thousands of boys and a handful of girls because generally boys are more interested in cars and racing, oily rags and spanners. This would change if there was a female winning at the top due to the same effect the Spice Girls had with their Girl Power.

      Sisters doing it for themselves and all those other Cliches!

      Bring it on I say!

      • VoiseyS (@voisey) said on 8th March 2012, 12:19

        @coefficient I agree with your analogy about boys and spanners, but are you really suggesting the “influence” of the spice girls could have a bearing on formula1?!

        please do not let this happen. the thought of simon cowell anywhere near a race track or team makes me cringe. we’d have an X Factor team before we knew it, with a competition for one of the drives….


1 2 3

Add your comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

All comments must abide by the comment policy. Comments may be moderated.
Want to post off-topic? Head to the forum.
See the FAQ for more information.