Which of Paul Ricard’s 167 tracks should F1 use?

Debates and polls

The Paul Ricard circuit is expected to return to F1 in the near future as the French Grand Prix is set for a revival.

Formula 1 races have been held on two different versions of the track before. The original 5.8km (3.6-mile) track used was until 1985 and after that a shortened 3.8km (2.4-mile) version held the French race until 1990.

The circuit has been extensively renovated since F1’s last race there in 1990 and now boasts a staggering 167 different configurations, all of which can be seen in this document (PDF) on the circuit’s website.

A race could be held on a different variation of the track every season until the year 2180 – so far into the dim and distant future it’s possible Bernie Ecclestone may no longer be with us by then.

However some of these layouts are completely unsuitable for F1 – such as the sub-1km loops which don’t include the pit straight. And it’s much more likely F1 will pick a configuration and stick with it.

But which one? Here’s a few of the more likely and interesting options.

1A – 5.752km

Paul Ricard 1A

This track is the closest to the original Paul Ricard circuit currently available. It includes the high-speed Varrerie S-bend at the start of the lap and the flat-out Mistral straight leading into the famous Signes corner.

The race organisers are tipped to use one of the longer circuit configurations. Track director Stephane Clair told Autosport one of the longer tracks would be used, but it’s not clear which one.

Using the longer version of the track without a chicane in the Mistral straight would encourage teams to use more low-downforce set-ups – something which is seen at very few F1 tracks these days.

1A-V2 – 5.791km

Paul Ricard 1A-V2

This is a very similar configuration to the first one, but with a slightly slower version of Varrerie.

The European Le Mans Series used this configuration for their race earlier this month.

1C-V2 – 5.842km

Paul Ricard 1C-V2

Though it would be spectacular to see F1 cars tackling the entry to Signes at over 200mph, some consideration is being given to using one of the chicanes to interrupt what would otherwise be a flat-out 1.1-mile blast.

This would be unfortunate as recent experience at Abu Dhabi has shown that placing chicanes in the middle of straights is not a good way to promote overtaking.

Daniel Ricciardo and Jean-Eric Vergne are familiar with this configuration – they raced on it in last year’s Formula Renault 3.5 meeting.

3A – 3.793km

Paul Ricard 3A

An alternative to using the chicane in the Mistral could be to return to the shorter track configuration which F1 used from 1986 to 1990.

With only nine corners (counting Beausset as two) this would be the simplest track on the F1 calendar – Monza currently has the lowest corner count with 11. At 3.793km (2.36 miles) it would be the second-shortest track on the calendar after Monaco.

We could expect an F1 race on the shorter track to have some of the qualities of the Brazilian round of the championship at Interlagos – a close grid thanks to the short lap length, and leaders kept busy lapping traffic.

It would also have the most laps of any race on the calendar today – 81 – which would be good news for spectators.

Version 2A is similar to this track but slightly longer at 4.087km (2.54 miles). I have suggested 3A as it is closest to the last version of the track F1 raced on.

Paul Ricard tracks compared

Potential distances of an F1 race on each track based on their lap lengths. F1 races must run to a minimum distance of 305km (189.5 miles). Monaco is an exception to this rule, running to a length of 260km.

Track Lap length (km) Race laps Race distance (km)
Paul Ricard 1A 5.752 54 310.608
Paul Ricard 1A-V2 5.791 53 306.923
Paul Ricard 1C-V2 5.842 53 309.626
Paul Ricard 3A 3.793 81 307.233

I say

Carlos Reutemann, Williams, Paul Ricard, 1980The likelihood Paul Ricard’s return to the F1 calendar will come partly at the expense of Spa-Francorchamps is very disappointing.

But that shouldn’t dampen our enthusiasm for seeing F1 cars return to a track they first raced at over 40 years ago.

The race organisers have indicated they would like to hold the race on the longer track. This only makes sense if they intend to use the full Mistral straight without the chicane.

Using the chicane would defeat the point of having the straight there and discourage teams from running their cars in low-downforce trim, which would distinguish the track from many of the other venues on the calendar today.

If it isn’t possible to run the full-length track without the chicane, then they should use a shorter configuration such as 3A.

A race on a busy track with a high number of laps – with lap times potentially dipping under 60 seconds – would make for a worthwhile break from the norm. Which is something the increasing homogenous F1 calendar badly needs.

You say: Which circuit should they use at Paul Ricard?

Which of the options above do you think would work best for F1’s return to Paul Ricard? Or should they use one of the 163 other variations of the Le Castellet track?

Cast your vote below and have your say in the comments.

Which of Paul Ricard's 167 tracks should F1 use?

  • 1A ?ǣ 5.752km (55%)
  • 1A-V2 ?ǣ 5.791km (19%)
  • 1C-V2 ?ǣ 5.842km (10%)
  • 3A ?ǣ 3.793km (8%)
  • A different configuration (6%)
  • No opinion (2%)

Total Voters: 326

Loading ... Loading ...

An F1 Fanatic account is required in order to vote. If you do not have one, register an account here or read more about registering here.

Debates and polls

Browse all debates and polls

Advert | Go Ad-free


125 comments on Which of Paul Ricard’s 167 tracks should F1 use?

  1. Jen Campbell (@12popsicles) said on 9th April 2012, 14:08

    They should run V3, could be a good drinking game to go with it.
    A shot every time a HRT gets lapped. One way to make the race interesting!

  2. Max Jacobson (@vettel1) said on 9th April 2012, 14:36

    I would love to see them use the A1 layout; it would be a lot more exciting to watch than the Tilkedrome races…but I wouldn’t want it to alternate with Spa, I would much rather they dropped Bahrain (or one of the many other broing circuits) and replace it with this.

    • Prisoner Monkeys (@prisoner-monkeys) said on 10th April 2012, 0:58

      @vettel1 – The only problem with that theory is that Spa is the only circuit willing to alternate with Paul Ricard. It’s all well and good to say “I’d rather they replaced Bahrain”, but that’s not going to happen.

      • Yes, I know, but I’d hate to see spa alternate, although there could be a spot vacant because isn’t Bernie dropping Korea for the new circuit in Manhattan coming next year, and the chances of Bahrain still being on the calendar will decrease significantly with all the unrest. There could be a spot vacant for next year that Paul Riccard could take outright?

        But then again, Mexico is planning a return as well, so it wouldn’t last…

  3. MRFS said on 9th April 2012, 14:42

    I’d like it to be 8-V1.. and not because it’s the last one. 350 laps of short track..mmm. Of course it wouldn’t be allowed..but I’d like to see it happen! Runnign the drinking game there would certainly prove popular..

  4. mildertduck (@mildertduck) said on 9th April 2012, 15:04

    I’d be tempted to see A1-SC-SHORT – would be scary to see really hard braking from 200+ kph, perhaps lots of cars would overcook it?

  5. Pamphlet (@pamphlet) said on 9th April 2012, 15:15

    I don’t see the appeal of the 1A config. The straight is much too long and boring.

  6. verstappen (@verstappen) said on 9th April 2012, 15:31

    The likelihood Paul Ricard’s return to the F1 calendar will come partly at the expense of Spa-Francorchamps is very disappointing.

    But that shouldn’t dampen our enthusiasm for seeing F1 cars return to a track they first raced at over 40 years ago.

    So true! I didn’t know much about it, but now – except indeed for the Spa alternation – I like to see it coming. I voted 1A, but 3A or @sam3110 ‘s effort also seem nice. Different is good.

  7. DaveW (@dmw) said on 9th April 2012, 16:13

    Doesn’t matter as long as we have a chicane-free Mistral. Plenty of run-off there. I like the short circuit, due to nostalgia, and because we need some short circuits. Memories of the Leyton House March run there alone provide enough goosebumps to want to see that ciruti run again. There will be lots of fist-waving at backmarkers, but whatever.

  8. GeorgeDaviesF1 (@georgedaviesf1) said on 9th April 2012, 16:13

    Spa configuration

  9. Michael Brown (@) said on 9th April 2012, 16:15

    1A is the fastest and the most fun. But I think the FIA will pick something like 1C-V2 because they love chicanes.

  10. Minor deviation from 1C-V2, instead of adding a chicane at the straight as shown, adding a more flowing chicane by going right before going into the chicane. With 1.1 miles for the straight, the chicane should not be an issue and with the turn right being wider and more flowing then the 1C-V2 chicane, it may even offer an extra overtaking point. If it is not feasible, 1C-V2 would be my choice.

  11. ShaneB457 (@shaneb12345678910) said on 9th April 2012, 16:50

    They should use 1A and make the start/finish line close to the last corner so that there is a really long run to the first corner. Now that would be interesting!

  12. I genuinely think they should have a team of marshalls with cones, who run out and change the configuration every lap.

  13. The amount of run-off on this track burns my eyes!

  14. AndrewTanner (@andrewtanner) said on 9th April 2012, 18:38

    I had a look at the .PDF Configuartion 8 gets my vote at a staggering 0.826 KM!

    Seriously though, 1A. Huge straight and a great looking, fast chicane.

Add your comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

All comments must abide by the comment policy. Comments may be moderated.
Want to post off-topic? Head to the forum.
See the FAQ for more information.