Vote for your Chinese Grand Prix driver of the weekend

2012 Chinese Grand Prix

Start, Shanghai, 2012Which driver had the best race weekend in China?

Compare all the drivers’ performances below and vote for who you think was the best driver of the Chinese Grand Prix weekend.

Driver notes

Sebastian Vettel – Reverting to the older-specification RB8 exhaust didn’t help Vettel’s cause. He had the sector times to get into Q3 but fell short by a few hundredths of a second. From 11th, he slipped back at the start as he took care to avoid the Williams pair. Much like last year, a two-stop strategy left him vulnerable at the end, as he dropped from second to fifth.
Mark Webber – Stuck with the newer exhausts and ended lap one in ninth after a customary sluggish getaway. Despite flying through the air after going off at turn 13, and running wide while trying to pass Raikkonen, he made an aggressive three-stop strategy work and passed his team mate for fourth with two laps to go.

Jenson Button – Couldn’t find grip in cool conditions during practice and was sixth in qualifying. Made a strong start to claim third, and made light work of traffic on his three-stop strategy. Was poised to attack Rosberg in the final stint when a slow pit stop dropped him back into traffic, and forced him to settle for second.
Lewis Hamilton – A gearbox change penalty turned second in qualifying into seventh on the grid. Nonetheless he moved up two places at the start and spent a busy race usually trying to find his way past another car. Seemed more circumspect in his approach, particularly with Massa and Perez, and lost some time which meant he was unable to capitalise on Button’s problem. But another third place gave him the championship lead.

Fernando Alonso – There was no opportunity for heroics this time. Alonso qualified ninth and finished there after going off while trying to pass Maldonado.
Felipe Massa – Started 12th and lost a place during the course of the race (despite Schumacher’s retirement). Massa viewed this as “a step forward compared to the first two races of the season”.

Nico Rosberg, Mercedes, Shanghai, 2012Michael Schumacher – Just as the W03 came good, the margin Schumacher had enjoyed over Rosberg in the first two races vanished. A 0.6s deficit in qualifying looked more like the situation last year. He lapped slower in the opening stint, but whether this was an act of tyre conservation that would have benefited him later on is something we’ll never know. He retired after his front-right wheel was not fitted correctly at his first pit stop.
Nico Rosberg – Led the Chinese Grand Prix for the third year in a row – only this time he won it. His pole position lap was superb, and he was confident enough to get out of his car before the end of the session, knowing pole was his. His team scrutinised his tyres after every pit stop for signs of the degradation they’d seen on Friday. As the race wore on it gradually became clear Rosberg had the car to win, and Button’s pit stop trouble sealed the deal.

Kimi Raikkonen – Didn’t complete any high-fuel running on Friday as Lotus struggled to get on top of the cool temperatures and their latest upgrade package, much of which was scrapped. Started fourth but ran into tyre trouble while two-stopping, plummeting ten places down the order in two laps and limping home 14th.
Romain Grosjean – A solid run to sixth was just the tonic he needed after completing only four laps in the first two races. Made his two-stopper work, and not just because his last stop was four laps’ later than Raikkonen’s. Time lost at that stop – and running wide at turn seven – showed he could have finished even higher.

Paul di Resta – A lowly 15th for the highest Force India on the grid shows how the team’s fortunes have changed. He couldn’t continue his points-scoring streak in the race, finishing behind the Saubers.
Nico Hulkenberg – Wheelspin at the start meant he slipped to 17th behind Kovalainen and damaged his nose. Lap ten repairs left him last, but a two-stop strategy allowed him to finish ahead of the Toro Rossos. However he couldn’t find a way past the struggling Raikkonen.

Kamui Kobayashi, Sauber, Shanghai, 2012Kamui Kobayashi – Sauber went into the weekend looking for better qualifying performance and found it – Kobayashi started third. But did it come at the expense of their race pace? Both drivers finished lower than they started. Kobayashi lost four places on lap one and his three-stop strategy dropped him back further. He ended the race tenth after defending strongly from his team mate.
Sergio Perez – Mystified by the sudden onset of understeer in qualifying as the track temperatures fell. But he made a good start, moving up two places and passing his team mate. Sauber switched him to a two-stop strategy as they began to doubt whether Kobayashi’s three-stopper was working. But a clutch problem at his second stop dropped him back behind his team mate and, ultimately, out of the points.

Daniel Ricciardo – The Toro Rosso pair found themselves scrapping to reach Q2, and again it was Ricciardo who came out on top. He spent the opening stint being held up by Hulkenberg and dropped back during the race.
Jean-Eric Vergne – Elected to make wholesale set-up changes and start the race from the pits. It paid off, and he was the fastest driver on the track for 10 out of 11 laps towards the end of the race as he lapped on soft tyres. He overhauled his team mate and caught the Raikkonen-Hulkenberg battle by the end of the race.

Bruno Senna, Williams, Shanghai, 2012Pastor Maldonado – Edged his team mate by a tiny margin in qualifying but lost two places at the start. Shadowed Senna throughout the race and finished a second behind, claiming his first points of the year.
Bruno Senna – Missing first practice turned out to be no great loss due to the rain. Made a good start but clipped Massa’s Ferrari, damaging his front wing. Like Maldonado, good pace on a two-stop strategy moved him up the order ahead of, among others, the two Ferraris. Passed the tyre-troubled Raikkonen but was demoted by Grosjean on the same lap for seventh.

Heikki Kovalainen – New technical director Mark Smith’s first race on the pit wall didn’t go entirely according to plan – Kovalainen lost time with an unspecified problem at the back of the car which left him last.
Vitaly Petrov – Was pleased to finish on the same lap as the leaders in a race that didn’t feature a safety car.

Pedro de la Rosa – 107% rule fears now look to be a thing of the past, but de la Rosa was still around a second per lap off the Marussias in the race.
Narain Karthikeyan – Was around 40 seconds behind de la Rosa before falling further back when he was lapped for the second time.

Timo Glock – Briefly held 18th at the start before being demoted by Petrov and the two Toro Rossos. Avoided being lapped until the very end of the race – when he lost so much time he was almost passed by Pic.
Charles Pic – The team took the canny decision to call Pic to drive through the pits on lap 48 without stopping, allowing the leaders to pass without costing him too much time. Until that point he had been around ten seconds behind Glock – he crossed the line less than half a second behind his team mate.

Qualifying and race results summary

Started Gap to team mate Laps leading team mate Pitted Finished Gap to team mate
Sebastian Vettel 11th +0.331s 32/56 2 5th +2.559s
Mark Webber 6th -0.331s 24/56 3 4th -2.559s
Jenson Button 5th +0.565s 56/56 3 2nd -5.386s
Lewis Hamilton 7th -0.565s 0/56 3 3rd +5.386s
Fernando Alonso 9th -0.273s 44/56 3 9th -5.523s
Felipe Massa 12th +0.273s 12/56 2 13th +5.523s
Michael Schumacher 2nd +0.57s 0/12 1
Nico Rosberg 1st -0.57s 12/12 2 1st
Kimi Raikkonen 4th +0.018s 43/56 2 14th +19.082s
Romain Grosjean 10th -0.018s 13/56 2 6th -19.082s
Paul di Resta 15th -0.428s 56/56 2 12th -8.94s
Nico Hulkenberg 16th +0.428s 0/56 2 15th +8.94s
Kamui Kobayashi 3rd -0.74s 19/56 3 10th -2.346s
Sergio Perez 8th +0.74s 37/56 2 11th +2.346s
Daniel Ricciardo 17th -0.781s 27/56 2 17th +11.4s
Jean-Eric Vergne 18th +0.781s 29/56 3 16th -11.4s
Pastor Maldonado 13th -0.006s 6/56 2 8th +1.046s
Bruno Senna 14th +0.006s 50/56 2 7th -1.046s
Heikki Kovalainen 19th -0.214s 27/53 4 23rd Not on same lap
Vitaly Petrov 20th +0.214s 26/53 2 18th Not on same lap
Pedro de la Rosa 23rd -0.589s 54/54 2 21st Not on same lap
Narain Karthikeyan 24th +0.589s 0/54 2 22nd Not on same lap
Timo Glock 21st -0.435s 51/55 2 19th -0.398s
Charles Pic 22nd +0.435s 4/55 2 20th +0.398s

Review the race data

Vote for your driver of the weekend

Which driver do you think did the best job this weekend?

Cast your vote below and explain your choice in the comments.

Who was the best driver of the Chinese Grand Prix weekend?

  • Sebastian Vettel (1%)
  • Mark Webber (2%)
  • Lewis Hamilton (10%)
  • Jenson Button (6%)
  • Fernando Alonso (2%)
  • Felipe Massa (0%)
  • Michael Schumacher (1%)
  • Nico Rosberg (69%)
  • Kimi Raikkonen (1%)
  • Romain Grosjean (2%)
  • Paul di Resta (0%)
  • Nico Hulkenberg (1%)
  • Kamui Kobayashi (1%)
  • Sergio Perez (0%)
  • Daniel Ricciardo (0%)
  • Jean-Eric Vergne (0%)
  • Pastor Maldonado (0%)
  • Bruno Senna (2%)
  • Heikki Kovalainen (0%)
  • Vitaly Petrov (0%)
  • Narain Karthikeyan (0%)
  • Pedro de la Rosa (0%)
  • Timo Glock (0%)
  • Charles Pic (2%)

Total Voters: 636

Loading ... Loading ...

An F1 Fanatic account is required in order to vote. If you do not have one, register an account here or read more about registering here.

2012 Chinese Grand Prix

Browse all 2012 Chinese Grand Prix articles

Image ?é?® Ferrari spa/Ercole Colombo, Daimler/Hoch Zwei, Sauber F1 Team, Williams/LAT

Advert | Go Ad-free

101 comments on Vote for your Chinese Grand Prix driver of the weekend

1 2 3 4
  1. Robbie (@robbie) said on 16th April 2012, 12:42

    Nico stamped his authority on the weekend.

    • laird18 said on 16th April 2012, 13:49

      Rosberg deserves the recognition, but I’m increasingly aware of how a driver’s profile is directly related to the success of his car.

      Look at Di Resta. He outqualified Hulkengerg by almost half a second, and lead him for every lap of the GP. He finished only 22 seconds off 2nd place, ahead of clearly faster cars (Ferrari + Lotus). He’s probably doing the best job possible in that car, yet, because the Force India is not a realistic challenger, he is rarly mentioned at the moment. (Similarly, I think Vergne has been very impressive, but is likewise rarely mentioned.)

      I’m hoping that Force India can take a step forwards in the European season. A young F1 driver’s prospects are inextricably linked to the momentum of their team.

    • zippyone (@zippyone) said on 17th April 2012, 17:49

      Simple, Rosberg is driver of the weekend (for me)

  2. Silverkeg (@silverkeg) said on 16th April 2012, 12:43

    I can’t even contemplate voting for anyone other than Nico.

    His qualifying lap is simply mesmerising to watch. Absolutely perfect, and a strong hit back after his previous mistakes in Q3

    and of course he won the race. Strategy was right and off the top of my head, I can’t think of one mistake he made the whole weekend.

    I’m sure others drove a good race too but I can’t see them in Rosberg’s shadows :P

  3. Prisoner Monkeys (@prisoner-monkeys) said on 16th April 2012, 12:46

    I’m going to vote for Grosjean. Rosberg is the obvious choice, but he really benefitted from Button’s botched stop. Grosjean, however, produced the kind of drive that he should have shown in Australia and Malaysia. It’s a little overdue, but he finally demonstrated the kind of potential that he has hinted at in the past. And he handled his strategy much better than Raikkonen did.

    Second palce goes to Charles Pic. He managed to stay within range of Glock with admirable consistency. The team may have finally made a decent choice for their second driver.

    • pluisje (@pluisje) said on 16th April 2012, 12:55

      Button only lost 5-10 seconds with that stop. Nico finished with a lead of more then 20 sec, even after losing a couple of seconds by slowing down for his team at the finish. It’s true that the pitstop dropped Button in the middle of traffic, but I don’t the it had any impact on the result in the end.

      • TimG (@timg) said on 16th April 2012, 13:22

        Button’s slow stop meant he came out of the pits behind several cars he would otherwise have cleared, and he lost more time getting past them.

        Rosberg was about 7 seconds down on Button when the McLaren stopped for the final time. Allowing 21 seconds for a stop, that should have put Button back out about 14 seconds behind with (I think) 18 laps to go. Button should have been able to close the gap but, of course, we’ll never know whether he’d have been able to make the pass stick. Stranger things have happened.

      • Incidentally… I would’ve voted for Rosberg even if Button had taken the win; a great performance.

    • Ridiculous. I can accept strange choices in some circumstances, but surely it’s impossible to pick anyone but Rosberg in this scenario.

      He dominated qualifying with half a second to Schumacher, in the same car. Waltzed from lights to flag to take his first, and well-deserved, victory with no errors along the way.

      You can’t possibly claim that Grosjean is worthier of the title than Nico.

      You just like to spark arguments, and… well… I know I’ve taken the bait!

    • xtophe (@xtophe) said on 16th April 2012, 13:11

      It’s not as if D’Ambrosio was blown away last year.

    • AdrianMorse (@adrianmorse) said on 16th April 2012, 13:27

      So you voted for Grosjean who didn’t make much of an impression in qualifying, and who did an “Alonso” in the race? Or are you not voting for Rosberg because of the anticipated voting behaviour of the other F1Fanatics (for example, Rosberg is going to win this anyway, so I don’t need to vote for him, or, I don’t like voting for popular choices)?

      I suspect that by placing Pic over Rosberg, you are just being contrary.

    • Hairs (@hairs) said on 16th April 2012, 14:08

      In this case, “showing his potential” translates to “Managed to stay on the track”. Hardly a ringing endorsement, nor an achievement of exceptional skill. It’s very much like Massa finishing miles behind his teammate and claiming an improvement because it wasn’t quite as embarrassing as it was during the last race.

      Equally “He could have finished higher” because of running wide at turn 7 is another way of saying “he made a balls of it”. Alonso made the same balls of it, but nonetheless. So far, he’s 3/3 on showing his supporters he’s quick (good qualifying results) and 2/1 on showing his detractors he’s still not up to the big time (two unnecessary crashes in races where only one other driver made an error).

      • Palle (@palle) said on 16th April 2012, 19:41

        +1. Grosjean seems to be the worst rookie of the year to me. But maybe its because it is more difficult to be a rookie in a car as high on the grid as the Lotus? No, thinking of Hamilton’s rookie year, Grosjean falls through somehow.

    • Todfod (@todfod) said on 16th April 2012, 17:18

      Rosberg is the obvious choice

      Exactly. So why would you vote for another driver then? Just trying to be different?

      • Robbie (@robbie) said on 16th April 2012, 18:42

        I think PM is just pointing out that in his opinion a few other drivers did something great that day too. I think it goes to the same kind of thinking that went on last year where SV didn’t always get DotW around here in spite of achieving pole and the win because he made it look too easy, and the nod went instead to someone who did something more unexpected with lesser equipment.

        For me NR is the obvious choice, full stop. I think it is questionable how much he benefitted from JB’s botched stop, so I would have left it at NR being the obvious choice, with runner up choices getting an honourable mention. But thank goodness we don’t all think alike or wouldn’t life be boring. PM has proved it is not ‘impossible’ to pick someone other than NR for DotW.

  4. pejte (@pejte) said on 16th April 2012, 12:47

    Britney is one of my least favorite drivers to say the least, but this weekend he was dominant. My vote goes to Rosberg.

  5. Slr (@slr) said on 16th April 2012, 12:48

    Can’t be anyone else but Rosberg. There were other drivers who had a good weekend, but no one but Rosberg deserves to win this poll. Rosberg put in a superb qualifying lap and was almost faultless in the race. He did have a bit of luck, but every Grand Prix victory has luck involved. Button may not have won in Australia if Hamilton had a better start, and Alonso would not have won a dry Malaysian GP.

    The only other driver who possibly deserves consideration is Hamilton who qualified well, and put in a solid race performance. Kobayashi might have been considered if the car was as economical with the tyres yesterday like it was in the first two races, the same goes for Raikkonen. If Button was better in qualifying, I would considered him also.

    • Jeanrien (@jeanrien) said on 17th April 2012, 19:13

      @Slr : Totally agree that other drivers could have been considered IF … But for Rosberg it was as close as it could be to the perfect WE. Very impressive during quali and nothing to say about his race, he was all by himself (and we didn’t see him a lot on the footage, it’s maybe why people tend to forget about him and it wasn’t a great show as he didn’t have to pass anyone … but still the best drive of the week end for sure)

  6. spankythewondermonkey (@spankythewondermonkey) said on 16th April 2012, 12:58

    has to be nico. his quali lap was just superb and followed it up by not putting a foot wrong in the race.
    vettel did well finishing in 5th after a poor quali, but not enough to wrest the DotW from nico
    lewis put in a good strong drive, doing well to make up for most of the grid penalty, but the honours must go to nico.

  7. sketchyterry (@sketchyterry) said on 16th April 2012, 13:02

    Doh I just votted for button, face palm! I meant to vote for Nico, supreme Lap, supreme race pace, awesome job. Barely put a foot wrong that Quali with that perfect lap to put him on poll to.

  8. andae23 (@andae23) said on 16th April 2012, 13:06

    This is a no-brainer: Nico Rosberg. 0.5 second quicker in qualifying and 15s or so ahead of the McLarens. He was dominant this weekend.

    It has to be said that numerous other drivers would have been candidates for best driver if Rosberg wouldn’t have showed up. Both Red Bulls recovered from a bad qualifying and a worse start. Raikkonen did a fine job for someone who hasn’t raced open-wheel in two years. And how about the to Williams-drivers? Almost collided in turn one, but both climbed their ways up to 7th and 8th!

    • jpowell (@jpowell) said on 16th April 2012, 17:19

      I am sure Nico deserves first choice ,but I think as good as it was if Hamilton had been out on a new set of tyres on his first lap the pole gap would have been much closer.

    • Jimmy (@jimmy) said on 17th April 2012, 3:13

      Voted for Hamilton, but I’m especially happy for Maldonado. He’s an entertaining driver to watch and has had his share of bad luck. Hopefully he will improve his consistency from here and maybe give us some surprise in Monaco.

  9. Maciek (@maciek) said on 16th April 2012, 13:14

    Charles Pic – The team took the canny decision to call Pic to drive through the pits on lap 48 without stopping, allowing the leaders to pass without costing him too much time.

    I hadn’t realised that. Canny indeed, but if I was the FIA, I would regulate this before it becomes a popular option for backmarkers. Unnecessary traffic in the pitlane seems like asking for mishaps.

    • Girts (@girts) said on 16th April 2012, 13:50

      @Maciek Well, on the track, we have seen collisions between backmarkers and those who lap them. So that ain’t entirely safe either. And Pirelli tyres have created much more additional traffic in the pitlane so I believe that FIA would look there first if they were concerned about too many cars in the pits.

      I think that having the current pitlane speed limit is enough to prevent teams from doing like Marussia too often. Normally that shouldn’t be the quickest option. Anyway, as long as nothing better is implemented to resolve the ‘problem’ of backmarkers (like getting rid of the blue flags, longer circuits, shorter races etc.), I believe that the situation of the slowest teams shouldn’t be weakened further.

    • Keith Collantine (@keithcollantine) said on 16th April 2012, 13:51

      Nah, it hardly ever happens, it’s not a big deal. And do we really want yet more rules?

      • Maciek (@maciek) said on 16th April 2012, 14:05

        No, sure, certainly there are enough rules as it is – but if it does become a popular option, it will be a matter of time before stuff hits the fan when a backmarker forces a front-runner to wait for a safe release or worse is involved in some incident in the pitlane. Don’t get me wrong, I have nothing against the backmarkers and I’ll be first to tell you that lapping cars is a lost skill in today’s F1, but cars driving through the pitlane without good reason seems like bad precedent.

        • Burnout (@burnout) said on 16th April 2012, 15:40

          The only reason Marussia did that is because behind Raikkonen there was a train of 12 cars all covered by 15 seconds or so. Leaving Pic out to get lapped by 13 cars in succession in one lap would have cost him far more than the 17 seconds it takes to drive through the pits.

          Honestly, when was the last time we saw that many cars following each other so closely and so late in the race? I don’t think this is an issue that needs to be regulated just yet.

  10. GeeMac (@geemac) said on 16th April 2012, 13:15

    I can’t be anyone other than Nico. Majestic quali lap and a solid, mature race performance mean that he would have gotten my vote even if Button hadn’t had his pitstop issued and had managed to catch and pass him.

  11. scribbler (@scribbler) said on 16th April 2012, 13:25

    In my opinion Button, had it not been for the Botched Pit stop would have been in clear air and bullied Rosberg into a mistake like he did with Vettel in Canadian GP. The laptimes might not support my theory but in my opinion Button would have been at least 0.5 sec quicker per lap in clear air and is able to save his tyres better than anyone when hes out doing consistent laps. For me Rosberg is a bit to obvious a choice and Button performed the best under considerably more pressure. Being in a train of 7 – 8 reasonably competitive cars didn’t help any of the front runners lap times and massively Flattered Rosbergs performance. Not that he wasn’t very impressive because he was and i am a fan.

    • Robbie (@robbie) said on 16th April 2012, 16:04

      Just a few thoughts in response…NR may have also been able to dial it up a notch and keep the gap to JB…his lead was such that he/his team may have been playing conservatively because they could afford to…also, who’s to say NR didn’t feel pressure? Methinks he likely was well aware that a mistake might cost him his first win. He may have also wondered if at some point his tires would fall off the cliff, such has his experience been in the first two races.

      • scribbler (@scribbler) said on 16th April 2012, 19:58

        I agree that NR may not have been giving it the “full beans” but to be fair thats probably what kept him on the black stuff. I disagree that he could have improved his pace without further degrading his tyres. He’s not renound for good tyre conservation where as JB is. Its difficult to say for sure what would have happened had we not been robbed of the ultimate chase by an unusually poor mclaren pitstop. its just my gut feeling we would have seen him real him in lap after lap. I’m more disapointed that MS had to retire from the race though, would have loved to see that silver arrows battle. My feeling was that MS was cleverly saving his tyres to pound some quick laps in and do nico on the second stop undercut.

        • Robbie (@robbie) said on 16th April 2012, 20:19

          Fair enough…you might be right…the only thing I can say in defence of NR here is that he is not known for tire conservation but then again he is not known to have found himself in a race-winning/WDC level car whereas JB has had much more practice with cars that ‘work better’ and therefore might inherantly be easier on tires. JB is good at it too with his driving style but it helps when you are in top cars. I’ll give NR some time yet in a car that is capable of winning before I can say either way how good he is at having pace and conserving tires at the same time. I think the fact that he/they finally got this car to not hit the cliff of tire fallout means he might have been able to push more without killing his tires. There’s also a chance that JB might have had to push his tires into submission in spite of his reputation for being easy on them. We’ll never know.

          • Craig said on 16th April 2012, 23:43

            I don’t get all this “that MS was cleverly saving his tyres to pound some quick laps in and do nico on the second stop undercut” talk. How is that possible? The tyres that he was supposedly saving were taken off in the first pitstop. He then retired at around turn 6 on his outlap….He surely would have pushed his original set to his limit – he did after all pit the lap prior to Rosberg.

            Anyways, Nico for me. He deserves it after all these years and drove a great weekend bar one slight off.

            Would he have won if Hamilton hadn’t got a penalty and Button didn’t have issues with his final stop?

            In the first case I think not. In the second; it would have made for a very interesting race.

  12. Tango (@tango) said on 16th April 2012, 13:27

    The big boys were their usual good.The podium was well owned by all present, and DoTw goes to the one sitting on top. Webber gave it all and Vettel was fast albeit well helped by flawless strategy. Alonso did his best, and it wasn’t enough, but not for lack of talent or trying.

    The three Frenchmen at last all had a very descent race, and for once the heaps of nationalistic praises from the TF1 presentor were well deserved.

    If I had to really point fingers, it would be to Karthikeyan and Massa. I am sorry to put Massa in there but being the only driver bar the bottom three cars not to have scored is scandalous. With a really tight midfield with young and hungry talent, the Massa we have been seeing for the last year is taking the seat from another.He spent the whole race slowing others down. Great for the spectacle, but as for raising the bar high, there’s work left to do ! As for Karthikeyan, being outclassed by PDLR in a dry race can not be defended.

  13. Alfisti37 (@alfisti37) said on 16th April 2012, 13:54

    I voted for Rosberg for his superb performance, but I really want to give some credits to Hamilton and Webber. Both of them raced all the way trough the train without clashing with anyone, and that very lap featuring the battle between them was epic. They might not have the best result as Rosberg’s, but they do deserve some credits.

  14. OmarR-Pepper (@omarr-pepper) said on 16th April 2012, 14:01

    Button. Because if it weren’t for the it problems he could have attacked Nico (and make sure he would have passed him eventually). Well deserved win by Rosberg anyway

    • andae23 (@andae23) said on 16th April 2012, 14:15

      But does the race winner have to be the BEST driver? Look at how Button performed in qualifying: 3rd row in a car that is capable of being on pole (He got outqualified by his teammate by half a second!). Thanks to this lack of performance in qualifying, he ended up in the situations that you describe as problems and meant he didn’t get the race win he could have had. So why would anyone vote for Button ???

      • MW (@) said on 16th April 2012, 14:27

        Exactly!
        I think one of the most impressive things about Nico’s drive was how he handled the two stop strategy to perfection.
        Having secured pole with a blistering pace he hit the sweet spot between good pace and good tyre management.
        Button had a great drive but Nico’s was the perfect drive.

      • David-A (@david-a) said on 16th April 2012, 14:45

        I agree, and that’s what Button did for most of last year too. Nico Rosberg was the best driver of this weekend.

        • James (@goodyear92) said on 16th April 2012, 16:50

          And the year before. That’s why it annoys me when people say Button never makes mistakes. He does, not having the pace in qualifying can cost you alot in the race and it happens to him alot.

    • Robbie (@robbie) said on 16th April 2012, 15:57

      @omarr-pepper…I’m of the belief that NR spent the last third of his race not nearly pushing the car like he could have…ie. saying would-coulda-shoulda on behalf of JB, as we could all do with all drivers who aren’t the winner on any given day, is one thing, but let’s not forget how in control NR was of this race, especially after his final stop. Methinks he ‘coulda’ dialed it up a notch if he had to and ‘woulda’ made it look even easier if he had to.

1 2 3 4

Add your comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

All comments must abide by the comment policy. Comments may be moderated.
Want to post off-topic? Head to the forum.
See the FAQ for more information.