Michael Schumacher, Mercedes, Monaco, 2012

Rate the race: 2012 Monaco Grand Prix

Debates and PollsPosted on | Author Keith Collantine

Michael Schumacher, Mercedes, Monaco, 2012What did you think of the Monaco Grand Prix? Share your verdict on today’s race.

F1 Fanatic holds polls on each race to find out which fans thought were the best and worst races during a season.

Please vote based on how entertaining and exciting you thought the race was, not on how your preferred driver or team performed.

Rate the race out of ten and leave a comment below:

Rate the 2012 Monaco Grand Prix out of ten

  • 1 (4%)
  • 2 (4%)
  • 3 (9%)
  • 4 (14%)
  • 5 (16%)
  • 6 (23%)
  • 7 (18%)
  • 8 (8%)
  • 9 (2%)
  • 10 (3%)

Total Voters: 773

Loading ... Loading ...

1 = ‘Terrible’, 10 = ‘Perfect’

You need an F1 Fanatic account to vote. Register an account here or read more about registering here.

See the results for past seasons here:

Image ?? Daimler/Hoch Zwei

282 comments on “Rate the race: 2012 Monaco Grand Prix”

  1. I thought the race was pretty dull so I only gave it a 5, and even that may have been too generous.

    The leading cars may have been close at the finish but at no point during the race did I feel that we would see the order change except through the pitstops.

    If only the rain which arrived after the race could have started earlier

  2. A solid 3 for me. A big yawn. Should just replace the race with 2x qualifying format sessions. The average fastest time wins. Now THAT would be interesting to watch.

  3. Gave it a 3, why do they keep running here!

  4. 4/10
    Sorry, I loved how close the top 6 were after 78 laps, but the action was… non-existent. I always enjoy an F1 race, and this was no exception, but apart from close racing and wise pit stop strategies we never saw a serious overtaking attempt.

  5. It’s no longer suitable for F1 racing. They should change the track significantly or drop the race.

    I fell asleep. That’s normally reserved for the girlfriend.

    1. Forgot to say I gave it a generous 4 but it probably should have been a 3.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

All comments are moderated. See the Comment Policy and FAQ for more.