How Ferrari solved their exhaust problem

F1 technology

Felipe Massa, Ferrari, Valencia, 2012One of the defining characteristics of F1 in 2012 is how closely matched all of the teams are.

Last year Red Bull’s mastery of flexible wings and exhaust blown diffusers gave them a decisive edge. Both are subject to much stiffer regulations this year. The positioning of exhausts has been heavily restricted and there is now a much more stringent front wing flex test.

However exhaust positioning remains important, as Ferrari has shown with its 2012 car. When they first launched the F2012 its exhausts were as far to the rear as the regulations allowed (remember the ‘Acer ducts’) and pointed towards the inside of the tyres. The intention was to replicate the benefits of the exhaust blow technology from 2011 by sealing the diffuser.

Unfortunately Ferrari?s solution had adverse effects. The rear tyres overheated from the hot exhaust plume.

Also, by placing the exhausts at the rearmost point the ‘coke bottle’ zone was crowded, making it difficult to get a consistent low pressure zone above the diffuser, which meant the car struggled for rear-end grip.

Even before the opening race Ferrari designers hunkered down in Maranello to design what was effectively a B-spec car. The biggest engineering challenge was to move the exhausts forward and de-clutter the coke-bottle area. Unfortunately this required the sidepods and radiators to redesigned, which required new crash tests.

The updated sidepods made their first appearance at the Mugello test in early May and featured conventional a conventional 2012 set-up with the exhaust exits as far forward as possible and blowing inboard towards the beam wing.

This single change improve the airflow to the coke-bottle zone and resulted in the F2012 gaining over half a second per lap. From that point Ferrari had a stable aerodynamic baseline from which to develop the exhausts further. The next sizeable upgrade came a few weeks ago in Montreal and was retained for Valencia.

Revised Ferrari exhaust

The first illustration shows the latest Ferrari configuration, which is very similar to McLaren?s original concept. The exhaust exit area is still as far forward as possible but now juts out over the sidepod undercut. This allows air to be aimed towards the outer part of the diffuser in order to replicate the 2011 blown diffuser effect.

The exhaust exit is shaped to pull the plume downwards so it bends towards the floor ?ǣ this is called the Coanda effect (see earlier article on McLaren’s exhausts).

The other benefit of this configuration is that clean fast-flowing air sweeps around the sidepod undercut unobstructed feeding the coke bottle zone. This creates a low pressure area below the exhaust exit which further helps ??pull? the exhaust gasses towards the diffuser.

But what about the rear tyres – won?t they still suffer from overheating? Partly ?ǣ but the gasses are directed a little more inboard and towards the diffuser rather than the tyres so it is less of an issue.

Revised Ferrari exhaust - airflow

The second illustration shows the direction of the both the exhaust gas (green arrow) and the airflow around the sidepod undercut (blue arrow). One can see how the exhaust solution is designed to ensure minimal interference between the exhaust gas and the air feeding the coke-bottle area. Red Bull use a tunnel to achieve a similar effect – the advantage of that solution is it allows more precise control of airflow.

In addition the yellow circle contains three slots carved in the floor. Not visible in the illustration are small slits from these slots to the edge of the floor. This means that the floor is one continuous surface as the slots aren?t closed.

These allow air to seep under the floor and energise the airflow around the rear tyres and diffuser, which improves the sealing effect of the diffuser edge. Red Bull tried a similar development but with holes in the floor instead – a configuration that was ruled illegal by the FIA but not before it had appeared at several races.

It is a testament to the Maranello squad that the exhaust changes have more or less closed the performance gap to McLaren and Red Bull.

But at Valencia Red Bull introduced a revised version of its exhaust tunnel concept which appeared to give Vettel a good chunk of lap time. Unlike Silverstone, Valencia isn?t a demanding aero circuit, so this weekend should give us a good read on how significant Red Bull?s innovation is.

F1 technology

Browse all F1 technology articles

Image ?? Ferrari spa/Ercole Colombo, illustration ?? John Beamer for F1 Fanatic

Advert | Go Ad-free

13 comments on How Ferrari solved their exhaust problem

  1. apsiloritis (@apsiloritis) said on 5th July 2012, 12:50

    Great article! very informative.

  2. BBQ said on 5th July 2012, 13:00

    Thanks John B. for this write-up. I was hopping you show those Ferrari floor slots as I would really want to know why this was allowed and that of RBR was deemed illegal. But never mind, as I tried the understand that specific paragraph in the rules but could not see why the Ferrari slot was legal. I understand the C31 (Sauber) also has those slots but I have never seen them.

    Once again, McLaren introduces a concept others make the best of it and overtake them. Just as A. Newey said at the beginning of last season: “it is annoying if they copy you and use it to beat you”…. lolz

    • MazdaChris (@mazdachris) said on 5th July 2012, 13:08

      Because the slots in the floor run right to the edge of the floor, they don’t constitute a ‘fully enclosed hole’, rather a shaped edge to the floor. The gap can be tiny, like less than a mm, but it has to be there. Ferrari and Sauber were doing that, while Red Bull had a fully enclosed hole which they were told they couldn’t have.

  3. Klaas (@klaas) said on 5th July 2012, 13:03

    Nice insight, thanks. Could you make some illustrations with RedBull’s new exhaust?

  4. rdpunk (@rdpunk) said on 5th July 2012, 14:03

    Great article! This is what I like about Modern Formula one, teams can update, change and in this case nearly design a whole new car to be faster and faster and won’t stop until the season is over. I know that the economical climate is poor and spending should be cut but Ferrari have been a prime example of why it shouldn’t be. They have probably spent more money that we could ever imagine on these updates but they have done it and will probably make the money back with winnings ect.

  5. so woonderfull car

  6. Mike (@mike) said on 5th July 2012, 14:40

    What a great read :D I think I’ll have to read it again!

  7. Atticus (@atticus-2) said on 5th July 2012, 14:45

    I would like to comment on the last two sentences.

    Is it safe to say Vettel have had that sudden significant advantage at Valencia because of the revised version of the exhaust tunnel concept? If so, and assuming that the aero downforce gain is more significant in Silverstone could we have been in for an even larger Red Bull-Vettel advantage in Great Briatin, had it not been for the rain which is expected to wash away such – in absolute terms – minor advantages?

    • caci99 (@caci99) said on 5th July 2012, 18:56

      @atticus-2 I think the advantage of Red Bull was not only to the update they brought in Valencia, but also due to the characteristics of the track itself which looks like suits Red Bull better. Red Bull until now has being strong in hot conditions, like Lotus as well. We will understand this week how true this is, considering that Silverstone is a lot cooler, and if it doesn’t rain.
      On the other hand, at Silverstone, the downforce Red Bull has gained will not play that great, because, if my understanding is correct, in Silverstone is easier to generate downforce because of the high speed turns, while in tracks like Valencia or Monaco is harder. So, even the teams with less sophisticated design can achieve the desired downforce. That’s how I understand it, but I may be wrong :).

  8. BasCB (@bascb) said on 5th July 2012, 15:05

    Thanks for another very interesting tech piece John.

  9. AndrewTanner (@andrewtanner) said on 6th July 2012, 13:27

    I loved this bit @john-beamer

    Not visible in the illustration are small slits from these slots to the edge of the floor. This means that the floor is one continuous surface as the slots aren’t closed.

    So simple when you think about it!

    Thanks again :)

  10. dkpioe said on 6th July 2012, 14:20

    reading this article, im starting to think now the reason teams are having problems with their tyres this year are because of their exhaust designs, as the tyres havent changed much from last year. exhaust gasses overheating tyres, its very interesting reading and makes sense putting them further from the tyres has resulted in ferrari moving forward

Add your comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

All comments must abide by the comment policy. Comments may be moderated.
Want to post off-topic? Head to the forum.
See the FAQ for more information.