Romain Grosjean, Lotus, Montreal, 2012

FIA issues new clarification on defensive driving

2012 F1 seasonPosted on | Author Keith Collantine

Romain Grosjean, Lotus, Montreal, 2012FIA race director Charlie Whiting has given drivers further guidance on the limits they must respect when defending their position.

The document, seen by F1 Fanatic, puts in writing several points discussed with drivers on the Friday of the Canadian Grand Prix weekend.

In it Whiting states that: “Any driver defending his position on a straight and before any braking area, may use the full width of the track during his first move provided no significant portion of the car attempting to pass is alongside his” (emphasis as in original document).

“Whilst defending in this way the driver may not leave the track without justifiable reason.”

Whiting goes on to define the term “significant portion”, stating that this applies if the car attempting to pass gets any part of its front wing alongside the rear wheels of the car in front.

The rules on defensive driving were previously clarified during the off-season. The previously accepted convention that a driver must leave room for a rival when returning to the racing line between braking zones was codified in Article 20.3 of the Sporting Regulations.

The document also addresses cases where it is not clear whether a driver has gained an advantage by going off the track. Whiting states: “we feel the stewards should be encouraged to use their discretion in cases where it is not entirely clear whether or not a driver has gained any direct or immediate advantage”.

This relates to article 20.2 of the Sporting Regulations which includes this stipulation: “Should a car leave the track the driver may rejoin, however, this may only be done when it is safe to do so and without gaining any advantage.”

2012 F1 season

Browse all 2012 F1 season articles

Image ?? Ferrari spa/Ercole Colombo

64 comments on “FIA issues new clarification on defensive driving”

Jump to comment page: 1 2
  1. Some of the stuff Senna (the late Ayrton) used to do makes Maldonado and Kamikake Kobyashi look like saints. Also I seem to recall Schumi deliberately taking opponents out to try and win a world championship (pretty sure one backfired on him). At the end of the day though its why we love F1 more than an other type of car racing. I just hope they don’t make it sterile by making people scared to push the limits. As long as the stewards apply commonsense and the drivers use their heads. You don’t see Hamilton and Button crash when they have their ding dong battles (what’s wrong with Button btw). They give each other room when it means a failure to do so would cause a crash. Webber taking Alonso the last race was another case in point. If that was the old days or one of todays young guns it could have ended in tears.

  2. themagicofspeed (@)
    14th July 2012, 22:08

    What a nanny-state load of utter rubbish. Stop dictating to racing drivers how they can or can not race, and let them race authentically and freely. If that means one of those two drivers trips over the other, boo hoo, so what. Thats Racing. Its saddening that for a man of considerable experience, he has never heard of it. Actually, its what Formula One used to be all about, back before money came along and became more important than anything else. He’s getting old so he probably cant remember.

    The FIA (Fools & Idiots Association) needs to stop sticking their nose in where its not welcome. If a driver wants to defend his position, assuming its sensible to do so (i.e unless its the likes of a Marussia or whatever holding up a front runner who is clearly faster, in which case, *** out of the way!) they should be allowed to do whatever they want to keep it. If the driver behind cant get past, so what, they obviously are not the better driver.

    This winds me up so much.

    The only exception, is when there’s championship contenders being held up by some rookie fool in his excuse for a Formula One car. Thats not on.

    1. If there aren’t rules on what drivers can and can’t do to defend position then we’ll just end up with drivers ramming each other off the track.

      If you want to watch a destruction derby, fine, but I want to watch the pinnacle of motor racing. As long as the rules are clear and fair I’m happy.

      1. themagicofspeed (@)
        18th July 2012, 23:42

        I agree there should be some rules – like if you pass someone while not on the track you have to give it back, etc etc those sort of rules, but they shouldnt be sticking their nose in dictating how many times they can move in a braking zone. As long as theres no deliberation in causing a collision etc, i dont think its their right to interfere in the art of racing. They are rich, fancy men in suits with rulebooks, and they ought to remember that and get down of that towering high horse of theirs.

Jump to comment page: 1 2

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

All comments are moderated. See the Comment Policy and FAQ for more.