Singapore, 2012

How can Singapore’s F1 track be improved?

Debates and pollsPosted on | Author Keith Collantine

Singapore, 2012The Singapore Grand Prix has been one of the most successful recent additions to the F1 calendar.

Ahead of last week’s race Bernie Ecclestone and the race organisers announced a five-year extension on the original deal which will keep it on the calendar until at least 2017.

Compare that to the other track which joined the calendar in 2008, Valencia, which did not feature on the provisional 2013 F1 calendar which appeared before the race.

However the Singapore track is not without its shortcomings and the possibility of changing it has been raised.

One of the chief concerns of the race organisers is the costs involved in constructing the circuit for each race and the disruption it causes to the city. They put the total cost of hosting the race at ??75m.

There are also practical problems with the circuit, such as the difficulty of recovering stranded cars. In the five races at the track so far, the safety car has been deployed eight times.

The slow average speed around the lap means the race can fail to go the distance, as happened this year.

One part of the circuit which drivers would like to see altered is also one of few corners on the track to have earned a name: the Singapore Sling chicane at turn ten.

Sebastian Vettel explained the drivers’ objection to it during the post-qualifying press conference: “I think we’ve discussed it many times, every year actually, to find a better solution in turn ten which probably requires to take a little bit of land from the cricket club for those couple of days or maybe remove the pavement for three/four days.

“I don’t know, but if you consider the costs for this whole event, I think taking a pavement away and putting it back on shouldn’t be a big problem,” he added. “In terms of safety I think that’s one of the worst corners we have on the calendar, because you’ve got these big kerbs, big bumps and it’s a bit tricky to find a better solution right now with the space we have, but I think that’s something we need to work on.”

Lewis Hamilton and Pastor Maldonado backed the world champion’s view.

Changing the Singapore track

A straightfoward way to tackles some of the problems could be to direct the cars left instead of right at turn eight (by the red marker on the above map), rejoining the present circuit at what is currently turn 14.

Kimi Raikkonen, Lotus, Singapore, 2012This would reduce the length of track which needs to be illuminated and cut out some section of track where recovering a car is difficult without a safety car. Although it would mean losing features such as the Andersen bridge, it would cut out the drivers’ least favourite corner (pictured).

With the present track length just over 5km, cutting this much of it would bring it close to the FIA’s minimum length for F1 tracks of 3.5km. A Grand Prix would likely have over 80 laps to reach the minimum race distance.

As Singapore is a street circuit, the opportunities for change are limited by the surrounding network of roads. But there may be opportunities to increase the use of purpose-built sections, such as the start/finish area.

Although Singapore has struggled to produce good races (averaging 6.3 in Rate the Race over the past four years), it has proved a popular addition to the calendar and those who’ve been to the race seem to have enjoyed it very much.

Whatever changes they make, hopefully the organisers see fit to keep it as a proper street circuit where drivers have to cope with a bumpy surface, a twisty track and foreboding walls.

What do you like or dislike about the Singapore Grand Prix track? What needs to be changed – and how? Have your say in the comments.

Debates and polls

Browse all debates and polls

Image ?? Sahara Force India F1 Team, Singapore GP/Sutton

138 comments on “How can Singapore’s F1 track be improved?”

Jump to comment page: 1 2 3
  1. By cancelling it.

    1. Comment of the year.

    2. Ha, good to see you on here too (McP here). But yeah, unless they can actually change the track to give rise to overtaking, it’s always going to be more of a spectacle that a race, and I for a fact don’t like that. But then, the track gets it’s money because the spectators seem to love it (I guess again for the spectacle, but also for the atmosphere it must have), so the organisers obviously wont care.
      I just wonder if a good tack layout could assist it. It’s unlikely, but it’s worth a try before it gets cancelled in five years time for not having any good races.

    3. I agree but if they were to cancel every GP at circuits that produce consistently boring races there would be fewer than 10 races left on the calendar.

    4. I don’t think Vettel’s fans will agree. If they exists, of course.

      1. I enjoyed this years Grand Prix despite Vettel winning. How can you say there were no overtakes?! I think this grand prix was actually better than the belgian grand prix this year

    5. Same would apply to Monaco then? At least Singapore has a USP. Personally i think it’s a great track.

      1. I think Singapore should stay, but Monaco is the most prestigious and demanding events on the calendar.

      2. Gimmick that’s only used to suit the European time zone.

    6. That was my first thought, well said. It’s time they paid more attention the fans of the sport rather than Bernie’s pockets.

  2. Personally, I would not change it at all as I see no problems with the circuit. The driver’s complaints about the Singapore sling are silly, it is unusual but that’s what makes it great. Many of the latest circuits have nothing unique to them. I hope turn 18 also stays if changes are made because that corner catches out a lot of drivers. The circuit must remain long to offer more chances to make mistakes, so I’d be firmly against the suggestion in the article of turning left at turn 8.

      1. yes, much shorter lap, more laps, more overtaking opportunites into T1, T7
        Also cut out all the turns from T16-final corner, its just chicane, chicane, chicane, last 2 turns

    1. Couldn’t agree more @slr

    2. @slr

      The circuit must remain long to offer more chances to make mistakes

      I don’t follow your reasoning here. While a shorter lap would mean fewer opportunities to make mistakes over a single lap, that wouldn’t necessarily be the case over the same race distance (i.e., with more laps).

      1. @keithcollantine I was talking about over one lap (i.e. a hot quali lap) rather than a race distance.

    3. The driver’s complaints about the Singapore sling are silly

      Why? How?

      I think if you get drivers complaining then you have to seriously look at why.

      1. Simple: He’s not the one in the car.

      2. I think they’re not silly, but I don’t think it should change; turn 10 is one of the defining features of the track; it’s the corner everyone associates Singapore with.
        It’s quite exciting watching onboard footage of it, and I believe that to make it safer, they should have curbs with either a gradually increasing, or a constant gradient, so the curbs act like circular ramps; that should allow the drivers to take it a bit faster, and if the curbs were flatter, and due to the small gradient, the drivers will be able to ride the curbs more, thus reducing the risk of damage due to the small angle at which the curb meets the tarmac.

        1. To clarify, I’d like the curbs to be circular, and for them not to protrude from the tarmac too much, much like the initial curb at the Ascari Chicane (from 2011, 2010, 2009, etc but not 2012)
          Only for the other sides to be identical to the curbs facing the track

    4. yes i like this coment!

    5. What about this idea: a crossover at turn 8/14!

      So instead of going right at turn eight, make it a straight there and take ‘turn 10’ the other way around (no sling necessary, because of slow exit of the turn before that). So give the circuit an 8-layout like Suzuka. The only drawback would be an expensive crossover at turn 8/14, but you get the straights in return!

  3. Turn 10 defo needs to go. It’s an awful corner, and not a very safe one. I’ve complained about it since ever here, and sometimes I get responses like “it’s an unique corner, an unique challenge and needs to stay” which I think it’s missing the point completely, but oh well…

    I don’t know how to improve that track, I guess you need to know that bit of the city to give a proper suggestion…

    To be entirely honest, I don’t like the Singapore track, so whatever they change will be welcomed, specially if it means racing will be better (or safer). But I think it should stay because it’s proven to be a massive challenge for the drivers and the cars, plus it’s a great spectacle. Watching the cars racing at night it’s still as cool as it was in 2008.

    1. Personally, I would round Turn 10 (which is the major problem corner) off – the picture at the bottom of the article makes it clear that there is the space to make it into a more gradual, high speed left hand turn.

      The other thing I would change is get rid of the last stadium section where the cars go under the seating – there are just two many 90 degree turns in that last section of the lap. Make it a flat out run to join those two sections of the same road together.

      1. @heskin-radiophonic

        I would round Turn 10 (which is the major problem corner) off – the picture at the bottom of the article makes it clear that there is the space to make it into a more gradual, high speed left hand turn

        There’s no chance of them doing that with so little room for run-off there, which is what Vettel alluded to.

        1. That’s a shame. After all it is a street circuit. How fast would they go? And how Does it compare with other sections?

    2. @fer-no65 I think Martin Brundle hit the nail on the head when he said the reason drivers don’t like the corner is because it makes them look silly.

      Not in the sense that it’s a challenging or difficult corner to get right, but that it’s so inelegant you can’t help but think they’re not driving it well.

      To put it another way, I don’t think I’ve ever seen a driver go through it and thought “they nailed that”. It’s more like “they survived that”.

      1. Yeah that sums it up pretty well. People say it’s a challenge, but it’s like a challenge in the way that literally threading a needle is. Sure, it’s hard to do, but does anyone actually enjoy the act?

      2. @keithcollantine that’s what I’ve always said. It’s a complete car breaker. If they want to “make it interesting”, when why not spil oil on the track? It’s a survival test, and if something goes wrong, bang, you hit the wall while still in the air !

        It’s hardly a challenge. It’s just ridiculous.

  4. I think that the the Singapore Sling chicane at turn ten should be made into a smooth corner, it would make the track faster during that particular section and would prevent the cars hoping over the curbs.

    1. That’s not possible for safety reasons, but I think they could simply ease the chicane a bit, with less obtrusive kerbs.

    2. There isn’t enough run-off there to have a fast corner.

      Make it a fast corner & if anyone went off there they would have a big impact on the outside barrier & then likely slide down the track to have another big impact in the runoff just before the bridge. Not to mention that in a race with a lot of cars around having a car bouncing off a barrier back onto the track wouldn’t be a good situation.

      The 3 kurb chicane isn’t ideal but is the safest solution to run round that part of the track, Whatever else you do wouldn’t leave enough run-off. After the 1st race in 2008 Charlie asked the drivers for feedback & alternatives & they gave feedback on the kurbs (And they have been tweaked over the 5 years) but nothing on possible alternatives to the layout & thats why nothing has ever really been changed there.

      The issue with cutting the track in half as Keith suggested in his article is that you then take away 2-3 possible passing spots that exist in that section (Turns 10, 14 & 15) of the track & basically leave the track with only 1 passing spot (The DRS zone).

      I like the layout as it is, Despite the bitching on here after this years race I actually thought it was a very entertaining race & I quite enjoyed the 2010/2011 races as well. Some intresting strategy, good/close racing, some good fighting & some good overtaking.
      I personally enjoyed Singapore far more than most of the races which recieved higher ratings earlier in this year as it featured far more of what I enjoy about racing (The things I listed above).

      Im also confused as to how people can say there was no overtaking as I saw quite a lot through this years race & most were not easy DRS drive-by’s either.

      1. I agree with everything GT_Racer said, I’m not a fan of turn 10 but it adds a bit of spectacle. The only way I can think of improving it is to lower the curbs, but then you’ll have Massa cutting the whole thing…

  5. I don’t think that turn 10 is the biggest problem at least not from spectators view, it might be for the drivers though. Instead I’d extend the track by one block after turn 7 so the Raffles Boulevard would be couple hundred meters longer and after that there would be just one corner before turn 10. That might increase overtaking. Also a good way to make track shorter and faster is to go straight from turn 16 to 20 if that’s possible.

    1. Good Idea – you could also tighten the corner going onto Raffles Boulevard to make traction onto the corner more important.
      Also, they could tighten turn 10 slightly to make it more of a braking point to aid overtaking – tighten the first part into about 90 degrees, which can also leave run-off as it is further forward, and then having a nearly flat out end to the chicane. They could then straighten out the next chicane and move the next corner back slightly (there’s enough space as it is dual carriageway at this section).

  6. 2 ideas from me:
    Make it slightly less twisty, reprofile the sling so intsead of being a double chicane its a single one, with a flick to the right before going left, bypass the under the grandstand bit.
    Go clockwise! that way the Singapore Sling can be a proper corner, and straighten out the silly boxy bit in the middle of the lap.

    1. The corner that is now turn 5 would be very dangerous if the track is run clockwise.

  7. Well I think that the organizers should build a bridge or a tunnel at Turn 8-14 crossroads in order to connect Turn 7 with Turn 13 and Turn 9 with Turn 15-16 . Thus two slow corners will be removed and two long straights will be added , leaving the circuit mostly as it is but making it faster with more overtacking opportunities. As for Turn 10 the should make it a bit smoother .

    1. The costs associated with the modification wouldn’t be too gargantuan actually and a tunnel/bridge would actually improve day-to-day normal traffic.

      Any building of a bridge/tunnel in would mar the landscape around the Civilian War Memorial though and the authorities wouldn’t allow that.


      Instead of the urban jungle, the real jungle. The Jersey GP will provide the skyscrapers on the calendar from then on.

      1. That looks fantastic. If only.

        1. It looks like a Singapore Spa version to be honest.

          Just to add on, the curvaceous part that is the current Old Upper Thomson Road at the ex-Thomson Road circuit is one of the most dangerous roads in Singapore

          There is one particular corner that is not known as the Devil’s Bend for nothing and is rumoured to be haunted as well. The link below has a vintage photo of a 1961 circuit map and you can see how dangerous it was in its full glory.

    2. Oh yes! Yes, this gets my vote! Yeah, a little work on that, and Singapore’s F1 track will be up there in terms of history, though it IS Formula Libre history, and not Formula One. :P

  8. What about making curve 16 less sharp, so that it the chicane can be taken faster.

    Then, curves 7, 8 and 9 can be changed so that the track goes around the other side of the park. This will remove the actual curve 7, a new curve similar to curve 8 will appear at the opposite side of the park, and curve 9 will be a new chicane.

    In google maps you can see how these changes may be possible and they will reduce the time per lap (effectively shorting the race). Moreover, they will need “minor” changes in terms of lightning and installations.

    1. * “What about making curve 16 less sharp? So that the chicane can be taken faster.” *

      Sorry xD

    2. And let all “curve”s be “turn”s. I don’t know what I was thinking about :-) Sorry

  9. Go right to the wall on the inside of T5 (it makes the corner much quicker and may allow cars to follow better on the run to T7.
    Go right to the wall on T7 and make the apex 2 or 3 metres later, rather than that stupid kerb in the middle of the road.
    Straighten out the silly right left just before te Anderson bridge (T11,12) its pointless
    Get rid of the section near the end. Have T16, but rather than go underneath the stands, keep going and emerge where the current T20-21 section is, perhaps then tighten the last corner to allow for an overtaking opportunity or open it out to allow cars to stay close for a lunge in T1

    1. The silly right left before Anderson bridge is where the road goes.

    2. One problem with bypassing Turns 17-19 to form a straight is that the Bay grandstand cannot be used anymore. It is one of the largest grandstands which sit 30 thousand people.

  10. Let’s create a bridge so the figure-of eight- would be possible, and yo uwould turn 4 medium straights in 2 long straights. I imagined this by looking at the picture of this article. From above looks possible. Invest a couple of millions to create that bridge or even something they can put and retire (would that be possible, I mean a temporary flyover?)

    1. artificial racer
      26th September 2012, 19:48

      ^^^ this is what I was pondering by looking at the map. Have either a bridge or an underpass built for F1 so that the circuit would go clockwise around the cricket ground and potentially create a bit better overtaking possibility. It would also benefit the city traffic the rest of the year. And there is plenty of runoff going round that way.

      Other alternatives would be a massive reworking to have the circuit use more of the shoreline area north of turn 1.

  11. make the lights go off at random times

    1. Hahaha that’d be interesting !

  12. Singapore looks spectacular.
    *Looks* spectacular. But it isn’t really.
    The bright shiny lights in the darkness and the flashing off the cars between the walls, the howling of the engines echoing in the canyons of the streets . . . Should be fantastic, but it isn’t, is it?
    There are lots of tracks that I can actually imagine going round with my eyes closed, but Singapore is just so visually bland that I get lost watching it on telly. Too many 90 degree bends and too many concrete walls that all look the same. I could imagine a tired driver getting really confused towards the end of the 2 hour race in that heat.
    I think the Turn 10 problem could be rectified by bringing the track up (widened) Connaught Drive which runs parallel to the T9 to T10 straight and would lead in the Anderson bridge turn quite neatly. There might have to be a bit of tree clearing there though to provide a run-off area.
    Alternatively, as others have pointed out, it would be far more exciting to have figure eight layout with a crossover at T8 and T14 instead of the two 90 degree bends (yawn). That would make the turn over the Anderson Bridge absolutely mighty and the T10 problem would be reduced.
    I’d also like to axe the section that goes in front of and under the Grandstand; it’s four 90-ish degree bends and a blast in front of the stands, whereas the track could have gone behind the permanent Grandstand and provided a superb overtaking spot into the 90 degree (Arrghh!) bend underneath the elevated highway. I know this is never going to happen though, because the seats in the grandstand must provide a decent wedge of income for the organisers.
    I still don’t think that the race will deliver the sparkle and excitement it promises, though. It’s not visually exciting enough on TV. I can’t be the only one out of love with it?

  13. I woud make it into a faster chicane with the same amount of runoff, like this:

  14. I don’t mind the idea of a shorter track, and it would be fun for the spectators too, to see the cars pass by 80 or more times. It would make finding a gap in qualifying more difficult, though. My only problem with the suggested shortcut is that I don’t like sector 3 in Singapore. Sectors 1 and 2 are interesting, but S3 has too many slow chicanes. F1 cars need to stretch their legs from time to time!

    I don’t see the big safety issue with the Singapore Sling. If you drive over the kerbs, you’ll be going pretty slowly, so you might be in for a bit of rough ride and possibly end up in the wall the way Raikkonen did in 2008, but would drivers really hurt their backs there, or dangerously climb over other cars? And if for some reason you don’t slow down enough for the corner, then you’d miss the middle of the corner altogether.

    1. @adrianmorse

      I don’t mind the idea of a shorter track, and it would be fun for the spectators too, to see the cars pass by 80 or more times.

      That’s a good point.

  15. I don’t know if it has already been mentioned, but alter the track to go straight at turn 8 and make turn 13 a monaco style hairpin. This would open up a good overtaking spot, an increase the average speed of the lap.

    1. That’s a very clever idea! From a quick glance at google maps, it is feasible as well.

  16. Personally I think there’s no real need to change the track for purposes of the racing. The sling is just about the only point on the track that really stands out, maybe combined with the turn back under the grandstands where we saw people crashing ever since the first race.

    I do get that if its to big a burden on city life, they could try to make more of it into a semi permanent part in the parkland, but it would mean changing quite a lot of the track and would make it less of a city race (we would cut two brides out for example and surely the cricket club and war monument, although who sees them during the race anyway), but the need to have a life around it and save on yearly buildup is good enough a reason to me.

    So that brings us to something like what @prisoner-monkeys posted in the roundup then.

  17. Basically, this course sucks. You all know why.

  18. Go north:
    If the circuit can’t be routed down the road that avoids the Singapore Sling, then skip the bridge loop entirely.

  19. I think that Singapore is one of the best tracks currently on the calendar. And not just for the nighttime or the uniquely coloured walls of which I’m a fan.

    The 2hour marathon races it produces are something that the drivers should be tested for at least once during a season. I have no problem watching all of it as I don’t find the races processional; there’s lots of overtaking to be had at turns 6/7, 8 and 14 which means cars don’t get stuck behind others for too long (I’m sure there were many overtakes last weekend); plus there’s lots of room on the straights for the back-markers to get out of the way. The race result is always a fair result of pace.
    I love the way the walls are close to the exits of the corners too. It doesn’t have the oppressiveness of Monaco because there’s breathing space on a lot of the corners and straights, but the closeness you get to see on some of the exits (especially of turn 21 before that beautiful sweep onto the straight) is incredible. Oddly enough it’s like a mix between Monaco and Canada for that.
    And given the rest of the track, I really don’t mind the Singapore Sling. It’s a unique solution to the problem of limited runoff. But the runoff area is the only thing I’d change about the track itself: it needs more in order to stop people hitting the wall (which is sometimes a bit harsh on drivers). I think the risk of suspension failure keeps the car in line, so a few extra yards of run-off by ripping up tarmac isn’t going to change the corner characteristic.
    The only other thing I’d want is for them to really go overboard on ways of removing cars from the track quickly and without a safety car. Jam it with cranes, open more walls, whatever. If there’s nothing they can do though then it’s an acceptable price to pay for the track layout.

    Basically I like Singapore. It has far less faults than other circuits, and it’s a good event to boot. And it has a good sporting role in the F1 championships. I don’t see much to change. The question “how can Singapore’s F1 track be improved?” strikes me the same way as asking “how can Neapolitan ice-cream be improved?”. a) is it’s improvement an issue? and b) there really can’t be too much to change before it stops being Neapolitan ice-cream. Why would we want to change Neapolitan ice-cream into something else which already exists? just keep the Neapolitan ice-cream.

    1. P.S. I like Neapolitan ice-cream.

      1. Get rid of the sickly strawberry/raspberry stuff.

        1. Madness! And have have chocolate and vanilla? Wouldn’t that be like any generic chocolate-coated lolly?

          1. No! Replace it with Pistachio. . . or maybe that’s pistacchio or pistashio – the nutty green stuff.

Jump to comment page: 1 2 3

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

All comments are moderated. See the Comment Policy and FAQ for more.