Whitmarsh: Hamilton’s Mercedes move “a mistake”

F1 Fanatic round-up

Martin Whitmarsh, Lewis Hamilton, McLaren, Montreal, 2012In the round-up: Martin Whitamrsh says Lewis Hamilton has made a “mistake” by leaving the team for Mercedes.

Links

Top F1 links from the past 24 hours:

Hamilton warned quitting McLaren is ‘mistake’ (The Telegraph)

“Mercedes-Benz is a great partner of ours and they are a great team. But anyone leaving McLaren, who wants to win, I think that?s a mistake because I have faith and belief in this team.”

Brawn: Lewis wants new challenge (Sky)

“There is a competitive market for drivers and Lewis is as competitive as anyone else in that respect. But Lewis didn’t come here because we offered more money – because we didn’t.”

Schumacher ‘undecided on future’ (BBC)

“His manager Sabine Kehm said: ‘Michael didn’t stay at Mercedes because he wasn’t sure he wanted to drive and that didn’t change over time.’ Asked whether he had now made that decision, Kehm said: ‘No.’”

Lewis Hamilton is making a huge mistake, say McLaren (The Sun)

Whitmarsh added: “Sergio is ready, otherwise we would not be signing him. In 2006, I was getting a lot of criticism about putting a young Lewis into Formula One. People said there was no way he could be ready.”

Rosberg and Hamilton get equal status (Autosport)

“It has been made clear to both the Briton and Rosberg that they will be treated equally – and both will have the same chance of gunning for glory.”

Lewis Hamilton’s move to Mercedes renews links with British drivers (The Guardian)

“Hamilton is not exactly stepping into unknown territory. Every one of his 20 grand prix victories has been achieved with a Mercedes engine in his car. He knows the company and is well aware of the quality of their engineering. He and his manager, Simon Fuller, will also have been influenced by the power of their marketing department to enhance his image around the world.”

Mercedes move to raise Hamilton’s global profile (Reuters)

“Hamilton, the first black driver to win a Grand Prix, features regularly in the gossip pages because of his relationship with U.S. singer Nicole Scherzinger. His looks and image, clean cut yet moody, make him a natural for brands wishing to connect with a youthful audience.”

New engines set to be scrapped (Hindustan Times)

“‘I listened to the noise of the engines in (Ferrari’s headquarters at) Maranello the other day, the new engine and the old engine, and even (Ferrari chairman) Luca di Montezemolo said it sounded terrible and didn’t like it,’ says Ecclestone. He feels FIA president, Jean Todt, ‘will get rid of it. I think Luca is also saying we should suspend it for two or three years’.”

F1: Promoter ‘Proud’ Of New Jersey?s Place On Calendar… (Speed)

“[Grand Prix of America promoter Leo Hindery Jnr] made no comment on the ‘to be confirmed’ status on the 2013 Formula One schedule or Bernie Ecclestone?s claim that no contract exists at present.”

Chris Economaki 1921-2012 (Joe Saward)

“Long-time racing journalist Chris Economaki has died at the age of 91.”

Tweets

Comment of the day

No prizes for guessing what today’s Comment of the Day is about. Here’s @PJA:

Despite all the speculation part of me felt that Hamilton would stay at McLaren, or at the very least the decision would drag on for a few weeks, so reading the headline when I logged this morning was bit of a surprise.

Having said that I can see why Hamilton decided to sign for Mercedes. And I don?t think money was the main factor.

While it hasn?t gone as far as Alonso and McLaren it seemed that Hamilton was not on as good terms with McLaren as he used to be, and the Spa tweets wouldn?t have helped.

Also on the performance side of things I don?t think it as big a gamble as some make out. He probably would only have been offered a multi year contract. So he couldn?t have signed a one year deal at McLaren and waited to see if Vettel goes to Ferrari in 2014 as some have suggested.

Although McLaren challenge for victories almost every season in the last decade they have only won one drivers’ championship and no constructors’ championship, they have to start paying for engines from next year so that means less money on the rest of the car and then there is the big rule changes in 2014.

I would have thought this deal should silence those rumours suggesting Mercedes may quit F1, and considering some of the people at the team, mainly Ross Brawn, in the medium term Mercedes could be the better bet.

2012 has been the first season while Hamilton has been at McLaren that they have had the overall fastest car, for me 2007 and 2008 Ferrari and McLaren were about the same and if I had to pick I would have said Ferrari, yet through various operational mistakes and reliability problems it looks as though they won?t win the drivers’ championship and if they win the constructors’ championship a large part of it will be down to Red Bull?s reliability problems.

I think Hamilton has almost as good a chance of winning a title in the next three years at Mercedes as he does at McLaren, whether he does win one or not will be hard to say as I think it will be hard to predict which drivers and teams will be on top in the next three years.
@PJA

From the forum

Happy birthday!

Happy birthday to Donwatters!

If you want a birthday shout-out tell us when yours is by emailling me, using Twitter or adding to the list here.

On this day in F1

Ten years ago today the 2002 United Grand Prix ended in farce as Michael Schumacher’s attempt to engineer a Ferrari ‘dead heat’ resulted in him handing victory to team mate Rubens Barrichello.

At least they didn’t crash into each other as the Williams pair did – Ralf Schumacher spinning into Juan Pablo Montoya earlier in the race. Montoya recovered to finish fourth behind David Coulthard.

Image ?? McLaren/Hoch Zwei

Advert | Go Ad-free

119 comments on Whitmarsh: Hamilton’s Mercedes move “a mistake”

  1. AndrewTanner (@andrewtanner) said on 30th September 2012, 13:44

    So on the one hand we have FOM and the FIA trying to cut F1 costs by throwing up some rubbish about how the new engines sound terrible and should be scrapped…yet, we have plans proposed for substantially increasing the entry costs?

    Answers on a postcard, please.

  2. kbdavies (@kbdavies) said on 30th September 2012, 16:10

    Interesting article by Benson on the BBC featururing some interesting comments by Lauda – http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/formula1/19776917 (is it ok to post a link?).
    On the issue of equality with Rosberg, the BBC’s initial report on the move specifically stated
    I think it would be good to cover Laudas’s comments on Lewis in one of the round-ups, Keith.

  3. kbdavies (@kbdavies) said on 30th September 2012, 16:15

    Didn’t finish my comment on the original BBC breaking news article regarding Lewis’s move to Mercedes above. It specifically stated that Hamilton had been assured of No.1 status before signing.

  4. the limit said on 30th September 2012, 20:48

    Interesting comments from Martin Whitmarsh but not unexpected. I sense a little relief from both parties that, finally, a conclusion has been reached. I said around the Monza grands prix that if McLaren and Hamilton were that unhappy in each others company, better to split now. Deep down however, I think Whitmarsh will have more pressure on his shoulders than Hamilton in the years to come.
    By that I am not bad mouthing Sergio Perez’s abilities, he has shown great promise, but he is still learning his trade. Alot for McLaren will depend on Jenson Button, and that means he needs to have a better season next year than he has had in 2012. As good as he is, he suffered an horrendous mid season slump which all but destroyed any hopes he had for the championship. If both drivers at McLaren fail to deliver the goods, fast car or not, questions will be asked and like it or not, Hamilton’s name will be mentioned. The axe will fall neatly on Martin Whitmarsh’s neck I feel if this driver lineup turns out to be a lemon.
    As others have mentioned over the last two days, if Mercedes are competitive, then Whitmarsh will be under even more pressure. The fact remains that McLaren are one of the three big teams in F1 built to win championships along with Ferrari and Red Bull. If people believe that such big teams can not slide into obscurity you only have to look at Williams to see that anything is possible.
    For all their greatness, McLaren have had so many great drivers in their team and yet recently so few championships. Others have already mentioned this. Of those drivers the most infamous case in recent years was Kimi Raikkonen. Five seasons at McLaren he fought for two titles and lost both times largely due to team errors. His first season at Ferrari in 2007 he was crowned the champion, at the expense of his former team.
    Its been fourteen years since McLaren last won both championships in a single season with Mika Hakkinen in 1998. They went nine years before Lewis Hamilton won them their most recent drivers title, which pretty much sums things up. Whitmarsh, in his own mind, may still believe that McLaren is the be all and end all team in F1 but recent statistics in terms of championships prove otherwise.
    Red Bull, through pouring money into the former Jaguar team and selecting the right people, have crafted one of the strongest current teams in F1. The recipe for success is there for the likes of Mercedes to succeed where the likes of Honda and Toyota did not. Its about selecting to right men and women to run the team, racing people, and not corporate monkeys who only strive to have the poshiest motorhome in the paddock. Let the team run itself, and have faith in those you have chosen.

  5. I don’t see how Martin can have a bigger problem than Lewis? He now has the fastest car, a promising rookie and a former champion. No matter how much I dislike Jenson’s in-aggressive style I have to admit that it matches perfectly with the current anti-racing regulations: cruise around protecting your tires and press the overtake button on the straight so you avoid getting into anything “wild”!

    Lewis on the other hand has moved down to the number five team in the championship to a car that is terrible on the tires and arguably slower also than the Sauber. On top of that I should remind you that McLaren didn’t lose two championships with Kimi due to team errors but due to disastrous Mercedes engines!

  6. DT (@dt) said on 1st October 2012, 20:35

    Whitmarsh should forget about Lewis and focus on sorting out the operational that has cost the team so dearly this year. Has it not been their pit stop c*ck ups, Jenson and Lewis, in particular, would have been ahead in the points and the team would have been in the lead in the constructors. In the last 10 years Mclaren has only managed to produced a car cable of winning the championship 3 times, 2007, 2008 and 2012. The fact that the team hasn’t worn the constructors in the last 10 years and only one one drivers championship (won by Hamilton) clearly gives indication of their performance level. I’m sure this statistics is one of the factors Hamliton advisors took into consideration on advising him to go with Mercedes. If i was on the board of Mclaren, I will be pushing for Whitmarsh to go!

  7. the limit said on 1st October 2012, 20:56

    So I take it that Raikkonen losing the race win to Alonso at the Nurburgring in 2005 was due to a blown Mercedes engine? All McLaren’s problems during Kimi’s time there were engine related. What hogwash! And also you hit the nail on the head with the fact that Whitmarsh has traded one of the top three drivers in F1 for a ‘promising rookie’. Anyway you slice it is a gamble and a brave one but a gamble non the less. So I think Whitmarsh has reason, deep down, to be concerned. Maybe we will have this conversation in three years time when McLaren have still won bugger all but I suppose people like you will still be blaming Mercedes ‘engines’! What a plonker.

  8. UH…. so you found a race with a different cause? It’s just funny that you had to point to 2005 which saw Kimi with two ten place penalties and two DNF’s because of engine failures.

    Or how about 2004 with just one point in the first seven rounds mostly due to engine failures? Or maybe you also forgot the official apology to Kimi from Mercedes?

    “People like me”…. hmm! No, I am not blaming any current McLaren problems on Mercedes but my point is that since it took them several years to sort out the engine reliability it may well take them several years to achieve a competitive car – despite Lauda’s nonsense about Lewis being fast in a slow car.

    Surely McLaren have made mistakes of their own but can you say that Lewis hasn’t? In 2011 he was way behind Jenson mainly on his own account. This year at least he is well ahead so let’s use it as reference. If he doesn’t get well ahead of Niko next year he certainly has a problem. On the other hand I’ll admit that Whitmarsh has a problem if Sergio cannot outperform Jenson.

    Deal?

Add your comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

All comments must abide by the comment policy. Comments may be moderated.
Want to post off-topic? Head to the forum.
See the FAQ for more information.