Sebastian Vettel, Red Bull, Suzuka, 2012

2012 F1 Driver Rankings #3: Sebastian Vettel

2012 F1 season reviewPosted on | Author Keith Collantine

Sebastian Vettel, Red Bull, Suzuka, 2012

Sebastian Vettel was made to fight harder for his third world championship victory than he was for the first two. The performance advantage he enjoyed throughout much of 2011 was gone.

Vettel hit a purple patch late in the season with four wins on the trot as Red Bull finally hit the sweet spot with the RB8. Even this was fleeting as McLaren asserted themselves once more before the season ended, and the RB8 was not the quickest car on average throughout the season.

But he took the opportunity to rise from the battle for second place and seize the lead of the championship. After that he narrowly prevailed in a nailbiting championship showdown, soaking up immense pressure from Fernando Alonso over the last three rounds.

As the season began the name of the game for Vettel was getting the best he could out of a car that was no longer the pace setter. He achieved this admirably in Australia, passing Rosberg in fine style early on and reaching the podium. But he faltered in Malaysia where another podium looked possible had he taken a little more caution lapping Narain Karthikeyan (who was penalised for the contact).

Beat team mate in qualifying 12/20
Beat team mate in race 11/17
Races finished 19/20
Laps spent ahead of team mate 865/1103

Anxious to leave no stone unturned in the pursuit of performance, Vettel experimented with an earlier exhaust layout in China. But unusually he failed to reach Q3 and in a repeat of last year found himself slipping back late in the race, ending up fifth.

It looked like a return to business as usual, 2011-style when he won round four from pole position, coolly rebuffing an attack from Kimi Raikkonen. But Red Bull were off the pace in Spain and Vettel was outdone by Webber in Monaco.

Consecutive pole positions in Canada and Britain showed the team were on the right track. But they misread the tyre situation in Canada and had to make a late pit stop, though this at least ensured he finish ahead of Alonso.

In Valencia he was in crushing form until his alternator failed. That was a major blow to Vettel’s championship hopes, sending a 32-point swing in Alonso’s favour.

He took more than half of that back with his best drive of the season in a race he didn’t win. Alonso’s elimination in the first-lap crash at the Belgian Grand Prix gave Vettel an opportunity, but he was only 12th at the restart.

Sebastian Vettel, Red Bull, Interlagos, 2012Vettel found it difficult to overtake other cars on Spa’s long straights due to his car’s poor straight line speed. But his commitment through the high-speed Blanchimont allowed him to make several passes into the chicane – including on his own team mate, and he rose from the field to take a valuable second.

Questions over Vettel’s capacity for racecraft are increasingly a thing of the past thanks to races like this and his recovery drives in Abu Dhabi and Brazil.

However he could have avoided penalties in Germany and Italy for errors while attacking and defending position respectively. His correct decision to cede position back to Romain Grosjean in Abu Dhabi having passed him with all four wheels off the track showed he was paying attention.

Vettel took some time to get the car to his liking in 2012 and did not always get the best out of what he had in the early part of the season. But by the final leg of the championship he was back in his comfort zone and it seemed nothing could put him off his stride.

His battling performances after being sent to the back of the grid in Abu Dhabi and knocked into a spin in Brazil demonstrated the speed, racecraft and rock-solid mental resilience of a triple-champion.

What F1 Fanatic readers said about Vettel

Michael Schumacher, Sebastian Vettel, Spa-Francorchamps, 2012Here’s what F1 Fanatic readers had to say about Sebastian Vettel:

Vettel truly deserved his third title. He battled with a car that wasn?t to his liking at the start, and score important points.

When the car was to his liking, he dominated. When events conspired against him he put in awe inspiring drives in both Abu Dhabi and Brazil, under immense pressure. He battled for positions in many races, and dismissed the view that he wasn?t a real racer.

Vettel still has some maturing to do, with frustration clouding his judgement in a few races. The fact that he is still developing as a racing driver must be a sobering thought to his rivals.
@Colossal-Squid

I think many people, when comparing the Red Bull to the Ferrari, simply assume that the Red Bull is a brilliant car (Newey = genius, so RB8 = genius) and because Alonso and Domenicali said at testing that the Ferrari is awful, they assume the Ferrari is awful. Think what you want, but for sure Vettel?s performance this year is highly underrated by many.
@Andae23

Vettel had some stonking races this year, and proved his mettle more than once. Alonso was just up against it in worse machinery, that?s pretty much all the difference.
@Hairs

Notes on how the rankings are produced

The F1 Fanatic Driver Rankings are my personal view on how the drivers performed across the entire season. Drivers such as Jerome D’Ambrosio who only competed in a small part of the season are not included.

Each drivers’ performance in all of the race weekends are taken into account and summarised. For more detailed views of how they fared in each weekend refer to the notes produced for each Driver of the Weekend article and the driver form guides.

A selection of F1 Fanatic readers’ views appear alongside the rankings. The full rankings will be published in seven parts, with individual articles for the top five drivers, after which there will be a vote for Driver of the Year.

Over to you

What’s your view on Sebastian Vettel’s third consecutive championship victory? Have your say in the comments.

2012 F1 season review


Browse all 2012 F1 season review articles

216 comments on “2012 F1 Driver Rankings #3: Sebastian Vettel”

  1. Crazy to have Vettel ahead of Hamilton in my view. I know people will say that he didnt have the relaiability but either did Sebastian. Vettel’s drives in Abu Dhabi and Brazil were terrific and at the end of the day the record books will show he is the World Champion, the Number 1 in 2012 so i really cant comprehend how Hamilton can be ranked above him when he finished 4th in the championship.Lewis had a better car for the first half of the season in comparison with Vettel and both had reliability problems but for a finish it was Sebastian who came out on top.

    1. Chris (@tophercheese21)
      13th December 2012, 13:42

      But the thing is that Lewis had far more reliability problems than Vettel.
      Not only that but it seemed as if Mclaren were almost determined to trip over themselves (obviously not, but they made far too many mistakes for a team of their calibre).
      – Early season pit stops problems in – Malaysia, Bahrain (x2), and Monaco severly hampered his races.
      – Mechanical failures that hampered his performance in Japan and Korea (Suspension)
      – Refuelling debacle in Spain – 24th on the grid.
      – Getting taken out by those GP2 bandits in Valencia, Spa and Brazil
      – Puncture in Germany ruining his race.
      – Gearbox failures in Singapore and Abu Dhabi.

      Mclaren had the pace to win this championship easily. And they should have with a driver with Lewis’s current form, and a quick car. But too many errors, the majority not Lewis’s fault, cost him the championship. He drove the nuts off that car. But to no avail.

      So I find that argument of Vettel having the same amount of problems to be somewhat wrong.

      Hamilton was clearly hampered much more severly by mistakes than Vettel was. And the evidence is in the numbers, Vettel won the C’ship and Hamilton didn’t. Simple as that.

    2. @padelee
      Really? Thought it was obvious to everyone the fight for best driver 2012 is between Lewis and Alonso.

      1. How is that logical when Sebastian beat both of them to the title?

        1. Because simply put vettel didn’t do that by himself. Winning a wdc is ALWAYS a combination of driver, car and team. The point of this ranking here is to single out as much as possible the team and car and purely look at the performance the driver made. Vettel did in that aspect less then alonso and hamilton.

          1. in my personal opinion this Should be the comment of the year.
            +100

          2. @turbof1 I disagree, Look at many of the races near the end of the season and you will see some amazing racing. They all had very different seasons but I think it’s unfair to suggest that Vettel didn’t perform.

          3. @turbof1 So Vettel’s car drove itself to victory 5 times this year and from the back of the grid to podium in Abu Dhabi and back to 6th in Brazil in the rain!!!..(Sarcasm) Look i understand where you are coming from, Lewis would have been right up there in the fight for the title if he didnt have so many reliablity issues and other incidents throughout the year, but Sebastian was very consistant from Bahrain onwards..and had those altenator problems in Valencia and Monza but he battled back and under massive pressure, from a comprehensive points defecit he hauld himself back into contention when it looked like Fernando might be on his way. It was a terrific comeback from Sebastian from japan onwards, and as i said earlier, put in two of the best drives of the year in Abu Dhabi and Brazil…

          4. The point of this ranking here is to single out as much as possible the team and car and purely look at the performance the driver made. Vettel did in that aspect less then alonso and hamilton.

            I’ve read and re-read the post by Keith, and I still don’t see where he removes team and car from the equation and singles out the driver. It can’t be done, which is why these sorts of rankings always come down to peoples personal preference.

          5. I think that’s a pretty fair assessment of how this whole thing works.
            At one extreme there could be a complete XXXX of a driver in an absolute rocket-ship of a car capable of winning everything through technical superiority, and at the other is a highly idiosyncratic car with a political and slightly disfunctional team who happen to be blessed with a driver whose singular minded intensity manages to unite and invigorate all those around him in an astonishing effort to conquer both the car and (most of) his opponents in a blast of heroic energy and pure resolve. Triumph of the Will!
            Sorry. Got slightly carried away there.

          6. So Vettel’s car drove itself to victory 5 times this year and from the back of the grid to podium in Abu Dhabi and back to 6th in Brazil in the rain!!!..(Sarcasm)

            Yes. That’s why he is 3rd out of 24 drivers – a very very good result.

      2. Don’t be arrogant. Kimi and Vettel were extrememely good as well, so it was close between those four.

      3. I disagree Jason, to me it is a discussion for the better driver between Vettel and Hamilton for 2nd and 3rd. I think if this was an article I wrote, I may have put Vettel above Hamilton, but this order is justified as well (only if – in my opinion – Hamilton is 2nd, not 1st).

    3. I can’t shake off the feeling that Hamilton has been a bit overrated this season. You can’t blame the team and luck for everything. After all the driver is part of this team and he bears his responsibility for the results too, which are not great when you look at the standings and into the pace of the car. For example all the drama around Lewis and his new contract didn’t contributed to the motivation and the passion they put into the race for the title. I mean, next year in Mercedes he may not score a podium and still be flawless on track. But that won’t make him 1 or 2 for the driver of the season poll.

      1. So it’s his fault that his car kept breaking down and his team kept messing up his pitstops?

        1. That’s not what i am saying, i am assuming that he was bad motivator, or less inspiring… you know, he lacked leadership maybe. Those are driver qualities too. The guys didn’t die for him there. And twitter dramas are not helping for the climate in struggling teams (again this is just an example).

          1. the errors were not his fault, but the way he handled them wasnt brilliant. At times he handled things excellent, then he totally drops the ball with twitter like moments.

            But despite that id still, as a driver and racer put him ahead of seb. Tho im a little biased. But fernando is a cut above the lot.

            Vettel and lewis are fantastic qualifiers. They pull something out over one lap no one else can. Fernando can chip away and make up the difference with brilliant consistancy that no one else can

        2. No, but it’s not the first time a driver will be unlucky.

          You have to discount reliability problems, not use them as a boost.

    4. I agree with you here, I think there are two important points casual fans tend to miss firstly, the immense pressure Alonso put Vettel under. There was a massive psychological warfare going on and Vettel handled it very well – four race wins in a row to haul himself back into contention in such a tight season (setting records along the way for longest period lead by a driver in a insanely competitive season) was no mean feat and when Alonso really cranked up the pressure over the final three races and things did not always go smoothly for Vettel he never buckled. At the same time I think it is fair to say Alonso wilted as the pressure grew over the final races – in Brazil it was clear Massa thought a fighting for victory was possible but Alonso could not find the speed over the final races that Massa proved the car was capable of. Alonso kept saying he was perfect and everyone believed this as the gospel truth but if you analyse the facst he faded just when Seb stepped up to the plate. Someone like Hamilton was never really under much pressure so we did not really get to see what he was made of – it is all good and well putting in some great drives but he was under no real pressure- and let us remember Hamilton did after all have the fastest car.
      My second point is a bit harder to put into words but it comes down to how a driver motivates/interacts with his team. Back in the day with Schumacher winning, Ferrari always looked the more relaxed team, a fun team (red wigs etc especially compared to McLaren) – these days with Alonso running his PR “Mr Perfect” campaign and enquiry after enquiry getting launched as to why Ferrari fail – you get the impression it is not a great place to be working at the moment, best to shut up and keep your head down. Seb seems very willing to share his success more with the team and worked hard with them to get the car back on track and then was able to take full advantage when they did so – Alonso has had the full backing of Ferrari for three years now but he never seems to be able to get the team to rise up with him (just a Hamilton will take a lot of credit should Mercedes come good, Alonso seems immune to taking any criticism when the car fails to develop etc). With such closely matched driver I think how each interact within their team is very important – I am not sure Alonso’s influence produces designers confident to try things and stamp there name on ideas etc.

      1. I don’t think the situation @ RBR is any different from Ferrari or McLaren. All 3 expect to win, but only RBR has achieved that. I can’t remember where, but there was an article about RBR that said they weren’t as friendly or something like that compared to the rest of the paddock.

        1. I am talking about a “atmosphere” that each team creates – you just know that if Ferrari’s car is not on the pace in Adelaide Luca is going to be spitting flames, demading answers etc…. Think how Pat Fry and his team must have felt when Alonso said he fighting against Seb and Newey…. you going to tell me Pat felt really inspired (and judging from what I read in the press he certainly did not). I think the “atmosphere” created by Alonso with his “i am perfect” speaches within Ferrari could not have been motivating for those working on developing the car…

          1. Yes, I do suppose that made it clear from the start for them that not winning would be blamed on them, while winning it would not be to their credit but Alonso’s, @cronies, true.

      2. 100% correct man!

    5. @padelee
      the record books never show the full picture, the races do. exactly what keith’s article describes as well. vettel in 3rd and lower than hamilton and alonso is justifiable.

      1. @andrewf1 I know ya, i respect everyones opinion but that doesnt stop me from having a differing one. I Like Hamilton, i think he’s a fantastic talent, same goes for Fernando who was amazing this year. Simply though for me i believe Sebastian was at least the second best driver of the season.

        1. In support of @padelee, a bit of data analysis
          Premise:
          1. A driver is best judged by what they do on race day, and race results are the ultimate judge of their quality.
          2. The only way to quantify this is to compare where starting and finishing positions and tell how often they were able to best their rivals, or be bested by them.
          3. Retirements should be removed from the equation because they are caused by factors to difficult to apply to the Driver input (mechanical failure and contact)
          4. Qualifying performances are not important because we are looking at the amount of change from start to finish, not the imperical position itself.

          The results are as follows…
          FA Average Grid position = 6.15
          FA Average Finish position = 3.27

          SV Avg Grid position = 5
          SV Avg Finish position = 3.44

          LH Avg Grid position = 4.78
          LH Avg Finish position = 4.35

          So, on average, and discounting races in which they the driver did not finish…
          SV was able to trump about 2 of his rivals each race,
          FA was able to best 3 of his,
          LH basically finished where he started.
          With this view of the data, Im struggling to see LH’s high rating over any of the other two. @andrewf1

          I am sure someone will point out a flaw in this analysis, and I look forward to such fruitful discussion.

          1. But if a driver – any driver – managed to take pole and first place in every race, they would have passed, or ‘trumped’ no one. and by your reasoning “basically finished where they started”.
            Doesn’t really work, does it?

          2. Your average finish position doesn’t include car failures outside of the drivers control. Can you factor that in please?

            (spolier – you can’t. This ranking has some subjective elements in it).

          3. It is just a crazy way of going about it – where is the reward for a good quali lap – poor guy on pole? If you useless at quali like Ferrari this year you going to LOVE this system. Can not see any value in it at all, you rewarding poor qualifing pace which was exactly Ferrari’s problem.

          4. Thanks for the feedback guys. Please accept my response

            @timothykatz

            pole and first place in every race, they would have passed, or ‘trumped’ no one.

            I agree this is a difficult one and well addressed in my original post. Indeed there is no way to improve from a Pole – Win, because there is no 0th place. To some extent it is mentioned in the Imperical Data (the actual position number. So, lets look further into it.

            FA: 2 Poles, with an average finish of 1.5 for those races
            SV: 5 Poles with an average finish of 1.8 for those races
            LH: 4 Poles with an average finish of 2 for those races.

            This data tell us that even from Pole, with no traffic, clean line, clean air, right of prime line into the first corner, LH’s most common response is to be beaten by his rivals. I will now brace myself for the comments on how the MCM car is a slow started, or how rivals sandbagged in Quali…

            @john-h

            doesn’t include car failures outside of the drivers control

            You are absolutly correct, that is why any race which the driver failed to complete the race distance has been removed from the analysis, we are only looking at what we KNOW the driver did and trying hard to remove external factors outside his control. Im not very fond of speculations, of the “IF Game” as many tend to be.

            @cronies

            where is the reward for a good quali lap

            I agree, seen above analysis to john-h. The point remains. Data shows that LH’s performance has a tendancy to finish where he started. Further the points totals indicate he didnt win, nor did he lead the Championship at any point, even in races were he had Pole, he failed to capitalize more often this FA and SV.

            All this said, I will now read our own Keith Collentine’s article which places LH above SV in ranking this year and see all the points which I surely have missed.

    6. @PatrickDelee It seems you have bias for RBR from your profile pic, and thus you are skewing the facts. Also RBR had a car that came under scrutiny more times then the fastest car on the track. Alonso pulled out more from the third best car than Vettel did early on, Hamilton retired more times from the lead than any other driver he fought through challenges and still stayed relevant to the championship for more than three quarters of the way through. The only issue RBR really had for Vettel was alternator/kers, which really isn’t new for RBR in the past couple seasons.

  2. Good call. I think you’ve got things spot on so far.

    Was a close thing between Vettel and Hamilton in second for me but I think Lewis just edges it, with Alonso slightly ahead.

    1. For me 3rd was never in question.

      I think it’s a close call between Lewis and Fernando. To me they are both best drivers of 2012.

    2. Exactly my idea too.

    3. One of the great things about this season for me is that the best three drivers on the grid were on top form. In my mind there’s very, very little separating Vettel from Alonso or Hamilton. You could justify putting those three in any order.

      1. I’ll agree with that. People have been saying for a while now that Alonso, Hamilton and Vettel were the three best drivers of this era and in 2012 they more than proved that.

    4. That pretty much mirrors my opinion. I think Vettel and Hamilton were very closely matched this year, with Alonso edging both. Vettel’s driving this year was undisputedly very good this season though and the fact he’s still maturing should instil fear in the competition for next year.

  3. It’s all about how much you weigh the cucumber.
    If he was as composed off track and on the radio like he is in one of his pole-laps, he could’ve been 2 or even 1.

    1. @verstappen: Totally disagree with you on that one. After all, it’s the drivers ranking, not the personality of the year awards.

      1. You gotta have mental strenght, not let your emotions get in the way of your driving – the finger is a personality thing, but bad angermanagement isn’t. @gerdoner

  4. Nice – the top 5 will be in the same order as in my rankings, good to see we agree again, Keith :)
    Vettel had a very good season – hard to compare with last year, as it was completely different, but he had to work really hard for this title. But Alonso and Hamilton just drove better and more consistently this year.

  5. Crazy to have Vettel behind Alonso in this ranking.
    To win a third championship, it should be ranked higher than “driving superbly with a poor car like the Ferrari” (Alonso)

    1. I suppose using the rationale you could see gilles villeneuve as a mere journeyman. There’s absolutely no way you could rank vettel higher than alonso or hamilton this seaon.

      1. Completely agree, if stats were all we went by what would be the point of doing a list like this at all as it would just be the order of the championship table.

        1. @debaser91 and Michael Schumacher would be declared the best driver of all time…..!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

      2. davidnotcoulthard
        13th December 2012, 15:10

        @dam00r @Davydavy
        No, I think it’s impossible to rate any of them higher and have everybody on earth agree with you.

      3. Well, you easily could, all three did so well.

        Vettel deserved his championship, he had to really drive for it this year.

  6. My gut feeling says this article gonna draw 200+ comments, bring it on!! :P :)

    1. Just wait for the next one in this series ;)

      1. @maroonjack Nope..so far that is way behind this :P
        And this has just now crossed the 200 mark

  7. I would put him at least at #2 just because of the fact that he won one of the most competitive seasons in history of the sport, but I can understand placing Hamilton one spot above. #3 doesn’t sit too well with me at all but I have very subjective opinion on the matter. Saw my girlfriend cry at least two times during Brazilian GP when we thought all was lost to evil genius of Fernando and had a huge headache myself on sunday evening from all the tension. So I don’t have the clearest judgement to rate Sebastian and kindly leave it to Keith:)

  8. +1 Perfectly placed in the ranking.

  9. “Questions over Vettel’s capacity for racecraft are increasingly a thing of the pass thanks to races like this and his recovery drives in Abu Dhabi and Brazil.”

    Quick correction needed there, unless it’s a pun, which would actually make sense, heh.

    I cannot say I agree with this one, though. Vettel behind Alonso is understandable, but even taking into account Hamilton’s reliability woes, ranking him third instead of second is rather harsh.

    1. Ha! No pun intended, just better typing needed.

    2. Well, without McLaren’s woes, Hamilton would probably be a two-time world champion. Unless you mean something else by “taking them into account”.

      1. @maroonjack – So if Hamilton would’ve had the fastest car AND the most reliable car, he’d be a two-time world champion? Good for him.

        1. He would, but that’s not the point. I was addressing “taking into account Hamilton’s reliability woes”. No matter which way you cut it, he was better than Vettel this year and on par with Alonso.

          1. @maroonjack

            Please explain why he was better than Vettel or Alonso (or Räikkönen). You’re all saying that obviously he’s better but why? I struggle to see his performances any better than the rest of the top runners.

          2. @tmekt
            I’m not saying Hamilton was better than Alonso. I think they were more or less equal this season, although they had very different “adventures” along the way. Fernando didn’t have the quickest car, but he had excellent starts and achieved a lot through consistent, solid driving, but he wasn’t as aggressive and entertaining as Lewis. Hamilton was also doing wonders with his car, but he was a bit unlucky, to put it mildly. I made a post about it here: .

            I don’t see the point in explaining why Seb and Kimi should be behind Fernando and Lewis in this ranking. Keith puts it very well in his articles and I pretty much agree with him so far.

          3. Looks like I messed up the formatting. The link should be separate from the last paragraph ;)

          4. @maroonjack

            I’m aware of the facts but they don’t clear anything up. They just say where Hamilton could’ve finished without technical problems. That’s not the way to measure the best driver; if it was you would have no choice but to elect Vettel for the wonders he did (that he actually did) with his car in India, Korea, Valencia and Japan for instance. You could say that these were solely because of the car but then what about Hamilton’s car this year? It was magnificent too so why weren’t his accomplishment (hypothetical or not) solely because of the car?

            Lewis driving aggressively and more entertainingly neither makes him better than anyone else. It’s just his driving style; who’s to say, if he had driven a little bit less aggressively he could’ve done better on some occasions like Valencia (I know I know the collision was Maldonado’s fault but still) or Hockenheim (I don’t remember any other driver’s having punctures so maybe it was his error… probably not though). So what if Vettel’s or Alonso’s driving style are somehow less “entertaining”? They seem to deliver regardless of that.

            I’m obviously not saying that Hamilton’s a bad driver. I just find it a bit difficult swallow that he’d be the next best thing since Senna, as some make him out to be.

          5. @tmekt
            Well then, I guess we will have to agree to disagree. In my opinion Alonso and Hamilton were pretty much equal, when it comes to demonstrating their skills and maturity behind the wheel. For me and many others they were better than Vettel. If you’re not convinced by now, after reading all the articles, comments and forums, then there is nothing I can do to convince you.

            By the way, try to avoid strawmanning others, as it gets annoying pretty quickly. Do I make anyone to be “the next best thing since Senna”? No. Do I claim that “entertainment” is the only redeeming quality in a driver? No. Try to appreciate an opposite point of view in its entirety, instead of narrowing it and twisting it, just to make it easier to argue. I’m not interested in that at all.

          6. @maroonjack

            Sorry if I came off disrespectful towards your opinion, wasn’t my intention. Just trying to find some sense out of things and in the same time express my own opinion. (btw you did twist and generalize my post for your reply a bit too)

            The Senna-point (and to be clear I meant Ayrton not Bruno ;) )wasn’t directed at you either but there really seems to be a lot of people out there that think like that. Hamilton is a great driver but a bit overrated in my opinion. Perhaps I’m just biased though.

  10. Might be because Alonso and Hamilton have been slightly overrated this year.I wouldnt put Alonso higher than third because he showed he wasn’t doing as good as he was saying he was , by getting pushed by Massa a lot in the second half.And especially Lewis , though everyone says Vettel won ’cause he had the better car, it was more often than not that McLaren were setting the pace.Plus, i still think there is some growing up left to do for Lewis(as in “room for improvement”)
    And before you call me a Vettel fan, know that i’m not.Even so , i think he should have been first.
    As for my “fanboy” affiliation, its Kimi. And he should be in 4th.Where he is.

    1. 20 divided by 2 does NOT equal 2.

    2. @wally02avg Vettel was pushed by Webber for more races than Alonso was pushed by Massa. Massa was also visibly improving at the end of the year, and he almost always pulls out something at Interlagos. As for the McLaren, it was rarely far ahead on race pace, and when it was it tended to break down. Hamilton lost more points than anyone else through misfortune and/or team mistakes, usually gifting more points to Vettel.

      Having said that, I’ve given up on Hamilton ever growing up, it’s a pity Button doesn’t have his talent.

      1. @george

        Vettel was pushed by Webber for more races than Alonso was pushed by Massa

        That is very true but supposedly Webber is supposed to be the best “number 2” driver of the top 3. Also, Webber losing his push on Vettel coincided with Vettel hitting a purple patch so really Vettel eventually beat Webber because he stepped up his game, whereas Alonso lost out slightly because Massa vastly improved while Alonso fell back a bit.

        Undoubtably though Alonso was utterly brilliant – my number one driver this season anyway.

  11. Definitely the correct ranking for Sebastian this year. Even though he was remarkable this year, the level of competition was abnormally high too.

    Personally, (and I hope this is the outcome), Lewis is #1 and Fernando #2.

    Lewis has made absolutely no mistakes this season, and he has corrected every single criticism that was placed upon him last year, and went even further to improve himself. Without doubt he was the most unlucky driver on the grid.

    1. I love Hamilton’s racing style, but I’m hopeing that he will shot his mouth from now on. Enough of tweeter and stuff. Just drive and show some raw speed even if the tires explode after 10 laps :)

  12. Is there an article describing how these rankings are created?

    1. It’s written in the article, it’s reflecting the personal opinion of the guy who made this ranking I would put Vettel #1 after all he got 3rd World Championship and as Lauda says… who becomes the champion at the end of the year is the best driver of the year simple as that

      1. who becomes the champion at the end of the year is the best driver of the year simple as that

        I think that ignores the rather obvious point that they aren’t all driving the same cars. To say nothing of luck.

        Frankly I think that’s something people say when they’re put on the spot by a journalist and don’t want to give a real opinion.

        1. @keithcollantine ssometimes i don’t agree with you, but this time you are 100% right.

        2. @keithcollantine

          To say nothing of luck.

          Of which Alonso had, by far, the most this season.

      2. I don’t think that’s the oft quoted line given by drivers and pundits, more like whoever wins the title deserves it i.e. there are no undeserving world champions but that by no means they are the best driver across the season. There is a difference.

      3. missed that part.

  13. I am so pleased to see this. At first it niggled at me a little but after thinking it over it is just the media pushing down the perception of lewis (even the wonderful James Allen!). I know that some will say it is pointless to play a game of what ifs, but if McLaren were as reliable as Ferrari lewis could have taken another 3,4 or even 5 wins. With that many wins, he would have won and we would all be hailing his performance. We would also be able to see how terrible button had been this year. Ok he won 3 races this year but so did lewis in 2011 yet I think it is fair to say that lewis has taken more heat for 2011 than button has for this year. here is to the boys in brackley giving lewis the platform he needs!!

    1. and if the Red Bull had the reliability of the Ferraris, Vettel would have won 6 races.

      1. Exactly – it’s a game of ‘what if’s and it is essentially pointless – but good fun!

      2. Alonso and Vettel had the same number of retirements, two. FA at Belgium and Japan. SV at the European GP, and Italy.
        In contrast, LH retired 6 times.
        @xjr15jaaag

  14. I put him as number one due to his outstanding capacity of getting the maximum of situations, some of those caused by own mistakes. Sebastian was more consistent than Lewis (who was very consistent) and Fernando (who did falter just a tiny bit towards the end). But I’m actually ok with him on 3rd, that’s how close the top 3 this year have been.

    In general (not 2012 season), I rate Vettel behind Alonso, but ahead of Hamilton… also very slightly.

    And I believe out of the next two, Lewis should be this year’s number one… hope Keith sees it the same way!

    1. “Sebastian was more consistent than Lewis (who was very consistent) and Fernando ”
      He was not consistent in the begging of the season. Plus he made mistakes such as Malaysia where it was 50/50 each drivers fault. A driver like lewis and alonso would not have clipped the HRT. In abu dhabi he hit someone from behind and as Martin Brundell said it best “that was clumsy”. Then had to change his front wing because he hit the styrofoam board under the safety car. Let’s not forget Germany where he passed Button outside the track. Last but not least in Brazil he was again at least 50/50 to blame for the collision with Senna and was lucky no continue the race.
      Hardly sounds like the consistency of Lewis and Alonso demonstrated.

      1. In abu dhabi he hit someone from behind and as Martin Brundell said it best “that was clumsy”.

        I don’t think any driver in history could stand up to having all his races analyzed the way Vettel’s are. Brundle must remember a certain A. Senna clumsily crashing into him from behind in 1989 in Adelaide. I could point out some other embarrassing crashes in Senna’s career, and not from his youth either. Using the standards I see being applied to Seb, Ayrton was a rather unskilled driver!

        Let’s not forget Germany where he passed Button outside the track.

        Oh, the humanity! People simultaneously say that they want more exciting, aggressive driving, and find fault with drivers for running afoul of the increasingly nit-picky rules. In the “glory days” of F1 Vettel could have gotten away with ramming Alonso – today, his skills are called into question for running off track while attempting an overtake.

        1. Senna clumsily crashing into him from behind in 1989 in Adelaide.

          You must be kidding, how do you compare Senna crashing into the back of brundel during heavy heavy rain and compare that to seb clipping the back of a car during abu dhabi.

          increasingly nit-picky rules.

          I never knew that a driver passing outside the race track and getting called for it was considered nit-picky. A first for everything I guess.

      2. A driver like lewis and alonso would not have clipped the HRT.

        Alonso, perhaps. But Lewis has a long history of making contact with other cars. That’s especially the case if we include those incidents where Lewis was not at fault, as you do here for Vettel.

        1. Alonso would probably have just sat behind the HRT, got on the radio to the team and complained until it moved safely out of his way!

          That to me is why, if forced to order the top 3 I would struggle to put Alonso ahead of Vettel or Hamilton. I think there is no real way of knowing which was the ‘best’ overall and would prefer to put them joint first, but if forced to differentiate I would pick Hamilton or Vettel first as they seem to be real racers. As a result they also make more mistakes, but to me that’s racing.

      3. with consistent I mean (and I ‘ve said it elsewhere) that he always got the maximum, even if he had to fight for it because of own mistakes. He got the points that were possible. And they were the basis for his title.
        With consistent I don’t mean without fault, but I mean bringing home the points in good and in bad days.

      4. plus he made mistakes such as Malaysia where it was 50/50 each drivers fault.

        That’s odd, I always thought a driver who had left the track must always be careful when rejoining that same track. And I guess Karthikeyan admitting it was his own fault was wrong as well…

        If you think Karthikeyan was talking about Vettel when he was ‘bullied off track’ guess again. That was Hamilton.

      5. lewis won’t hit an HRT — but he can hit a “RED” ferrari stopped on a red light, at the pitlane

    2. I’d put Vettel’s slight contact in Abu Dhabi due to “race rustiness” – he had become used to leading from the front again with 4 straight wins and to then be sent to the back of the grid (a situation all but unbeknown to Vettel) would obviously come as an unwelcome surprise. I think the mental integrity he had to be able to fight back onto the podium really showed us what a great driver he is and you could see the elation (and perhaps relief!) on his face on the podium.

  15. this is ********…… he’s 2012 world champion!!!!! i can understand if he’s below alonso… but why he’s not ahead of hamilton!!!!!!
    come on…hamilton too had a very quick car…..and he hasn’t done anything better than vettel….

    1. LoreMipsumdOtmElor
      13th December 2012, 14:22

      I’m not a Hamilton fan but he would’ve clearly been world champion if it wasn’t for the technical failures.

      1. Karthikeyan would the world champion if he’d won all the races

    2. It is because that Vettel has fewer fan than Hamilton here I think :)

      1. @ka12 I can assure you it’s not. As it says in the article, this is my view on who performed best in 2012 – not who was the most popular (we have a different thing for that).

        Obviously Hamilton is in front of Vettel in the rankings. Where he is and why he’s there will be revealed tomorrow.

        1. It will be interesting to read the reasons why LH is ahead of SV. I too am sitting on the fence about this one so it will be fun to read and debate the reasons.

          I don’t think though, that one can say without the technical issues LH would clearly have been WDC. That’s playing woulda, coulda, shoulda, and if one is to somehow erase LH’s technical difficulties, then doesn’t one have to also erase SV’s? In which case it is not clear at all who would have been WDC. I think the only thing that is clear if both LH and SV had perfect reliability, is that the fight would have come down to SV and LH, not SV and FA.

          1. http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/groups/f1/forum/topic/alternative-history-mid-season-the-2012-championship-without-misfortune-1/

            This thread from the forum is impartial in as much as it can be when you’re extrapolating what went wrong in the season, but both Vettel and Hamilton’s bad luck (as well as others of course) are analysed and it concludes Hamilton would have won if things had gone his way. I agree it’s a big if and I understand why some people have a problem with it but in my view Hamilton was the best driver this season.

          2. davidnotcoulthard
            14th December 2012, 1:39

            @debaser91
            I’m fine with your opinion on how good Lewis is, but the “if” part seems to ignore that his car was an “extreme version”, so to speak, of the RB6, or even perhaps the race-leading Leyton House: Fast but fragile – If he loses all his problems and win the title people will probably cry that the car won it.

          3. I disagree, considering he had a world champion team mate who didn’t get near extracting the same pace out of the car anywhere near as consistently.

        2. So Ham in ranking n.2 revealed???

          1. No, that’s why I said:

            Where he is… will be revealed tomorrow.

    3. @jason12joy , no it isn’t an expletive, it’s an opinion. I would’ve had Alonso at number one despite him not being the world champion. Although there are good arguments for Vettel being at #1, there are compelling arguments to put Alonso, Hamilton or Raikkonen there too. And if the championship order was all we would go on, then it’d be like saying that both Williams drivers definitely did better than the Caterhams, STRs and Marussias, which isn’t necessarily true.

  16. In my opinion ranking top four is extremely hard this year, since they all drove in different teams. Alonso, Hamilton, Vettel and Räikkönen all had a great year and crushed their team mates. Alonso and Räikkönen with a bigger margin of course, due to having poor team mates.

    I’m a bit disappointed to see that in the end the humble guys (Vettel and Räikkönen) get ranked lower than those who are constantly bragging about their achievements and diminishing their team and other drivers (Hamilton and Alonso), even if the ranking might be correct.

    But I wonder if telling all year that you’re taking the maximum out of your car or that your rival has a dominant car actually affects people’s opinion. I think so, since most of the fans are certain that Alonso was the best driver of the year, even though Hamilton, Vettel and Räikkönen also had almost a perfect year.

    1. Raikkonen doesn’t speak out because he just doesn’t care, I wouldn’t give him extra credit for that. And one word I would not use to describe Sebastian Vettel is humble.

      1. Compared to our spanish friend, he is a monk.
        He generally admits mistakes and when he hasn’t had a perfect lap. In F1 this should count as humble.

        1. He generally admits mistakes

          erm..does he?

          1. Yes he does. Have you ever seen any of his interviews post-race? With Narain, he believed he was in the right, I’ll give him that. But he is not shy to say that things could have gone better, also from his side, wheras Alonso always praises himself saying that he got the maximum, even in races where Massa was better.

          2. @magon4

            With Narain, he believed he was in the right

            With quite good reason. The stewards did agree with him. Not to say that, that is always the truth, but it does mean that he has the facts, numbers and rules on his side. Which in most cases would be enough. From a subjective view, it might be different, but then it will be subjective. Of cause he will believe that he didn’t do anything wrong, like Karthikeyan will believe otherwise, and us fans will be somewhere in between based on our subjective standpoint. So I think its a little harsh to hold it against him like that.

          3. you seem to forget Germany when he passed Button outside the track.

          4. @mads

            Of cause he will believe that he didn’t do anything wrong, like Karthikeyan will believe otherwise

            Even Karthikeyan admitted fault.

            The only thing people can criticise Vettel for is the finger (which we have seen numerous times in F1 but only seems to be a big deal when Vettel raises it) and his comments towards Karthikeyan afterwards.

      2. @debaser91 – I don’t understand why Vettel is often considered to be arrogant. Sure, he’s had his finger thing, but Alonso had his dances in 2006 and he wasn’t generally considered to be full of himself before 2007.

        Vettel probably was childish back in 2010, but I was talking about this season.

        1. @hotbottoms

          I don’t see why people find the finger thing arrogant, is it annoying yes. Arrogant. No, its just his way of celebrating.

          However petty name calling to Narian, whining when he lost his from wing in Abu Dhabi and having a little fit about DRS when passed by Lewis weren’t childish?

          Not saying Alonso is any better but to say Vettel wasn’t childish this season is very ridiculous statement. To be honest, I’d say most of the top drivers, bar Webber are pretty full of themselves. Just some show it more than others.

          1. you mean Button calling Kobayashi an idiot and Webber calling Grojean a first lap nut jub (when Keith has gone to pains to show that really isn’t the case) are okay?

            And while Vettel clearly was agitated after he hit the DRS board in Abu Dhabi, afterwards, he admitted that it was his mistake, that he made things harder for himself, and that he should have been paying closer attention.

            But against Alonso (me and the team were perfect and didn’t make any mistakes), sure… Though there is something inherently childish to continuing to say you are perfect and made no mistakes when you have. Reminds me a bit of George W. Bush.

          2. @davef1 raising your index finger is not arrogant? if he did it at one or two races thats a fair comment…but 36? reminding the world he is number 1, numero uno, top of the heap, the best every race isnt arrogant? if it was his way of celebrating I’d like to see him show us 2 fingers when finishing second and 3 fingers in 3rd :)

          3. One thing about Vettel’s index finger – it only appears when he has won (qualifying or race). Alonso’s claims of being the best do not seem to show correlation with actual results. I think that is the important difference. Any victorious driver is entitled to express happiness at his success, the others should show respect to the victor.

  17. Completely agree with the ranking. Frankly I didn’t expect Seb to show up at #3 here. His drive in Spa was spectacular and so was his Brazil drive under pressure. I believe his Abu Dhabi drive’s been blown out of proportions given how the race seemed to play exactly into his hands.
    And then there were 2…I know the ranking’s been decided and it would be Alonso at the top most probably. But I just wish Lewis gets it, coz he was almost flawless the whole season (which cannot be said about Alonso, who seemed slightly listless when it counted) and was on the money race after race till the last one.

  18. Lewis was just too amazing this year…
    Lewis #1 and Fernando #2

  19. It’s so difficult to compose a top three this year. Vettel, Alonso and Hamilton have all had brilliant years and to be honest I don’t know which one of them would have become champion if they all would drive in the same car. As you explain, the minor details have made the difference this year: Vettel’s unnecessary penalties this year probably made him third on your list. I disagree, I would put Vettel ahead of Hamilton and Alonso.

    Vettel has really proven himself this year – like the 2010 title, it certainly wasn’t handed to him on a silver platter. His fine drives in Belgium, Abu Dhabi and Brazil proved to be crucial for his championship campaign, which I think makes the 2012 title stand out from the others. I wonder if he can emulate Schumacher’s championship tally.

    1. Oh, and thanks for using my quote :)

  20. I agree with this ranking. I also acknowledge that Keith proved me wrong :p. I really tought you would put him higher, due that being less hard to understand. However, logical and rational speaking Hamilton really deserves to be higher ranked then vettel. Choosing so would always arise controverse but ultimately it is the right choice! Glad you did so Keith. Have a none-vettel thumbs up of me :p.

  21. Before every one suggests that Vettel should be higher than 3rd ask yourdelf: had Button’s car broken down on the last lap in Interlagos which given Mclaren’s record this year was possible, Alonso would be champion, in that case where should Vettel stand? Absolutely nowhere!
    He made all kinds of mistakes, he delivered the most pathetic radio message of the year as in “…do something” in Hungary, he made a mockery of the podium ceremony in Abu Dhabi, he had STRs and Schumi make way for him while giving a hard time to anyone else. But most importantly after 3 consecutive he has failed emphaticaly to win the hearts of the german crowd. Just remember the bright red grandstands and the Mercedes-BMW booing in the early noughties Hockenheim.

    From the other 2 I’d go with Alonso for the simple reason that with Hamilton missing so much from the action due to his problems doesn’t necessarily mean that he would deliver on all these situations. Yes he would have more points but inevitably he would have made more mistakes or lose some battles with the rest of the grid tainting his year.
    As for Alonso I believe he was outstanding in every respect bar qualifying and that only occasionally. Yes he is a villain but I challenge anyone to point one a single race this year that he had the fastest car, save perhaps Monza. And above all he was taken 2 times by the Lotuses. Comparing these 2 with the 2 alternators is ridiculous its the RBR obligation to have a reliable car and it is fair when they pay the price for their failings, while on the other hand Ferrari couldn’t make Romain any less erratic.

    1. @philby All that says is you don’t like the guy, it says nothing about his qualities as a driver. Why should I care about him sounding a bit whingey on the radio (as pretty much ever driver does at one point or another) or, in your view, people at his home race not cheering him enough?

      Vettel put in several brilliant performances this year and it’s getting rather tiresome the lengths some people go to ignore that.

      1. @Keith, “Vettel put in several brilliant performances this year and it’s getting rather tiresome the lengths some people go to ignore that.” So did half the grid, there is not any sense in this.

        I didn’t go to any “lengths” I only stated some facts which don’t dispute.
        It isn’t that I don’t like him I just don’t rate him higher than Button and lower than ALO/HAM/kimi

        1. @philby

          I only stated some facts

          This stuff about the radio and the crowds and the podium is not fact, they are your opinions. Now, I don’t mind people sharing their opinions here – indeed I encourage it – but you won’t persuade people of your opinions by trying to claim they are facts.

          Particularly when the opinions you’re voicing aren’t relevant to his qualities as an F1 driver, which is the subject here. You surely don’t think I would write “I was going to put Vettel third but I thought his radio messages were a bit silly and he hasn’t got enough fans in Germany so I’ll move him down two places”, do you?

          1. @Keith,

            For the radio yes it is an opinion and irrelevant agreed. STRs and Schumi making way is fact, you chose to ignore, his many errors also.

            “I was going to put Vettel third but I thought his radio messages were a bit silly and he hasn’t got enough fans in Germany so I’ll move him down two places”

            No I didn’t his errors should have sufficed.

          2. @philby
            And how is Schumi and the 2 TRs moving over for him Vettels fault?

          3. Alonso THE Great
            14th December 2012, 16:55

            Hi Keith

            Vettel was not that brilliant this season as people try to make it up

            He was easily out paced by webber earlier in the season and only remained in 5th position until summer break

            Only when RB8 became quickest since singapore vettel drove better.

            Besides this vettel failed to respect other drivers with his ugly comments (Malaysia, Germany, Abu dhabi, Hungary ETc)

            Vettel is simply a driver who is in RIGHT place at the RIGHT time nothing more than that.

        2. @philby

          So did half the grid, there is not any sense in this.

          “Half the grid” didn’t perform as well as Vettel did they? Or perform well as often, now?

          It isn’t that I don’t like him I just don’t rate him higher than Button and lower than ALO/HAM/kimi

          Wow, just wow.

          1. @ David -A, Yes half the grid did produce brilliant drives
            HAM, BUT, ALO, MAS, RAI, MAL, PER, KOB, HULK, SENNA, WEB, RIC,ROS,MSC and Vettel of course , that’s 14 did produce a brilliant drive most of them more than one so in my opinion this argument didn’t hold any sense,

            “Wow, just wow.”

            ditto.

          2. @philby

            They may have produced brilliant performances, but the point raised by Keith is that Vettel’s performances, much like the other top drivers (RAI/HAM/ALO), stood out from the rest, which is why htey are at the top if the rankings.

            And Vettel not being any better than Button? How was Vettel no better than Button this year? I don’t remember Vettel going around 6 races where he only scored 7 points?

          3. Maldonado’s in Spain, Perez in Malaysia -those stand out the most- in my opinion was equal at the very least to the best of Vettel this year.
            Certainly Vettel outperformed Button this year, my assessment though was voiced regarding their quality as drivers over the last 4-5 years not this year especially.

          4. @philby

            Maybe in your opinion, but over the course of the season, the number of “brilliant” performances from most of the field doesn’t stand up to Vettel’s. Vet maintained a high level of performance, with a number of standouts (just like Ham/Alo/Rai) in order to win the title.

            And the only year Button could be argued to have been as good/better than Vettel was 2009 (first half). Even 2011, Button’s best year in many people’s eyes, was likely made to look better because of Hamilton’s underperformance, while Vettel romped away from the pair of them.

    2. @philby

      Before every one suggests that Vettel should be higher than 3rd ask yourdelf: had Button’s car broken down on the last lap in Interlagos which given Mclaren’s record this year was possible, Alonso would be champion, in that case where should Vettel stand? Absolutely nowhere!

      That’s a rather big and pointless “if”. What about “if” Vettel’s car didn’t break down in Valencia, or “if” Button’s car broke down in either of the other 2 races he won (Vettel would have inherited the wins, from 6th and 11th on the grid, no less)? Vettel would still have been worthy of a high ranking, since he fought all season, in a car that wasn’t always the best, and had a lot of inspired drives.

      He made all kinds of mistakes, he delivered the most pathetic radio message of the year as in “…do something” in Hungary, he made a mockery of the podium ceremony in Abu Dhabi, he had STRs and Schumi make way for him while giving a hard time to anyone else.

      I’ll assume you wrote on Kimi’s article about the “mockery” he made of the podium as well. And “all kinds of mistakes”? Yes, he had a few, but he usually atoned for them, by finishing 3rd in Abu Dhabi, and 6th in Brazil, despite the damage to his car.

      And above all he was taken 2 times by the Lotuses. Comparing these 2 with the 2 alternators is ridiculous its the RBR obligation to have a reliable car and it is fair when they pay the price for their failings, while on the other hand Ferrari couldn’t make Romain any less erratic.

      Romain didn’t take out Alonso in Japan. Kimi and Alonso had contact, and it wasn’t really even Raikkonen’s fault. And since this is a driver ranking, while it may be RBR/Mclaren’s obligation to make a reliable car, it isn’t Vettel or Hamilton that are to blame when their cars do break down.

      1. A) KIMI didn’t make a mockery “****” isn’t the same as “****” and he didn’t pour champagne on DC who is trying to do his job.
        B) Ok so what if I said Button making way as Schumi did? instead of breaking down.
        C) Yes in Suzuka is debatable but to say that ” it isn’t Vettel or Hamilton that are to blame when their cars do break down.” is ludicrous. They chose to drive for the Team that designed and raced an unreliable car. And if you don’t agree with me ask Lewis Hamilton who left Mclaren for this exact reason.

        1. It’s just a bit of fun though.
          (and it wasn’t champagne either)

          1. @xjr15jaaag,

            For your previous comment in which can’t reply for some reason

            STRs and and Schumi moving over is a fault of his, is an unfair advantage he enjoyed whie his rivals didn’t thus undermining his success.

          2. That’s invalid; the variation in cars means people have advantages everywhere.
            And Vettel didn’t force them to pull over for them did he?
            he didn’t stop the car and run over to tell them to move out of his way did he?

          3. @xjr15jaaag,

            It is not invalid it is unfair because in Vettel’s case it doesn’t happen randomly, and even if Schumi chose to do it for the Torro Rosso boys it’s safe to assume that he did tell them to move over, not in person obviously mr. Marko handles these things.

        2. @philby

          A) KIMI didn’t make a mockery “****” isn’t the same as “****” and he didn’t pour champagne on DC who is trying to do his job.

          So what? Kimi still swore. Should that be ignored? And what’s wrong with the champagne antics? DC and Vetel are good friends (I believe), and it was all in good humour.

          B) Ok so what if I said Button making way as Schumi did? instead of breaking down.

          Vettel would have passed Schumacher anyway. He was around a second a lap faster. Alonso wasn’t faster than Button. He wasn’t faster than Massa in fact, who let him through.

          C) Yes in Suzuka is debatable but to say that ” it isn’t Vettel or Hamilton that are to blame when their cars do break down.” is ludicrous. They chose to drive for the Team that designed and raced an unreliable car. And if you don’t agree with me ask Lewis Hamilton who left Mclaren for this exact reason.

          lol, if Mercedes are unreliable in 2013? Do we blame Hamilton for driving that car then? If you’re going to down grade a driver for driving an unreliable car, why not downgrade them for driving a slow one?

        3. Alonso THE Great
          14th December 2012, 11:36

          Your are spot on Kim Philby

    3. @philby – It’s also fair when Alonso and Ferrari pay the price for failing to produce a faster car.

    4. Thanks for replying to this @keithcollantine, saved me quite a bit of time :)

      One thing I’d like to point out though, to @philby and to all those who shares his views on Alonso’s retirements – when will people stop blaming Raikkonen for their collision in Suzuka? Alonso had a full car’s width to his right, there was absolutely zero need to squeeze Raikkonen to the left, and Raikkonen, rightly so, didn’t have to yield. Blaming Kimi for that pretty much shows the length some people will go to justify Alonso’s season as absolutely inch-perfect, and to be honest this refusal to acknowledge the very few mistakes he made this season (something that does not detract from his great performance this season at all) is just as tiresome as the constant Samurai references :P

      1. @Guilherme, There is still no excuse for SPA though, and also I never said Alonso had an inch-perfect year. He made mistakes, China for example from 7th to 9th trying to overtake a Williams, but it also happens to have had a better year than anyone else.

    5. Before every one suggests that Vettel should be higher than 3rd ask yourdelf: had Button’s car broken down on the last lap in Interlagos which given Mclaren’s record this year was possible, Alonso would be champion, in that case where should Vettel stand? Absolutely nowhere!

      You are wrong in your first line itself. If Button’s car had broken down, then Alonso and Vettel both would have gained a position (1st and 5th) and Red Bull would have ordered Webber to drop two places so that Vettel would have finished 4th and still won the title.

      1. @sumedh, quiet possibly i must agree but then all this “the drivers are free to race at Redbull”, and the bashing for 2 1/2 years since Germany 2010 would make them big fat liars, and noone like a Liar.

        1. @philby – In the Brazil race itself, Webber let Vettel through once. I am sure Red Bull wouldn’t hesitate to do the same once again.
          “Drivers are free to race” works as long as both of them are in mathematical contention. Once that is out, it is team orders at every team in F1.

          1. @sumedh, what if Button stayed in the raced but surrendering the lead to Alonso in Schumacher’s or Torro Rosso’s style?

          2. But he didn’t.
            So there’s no point arguing about it
            @philby

    6. had Button’s car broken down on the last lap in Interlagos which given Mclaren’s record this year was possible, Alonso would be champion, in that case where should Vettel stand? Absolutely nowhere!

      Umm.. I’m pretty sure that he would stand as runner up in the 2012 WDC. That’s not actually “absolutely nowhere”.

      I’ve never really understood the intense personal hostility some people seem to feel for Vettel, who strikes me as perfectly pleasant and engaging, at least by the standards of F1 drivers.

  22. no matter how you rank Kimi, Alonso, HAM or Seb – there will be controversy as either one would be a worthy #1.

    1. cotd
      couldn’t agree more

  23. Initially, I was very convinced that Vettel should be 2nd or 1st in the rankings. But reading this paints a better picture. He did make some judgement errors early on in the season. I had completely forgotten about that German GP penalty.

    This actually paints a very dangerous picture for 2013 though. This was a year when Red Bull was 2nd fastest and Vettel also did a number of mistakes. But they STILL became champions. If both go up a notch – which they are certainly capable of – 2013 will be another 2011! That title will be fully deserved – as was this – but it will be boring for the sport.

  24. I’m surprised (in a good way!) nobody has mentioned things like ‘nationality-bias’ yet! We can have nice things.

    While I got a different order for the top 4, I can’t really argue with the reasoning, as it was very close. As for Vettel, I remember cheering when he won in Singapore, despite not being a fan at all, it was time for him to win again. I do wonder what his ranking would have been if Lewis didn’t break down in Singapore or Webber would be able to start properly, but that’s a load of ifs. His driving after the summerbreak was phenomenal, spare a race or two.

  25. Seems fair, particularly when you compare Vettel’s qualifying record to his team mate, which has to be one of the fairest ways of measuring a driver’s performance. Alonso beat his team mate 18 times, Hamilton beat Button 16 while Vettel beat Webber 12 times and that was helped by Webber’s mechanical woes in Valenica and the team’s mistake in Q2 in Barcelona. Plus the average gap between VET and WEB was only 0.11 sec compared to Alonso’s 0.33 and Hamilton’s 0.27

    1. I don’t think either Button or Massa is as strong at qualifying in general as Webber is. I know a lot of people like to talk about Webber as though he isn’t much of a benchmark, but he is actually a very good qualifier.

      1. I agree, although Webber’s qualifying this year has been mostly disregarded in driver reviews.

    2. Those are some odd numbers you picked to measure a drivers performance.

      I would notice that Webber is a much stronger Number 2 then Massa or Button, and that Vettel still beat him over the course of the season by over 100 points. He had five wins to Webbers two, and ten podiums to Webbers four.

      Meanwhile Hamilton, who is presumably going to be ranked second here, finished the season essentially tied with his (more lower ranked) teammate in points and results.

      These lists are always basically popularity contests. If you want want driver A to rank higher than driver B there is usually some data you can point to support that conclusion.

      1. I don’t see how qualifying performance is an odd measure when it’s generally the one time team mates can be compared with more or less no outside interference, that you get in the race. Clearly Vettel has had a great season and I’m not arguing he should be ahead of anyone bar Alonso and Hamilton.

        1. @katederby

          And Webber had a good season as well. Or at least a much better season than Massa and Button. And as @aka_robyn pointed out, Webber is a very good qualifier. Massa and Button on the other hand aren’t.
          So no, comparing the difference in qualifying between Vettel and Webber to the difference between Alonso and Massa or Hamilton and Button isn’t a good yardstick.

  26. I personally believe it’s Ham at no. 1 over Alo.

    Correct me if I am wrong, I think both have been absolutely flawless apart from Alo spinning his car in Q2 in Australia whereas I can’t think of any driving error by Ham. In terms of racing, both are equally matched according to me.

    I think Keith ranks Alo no.1 so I’ll be really awaiting the reasons for the same if that’s the order

    1. You are 100% worng, in all the forums here and @ any other site Alonso is nr.1

  27. Thank you, someone has not said Vettel did a brilliant job purely because he won. Whilst he made many good overtakes this year, I still don’t think he is in a HAM/BUT/ALO/RAI league. Some of the brilliant recovery drives he made were of his own making, it seems Martin Brundle is the only person to acknowledge that VET turned in on SEN putting him on the back foot. He also was the maker of much of his trouble in Abu Dhabi, damaging then futher damaging it by hitting a static object.

    1. Making mistakes is one thing, atoning for them is another.

      And how would Button in the same league as those guys and Vettel not?

      1. @david-a I admire your patience, mate, I really do :P Every time I see someone saying Vettel is not on the same league as Button it just reasures my belief that some people will never, ever regard Vettel as a Top 3 or even Top 4 driver.

      2. @david-a

        Because they don’t like Vettel. That’s all there is to it.

        1. I don’t dislike Vettel, but there can be no denying that Button has only once caused a collision in the last 4 years of racing and whilst not as fast as Vettel is much safer in wheel to wheel action.

          1. By that logic, Hamilton isn’t in the same league as Button either, based on the collisions Hamilton caused in 2011.

    2. @sw280

      it seems Martin Brundle is the only person to acknowledge that VET turned in on SEN putting him on the back foot.

      How exactly does a driver whose got an inside line turn in on another driver on the outside? Vettel would have had to steer away from the corner to do that…

      Vettel passed Senna into the hairpin but because of the Williams straight line speed Senna was able to retake Vettel. Vettel went to the inside (as he’s got every right to do) and kept his line while leaving plenty of space on the outside for Senna and making the apex. So Vettel didn’t understeer into Senna or made a move towards Senna.

    3. @sw280

      Never mind, I was thinking about Abu Dhabi. You were refering to Brazil.

      Although I do have to say Senna lunched up the inside of two cars before getting halfway next to Vettel. So It would have been impossible for Vettel to have seen Senna there.

  28. So Vettel became a champion with slower and not that reliable car, beating better drivers? In fact, beating the same two drivers three(four) times in a row? I am pleased, Vettel should be pleased, too.

    1. @crr917

      I agree. Alonso can win this one. Vettel got the real prize.

  29. Not sure why some people are getting so steamed over this ranking business – not just Vettel, but the whole list

    It’s just one person offering his opinion, after all. I don’t happen to agree with Keith, but it’s not that big a deal.

  30. Was gonna argue the wheres or whats. But the photo at the top is…….awsome.

    To capture the Pirelli logo as a ring while the car looks static is quality.

    1. slow shutter speed

  31. I agree with this ranking, to be frank Keith has always ranked drivers from the top drawer very accurately throughout the whole season. Vettel drove immaculately throughout the middle and end part of the season but where was he at the start? That’s right not too close to the front of the grid.

    1. Not sure what you mean by “not too close to the front of the grid”. If you mean his qualifying position, it was a bit poor. But in Alonos’s case his poor qualifying position seems to be regarded as an actual point in his favor, so I don’t see why it’s held against Vettel.

      In you mean his race performances, after five races Vettel was leading the WDC standings. He must have been doing something right.

  32. Ooops, closer inspection looks like a painting,

    heading for the wardrobe…..

  33. The 1 stat I look for in the year when trying to rank who drove better in a season, is just how often drivers beat their team mates, which is something that @keithcollantine has already provided.

    Looking at the top 3 and how many times they beat their teammates in the race, 1. Alo (17/17-100%), 2. HAM (9/13 – 69%), 3. VET (11/17 – 64%)

    It does indeed show how close the race for 2nd/3rd was…

    Note: Even though Kimi was up 88% on Grosjean, I don’t think Kimi was a top 3 driver this year, I still feel that the Lotus/Kimi/Gro combo let a great opportunity go, much like MERC/SCH/ROS in 2011.

    1. The 1 stat I look for in the year when trying to rank who drove better in a season, is just how often drivers beat their team mates

      That’s a meaningless statistic for many reasons. It assumes that the gap in skill between drivers and their teammates is roughly equal across teams, which is obviously not the case. It also does not take into account team orders – over the last several races Massa looked to have the beating of Alonso, by quite a margin in some cases. But he dutifully allowed Alonso to finish ahead of him to maximize his points total.

      1. It was just 2 races, which would still mean better percentage then the others. I agree this not the most accurante thing and shouldn’t be used soley to determine who drove how well, but just pointing out that Massa in reality only two times gave position to Alonso. (USA and Brasil)

        1. @brace

          What about Korea then?

          And I found it quite suspicious that when Ferrari/Alonso actually needed Massa, or rather when Massa would no longer harm Alonso’s chances, Massa ‘suddenly’ rediscovered his form and even started beating Alonso in outright pace.

  34. I’d love to hear from Newey which driver he prefers. He has said many, many times how hard worker and technical Vettel is and his ability to tell exactly what he needs from the car. Many people believe a world champion is only about how they perform in the track.
    Alonso is more aggressive, Hamilton may be faster (in 1 lap, specially). Vettel is both and work better and harder, it seems.

    1. I think you can find the same things being said about Alonso, even way back in 2005 or 2006. There was some comment from James Allen or Ted Kravitz about it and about how McLaren’s practices might differ from Renault’s and that it could be slightly frustrating for Alonso not being able to work as fast with engineers and be involved with them as he used to be in Renault.

      1. @brace

        Ted Kravitz? The man convinced Button would have won Monza 2011 if not for being stuck behind Schumacher for 20 laps? That Ted Kravitz?
        The Ted Kravitz who always tries to take a dib at Vettel’s on or off track performance?

        Sorry, that man is a joke. A biased joke.

    2. Interesting point, but Id be amazed to hear that Hamilton and Alonso don’t do everything possible to win every race.

  35. William Brierty
    13th December 2012, 22:12

    I love this. Its one of the great pub debates of the land. Sebastian Vettel: benchmark or beneficiary? OK, I’m getting off the fence. I see no legendary qualities in Sebastian Vettel. For me, I have always stuck with the concept that a great driver is a driver that does well in a poor car, no matter what the balance. You may say, look at Monza 2008, and yes he did do well in a midfield car, but a car that was good in the wet because of its tendency to over-heat its tyres in dry. And Vettel had the best car in ’09, ’10 and ’11, and even though the McLaren was faster this year, it was so unreliable Lewis lost two victories, and probably a further two to operational issues and contact in Brazil.

    Also, in manner comparable to Button and Massa, his performance falls off the cliff when his preferred balance isn’t there. In the first half of the season Webber fundamentally beat Vettel, because it seems that Vettel lacks that versatility that makes Alonso and Hamilton, in my view, the finest drivers in the world.

    Now personally I don’t subscribe to this view that Vettel can’t race. He is fantastically accurate and sometimes very aggressive wheel-to-wheel racing, but is lacking that confident intensity that enables Button, Alonso and Hamilton to swarm all over the car ahead overwhelm them and pass them. Actually I would compare his racing style to Raikkonen’s; sometimes spectacular, always accurate, but also hesitantly intelligent. Actually Vettel and Raikkonen are hugely similar in driving style. Both have great race pace, both are accurate racers, both are great on their tyres, both are clean in the wet and both can control a race from the front comfortably and calmly. Vettel wipes the floor with Raikkonen in qualifying though, which gives him great grid positions, and also the undesirable statistic of never winning from outside of the top 3 on the grid.

    Don’t get me wrong, when I say there’s nothing legendary about Vettel I’m not doing him down to Raikkonen/Button/Rosberg levels, he’s still one of the “big three”, I just think that the greater versatility of Alonso and Hamilton put them that one step ahead. I’m also not saying that Vettel will never be legendary, because most of these phenomenal feats performed by my personal top driver, Alonso, are as a result of his huge experience, which will come to the tender 25 year old in time. So maybe, at the end of his career Vettel will be able to raise that finger confident in the knowledge that he is a legend of Formula 1 and the equals of Fernando Alonso and Lewis Hamilton, but he has a way to go yet.

    1. Great comment

    2. You may say, look at Monza 2008, and yes he did do well in a midfield car, but a car that was good in the wet because of its tendency to over-heat its tyres in dry.

      And what excuse do you use for his excellent dry performances in that same Torro Rosso? Wait, let me guess; “It was a Newey car”.

      And Vettel had the best car in ’09

      Did he? Did he really? Red Bull started the season slower than Brawn. Then they gained the upper hand. But along with their succes came a resurgent McLaren who were just as quick if not quicker. And then there were plenty of races where the Brawn was quick(er) as well. Valencia and Monza for instance. Button hit the ground running but lost form halfway through the season. When Button wasn’t scoring Barrichello was. And good points I might add.

      In the first half of the season Webber fundamentally beat Vettel

      Newsflash, fundamentally now means three times out of 10!!
      So Massa fundamentally beat Alonso in the second half of the season?

      and also the undesirable statistic of never winning from outside of the top 3 on the grid.

      As opposed to Hamiltons amazing statistic of never having won from outside the top 4. Because that 1 place makes all the difference.

      1. William Brierty
        14th December 2012, 8:52

        OK, you asked for it…
        1. The STR3 was very solid car, which explains Vettel’s fourth place in Shanghai, but also explains why Bourdais showed flashes of pace. Its nothing to do with with fact that it was “a Newey car”, it was just a good package, and could be mentioned in the same sentence as the Renault R28, or mentioned in the same sentence as the McLaren MP4-23 in the wet.
        2. I knew I’d get picked up on this. When I say Vettel had the fastest car in 2009, I mean the raw pace at the final races. Now its right that you query that, because Hamilton was on pole in Abu Dhabi, but remember you can read less into qualifying in 2009 due to the fuel loads. Also the MP4-24 was very track specific and struggled with high speed corners, explaining Hamilton’s poles at the point-and-squirt tracks like Valencia, Monza, Singapore and Abu Dhabi, and you may say that Hamilton won at “Red Bull tracks” in 2009; but remember Vettel cocked up qualifying at both Hungary and Singapore. I would imagine that the average percentage deficit to pole position of the Red Bull was the smallest of any ’09 chassis.
        3. Before the German Grand Prix this year, Webber had more wins, more points and had beaten Vettel in qualifying in 5/9 races.That’s pretty fundamental for me.
        4. What I was illustrating with that statistic is that Vettel seldom has to fight for his wins. How many Vettel wins can you think of when he was under real pressure? I got Spain ’11, Monaco ’11 and Bahrain ’12. How many races has Hamilton fought and won the race? US ’07, Monaco ’08, Germany ’08, Turkey ’10, Canada ’10, China ’11, Germany ’11, Canada ’12, Hungary ’12 and US ’12. I rest my case.

        1. nonsense mate….

        2. 1. The STR3 was very solid car, which explains Vettel’s fourth place in Shanghai, but also explains why Bourdais showed flashes of pace. Its nothing to do with with fact that it was “a Newey car”, it was just a good package, and could be mentioned in the same sentence as the Renault R28, or mentioned in the same sentence as the McLaren MP4-23 in the wet.

          You’re overrating the STRs there. STR and Red Bull weren’t particularly good in 2008, clearly only capable of being 6th/7th fastest over the course of the season. The MP4-23 was always fastest or 2nd fastest, and the R28 fourth (maybe even 3rd near the end of the season, when Piquet had good pace, and BMW switched toward 2009).

          3. Before the German Grand Prix this year, Webber had more wins, more points and had beaten Vettel in qualifying in 5/9 races.That’s pretty fundamental for me.

          More wins and points because of Vettel’s alternator and Narain Karthikeyan respectively. Otherwise, Vettel was almost always faster, and the fact htat Webber was only ahead in races he won, suggests that Vettel was better when the car wasn’t that good.

        3. it was just a good package

          No it wasn’t. In normal conditions it was the 6th fastest car at best. The McLaren, Ferrari, Renault, BMW and Red Bull were all quicker in outright pace. In the wet it was indeed a better car but then the difference was still made by Vettel who outqualified Bourdais by almost a second in Monza and who drove past Bourdais in Spa while battling Kubica on slicks making Bourdais look like he was standing still.

          Also the MP4-24 was very track specific

          As was the RB5 and the Brawn GP. The difference however between all three cars is that the Brawn GP was the only car to enjoy a clear advantage over the rest for half a dozen consecutive races. Which was one third of the entire season.

          Before the German Grand Prix this year, Webber had more wins, more points and had beaten Vettel in qualifying in 5/9 races.That’s pretty fundamental for me.

          Webber had one more win which would have been equal if not for Vettel’s alternator trouble. That’s also the reason Webber had more points. Vettel outraced Webber in 6 of those 9 races and when Vettel won he absolutely dominated Webber. When Webber won however Vettel wasn’t far behind.
          Also, you say Hamilton is of legendary status. But he has been outraced by his teammate more than Alonso and Vettel combined. Sorry, I fail to see your ‘logic’.

          What I was illustrating with that statistic is that Vettel seldom has to fight for his wins.

          That’s his strength and also shows why many consider him to be (already) greater than Hamilton. It can’t be Vettel’s fault that nobody can touch him once he exits the first corner in first. Also, Hamilton has had plenty of races where he should have done what Vettel has managed to do so many times. The fact that Hamilton hasn’t been able to do that is very telling to me.

          At the end of the day this is just a ranking put forward by an F1 Fan. Many will agree with it, many will not. What matters is what is achieved though. In the past four years Hamilton has finished fourth or lower. And that’s not just because his car wasn’t up to the challenge.

  36. Just to make a statement: I think most people who agree with his ranking, will mostly also agree that Vettel’s 2012 campaign was one of the best in recent years. There are only a handfull of drivers who drove better the last 5 years or so. Unfortunaly, he met some of those this year. Vettel, Alonso and Hamilton all 3 drove really superb. That also means though you will have to judge them on the smallest mistakes. In that aspect it is Vettel who felt short, so in the end his ranking is fair. Harsh, but fair. I have to add that if you put those 3 in any order, you are never far away from the truth. Very little to choose between indeed.

    1. I was thinking the same. Just 2 years ago they all fought for the championship, but the way they drove that year was ridiculous compared to this year. They all had more then few off moments.
      Any version of this three from 2012, driving in 2010 against older versions would have been champ easily.
      Shows you just how much they progressed in just 2 years and the quality of top drivers this days.

      I remember in 2006, after Schumacher crashed out of Australia, he said that every driver has to make one such a mistake a year, and that when Alonso does it, he will catch him.
      Little did he know, that Alonso’s mistake never came. The worst Alonso did was perhaps his 5th place in Indianapolis. That year I became a diehard Alonso fan, even though I was huge Kimi fan year before and wishing all the misfortune on Alonso in 2005. :)
      Kimi on the other hand got my respect with his 2003 drives and I so hope that guy comes back. One of the best, definitely. That’s the guy who could mix it with the top 3 of today.

    2. Yes, I’m totally with you on this – excellent comment. It was a great season in terms of standard of driving, especially when compared to 2010 as brace mentions. In all honesty, Vettel Alonso and Hamilton could all be tied in 1st place it’s so close, but if I had to choose which one to put in 3rd I would put Vettel there. Alonso and Hamilton didn’t drive into other drivers (as Vettel did to Senna at Brazil) as far as I can remember.

  37. Vettel didn’t achieve much in the early part of the season, when he didn’t have a dominant car. That says it all really, Alonso did.

    That he could gain many places, when out of position due to penalties or incidents, is surely only what we’d expect of a top driver (that he clearly is) in one of the best 4 cars on track, and is not proof that he can deal with pressure – which for me is fighting and beating rivals in similar cars. He didn’t beat Webber by a lot despite being number 1, clearly had a better car than Alonso, and only beat Hamilton thanks to the latter’s ridiculous misfortune and mismanagement.

    Brilliant series of articles.

    1. @switchbacker

      I agree, one second place in Australia splitting the faster McLarens, one potential fourth (and maybe even a third place as he was catching Hamilton) in Malaysia, victory and a championship lead in Bahrein some 40 seconds ahead of his much better team mate…

      If you think about it, it’s unbelievable that Vettel got back from such a poor start to the season… But that’s Adrian Newey for ya.

      He didn’t beat Webber by a lot despite being number 1

      So true, just a measily 102 points… If he had outscored Webber by 200+ points maybe he would have impressed me. Still, even if he had we all know that’s only down to Red Bull favoring Vettel and Webber getting a dead Kangaroo stuffed in the car every race.

      1. I didnt say he was better than Webber, I said it was relatively close (12/8 is close in my book even if Vettel’s victories and Webber’s more frequent misfortune make the points gap, as you point out, significant.), and as a number 1 driver he has a clear advantage, even if Red Bull handle it more diplomatically than to stuff a kangaroo into Webber’s monocoque. He’s a tall guy there isnt space. Or remove a gearbox seal.

        I was arguing that he was not as good a driver as Alonso or Hamilton, and indeed his success in those 4 was helped by the misfortune of who else but Hamilton.

        As for Alonso, most agree that his Ferrari at that time was slower, so admitting I phrased my point clumsily, it stands.

        Vettel clearly had a great season, I just think Alonso and Hamilton were better. Sorry.

        1. Here you must Compare his Age and F1 Experience I don’t think neither Alonso nor Hamilton was as Matured as Vettel was in 25 Do they??
          Vettel was Just getting Better and Better. Webber out scored Vettel in First 10 races but remember Vettel has 2 Zero Point Finshes Compared to webber in Spain.
          Vettel was equal to Lewis and Alonso Just edges the both in Experience.

          1. @harsha +1111 i thought i was the only one who noticed and thought this

    2. Vettel may have been a bit slower at the start of the season but he was fast when it mattered the most. On the other hand Alonso was the one that failed under pressure at the end of the season when he was slower than Massa. It would’ve been interesting to see what Massa could’ve achieved if Alonso was not slowing him down in the last couple of races. At the moments when Vettel was leading the championship he was still risking his wins chasing the fastest laps despite the calls from the pit wall to slow down. For me that is a racer. On the other hand at the last race, with nothing to lose, Alonso still didn’t have the balls to take more risks and try to win the race. Instead he chose to play it safe and wait for others to make mistakes.

  38. Absolute rubbish….. I really enjoy this website but i have to disagree with this one I’m afraid (I have agreed with the others especially the Hulk coming 5th). Vettel needs to be second or 1st. Simply because Hamilton was excellent, and yes he got the most out of the car and didn’t make mistakes, but so have a lot of other drivers in slower cars. All I need to say is, if Hamilton had vettels season this year with all the wins, poles, overtaking and drama (even in one of the fastest cars) he would have unquestionably been hailed the greatest F1 driver ever by all the British press! Therefore why cant Vettel receive this praise….

    1. You can disagree without having to say this is absolute rubbish. I disagree with the ranking too, but the fact is the top 3/4 drivers were all good and could reasonably have been ordered in any way. I would rank them differently and put Vettel higher too but I think Keith has done a good job of explaining his personal rankings and given the slim margins I don’t think that’s at all unreasonable or surprising.

      1. Agreed. Apologies! Was posting in a rush. Sorry Keith. However I do still disagree.
        Oli

  39. Too much argument about who is the best… I admire the fact that Vettel make his victories or other achievements look “easy made”.He is great,taking the results he wants,exactly when he wants them by taking out the best of a really good car…and he never make to much noice about himself like “l am a great driver but the car was awful”…l am not Vettel s fun but he is the champion.

  40. always a lot of excuses for hamilton, poor hamilton suffered a failure, his team let him down.
    it’s called racing people, it happens to all drivers.
    to reduce what a driver has achieved by winning a wdc to simply who designed the car belittles the efforts of many in a team and particularly the driver. All great F1 drivers have benefited from car design in the past and will continue to be the case in the future. Button 2009, and a certain championship in 2008 springs to mind, along with schuey, mansell, senna, prost and alonso, stewart, clark. Does it make what they achieved any less significant. the answer is simply no.
    for me, alonso was the best driver in the field, vettel was able to mix it with him, kimi was great first year back and I looked forward to them all again hitting the track in 2013

    1. @kkarl

      it’s called racing people, it happens to all drivers.

      Of course it does, no one is saying otherwise. But it does not happen to all drivers to an equal degree, which is where differences arise.

      1. whom then determines equal degree in motor racing. to me, that then becomes based on a person’s opinion, biased or otherwise about what the result might or could have been. we don’t operate in such a world. results are results based on what happens on the track. It may appear overly simple, but it is what it is.
        of course I’ve mentioned the ‘b’ word. I’m not suggesting a biased, I appreciate your efforts greatly for the comprehensive articles and information you gather for people like me.

  41. vettel should be number two atleast. people continue to down play his achievements but he continues to deliver when it matters most. hence three titles in a row! nuf said

  42. I think this was his best year, like Alonso’s was. He delivered when he had to and while you won’t catch me complaining about anyone dominating a race or season, it was nice to see another side to him where he was forced to battle for position. He really, really stood out in Spa for me and I think his performance there was a highlight of the season. Recovering like he did in Abu Dhabi and Brazil is the sort of thing that you would look back at in 20 years and hold in such a high regard as you would any other nail biting race.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

All comments are moderated. See the Comment Policy and FAQ for more.