Sky to show final pre-season test in 3D

2013 F1 season

Paul di Resta, Daniel Ricciardo, Jerez, 2013Sky have announced they will show the final pre-season test of 2013 live and in 3D.

Footage from the four-day test at the Circuit de Catalunya from February 28th to March 3rd will be broadcast from 2pm on the Sky 3D and Sky Sports F1 channels. Coverage on the final day will start at 1pm.

The coverage will be presented by Simon Lazenby with commentary from David Croft. It will also be shown in HD for those without 3D televisions.

Sky’s director of 3D John Cassy said: ??It?s proved a huge success with other sports, and now for the first time ever, 3D will bring TV viewers a new perspective on Formula 1.

Sky F1 commentator Martin Brundle said: “3D will show us the real challenges of the race track with added depth and perspective. It will be a new, immersive experience for viewers and I can?t wait to see what F1 action in 3D will reveal.”

2013 F1 season


Browse all 2013 F1 season articles

Image ?? F1 Fanatic | f1fanatic.co.uk

Advert | Go Ad-free

45 comments on Sky to show final pre-season test in 3D

  1. FD (@fd) said on 6th February 2013, 9:16

    Wow! Bit by bit, broadcasting gets better. Now ONE HD in Australia, please follow suit

    • electrolite (@electrolite) said on 6th February 2013, 9:20

      The technology was already there. Unfortunately, it’ll be many years before we have the option of watching everything in 3d. My response to this was a.) Only now? and b.) Just one test?

    • Adam B (@lurker) said on 6th February 2013, 9:27

      I don’t care if OneHD broadcasts in 3D. I just wish they wouldn’t interrupt the race very 4 minutes for 3 minutes of ads.

      • Prisoner Monkeys (@prisoner-monkeys) said on 6th February 2013, 9:32

        @lurker – How do you expect them to pay for the broadcast rights, then?

        • Adam B (@lurker) said on 6th February 2013, 9:38

          that argument might even carry weight if they didn’t somehow manage it for other sporting events.

          For example, when the MotoGP is on, they have advertising between Moto3 Moto2 and MotoGP, but only have one ad break in the middle of the actual race.

          This is on the same network that broadcasts the F1 race. They are notoriously bad at it, and the local commentators are absolutely woeful.

          • Prisoner Monkeys (@prisoner-monkeys) said on 6th February 2013, 9:46

            For example, when the MotoGP is on, they have advertising between Moto3 Moto2 and MotoGP, but only have one ad break in the middle of the actual race.

            MotoGP races are shorter than Grands Prix.

            MotoGP gets broadcast with the support categories; Formula 1 does not.

            The broadcast rights to Formula 1 are probably more expensive than the rights to MotoGP.

        • Nick.UK (@) said on 6th February 2013, 11:53

          A fair point, but is it worth paying for the right to broadcast if the overall quality of that broadcast is destroyed by the fact you only end up actually showing 60% of what you paid for the right to show.

        • JCost (@jcost) said on 6th February 2013, 12:54

          Split screen?

    • Keith Collantine (@keithcollantine) said on 6th February 2013, 9:27

      Amusingly, the press release came out while there was nothing on the track here in Jerez…

  2. Alfie (@alfie) said on 6th February 2013, 9:16

    Testing…coverage?

    I need to lie down.

  3. James Raine said on 6th February 2013, 9:20

    Who cares about 3D? Put the gimmicks aside, Sky, and offer F1 without the up-sell.

  4. andae23 (@andae23) said on 6th February 2013, 9:26

    I’m actually in the position that it is cheaper for me to go to the Barcelona test than to buy a 3d TV.

  5. GT_Racer said on 6th February 2013, 9:35

    F1 has been filmed in 3D before, FOM ran some trials using top end equipment at the 2010 Canadian Gp & had 3D In-Car cameras filming footage during practice at a couple races in 2009-2010.

    The reason that was the end of F1 in 3D is that it was discovered that 3D didn’t work for F1, As soon as cameras needed to move, zoom or re-focus the footage just became blurred & I gather the 3D In-Car footage was also considered unspectacular.
    It was shown off to the media & the response from them was just as unimpressive.

    Indycar, Nascar, American Le Mans, Grand-Am, V8 Supercars, DTM & I believe the SuperGT series in Japan have also run various 3D trials & all abandoned it & came to the same conclusion.

    So the 2-3 people who will try watching in 3D will likely be switching over to the HD channel soon enough.

  6. robk23 (@robk23) said on 6th February 2013, 9:43

    Well I’m not bothered about the 3D bit (I just don’t understand the obsession with 3D these days) but coverage of testing is great! At least it will mean more coverage than SSN offer at present.

    • Agree, I dont have a 3D TV so I care little for that, but just to have some coverage of the testing is good news. Barca tests are when we should be seeing the cars show some indictation of a pecking order, and hopefully a far bit of running.

    • Nick.UK (@) said on 6th February 2013, 11:58

      3D only works when it’s filmed with a 3D lense. Films that get converted in post production are what look rubbish. Personally I love 3D when it is A) done right, B) warranted. I don’t know if this F1 coverage will be either. Without an immersive cinema/proper sized IMAX screen to watch 3D on, it just seems pointless.

  7. Dizzy said on 6th February 2013, 9:50

    I saw some of the 3D stuff that LG filmed & have to say I was far from impressed when it came to the on-track stuff.

    There were shots of stationary cars & some stuff shot in the pits which looked great in 3D, However the stuff shot out on track was far from impressive.
    The lower shots at track level kinda looked OK when cars were coming straght towards the camera but as soon as the car got close to the camera or the camera needed to move to follow the car it just looked a mess. The trackside scenery looked great in higher shots but the actual cars didn’t.
    Some of the onboard stuff looked kinda cool but again was nothing spectacular & there were moments when the 3D effect seemed to get lost & everything just looked blurred.

    I also saw the sky goodwood 3D stuff last year & felt the same, some of it looked OK but most just fell flat.

    Some stuff works brilliantly in 3D, some movies & animation in particular & there are some sports which do come across nicely in 3D, Sadly from my experience F1 isn’t one of them.

  8. Mattj99 said on 6th February 2013, 9:55

    That could be awesome. The standard FOM footage does flatten circuits out it will be good to see how well 3D shows the elevation changes.

    • david d.m. said on 6th February 2013, 16:55

      I think they should be putting onboard HD cameras first and then look at 3D, after all only sky in the UK will be broadcasting it.

  9. William (@william) said on 6th February 2013, 10:41

    ONE and TEN gives us great coverage besides the backlash ahead of the Bahrain Grand Prix. Hopefully ONE will be doing the live qualifying and races intead of TEN as they have Graham Norton on at 9.30pm Sundays as part of their “Super Sunday”. As for MotoGP they have a lot more shorter breaks maybe that is a sign of things to come for F1. What is the broadcast details for the 2013 Formula One at Albert Park and for the rest of the season

  10. James (@jaymz) said on 6th February 2013, 10:44

    Absolutely brilliant. Now all sky have to do is put constant re runs of races on the channel when it’s mostly idle and it will be perfect!

  11. John Bergqvist said on 6th February 2013, 10:53

    Sky are only doing this (using their own cameras) because FOM don’t cover testing live themselves. Don’t expect to see it during the races unless FOM follows suit (which is unlikely).

    • Elliot Horwood . said on 7th February 2013, 7:36

      FOM does cover testing, i saw some footage with the F1 watermark bottom left from hamiltons crash…

      • John Bergqvist (@) said on 16th February 2013, 14:38

        Yes, but only that footage though. We’ve come to the conclusion that FOM were filming that day for footage for the season review, and just happened to capture Hamilton’s crash by coincidence.

  12. I am so looking forward to seeing the final test, live on TV. Haven’t got a 3D tv, but my work place has though :D

  13. invisiblekid said on 6th February 2013, 11:22

    The coverage will be presented by Simon Lazenby

    I’ll pass then.

  14. BradandCoffee said on 6th February 2013, 11:31

    I hate to ruin the fun, but there probably won’t be any in-car 3D (which would be the real treat). I think we’d have heard about it if those camera pods had been updated with an additional camera.

    • GT_Racer said on 6th February 2013, 11:48

      There won’t be any in-car cameras as teams run there own things in the camera locations during testing.

      However I understand that FOM have upgraded the In-car cameras to HD for this season.

      • John Bergqvist said on 6th February 2013, 14:33

        Well Sky do sponsor Mclaren, so they may convince them to stick a 3D onboard camera in their car. It’s Sky doing the 3D filming, not FOM.

        • GT_Racer said on 6th February 2013, 16:57

          Sky don’t sponsor McLaren.

          Also Sky don’t have any 3D in-car cameras (FOM have 1 custom made unit which isn’t live broadcast) nor do they have any of the transmission/reception systems used for in-car cameras.

          Everything on & in the cars linked to the in-car cameras is designed around FOM’s systems, Getting cameras & transmission systems from elsewhere would just cause problems as they almost certainly would not fit correctly on or in the cars.

          Also as I said in the earlier post, During the test’s teams run there own things on the camera locations (Piton tubes on the roll-bar cam, Stuff aimed at tyre data on nose/side camera locations), Teams don’t even allow FOM to test new in-car cameras during the test’s, Its why new in-car camera units are usually tested during Friday practice at race weekends.

  15. Mallesh Magdum (@malleshmagdum) said on 6th February 2013, 11:43

    for most people, going to the race, etc will be cheaper than buying a 3D TV with a 3D connection! Not impressed

    • LoreMipsumdOtmElor said on 6th February 2013, 11:51

      3D TVs aren’t that expensive these days. Doesn’t change the fact though that 3D is utter crap and the only application is to show it to your friends. Once everyone has a 3D TV, the hype will hopefully be over.

Add your comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

All comments must abide by the comment policy. Comments may be moderated.
Want to post off-topic? Head to the forum.
See the FAQ for more information.