Sky to raise F1 channel cost and offer cut-price stream

Television

Christian Horner, Buddh International Circuit, 2012The cost of watching F1 on Sky in the UK will rise to ??510 per season next month.

On April 9th the Sky F1 channel will become part of the Sky Sports package which costs ??21 per month on top of a ??21.50 per month Sky subscription (excluding offers), with a minimum 12-month contract.

The F1 channel is currently part of the HD pack which costs ??381 per year (discounted to ??349.50 at present). Existing Sky customers who receive the F1 channel through the HD pack will continue to do so after the move. According to Sky, 4.5 million subscribers have the HD pack.

Sky is also planning to offer on-demand access to Sky Sports via its Now TV streaming website. This service, which does not require a Sky contract, will offer 24 hours’ access to Sky Sports, including the F1 channel, for ??9.99.

Nine of this year’s nineteen races will be shown on free-to-air television in the UK. All the rounds are being shown on Sky.

2013 F1 season


Browse all 2013 F1 season articles

Image ?? Red Bull/Getty

Advert | Go Ad-free

156 comments on Sky to raise F1 channel cost and offer cut-price stream

  1. Lin1876 (@lin1876) said on 7th March 2013, 16:49

    To be honest, if you watch other sports (especially football) then Sky Sports isn’t a particularly bad deal, but I sypathise with those who have no such interest. The new streaming option is an interesting one — I wonder what take-up will be like…

    Football, rugby, cricket, and now F1 are on pay TV, at least to some extent. I’m not going to say whether it’s right or wrong, but I think we have to accept that this is the future.

  2. BenH (@benh) said on 7th March 2013, 16:53

    Wonder if this is going to have any effect with SkyGo. I use that mainly with the HD pack. I know last season it was funny about letting me use it on the Xbox at times (especially the on demand stuff) and this season I will purely be using that for watching live races too.
    Hope they dont try and mess things up more with that as really wont be happy.

  3. Steve C said on 7th March 2013, 16:56

    Over here in Canada I gradually got rid of my cable coverage. I now have no television service at all. Purely Netflix and, yes, downloading or streaming from sites. I watched all the races last year including some SKY coverage via various streaming sites. Sometimes live, sometimes later in the day. More often than not the video was clear and easy to see. I certainly would not pay $1000 per year subscribe to SKY to watch the coverage. If the streaming sites disappeared I just wouldn’t watch at all.

  4. Rigi (@rigi) said on 7th March 2013, 17:15

    thank god i don’t live in the uk.

    here in switzerland i could watch it on swiss, german and austrian tv, haha :)
    (for free)

  5. sidecar_jon said on 7th March 2013, 17:16

    Shame fully i applaud this move, the more unreasonable the price gets the less subscribers sky will get and the more the f1 sponsors will get shirty about falling numbers of eyes on their hard paid for moving adverts, sooner it might come back to the BBC fully.

  6. MW (@) said on 7th March 2013, 17:16

    Anyone else got a sat box which decrypts Sky signal and feeling pretty good right now :)
    It’s a bit like Apple and downloading torrents, rip me off and I’ll be forced to find alternate means.

  7. WillP said on 7th March 2013, 17:16

    “Sky is also planning to offer on-demand access to Sky Sports via its Now TV streaming website. This service, which does not require a Sky contract, will offer 24 hours’ access to Sky Sports, including the F1 channel, for £9.99.”

    This is interesting. However, would like to find out more! I could probably throw a tenner at sky for the odd race that I can not watch on the BBC… basically means finding up to £100 for the year. Just about acceptable to me. Still wouldn’t see qualifying for half the races, but its better than not seeing anything.

    However, is this on top of the £15 a month for the service? Or is it separate? I can’t really tell. The latter option is the only possibility to me.

    • Keith Collantine (@keithcollantine) said on 7th March 2013, 17:20

      The guy I spoke to said there would not be a subscription fee for that, just the one-off charge.

      The website mentions a subscription fee but it also doesn’t say anything about getting the sports channels so it mustn’t have been updated yet.

      • WillP said on 7th March 2013, 17:40

        Well that’s good to know, thanks. I know that £9.99 is still a bit of a mickey-take for 24 hours of access, but if I am sitting in my lounge with no sky, knowing a race is due to start in an hour, I can well imagine the temptation will be there to throw a tenner at the internet to stream the race legally and reliably, without the hassle and stress of a contract.

        I just hope what you says is true! I guess it will become apparent soon enough when it is launched.

  8. Dan Brown (@danbrown180) said on 7th March 2013, 17:17

    £510 could get you tickets to silverstone and spa….

  9. I Love the Pope said on 7th March 2013, 17:20

    Is the Sky coverage commercial free? We have cable in the States which is about $1400 a year and has commercials.

    Count your blessings.

  10. Ben (@scuderia29) said on 7th March 2013, 17:23

    ill stick with bbc thanks, the highlights are really pretty decent even on the race weekends where they dont get to show the live event. A good team team too, the only person i like on sky is ted kravitz, bbc will miss jake humphreys though

  11. Emma_LN said on 7th March 2013, 17:41

    Just to point out that you can also get SSF1 on VirginMedia for less than £30 a month depending on what package you go for.

  12. Tango (@tango) said on 7th March 2013, 17:44

    Here’s a thought: In France, we are moving towards Canal +, which is 40€ a month subscription (you do get great movies and programs besides F1, but I still find it a rip off). Obviously, I’m going to switch over and spend 400+€ for an activity which used to cost me 0€ (apart from the off year GP Week end, which is probably going to be slashed.) Anyway, just saying I know what you feel and even worse: we don’t get 9 free GPs a year ! All this gets me thinking: how is it going to change the viewing mix of F1 ?
    In France, we do not have a pub culture and watching F1 is more of a private matter (and a dwindling one, 2M viewers tops). I have a decent pay and can afford Canal + to get my F1 dose, but it didn’t come without heavy thinking (the wife is less hooked and had some objections). Of all my friends, I know only one (hardcore, much more than I am) who will pay the price. So from the 10 something friends I know which used to watch 2 out of 3 GPs, only one will continue doing so. It’s no scientific measure, but I feel casual fans will lose all chance of watching a GP.
    So who will compose tomorrow’s F1 viewers ? Hardcore fans and the off chance Football-fan who hoped to see a replay of the previous Champions league match. Let’s be real here : F1 does not have the pull of Football (it will have when karting is as cheap and accessible as football) so my guess is people being drawn to it through the TV (you know, Sunday morning, mum and dad are sleaping, there’s nothing to do…Ouh, shiny cars!) are by default going to become a rarity.
    The ever optimist then skips to the next train of thought : If this is so in England, in France, and is the future of sports viewership in the whole of Europe, what does it mean for F1’s future ? Well first, it will seem idiotic to speak about “a wider appeal” when your viewer base is solely comprised of die hard fans. Sure, this base will forever shrink, but its needs differ to the “broad audience”. Losing historic races ? “Never!”. Changing point system? “A heresy”. A P2P button ? “Is this Champ car or what?”. What I mean is, this might be the chance of a lifetime for real fans to have their voice heard, as it will be the one that really matters, as they will be the sole viewers….
    Obviously, reality is rather that F1 is shooting a bullet in its foot and compromises its future in both its historic countries but hey, one can always dream.

    • Luc said on 7th March 2013, 21:32

      You meant to say that there’s not going to be new fans watching f1? I agree, with Bernie’s greed, the new breed of f1 fans is non existant.

      I think Bernie will come back on this money making idea of his, as sponsors are in time less likely to step into f1, and the consequences will be well felt within the paddock.

  13. Michael (@freelittlebirds) said on 7th March 2013, 17:49

    Am I misunderstanding this? Does everyone need to pay 510 pounds just to watch F1 in the UK?

    • Keith Collantine (@keithcollantine) said on 7th March 2013, 21:21

      @freelittlebirds If you want to be able to see all the races live on your TV and you don’t buy the Sky HD pack at the lower price (£349.50) before April 9th, yes.

      • Michael (@freelittlebirds) said on 7th March 2013, 23:44

        Thanks Keith,

        510 is a lot – 350 sounds a lot better:-)

        I pay ~$210 dollars per month for TV/Internet/Phone. I suppose in a way I pay the same as you guys in the UK. F1 itself is not expensive in and of itself but the package is.

  14. Dizzy said on 7th March 2013, 17:50

    For those without sky the TV deal was always a bad thing, However as a Sky subscriber I have been loving there F1 coverage.

    I especially love all the extra feeds they have throughout a race weekend. Been able to go over to an in-car feed or listen to team radio on the pit feed during any session was simply brilliant last year & im looking forward to been able to do the same this year.
    i know that bbc has these on there website, but only for qualifying & race & they no longer have them on the tv.

    I now watch the main broadcast on my big screen tv, the onboard feed on my laptop next to the tv, the pit channel on my ipad via sky sporst app & the timing app on my iphone.

  15. I have a simple solution I adopted last year.

    I bought the Sky Sports App on my iPhone. The subscription for the Sky Sports package including F1 is £5 per month.

    I then put this app onto my iPad. Expanded the app. Hey presto full F1 coverage for a fiver. Not HD. But pretty good quality. Even watched some F1 in the car when out and about…

    The Sky Sports designed for the iPad costs a lot more – yes its better quality but v expensive.

    Simple but v effective solution.

    • TomEC1 said on 8th March 2013, 11:15

      I already have Sky HD but if I didn’t then I would probably do this – great idea!

      Does it even include Premiership football on the regular Sky Sports channels?

Add your comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

All comments must abide by the comment policy. Comments may be moderated.
Want to post off-topic? Head to the forum.
See the FAQ for more information.