Luca di Montezemolo, Ferrari, Finali Mondiali, Mugello, 2013

Ferrari couldn’t be stronger politically – Montezemolo

2013 F1 seasonPosted on Author Keith Collantine

Luca di Montezemolo, Ferrari, Finali Mondiali, Mugello, 2013Red Bull may have won the last four world championships but Ferrari still wield ultimate political power in Formula One, says Ferrari president Luca di Montezemolo.

Ferrari has gone five years without winning a championship but as Montezemolo told Italy’s RAI Uno television channel, the team remain uniquely important to F1.

“We have reached an agreement with Ecclestone and the FIA and we are the only team with the right of veto: more political weight than that is impossible,” said Montezemolo.

“We are aware of our strength in Formula One, which without us, would be completely different. Having said that, it?s true that weight also comes from having a winning car and that was lacking. The rest is all gossip.”

The Ferrari president laughed off Bernie Ecclestone’s recent comments that Red Bull team principal Christian Horner would be the best person to succeed him in charge of Formula One:

“Ecclestone sees Horner as his successor? As the years go by, he more and more enjoys making jokes and I?m happy he still has the desire to do so…”

Ferrari slipped to third in the constructors’ championship this year, which Montezemolo blamed on Felipe Massa’s penalty for repeatedly crossing the white lane at the pit lane entry during the Brazilian Grand Prix.

“I think it was disproportionate and unjust, as was [Lewis] Hamilton’s,” said Montezemolo, referring to the Mercedes driver’s penalty for causing a collision with Valtteri Bottas.

“If Felipe had stayed in fourth place, we would have been second in the constructors’ championship.

“Every so often, the gentlemen who come to the races to act as stewards make decisions that are a bit ridiculous and anachronistic. One needs to be careful that we maintain credibility, for the work of the teams that invest money and for the drivers who risk their lives.”

2013 F1 season

Browse all 2013 F1 season articles

Image ?? Ferrari/Ercole Colombo

102 comments on “Ferrari couldn’t be stronger politically – Montezemolo”

Jump to comment page: 1 2
  1. di Montezemolo is ridiculous sometimes, however, in the last couple of years, Ferrari always seemed the main title challengers for Red Bull! Imo they need to get their things together and start winning!

    Getting James Allison was a plus, hiring Raikkonen is also a plus for next year! We shall see what happens! Personally I’d love to see Vettel, Alonso, Kimi, Hamilton all fighting for the 2014 championship!

    1. Personally I’d love to see Vettel, Alonso, Kimi, Hamilton all fighting for the 2014 championship!

      And when Rosberg or Ricciardo win, will you be disappointed?

  2. Still baffles me that Bottas was so aggressive being lapped.
    So much to loose and so little to gain.

    1. @jason12 He wasn’t being lapped, he was unlapping himself. And there’s nothing wrong with drivers doing that – several other drivers did it during the race (on Vettel) and we’ve seen it happen many times before. Hamilton himself did it last year in Germany.

  3. I didn’t see the interview, so I don’t know if he was asked about Ferrari’s political power, but there have been quite a few complaints recently here in Italy. The italian journalists complained that Massa received a penalty in Brazil and Vettel and Webber didn’t. Some commentators said that that’s because Red Bull has now more political power than Ferrari. Same for the tyre change after Silverstone, italian journalists are saying that Pirelli changed tyres because Red Bull complained and they have so much power in F1 that Pirelli obeyed (of course, that’s not what happened, but who cares).
    I think Montezemolo wanted to reassure the tifosi that they still have an unfair advantage over the other teams!

    1. And why Vettel and Webber should have received a penalty?

      1. Because they both crossed the pit entry line. Of course Vettel and Webber did nothing wrong, because drivers were allowed to cross the first part of the line, but the commentators didn’t know it, so they blamed RB’s political power.

    2. @yobo01 That’s a very interesting perspective, thanks for that.

  4. Wow… Just wow… He actually said the following 2 quotes in the same interview

    “We have reached an agreement with Ecclestone and the FIA and we are the only team with the right of veto: more political weight than that is impossible”


    One needs to be careful that we maintain credibility

  5. The old vampire is scared that F1’s new king could be a werewolf :)

    1. AKA Fittipaldi? :) I for one would love to see Emmo in charge, I think he would make for a very well respected and influencial supremo. Except for on full moon nights obviously

  6. They might be the only team to have right for veto. And next year they have a driver who might be the only driver in F1 history who once was paid not to drive at all, when 2013 he was driving without being paid. Politics..

    1. Brilliant! Hope @keithcollantine gives you CotD for that one! Truly excellent observation @BringOn2014!!

  7. It’s a bit petty to still be hung up on Massa’s penalty. It’s like they’re pinning the blame on the stewards for them losing 2nd place in the constructors. The fact is they got a penalty for doing something they were warned would merit a penalty if they did it.

    As Massa said he didn’t overtake anybody or even really gain any time, so a punishment in the form a drive through maybe doesn’t fit the crime, but they were all told more than once “if you do this, you will get a penalty for it”. Massa did it, and guess what he got a penalty. A harsh penalty, but one he should have known was coming.

    Massa may not have gained any time from going over the white line, but as Martin Brundle pointed out in his Sky Sports column the pit entry area at Interlagos is pretty scary and potentially dangerous, with the fast and blind left hander and the high pit wall, so is it possible Massa got the penalty more for crossing the box and putting himself in unnecessary danger, rather than actually gaining time by taking a short cut?

    Any thoughts anyone?

    1. As Massa said he didn’t overtake anybody or even really gain any time, so a punishment in the form a drive through maybe doesn’t fit the crime

      I think they introduced the rule not to stop drivers from gaining time but due to safety concerns of hitting another car from behind that is slowing down when entering the pits. So the “crime” would be similar to speeding in the pitlane, which also attracts a drive-through.

    2. IMO, as Brundle has said over the last few GPs, everything in F1 is so meticulously planned and detailed out, nothing is done unless there’s a benefit to it. Currently, Charlie seems to only look at track position and then occasionally, at lap time but there are other benefits – it’s easier on the tyres!

      Massa effectively cut the corner by straightlining it. He was told not to and he decided to do it anyway. I can’t see how that isn’t a penalty.

      I imagine the decision to penalise drivers in Brazil was down to safety reasons but ignorance is bliss – I’ll just pretend that the FIA are doing the right thing for once!

  8. I’m still glad Ferrari still has that veto, for all the people that are complaining Ferrari used that veto to prevent from the adoption of the ridiculous 4 cylinders turbo engines , i know that it was used not for the sake of the sport but at least it prevented from what could have been killed the spirit of the sport

  9. @tifoso1989 Ferrari leaving wouldn’t mean Alonso leaving. He would be hired right away by the next best team, even if the seat is secured by a contract. And so people in Spain will fill the stands to support Alonso in whatever color he is wearing (as you can probably see in 2005 -2006 videos). F1 would be shot, definitely, but many people support DRIVERS, not just the team. And Bernie is wise enough to take F1 to… Finland? They have 2 or 3 drivers there so it would be a secured business. And Bernie can also “threat” (as Ferrari does) retiring Italy from the calendar. Ferrari needs F1 as much aas F1 needs them.

    1. @omarr-pepper

      And Bernie can also “threat” (as Ferrari does) retiring Italy from the calendar

      No he can’t, look what happened this year with Mercedes in the testgate, the team suggested the penalty and they were satisfied, no one dared to just punish what was a clear breach of the regulations, you know why ? because if the daimler board of directors has decided to quit F1, F1 will lose something like 17% of its value, Mercedes which offers the safety car, the medical car and transports all the FOM equipements iis so important to Bernie, how about Ferrari ??? what would stop them from quitting F1 and made their own league something like NBA ?? A league that is reigned by pure F1 regulations and the profits are shared between the teams, only a big prize money and the highest political power would prevent them from that and that is exactly what Bernie Ecclestone did

      1. There are ten other teams in F1, and none of them objected to the penalty. Anyway, even if Merc pulled everything out of F1, the track cars would then be supplied by Ferrari and/or McLaren instead. As for the shipping, not every lorry in the paddock has a three-pointed star on it.

        1. I didn’t say that F1 will die if Mercedes pulled out, but it will lose some of its value which is a disaster for Bernie & his partners who they are only interested in making the maximum profit out of the sport

      2. @tifoso1989 why do you quote me if your answer is totally different? I don’t get it… and btw, F1, as you say, needs not only Ferrari,,but the other teams as well.

        1. and for the record… if Ferrari can make their own single-seaters league, with F1-like cars, why did the A1 championship (“powered by Ferrari” as it said on the presentation) wasn’t a success? just because it wasn’t “the” real F1

          1. @omarr-pepper
            A1 GP has nothing to do with Ferrari, the series was founded by Sheikh Maktoum of Dubai who sold his position as chairman later, the original chassis were Lola powered by a Zytek V8, it was in the final season of the series that the chassis & the engine were provided by Ferrari, that’s unfair comparison plus the fact that the concept of the series was based on nations racing each other and not teams

  10. Just a loser trying to make himself more important than he really is in the grand scheme of things. Bernie making more side deals!!! Maybe Bernie also gave Luca a few million $$$$ to help him thru this mid age losing crisis….. Or maybe Perelli could make tires for Ferrari’s inferior cars and they might do better or maybe not…. or maybe Luca should spend more time making a race car and less time whining…………. Thinking way back, the only way Ferrari won the 1964? world championship was for Ferrari to have the last race in the series cancelled because it was obvious that the Cobra’s would win the race and the championship. Thanks, RnR

  11. Being politically strong is one thing, being fast is another.. and you ain’t doing at the minute Luca. Nothing else matters.

  12. This is the mentality that has led to Ferrari fielding dogs for the last five years.
    Even the pope has recognized modernity.
    Ferrari? Not so much.
    I am a Ferrari fan, and I look forward to the Kimi/Nando battle next year, but with The Godfather at the helm, it is unlikely that battle will be for the championship. Sadly.
    You are NOT Enzo, doofus. Get to work or, better yet, get out.

  13. you know, I wouldn’t really be bugged if Ferrari left F1, it might actually give better direction for the sport.

Jump to comment page: 1 2

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

All comments are moderated. See the Comment Policy and FAQ for more.