Caterham CT05: First pictures

2014 F1 cars

Caterham CT05, Jerez, 2014

The Caterham CT05 has been revealed. Check out the first pictures of the new car.

See pictures of all the 2014 F1 cars

2014 F1 cars


Browse all 2014 F1 cars articles

Advert | Go Ad-free

115 comments on Caterham CT05: First pictures

  1. Bullfrog (@bullfrog) said on 28th January 2014, 14:37

    I like this one because it’s just bonkers.
    It must be more advanced than we think, because Caterham are calling it CT05, not CT04

  2. Girts (@girts) said on 28th January 2014, 14:38

    Seriously, you spend hundreds of millions, gather the best drivers in the world and then make them drive these… things?

  3. obviously said on 28th January 2014, 14:40

    No wonder this was the first car to pass the crash test. It looks like a tank!

  4. GeeMac (@geemac) said on 28th January 2014, 14:43

    Oh come on! Is this what the sport I love has come to?

  5. Jarv F150 (@jarvf150) said on 28th January 2014, 14:47

    I think someone has been stealing from the Mad Max 2 set.

  6. Anthony (@lagerstars) said on 28th January 2014, 14:47

    That nose looks awful!
    And surely not only is that sloping rearward nose going to create drag isnt it also going to generate (albeit a tiny amount) lift as well to counteract the downforce the nose generates?

  7. Kevin McDonald said on 28th January 2014, 14:47

    The nose aside, I’m really curious what on earth is going on with those side pods.
    They are so fat and ‘square’ looking its almost like a early 90′s car.

  8. PaulM (@pmelton) said on 28th January 2014, 14:50

    Looking at all of the elements, I just have a feeling that this is not going to be very fast at all (happy to eat humble pie). They have not even bothered to cut in the side pods to get air-flow to the rear of the car. The open bodywork at the back is just a wasted opportunity. I understand that Caterham are working to a limited budget, but surely they could have done better than this…

    • petebaldwin (@petebaldwin) said on 28th January 2014, 15:11

      I agree – no undercut at all, catastrophically ugly, no real flow to it.

      With the rest so far, if you cover up the noses, they look fairly nice but not this. This just looks…. budget.

  9. DaveD (@daved) said on 28th January 2014, 14:52

    Oh my god….what did they do to that poor car? Were they intentionally trying to make it as ugly as humanly possible????? OH MY GOD! That is hideous.

    • DaveD (@daved) said on 28th January 2014, 14:57

      OK, I just looked at it again….and it’s even worse a second time. Somebody beat that poor thing with an ugly stick, knocked it out of the ugly tree (and it hit every branch on the way down) and landed on it’s head! Then they glued the ugly stick on it’s nose.

      You’d have to tie pork chops around that things front wings to get the dog to play with it.

  10. JackySteeg (@jackysteeg) said on 28th January 2014, 14:56

    I may be in a minority here, but I prefer this a thousand times over the other finger-nosed cars. At least there’ll be no Ann Summers-related references.

    Once again, it’s incredibly interesting to see yet another different interpretation of the rules. If nothing else, 2014 has visually produced the widest range of car designs in years.

  11. kpcart said on 28th January 2014, 14:56

    I really like it, I think the negative comments to this are so over the top. look at the car as a whole not just the nose tip – look at the rest, the colour scheme etc. I think in years to come this years cars will be respected because so many look so individual, – reminds me a bit of the 70s, but unfortunantly the nose can be so individual at the moment

  12. Colossal Squid (@colossal-squid) said on 28th January 2014, 14:57

    Budgets at the back of the grid are very tight. Still, I’m surprised Caterham ran out of money and couldn’t finish building the nose.

  13. petebaldwin (@petebaldwin) said on 28th January 2014, 15:07

    :D Wow….. Not sure what to say about that. It’s certainly different!

  14. petebaldwin (@petebaldwin) said on 28th January 2014, 15:07

    :D Wow….. Not sure what to say about that. It’s certainly different!

  15. Fixy (@fixy) said on 28th January 2014, 15:11

    I’m sorry, F14 T, for having insulted you! And you too, MP4-29, and you as well, FW36…
    My dear CT04, you are as ugly as the Ensign N179!

Add your comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

All comments must abide by the comment policy. Comments may be moderated.
Want to post off-topic? Head to the forum.
See the FAQ for more information.