Ferrari complaining ‘because they’re not winning’

F1 Fanatic Round-up

F1F CSIn the round-up: Lewis Hamilton says Ferrari wouldn’t be lobbying for changes to F1’s rules if they were winning races this tear.


Your daily digest of F1 news, views, features and more.

Hamilton defends new-look F1 from Ferrari critics (Reuters)

“‘[Luca] di Montezemolo didn’t say a thing when Michael (Schumacher) won those five world championships (in a row),” smiled the winner of last weekend’s race in Malaysia who will be chasing a third successive pole position on Saturday.”

Lewis Hamilton, Mercedes, Sepang International Circuit, 2014Ecclestone holds secret talks with Ferrari boss Di Montezemolo in London after drop in TV ratings for Malaysian Grand Prix (Daily Mail)

“Di Montezemolo is concerned that viewing figures in Europe fell for last weekend’s Malaysian Grand Prix, reflecting Ferrari’s online poll that found 78 per cent of the 35,000-plus respondents did not like the new formula.”

Williams apologises to Massa, Bottas (Autosport)

“For our fans, we want to apologise for that because we didn’t handle it in the best way.”

Williams duo resolve team orders row (BBC)

“Williams said later that they intended to let Massa back past Bottas if the Finn failed to clear Button within a couple of laps, but this was not explained at the time.”

Driver weight issue dangerous – Sutil (ESPN)

“You feel it before the race that you haven’t got your ultimate power. The cars are a bit slower so you don’t need to be in superb shape to finish it, but still it’s like if you go for a run for one and half hours and you don’t eat enough, you have a sugar hole. You are almost getting in an area where you don’t work well up here [in the head]. This is the danger we are facing.”

US team to be given green light to jump on the F1 bandwagon by next year (The Independent)

Bernie Ecclestone: “I think Haas will be accepted. They have got the money but it’s a question of whether they are going to spend it.”

Eric Boullier on Stoffel Vandoorne (McLaren)

“He’ll be testing the McLaren MP4-29 here in Bahrain next week – his first Formula 1 test – and I’m sure he’ll acquit himself very well.”

Bahrain authorities hope for quiet as F1 contemplates lack of noise (The Guardian)

“Al-Wefaq’s peaceful rallies are usually just that. More worrying for the security men is the 14 February Revolution Youth Coalition cyber-group, who often clash with the police. It, too, has called for demonstrations on Friday, in the al-Seef junction area, west of Manama, under the slogan ‘Stop the blood formula’.”

Nico Rosberg Q&A: Mercedes should have Bahrain advantage (F1)

“Failure is failure. And there is pressure in any team. For Williams it was about the existence of the company – and for them that had the same importance as brand value for others – so doing well, being successful is a necessity for every team.”

Bahrain Grand Prix Betting: Mercedes can assert dominance (Unibet)

My Bahrain Grand Prix preview for Unibet.


Comment of the day

@William-Brierty reckons GP2 needs to raise its game:

2014 is a litmus test for GP2. In the shape of Stoffel Vandoorne and Raffaele Marciello, GP2 has two serene talents who should go unchallenged by the resident Felipe Nasr, Jolyon Palmer and Alexander Rossi.

And yet, in the past three years the eventual champion has had over three seasons worth of experience before taking the title, and therefore, if GP2 is to wrangle the status of number one feeder series to Formula One back from Formula Renault 3.5, the prevalence of talent over experience must be established. It is vital also, for the very survival of GP2, that the known talent of Mitch Evans and Daniel Abt shine through more brightly in their first year compared with their somewhat lacklustre first years.

That said, GP2 is well placed in the modern world of F1, with the comparable handling, torque and traction characteristics of the Dallara GP2/11 chassis giving young drivers a presumably similar sensation to driving a modern F1 car, and therefore it is essential that the success we have from Daniil Kvyat and Kevin Magnussen in the first two races in F1 translate in young success in GP2 so it does not become a retirement home for well-backed drivers lacking in talent.

If Palmer fulfils his pre-season status as title favourite and wins the title with DAMS, and if Marciello, Vandoorne, Evans and Abt spend most of their time on the outer reaches of the top ten, then a series ignored by the Red Bull Young Driver Programme and clearly struggling financially in the way they failed to update the GP2/11 chassis after the normal three year had elapsed, might just cease to exist. That would be shame, because probably some of the best racing held on grand prix tracks in 2013 was GP2 races.

From the forum

Happy birthday!

Happy birthday to D_Omin!

If you want a birthday shout-out tell us when yours is by emailling me, using Twitter or adding to the list here.

On this day in F1

Michael Schumacher won the first ever Bahrain Grand Prix ten years ago today – on 04/04/04. Schumacher led home team mate Rubens Barrichello for his third win in as many races, with Jenson Button’s BAR 26 seconds behind in third.

Image © Daimler/Hoch Zwei

Advert | Go Ad-free


138 comments on Ferrari complaining ‘because they’re not winning’

1 2 3
  1. maybet said on 4th April 2014, 0:09

    Aren’t you the famous ” flat out guy ” like you have proclaim to be in the past few season when vettel was winning everything??

    Why stop now?? opps, because you are winning.

    Pot calling kettle black.

  2. djdaveyp85 (@djdaveyp87) said on 4th April 2014, 0:11

    @keithcollantine please do the same poll as ferrari so we can have an independent source.

    Maybe add a few more questions to it and do it in a survey format, but please do ask that specific question. I’m intrigued.

    • Giggsy11 (@giggsy11) said on 4th April 2014, 1:32

      This wouldn’t work as people would know what you are testing thus giving you invalid data.

      • I have to disagree with you. I think some more polls on this season could be helpful. We already have polls on the double points, engine sound and on these first two races, we would only have to know what people are thinking about the new fuel rule and the complexity of rules. Maybe Keith already had planned to do this somewhere ahead in this season.

        • Kazihno (@kazinho) said on 4th April 2014, 2:17

          Still doesn’t make it any more valid. You will just be adding more noise.

          The result will still be a self-selecting sample of registered F1Fanatic users who are motivated enough to vote on a subject in response to another on-line poll.

          You are trying to make 2+2=5.

        • tmekt (@tmekt) said on 4th April 2014, 10:13

          We should have a poll about having new polls.

    • Keith Campbell (@keithedin) said on 4th April 2014, 9:47

      I think it is much too early to be running polls on the state of F1s new rules. We’ve only had two races, which admittedly weren’t classics, but 2 races is far too small a sample size to make a judgement in my view. Maybe the summer break would be a good time to analyse how things are and whether the new rules have been positive or negative from the fans’ perspective.

      Circumstance can be everything in sport though. Just as an example, if Hamilton runs away with the title then we might have a dull season, and people may say the new rules have ruined the sport. Or maybe Nico will be able to match him, and we have a great competition and fans will say the new rules have really delivered. Two different outcomes which could drastically affect perception of the sport, but are not actually representative of ‘the new formula 1′ (but are indirectly related)

      • Michael (@mhonners) said on 4th April 2014, 12:36

        I totally agree. I’ve heard people say go back to the v10’s yet that era was just as, if more, predictable than now with schumi running the show. Every season has boring races, every racing series does.

  3. Dave (@raceprouk) said on 4th April 2014, 0:18

    When was LdM last seen at a GP? (Monza doesn’t count)

    Ferrari and F1 will both be better off when LdM retires. It seems to me he’s the only member of Ferrari that’s so against this new formula, yet he’s almost never trackside.
    It’s simple really – Ferrari haven’t done a good enough job for several years now. The solution is to do better, not have the company head dragging the sport through the mud in this manner.

    • Dave (@raceprouk) said on 4th April 2014, 0:21

      “In addition, the fans don’t like the noise from the new engines and are confused by rules that are too complicated,” Ferrari said, adding that the ‘no’ vote increased substantially after Mercedes’ one-two in Malaysia.

      Says it all really.

  4. George (@george) said on 4th April 2014, 0:19

    Bernie Ecclestone: “I think Haas will be accepted. They have got the money but it’s a question of whether they are going to spend it.”

    Wow, bit of a turn-around there Bernie!

    • Joshua Mesh (@joshua-mesh) said on 4th April 2014, 2:04

      Its enlightening. He is saying that they dont want to spend their money and if they want a license, they need to show him that they will.

      • Lucas Wilson (@full-throttle-f1) said on 4th April 2014, 8:10

        So, basically, its a case of, give me millions of pounds to make me even richer, and I will let you compete. Welcome to Formula 1 Gene Haas!

        • James (@iamjamm) said on 4th April 2014, 9:07

          Not sure I agree with that. I think it’s more that Bernie doesn’t want another Caterham/Marussia trundling around at the back struggling. Haas would have the budget/investment to compete further up the field. Obviously there’s an entry fee to be paid but that should be a standard fee that the other teams all have to pay (plus the $$ per point from the previous season). I also think a US owned team would be good for the sport.

          Not often I defend Bernie…

  5. iAltair (@ialtair) said on 4th April 2014, 0:30

    I expect Vettel to be complaining more, afterall being a four time World Champion and suddenly not winning. But no, he believes in the team and Renault. Or perhaps it’s just top early for me to say such.

  6. matt90 (@matt90) said on 4th April 2014, 0:39

    Maybe if Ecclestone hadn’t gone to the media at every chance he could to say how disappointing his own product is this year (before backtracking in Malaysia, as up until that point he only operated on some blind assumption and/or an intricate system of Chinese whispers), casual viewers might have been more inclined to watch. Maybe start with that before you look at shortening the races or attaching a foghorn to the exhaust or whatever other foolery you’re contemplating.

  7. a humble opinion about the polls. Reading some comments mentioned yesterday, Some people, clearly not defending Ferrari, complained about the mention of this site’s poll, well, quite often. I guess that it’s normal, it’s OK to be proud of our good job. I remember the first time I made a cupboard with my own hands (an old hobby I have) I mentioned it to everyone who crossed my path: “by the way, have you seen my new cupboard? I made it”. It sounds like: “Do you remember when I beat Vettel in junior categories?” Oh yes, Paul, you’ve already said it. “Do you remember how my poll showed 97% of fans disagree with the double points finale?” Yes, man, we know it. “I personally disagree with it”, yes OmarR-pepper, we know it, you’ve said it already.

  8. Bazza Spock (@bazza-spock) said on 4th April 2014, 1:17

    Re a minimum seat weight ridiculous short-sightedness on the part of the drivers – the kind that you’d only expect from team principles. Nothing will change until a driver passes out and crashes during a race and even then I bet the driver will cop flak for not being ‘tough enough’. THe FIA really need to step in and impose a minimum seat weight. If 2014 is supposed to be a bold new frontier of technology then the cars shouldn’t be limited to using pint-sized driver to get the edge on the competition. The real world doesn’t work like that so why should F1?

    • Tim (@grez76) said on 4th April 2014, 2:12

      @bazza-spock I agree completely.

      The FIA will have blood on their hands if or when something tragic occurs. The drivers are too competitive. I can’t imagine the smaller-framed drivers agreeing to give up any advantage they have. Self-governance has already proved unworkable by teams in other safety areas. (Voting for tyre improvements before Silverstone forced the issue.)

      In order to ensure energy and hydration levels, I would love to see an FIA imposed banquet on the grid pre-race.

      Seriously though they quoted the driver weight issue when they raised the combined minimum weight for this year, but the drivers are losing more weight than ever! The new MGUs have obviously over-filled the extra tolerance. Some of the drivers look absolutely terrible, I’m just glad Mark Webber got out before this year. My wife always wanted to cook a good meal for him. Is this the image that F1 wants to convey? Gaunt, unwell superstars passing out at PR events (according to Martin Brundle) and next passing out on-track!

      • Egorov (@egorov) said on 4th April 2014, 11:05

        Some of the drivers look absolutely terrible, I’m just glad Mark Webber got out before this year. My wife always wanted to cook a good meal for him.

        @grez76 LoL… Very well put

      • DaveW (@dmw) said on 4th April 2014, 18:29

        LOL at the grid banquet idea. I imagine it would be like getting my toddler to eat her breakfast. The teams would be trying to shove spoons full of oatmeal in their mouths while the drivers try to slap it off the spoon. Or the drivers would be dumping their food under the table when no one is looking.

        The minimum seat+driver weight thing has to go through. It will be limited in effect, because using weight as ballast is always an advantage, but it will mitigate the interest in minimizing driver weight.

    • I think you need to read that again @bazza-spock. The idea was minimum seat and driver weight. The seat ballast could even be adjusted by officials prior to each race so every seat + driver entered each race at the same weight i.e. 85 kgs. Simple and effective solution. Not a bad idea at all.

  9. Breno (@austus) said on 4th April 2014, 1:35

    I was under the impression most people have serious complaints with 2014 (noise, double points, looks, penalties, take your pick).

    • Joshua Mesh (@joshua-mesh) said on 4th April 2014, 2:05

      Thing is, everyone has to always be anti di Montezemolo ;) So now everyone loves the new formula because he does not.

      • Albert said on 4th April 2014, 2:53

        While there are lots of things to dislike about the current F1, I doubt most people think that one team twisting the rules to their favor will solve them.

        And that’s what, i believe, comes to most people’s mind when talking about a secret meeting between Mont., Todt and Eccl..

      • petebaldwin (@petebaldwin) said on 4th April 2014, 10:54

        @joshua-mesh – no its because a poll of Ferrari fans has stated that a decent amount of them dont “like the new f1″

        Personally, im not sure if I like the new regs yet but it’s got nothing to do with what they sound like. LdM is jumping to conclusions and then misrepresenting data for his company’s gain. That’s why people are unhappy

      • Egorov (@egorov) said on 4th April 2014, 11:06

        @joshua-mesh When will LdM retire? Its time for some young hot blood at the top.

    • Albert said on 4th April 2014, 2:28

      Those are things that bother people, true.

      But I doubt anyone honestly believes those are the things LdM is going to discuss, though.

    • Adam Hardwick (@fluxsource) said on 4th April 2014, 9:15

      The only thing bothering me this year is the spectre of double points. Everything else, I’m loving.

      • Aled Davies (@aledinho) said on 4th April 2014, 9:47

        +1 maybe i am biased because as a hamilton fan I am finally seeing him with a car that is the class of the field for him to exploit. But I think the way the cars handle is great the drivers look on edge this year, something that hasn’t been apparent since I dont know when!!

        The engine noise is just that; noise! I know it makes a difference to some people but I tune in to WATCH the races not listen to them

        But the double points thing is the most ridiculous rule ever conceived in F1. And this in a sport where in the 80’s only 11 of your 16 results counted towards the championship…

  10. trotter said on 4th April 2014, 2:08

    In the first moment, after reading about seat + driver equalization, I thought F1 folk is again unable to make a simple step for the benefit of everyone in the long run, instead of looking at its own short-term interests.
    But on a second thought, the matter isn’t that straight forward either and here’s why.

    You can’t just add a difference in mass between the drivers by making a seat heavier. You would actually have to calculate, if possible at all, where is the trade-off between muscle mass and heavier COG. The reason is simple. If you just add kilos for difference, you’ll penalize lighter drivers. The reason is, 80 kg of pure muscle and 5 kg seat, is much more useful than 60 kg of muscle and a 25 kg of worthless seat. The 80 kg guy inherently has more muscle mass, while the lighter guy is as if he has 20 kilos of pure fat that isn’t useful for anything. Not even fat. Basically, just a weight below his but. 20 kilos of worthless weight is a handicap in comparison to a driver who simply has a bigger build and can perhaps wrestle his car that much easier.

    It isn’t really as simple as I explained, but you get the picture.
    That said, I still do think that something needs to be done, because it’s unfair that someone with just as much talent is handicapped by simply being taller, which is completely out of anyone’s control. You can’t really shorten yourself…

    • Adam Hardwick (@fluxsource) said on 4th April 2014, 9:10

      Actually I think the lighter guys would still have the advantage – the ballast added to bring the driver/seat up to weight can be placed to help control the CoG.

      It might have flaws, but it’s a MUCH better solution than the current one. Although I’m biased, I’ve been saying this should be done for a few years now.

    • Mike Dee (@mike-dee) said on 4th April 2014, 10:11

      20 kilos of worthless weight is a handicap in comparison to a driver who simply has a bigger build and can perhaps wrestle his car that much easier.

      You do know that the cars have power steering and hydraulic brake systems that can be adjusted to the drivers likes? So I don’t think that commentators refer to physically wrestling the car around the corners like when trying to reverse park a road car without power steering. @trotter

    • matt90 (@matt90) said on 4th April 2014, 10:58

      F1 is about endurance rather than outright power though. Regardless of how heavy a driver is, the car still weighs the same at the moment, so smaller drivers already carry that ballast penalty anyway- it just isn’t located in their seat. And bigger drivers haven’t been shown to be more capable at wrestling cars than the smaller drivers.

      heavier COG

      What is a heavier centre of gravity? If you mean higher, then there simply has to be a rule about the ballast placement to make sure that ballast in the seat, together with the driver, give the same COGs for all drivers.

  11. Albert said on 4th April 2014, 2:09

    What a year this is shaping up to be. Lots of drama, action, splendor!

    Shame it’s all happening outside the circuits :-P

    Now seriously, Ferrari is lobbying hard, Hamilton calls them out, which I find good. There are times in F1 when, for better or worse, rules needed changing (see exploding tyres last year), but at this point, there’s little reason to believe this is one of them.

    • maybet said on 4th April 2014, 2:19

      you kidding me??

      There are every single reason to believe this is one of them, if not the worst.

      Lewis only stop complaining because he;s winning. He was very outspoken about missing flat out racing, but his tone changed when he is winning.

      Typical hypocrite

      • Albert said on 4th April 2014, 2:25

        While I agree that Hamilton most likely doesn’t complain because he’s winning, I can’t see anything inherently wrong with the new regulations that would require change.

        The core of F1’s current problems are a different issue.

        • maybet said on 4th April 2014, 2:29

          last season drivers are able to coast around 80-90 %.

          Guess what, they are only able to coast around 60-70 % due to tire saving, power unit saving ( 5 per season), gearbox, fuel saving, etc

          FIA regulation said you can rev until 15,000rpm. But they impose fuel flow restriction which means they are only able to rev until 10,000-12,000.

          Yeap, worst season. It seems that the viewer rating for the past two races were so bad that Todt, LDM, Bernie and co are having meeting for emergency solution.

          • Albert said on 4th April 2014, 2:39

            It sounds like typical first races after new rule changes. It will take some time before teams and drivers can push, it’s only natural.

            And I seriously doubt the meeting will have anything to with ratings. More like with Montezemolo trying to twists things in Ferrari’s favor.

          • maybet said on 4th April 2014, 2:43

            if that’s the case, LDM influence would’ve changed the FIA reg to favor them for the past few season where rbr was dominating.

            Its all come down to business eventually, no money – no shows.

            The very hardcore element of F1 has been ditched. Why do you think people watch F1 instead of Indycars where they were more competition with close racing??

            Speed of F1 cars that are so obvious through video motion + the noise that could blow your eardrum away without an earplug.

          • Albert said on 4th April 2014, 2:49

            Just because he wasn’t able to change the rules the last 5 years it doesn’t somehow mean he’ll never try it.

          • You are exactly right; it is probably the worst ever due to the dumb coasting. Like I stressed yesterday it is complete overkill to introduce these super effective hybrid units and then limit the amount of fuel at the same time. To limit revs, flow and turbo pressure is all about power equalization but to limit total fuel on top is downright moronic.

            Again; except for the sound the new format is great with it’s effective hybrid relevance and tons of torque. What is destroying everything is fuel limit as well as the tires. The good part is that both are very easy to fix and send everyone racing their sleeves off, the sad part is that they are not going to do that.

      • Herp said on 4th April 2014, 20:14

        Wait a minute.

        1. You know Lewis doesn’t like the new F1 because he has criticised it.
        2. Lewis is a hypocrite because he hasn’t criticised the new F1.

  12. ElBasque (@elbasque) said on 4th April 2014, 2:27

    @keithcollantine are we going to get any more Todt FIA rating polls? It’d be good to see where he is after this latest raft of controversies.

  13. Chris (@tophercheese21) said on 4th April 2014, 4:02

    Hamilton’s right. It’s all just part and parcel of Formula 1. The winning team loves the regulations and the way the sport is heading, whilst the teams that are struggling hate it.

    I’m not sure how good or bad Ferrari’s aero package is, but if it’s true that the wind tunnel numbers are correlating, then it really must point most of the blame at their power unit. Is it too thirsty? Down on power? Who knows, but Ferrari aren’t where they want to be and they’re not exactly exuding confidence.

    Also, the people dishing hate at Hamilton can go kick rocks. The guy destroyed the field by quite some margin and did it with ease. I doubt he gives a damn about people’s opinion of him.

  14. HoHum (@hohum) said on 4th April 2014, 4:33

    I would like to point out that I am not happy with the state of F1, but I prefer the current F1 to last years F1, double points excepted.

    • Hamilfan (@hamilfan) said on 4th April 2014, 12:20

      @hohum wait till a couple of races and then somebody lobbys for a rule change . Bernie is too old . FIA needs fresh blood for management . I am sick of these politics. why can’t they just try doing some stuff . Improve rather than complain . Else , they end up doing some shady stuff like illegal tyre test , fuel flow infringement . F1 needs to be kept on a tighter leash and on one that does not extend with money .

  15. Fer no.65 (@fer-no65) said on 4th April 2014, 4:36

    I don’t understand how a driver can decide (or agree) to drive a full race at Bahrain without drinking anything.

    Sutil has never been the smart kind of driver and it shows now, I suppose. How many tenths do you gain by not having a water bottle? and how many do you lose for not being properly fit and hydrated? the risk of fainting is a lot more punishing (even in sporting terms) than 3 tenths a lap…

    As for Hamilton saying that. He’s right. But he was also complaining when Vettel “had it easy” with the best car, and he didn’t and now obviously he’s not saying anything. People complain when things don’t go their way, it’s a fact. There’s nothing spectacular about saying it to the public.

    • Aled Davies (@aledinho) said on 4th April 2014, 9:54

      He did complain about Vettel winning all the time, but I think that was mainly down to the car advantage Vettel had rather than the regulations of F1 itself?

      LDM moaning is nothing new – whenever Ferrari aren’t on top he moans….He’s been moaning a lot the last few years

    • Keith Campbell (@keithedin) said on 4th April 2014, 10:20

      I think the not drinking comment might be an exaggeration to bring more attention to the weight issue (which is one of the team’s biggest problems currently). Like you said, any gain from not carrying a water bottle in the car would likely be offset by a drop in performance – lack of concentration from dehydration would at least lose you time, if not cause a crash. So i think, and certainly hope, no teams are considering this.

      There should be a regulation saying you have to carry x litres of water on board at the start of the race, but i don’t know if there is currently. If teams doing this became an issue i’m sure a regulation could be written in on safety grounds.

      • Keith Campbell (@keithedin) said on 4th April 2014, 11:00

        Having now read the artcile i take that back, it looks like Sutil is actually serious (could still be a bluff, who knows). He’s talking about a saving of 0.9kg. If 10kg = 0.3 secs/per lap (roughly), then 0.9kg is worth 0.027 secs. Over 60 laps that’s 1.62 seconds. Definitely not worth it if it affects concentration even a tiny bit. In qualy, they might run without it anyway and that’s fine for 5-10 minutes of running, over a race then no way.

        Having said all that i’m actually on Sutil’s side and think it’s ridiculous they haven’t agreed on a fair solution. Teams and drivers cannot be impartial on these things, that’s been proven, so surely the FIA should have the power to implement a ruling on health & safety grounds.

        • MazdaChris (@mazdachris) said on 4th April 2014, 19:43

          I think sadly (and I’d love to be proven wrong!) the FIA will take the same sort of stance they did back in the bad old days when drivers objected to things like trees lining the race track – drivers were told that if they think it’s dangerous, just slow down. Likewise, the FIA may well simply say that they haven’t instructed any drivers to lose weight, and if they choose to put themselves into that kind of physical condition then that’s their own responsibility. A terrible attitude, which ignores the regulations’ part in creating this situation in the first place, but that’s the way they’ll probably see it – if drivers don’t want to be thin and dehydrated, then they will be expected to eat more and drink…

    • Iestyn Davies (@fastiesty) said on 4th April 2014, 12:07

      Sutil is already apparently giving away 0.4 sec per lap to Gutierrez based on his heavier weight.. as Gutierrez’s car is itself overweight (10kg more = 0.3 sec per lap). So, over 57 laps, that is roughly 22.5 seconds.. on top of their car losing them say half a second in Q (hence they are adrift of the midfield). Not drinking water (or carrying the weight of it) can claw back some of that time for Sutil, if he can keep his concentration.

      Sauber will only realistically compete again in the midfield when they bring in their lightweight chassis (shaving 20kg), probably for Barcelona. Hopefully that can put Sutil near the weight limit that it becomes more irrelevant, but given that disadvantage we can note he outqualified/outpaced Gutierrez all weekend in Melbourne.

      • Iestyn Davies (@fastiesty) said on 4th April 2014, 12:08

        Alternatively, he can go down the Webber route and go from a normal looking guy with good fitness to an Olympic style athlete with only 4% body fat.

        • Keith Campbell (@keithedin) said on 4th April 2014, 12:41

          You really think he can safely lose another 15kg to match his teammates bodyweight? He already said he’d lost 4kg since last year. And even his teammate + car isn’t under the weight limit, so he would still be at a disadvantage compared to other teams. There comes a point when there’s nothing more a driver can do about it, i personally don’t know how far sutil is from that point but i suspect he’s fairly close.

1 2 3

Add your comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

All comments must abide by the comment policy. Comments may be moderated.
Want to post off-topic? Head to the forum.
See the FAQ for more information.