Rosberg leads first in-season test for Mercedes

2014 F1 season

Nico Rosberg, Mercedes, Bahrain, 2014There was no let-up in the Mercedes supremacy even during testing as Nico Rosberg headed the times sheets in Bahrain.

All 11 Formula One teams were on hand for the first of eight days of in-season testing. Each of the four pairs of test days are being held immediately after race weekends.

Rosberg ended the day four tenths of a second quicker than Nico Hulkenberg with Fernando Alonso third. The Ferrari driver, who is driving on both days was almost a second off Rosberg’s time. He spent the morning doing fixed speed runs for aerodynamic evaluations and testing different electronic set-ups.

The F14 T came to a stop during the morning, bringing out the red flags. In the afternoon, as the track temperature hit a scorching 45C, the team switched their focus to set-up comparisons over a series of short runs.

Kevin Magnussen was fourth for McLaren, who made an 11th-hour change to their driver line-up, choosing to put Magnussen in the car for both days instead of running Oliver Turvey and Stoffel Vandoorne.

Russian 18-year-old Sergey Sirotkin had his first run in an F1 practice session for Sauber and covered 411km, comfortably more than the 300 he needed to qualify for an FIA superlicence.

It was an unproductive day for Pastor Maldonado, whose Lotus only completed 16 laps due to problems with its Renault power unit.

Driver Car Best time Laps Difference
1 Nico Rosberg Mercedes W05 1’35.697 121
2 Nico Hulkenberg Force India-Mercedes VJM07 1’36.064 69 0.367
3 Fernando Alonso Ferrari F14 T 1’36.626 69 0.929
4 Kevin Magnussen McLaren-Mercedes MP4-29 1’36.634 102 0.937
5 Valtteri Bottas Williams-Mercedes FW36 1’37.305 28 1.608
6 Max Chilton Marussia-Ferrari MR03 1’37.678 60 1.981
7 Daniel Ricciardo Red Bull-Renault RB10 1’38.326 91 2.629
8 Sergey Sirotkin Sauber-Ferrari C33 1’39.023 76 3.326
9 Robin Frijns Caterham-Renault CT05 1’40.027 63 4.330
10 Pastor Maldonado Lotus-Renault E22 1’40.183 16 4.486
11 Daniil Kvyat Toro Rosso-Renault STR9 1’40.452 67 4.755

2014 F1 season

Browse all 2014 F1 season articles

Image © Daimler/Hoch Zwei

Promoted content from around the web | Become an F1 Fanatic Supporter to hide this ad and others

Advert | Go Ad-free

51 comments on Rosberg leads first in-season test for Mercedes

  1. Younger Hamii (@younger-hamii) said on 8th April 2014, 16:38

    Typo in the second paragraph, Rosberg was three tenths quicker than Hulk.

    Anyway, any reason why Williams and Bottas did little running today?

  2. Damonw said on 8th April 2014, 16:42

    Another massive number of laps done by Rosberg, just hope Hamilton gets the same amount of mileage tomorrow.

  3. Cole (@cole) said on 8th April 2014, 16:47

    “It was an unproductive day for Pastor Maldonado, whose Lotus only completed 16 laps due to problems with its Renault power unit.”
    But he promised he will make up lost ground, and T-bone two cars next outing…..

  4. NickF12013 (@nickf12013) said on 8th April 2014, 16:56

    So Lotus did again only 16 laps. On the whole pre-season test they couldn’t get the car to do at least an out-lap. In the practice sessions of the 3 Grand Prix so far they’re not doing a lot of mileage and still sometimes they can’t get even the car started. So out of all this problems, can anyone explain to me why on race days they’re able to bring both cars home and run for a whole race distance?

    • DaveF1 (@davef1) said on 8th April 2014, 17:03

      I’m not so sure but my best guess would be a combination of both drivers are not pushing the car to the maximum and the team running the car as conservatively as they can.

      Either that or they’re just really lucky.

      • stefano (@alfa145) said on 8th April 2014, 17:33

        I was thinking the same thing, but why would you go wild and extreme the first laps of a testing session? Ok it’s testing so you have to test how strong you can get, but still. I’m thinking they’ve been lucky as well

    • spoutnik (@spoutnik) said on 8th April 2014, 17:52

      Maybe the problems they have cannot be fixed by running the car. Furthermore, given their budget, if they can spare some components they will do it I guess.

      • luc said on 8th April 2014, 18:00

        That’s a great reason to let maldonado go testing.

        • For Sure (@forsure) said on 9th April 2014, 15:42

          I dunno. I think Maldonado could be a decent driver when he’s away from the red mist of competition. Maybe he should take up rallying or some sort of trials racing.

          Either that, or Lotus figure that with only 10 other cars on track he’ll be less likely to hit someone!

  5. I believe they are, but just to confirm, does anyone know if the teams are allowed to use engines outside of their 5 per season allowance in these tests?

  6. HoHum (@hohum) said on 8th April 2014, 17:37

    Seeing very few TEST drivers on sheets suggests that the teams feel there is a lot to be learnt by both engineers and drivers.

  7. spoutnik (@spoutnik) said on 8th April 2014, 17:54

    It’s a shame Stoffel Vandoorne couldn’t try the McLaren. I would have loved to see him in the car :)

  8. Nickpkr251 said on 8th April 2014, 18:21

    Hope Mercedes don’t become the next redbull, we had enough years of Domination ….

  9. Alex McFarlane said on 8th April 2014, 18:24

    Sorry if this is a stupid question, but with engines homologated and tyres seemingly not so much of an issue this year, what are teams testing besides reliability, aerodynamic developments and setup?

    • HoHum (@hohum) said on 8th April 2014, 18:31

      Apparently the tyres are still an issue for a lot of teams, but your “besides..” seem to cover enough on their own without adding driving style options etc.

    • Max Jacobson (@vettel1) said on 8th April 2014, 18:32

      Pretty much exactly as you said! Which, considering the rule changes are so expansive, is a lot to be testing.

      You also have all the electronic systems, such as ERS management and brake-by-wire to be refined throughouly.

      • HoHum (@hohum) said on 8th April 2014, 18:46

        @vettel1, good point Max, surely it is the electronics that differentiate the reliability and useable power that differentiate teams using the same engine supplier, and quite possibly even the teams with different ICEs, given the comprehensive design rules and fuel flow restrictions attached to the ICEs it is hard to believe the M_AMG ICE alone is so vastly superior to the Ferarri and Renault ICEs as it appears to be.

        • Alex McFarlane said on 8th April 2014, 19:33

          Apparently the Merc engines are novel in the sense that the compressor that is traditionally packaged with the turbo unit has been mounted to the front of the engine and connected to the turbine in the turbo via a connecting shaft through the centre of the engine. I’m in over my head regarding the technical stuff, but the practical benefits of this seemingly small innovation is that they have a smaller, more centrally located intercooler, less piping round the engine, the ability to force more air into the engine and therefore more hotter air to channel into the turbo. This helps to eliminate lag and conserve more energy for use as power. All the merc engines have this packaging but obviously the works team knew about this for longer so could develop their car specifically to take advantage of these features.

        • Max Jacobson (@vettel1) said on 8th April 2014, 21:54

          @hohum the Mercedes package clearly does have some degree of a power advantage – may that be due to the ERS (which supplies the bhp needed to eke out the km/h) being more efficient at supplying energy due to the turbo positioning described below, or a simple increase in power from being able to maintain boost pressure more effectively. Or indeed both.

          But I agree, that alone is clearly not propelling them away from the Renault and Ferrari shod runners: Red Bull – were it not for their disqualification and pit stop error – would be a fairly comfortable second in the constructor’s championship. Nor does it appear there are any major aerodynamic innovations on the Mercedes, so it must simply be an extremely well-refined concept – every element working harmoniously in the aid of performance and efficiency.

          And therein lies a grain of hope for the other teams. Mercedes may hold a commanding lead over the competition, but they are probably much closer to the capacity of their car. Red Bull for example on the other hand have vast reserves of potential to mine. Of course, a lot of where Mercedes hold an advantage seems to be in the inherent design characteristics of their car (which will be difficult to mimic during a season), but there is hope yet for the other teams, should they improve their software packages et al to be able to utilise all of the power these new engines provide, or (perhaps more importantly) manage the torque.

          • HoHum (@hohum) said on 8th April 2014, 22:21

            @vettel1, right Max, and if RBR have vast reserves of potential, what must Lotus have.

          • Alex McFarlane said on 9th April 2014, 11:09

            I wouldn’t disagree with anything you’ve said there, except that with the new regulations being quite restrictive in terms of engine development and where teams can make up aerodynamic performance, it’s difficult to know where the most development potential lies with the cars (obviously the software and electronics is a big area). It may well be that the Merc still has masses of untapped potential. I guess it depends on how many ideas they’ve got that they haven’t yet been able to put into practice.

      • Alex McFarlane said on 8th April 2014, 19:23

        Ah yes, silly me! I’d forgotten about the electronics and how much more complex those systems are this year, it’s almost like a battle of the software programmers thia year.

        • HoHum (@hohum) said on 8th April 2014, 19:43

          No Alex that is a valid point, one of the problems with Turbochargers is heat transfer from the exhaust driven turbo to the compressor and thence to the charge air, I fully expected the motor/generator to be seperated from turbocharger for the same reason, moving the compressor at the same time seems a no-brainer in retrospect, are we sure this is unique to M-AMG?

          • Alex McFarlane said on 8th April 2014, 20:39

            Sorry, my reply ended up below. I’m not sure that it’s unique to Merc but given the performance difference between the three powertrains so far it would seem they’ve got something different going on. I remember the preseason rumours claiming the Merc powertrain had 100hp more than their competitors and this would appear to be the reason. It’s an elegant solution and perhaps a no-brainer in retrospect but simple solutions often require a lot of thought ;-)

  10. Nikhil said on 8th April 2014, 19:48

    Looks like force india might be competing against the likes of ferrari ,redbull,mclaren. good to see a small team, to be there up at the tops with very less resources compared to one near them . i hope they continue to deliver even on other tracks

  11. SauberS1 (@saubers1) said on 8th April 2014, 19:57

    It looks like, the Force India has strong developing section.

  12. Alex McFarlane said on 8th April 2014, 20:23

    I’m not sure that it’s unique to Mercedes, but from the feature on Sky Sports F1 during Friday practice they made it out to be one of Mecedes ‘secret’ weapons. I wonder if McLaren will be giving Honda feedback on the Merc engine, could give them an advantage in knowing what they need to be competitive.

  13. Marienx said on 9th April 2014, 0:43

    Tell you what happened with Crashtor Maldonado and Lotus as why he called a day… He noticed no car was getting close to him, therefore ending his chances at crashing the competition. He was getting bored and quit after only doing 16 laps.

  14. Did i see Max Chilton ahead of Daniel Ricciardo?? OMG!!!

  15. Peter A said on 9th April 2014, 10:11

    Noticed that Max Chilton’s time was quicker than his quali time on Sat. Have they had upgrades or did he underperform on Sat?

Add your comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

All comments must abide by the comment policy. Comments may be moderated.
Want to post off-topic? Head to the forum.
See the FAQ for more information.

Skip to toolbar