Alonso not surprised Ferrari were lapped by Mercedes

2014 Spanish Grand Prix

Fernando Alonso, Ferrari, Circuit de Catalunya, 2014Fernando Alonso says it was no great surprise for Ferrari to be lapped by Mercedes during the Spanish Grand Prix.

“Well unfortunately it’s not a surprise in a way,” Alonso told reporters after the race.

“You know we were one minute behind the leaders in the first couple of races, with some Safety Cars in the race. So today that we [don't] have any Safety Car this one minute was one minute and a half.”

Alonso was the last driver on the lead lap but team mate Kimi Raikkonen was lapped by the two Mercedes drivers.

“Unfortunately we’re in a position compared with Australia or Malaysia so we didn’t close that gap, it was our intention so we need to do an extra and we need to close it in the next couple of races,” Alonso added.

“It’s going to be tough, no doubt. We are too far behind – not for Ferrari, for everyone – to compete with Mercedes. But it’s the fifth race of the championship so our work is to make things not that easy for Mercedes.

“When they have a big gap they don’t stress the mechanical side and everything. So we need to do better.”

Alonso said his battle with Raikkonen – who he passed for sixth place during the final stint – “was fun”.

“Obviously we would like to fight for first and second but unfortunately today we were not quick enough,” he continued.

“And at the end, yeah, we had different strategies. I had newer tyres and I was able to pass him but as I said we would like to fight for first and second hopefully soon.”

2014 Spanish Grand Prix

Browse all 2014 Spanish Grand Prix articles

Image © Ferrari/Ercole Colombo

Advert | Go Ad-free

38 comments on Alonso not surprised Ferrari were lapped by Mercedes

  1. Fer no.65 (@fer-no65) said on 11th May 2014, 16:47

    It’s going to be tough, no doubt.

    It’s going to like this all season, no doubt. I’m absolutely sure. I don’t see Ferrari making a magic recovery… in the development race, I’d not bet on them…

  2. Osvaldas31 (@osvaldas31) said on 11th May 2014, 16:47

    And at the end, yeah, we had different strategies. I had newer tyres and I was able to pass him but as I said we would like to fight for first and second hopefully soon.

    Well, you could try to pass, when both of you were on equal terms. It was the only way Ferrari could please their number one driver today, because they can’t do that with a good car.

    • Broom (@brum55) said on 11th May 2014, 16:56

      If Kimi could have changed his strategy to cover Alonso but didn’t. So why blame Ferrari or Alonso.

      • Albert said on 11th May 2014, 16:58

        That’s interesting, for years we’ve been blaming Ferrari each time they get the strategy wrong, but now, suddenly, they’re the drivers’ responsability? That’s quite interesting.

        • Broom (@brum55) said on 11th May 2014, 17:57

          Maybe you’re right, I don’t know either. What I do know is if Ferrari wanted to satisfy their number one driver, they would have got on the radio and told Kimi to move aside early on. Keeping armchair fans happy has never bothered them before.

          At this stage with basically no championship to play for, then there is no reason why Ferrari wouldn’t give their drivers more liberty to make their own calls or split strategies as a gamble to get more points.

          Anyway there was no prior evidence that a 3 stop strategy would have been faster than a 2 stop strategy, otherwise more drivers would have chosen it. Hindsight is a wonderful thing.

          • Albert said on 11th May 2014, 18:30

            “they would have got on the radio and told Kimi to move aside early on”

            That has proven to be something very dangerous to do.

            I don’t know if Ferrari were intentoonally favoring Alonso or not, you really aren’t making much sense.

          • Broom (@brum55) said on 11th May 2014, 19:31

            @Albert

            I was referring to the decision to go for 3 stops and not 2. The original poster clearly made a reference to unequal treatment for Kimi.

    • Cuesta (@cuesta) said on 11th May 2014, 17:00

      That’s false. Fernando said in the Spanish broadcast at the end of the race, that he changed the strategy on the fly because he saw it was working for Vettel.
      Also, before the race, Ferrari’s test driver Pedro De La Rosa said both Ferraris were going to use a two-stops strategy because the computers said it was seven seconds faster than a three-stops one.

    • Joshua Mesh (@joshua-mesh) said on 11th May 2014, 17:02

      @osvaldas31

      You know how Rosbergs side of the garage had their own strategy to try beat Hamilton? If you watched the race, you most definitely heard the radio transmissions.

      Well consider for a moment that at Ferrari they also have two sides of the garage. Now consider that maybe, just maybe, those two sides of the garage are running their own races with their own strategies, just like what is happening over at Merc.

      Consider your mind blown.

      • Osvaldas31 (@osvaldas31) said on 11th May 2014, 17:26

        @joshua-mesh Now consider unwritten rule, that leading driver gets call to the pits first. And consider, that if they were on different strategies, why Raikkonen stopped just one lap later than Alonso on their pit stops, but had to hang on for quite a long time shot tyres later on.

        • Joshua Mesh (@joshua-mesh) said on 11th May 2014, 17:55

          @osvaldas31 you are mistaken. Some teams give the choice to pit first to the leading driver… they dont force them to pit first.

          In Kimi pit second, its because he decided to pit second.

          • Osvaldas31 (@osvaldas31) said on 11th May 2014, 17:59

            @joshua-mesh Did you hear Kimi’s radio message to the team after the race – “who made these calls”?

            So your argument that Kimi decided that is unfounded.

          • Joshua Mesh (@joshua-mesh) said on 11th May 2014, 18:04

            Then blame KIMI’s strategy team! Dont blame Alonso’s strategy team! There are two teams, one per driver. Kimi needs to hire better people!

        • Shaboopi said on 11th May 2014, 19:16

          Hey Osvaldas, get a clue. You think anyone forced Kimi to sign for Ferrari? You think he’s being wronged while being paid exorbitant amounts of money? You blame Alonso or the team for this? Kimi never listens to anyone, supposedly. He can just tell them he’s coming in if he wants to. He didn’t. You talk of him like he’s a baby. He chose to return to a team, he could dictate terms. If your theory of 1st driver is even correct, which you can’t even prove, so what? Alonso is beating him by how many points this year?

          Your one of those fans that has to whine, but Kimi doesn’t give a damn about you, that is simple fact. He’s an adult, they are all adults, they all know each other, he signed a contract, and he has free will. You whining about it now doesn’t change that simple fact. If you want to blame anyone, blame Kimi.

    • HUHHII (@huhhii) said on 11th May 2014, 17:34

      +1

      Ferrari doesn’t deserve to have a driver of Kimi’s calibre in their team. I really hope Kimi could end his career somewhere else.

  3. Olba said on 11th May 2014, 17:00

    I don’t know what Ferrari was thinking with Raikkonen’s strategy, he was only fighting against his teammate and leading with 1,5s before Alonsos pitstop and this plan cost him 1-2 places. I don’t really trust Spagnolo.

  4. zoom (@zoomracing) said on 11th May 2014, 17:03

    Kimi was dead slow with the hard tyre, Alonso with older tyres was way faster than him with new tyres, the better driver won today.

  5. spoutnik (@spoutnik) said on 11th May 2014, 17:09

    We indeed saw to a (almost complete) fully extend how far behind Ferrari was.

  6. venom (@venom) said on 11th May 2014, 17:16

    Did I hear about testing in spain? do we know which drivers are taking part.

  7. Fran (@coloo33) said on 11th May 2014, 17:22

    Good race by Fernando and Kimi, that is the limit of the car, just awful.

    But the way that they favour Fernando with the strategy it really surprised me.

    I guess Santander has a lot of power inside the team.

  8. Rainman (@rainman) said on 11th May 2014, 17:27

    Wont it be real fun if Alo and Ros swapped teams next year……. That would be something!

  9. HUHHII (@huhhii) said on 11th May 2014, 17:41

    Looks like Santander plans RAI’s and ALO’s tire strategies. That’s the only explanation I can come up with.
    What a disgusting race.

  10. Albert said on 11th May 2014, 17:49

    In all fairness, considering Alonso’s and Raikkonen’s performances so far this year, you can’t really blame Ferrari for giving Alonso a better strategy. Looking at past races, he had a better chance to challenge for higher positions.

  11. Swindle94 said on 11th May 2014, 18:24

    I don’t have a problem with the different strategies, Just that the timing of Kimi’s stops could have been better. Ferrari are fortunate they have the two best drivers on the grid to cover up for a car that barely deserves to finish in the points.

  12. Ana said on 11th May 2014, 19:01

    Shame on ferrari…

  13. Herp said on 12th May 2014, 0:01

    Shame on Mercedes for making sure Hamilton won again. I like Rosberg. I guess Blackberry must be making their pit stop calls for them.

  14. tmax (@tmax) said on 12th May 2014, 15:33

    It looks like a good 5 years of Alonso’s career got wasted in Ferrari …..

    They just seem to be on a race to the bottom since 2009

Add your comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

All comments must abide by the comment policy. Comments may be moderated.
Want to post off-topic? Head to the forum.
See the FAQ for more information.