FIA ‘approves entry’ for 13th F1 team

F1 Fanatic Round-up

Start, Circuit de Catalunya, 2014In the round-up: The FIA has approved the planned entry of a second new F1 team, FRR, in addition to Haas Formula.

Links

Your daily digest of F1 news, views, features and more.

FIA grants entry to Romanian FRR F1 project (Adam Cooper’s F1 Blog)

“FRR has a lot more elements in place compared to Haas. It is planning to use a Renault power unit, while the car will be built and run by a team put together by former Force India and HRT boss Colin Kolles at his base near Munich.”

David Coulthard: “F1 drivers not happy” (AOL)

“The marketers love it because it gives them a reason to put their investment into F1, and I completely understand that, but the drivers are not enjoying driving the cars this year.”

Raikkonen bemoans unlucky 2014 (ESPN)

“I have driven well many times, but there’s always been something going wrong in the races – like punctures from other people hitting me – and it’s just never come together really. It’s a shame. Again we had a good position [in Monaco] but got a puncture so it’s just bad luck.”

‘We’re not just looking for the next Lewis Hamilton, we need to find the next Adrian Newey and Ross Brawn as well’ (The Independent)

John Surtees: “I hate so many regulations I must say. When I come along and I watch a programme and they start bringing up fuel gauges onto the programme to show how much fuel this driver’s got and whether he might have to ease off or adapt it’s another thing.”

Lewis Hamilton and Nico Rosberg’s former karting boss says rivalry goes back further than Mercedes (The Mirror)

Dino Chiesa: “Lewis’ fast lap was always a little bit faster than Nico’s. He knew it then and he knows it today. That’s why he always waits so long until he goes out in qualifying.”

Success ‘a brilliant surprise’ (Sky)

Mercedes’ Andy Cowell: “[Separating the compressor and turbine] was an idea that came out of the group of people that sat down and laid the engine out. It was a mixture of people from the engine side, chassis side, programme managers – the whole works group of people.

Wolff: driver freedom won’t backfire (Autosport)

“They are part of a very large organisation and I have 110 per cent confidence that it will not be to the detriment of the team.”

Monaco 2014 – race edit (F1)

Highlights from the last race.

Emmo on Bruce, Denny, Can-Am and Indy (McLaren)

“[Denny Hulme] was sometimes surly and always superstitious – he refused even to sit in a race car on Friday 13th, for example, and even had that eccentric stipulation written into all his contracts – and he didn’t appear to care what people thought about him. But once you got to know him, you realised what a fantastic guy he was.”

Tweets

Comment of the day

Nico Hulkenberg has been praised for his fine start to the year but @Craig-o says his team mate Sergio Perez deserves some credit too:

I’m genuinely impressed with the maturity he’s shown for most of the season so far. If it wasn’t for his needless contact in Monaco he could well have finished in the points too in every race he has started. [...]

The fact that Hulkenberg hasn’t scored a podium let alone a win in his career is a travesty given his talent. I always thought that Perez would be good for a team like Force India but I never expected him to give Hulkenberg as much of a challenge as much as he has been doing, it’s another thing to keep up that sort of run all season long though.
@Craig-o

Happy birthday!

Happy birthday to Tom Parfitt!

If you want a birthday shout-out tell us when yours is via the contact form or adding to the list here.

On this day in F1

Ayrton Senna announced his arrival in Formula One with an unforgettable drive in the pouring rain at Monaco.

He started his sixth grand prix from 13th on the grid, but in dreadful conditions he was closing on leader Alain Prost when the race was abandoned before half-distance. Both were also being caught by Stefan Bellof’s Tyrrell.

Sadly we’ll never know how the race would have turned out. But we do know Senna’s Toleman had sustained suspension damage which could have put him out; Tyrrell were eventually disqualified from the season because of a ballast infringement; and had Prost finished second in a full points race, instead of first in a half-distance race, he would have been that year’s champion.

Here are the closing stages of the race:

Image © Ferrari/Ercole Colombo

Advert | Go Ad-free

98 comments on FIA ‘approves entry’ for 13th F1 team

  1. Michael C said on 3rd June 2014, 0:24

    Its great that there are more driver seats avaliable, but 26 cars in Monaco, Interlagos and Osterreichring… equidistantly placed that’s 3 seconds of clear track until you reach the next car!

  2. Toxic said on 3rd June 2014, 0:35

    Those “percent” quotes are so annoying. Maybe it’s because I am a technical person but seriously, learn your math :)

    • 110 percent confident, that is admitting that one is overconfident?

    • Patrick (@paeschli) said on 3rd June 2014, 5:57

      Yeah, what’s the problem with 100%? Stop saying 110%, 120% or 200% …

    • US_Peter (@us_peter) said on 3rd June 2014, 6:37

      “I have 110 per cent confidence”

      Oh yeah? Well I have, like… 4000% confidence Toto!

      Seriously, to me whenever I see someone quoted saying that they have more confidence than is possible, drive the car faster than is possible, or extract more of the car’s potential than is possible, I pretty much think they are mentally challenged and I am very skeptical of anything they say from then on.

      • Jack said on 3rd June 2014, 7:07

        and you do realize that it is a form of expression right? or you ACTUALLY think they are mentally challenged? because if you LITERALLY mean that, its pretty unreasonable.

      • Keith Collantine (@keithcollantine) said on 3rd June 2014, 8:42

        @us_peter It’s just hyperbole. I assume “I pretty much think they are mentally challenged” is the same?

    • Diego (@ironcito) said on 3rd June 2014, 6:44

      To be fair, I don’t think that it’s a math problem. 110% is a perfectly valid figure, except that it doesn’t apply to things like confidence, effort, dedication and so on. But I agree that they are somewhat annoying to us OCDs ;)

      • mateuss (@mateuss) said on 3rd June 2014, 8:42

        Not when the maximum is by definition 100%. Values >100% are not valid in cases like this.

        Nothing to do with OCD. It’s spreading scientific illiteracy and general stupidity, and I think it is justified to be annoyed at such damage being done to society.

        @us_peter It’s the same for me, that sort of statement from somebody is enough to from then on heavily question their ability to properly understand, interpret and report even trivial events.

        • Ady (@ady) said on 3rd June 2014, 10:17

          I have a 3Ghz processor in my computer, but I am running it at 3.5Ghz, therefore it is running at 116%.

          • mateuss (@mateuss) said on 3rd June 2014, 11:32

            This is not a comparable statement and deficient one, but from the previous part of the sentence, and the numbers themselves, it can be understood you meant that it’s running at 116% frequency COMPERED TO WHAT IT WAS BEFORE.

            If you don’t give that calculation, or make that clarification, either we have to assume you are talking in absolute values or its just random jabber.
            And most of the time it seems they intended to use it in that plain wrong, absolute way.

            And just for loughs, given the amount of times Alosno has said he will be giving 120%, which would have to be way over 50 times. If we assume he used in relative terms, like you did or are trying to suggest others do (maybe, I did not get your point).

            Than when he started he was “giving it” less than 0.01% of what he is now. (1/ (1.2^(>50))*100) Which means the Minardi might have been the fastest car on the grid for all we know! Alonso just couldn’t be bothered…

          • mateuss (@mateuss) said on 3rd June 2014, 11:33

            *Then

    • JCost (@jcost) said on 3rd June 2014, 8:09

      Actually 120% or over is mathematically possible in some (many) cases…

    • PorscheF1 (@xtwl) said on 3rd June 2014, 9:45

      It’s nothing more than an expression. It’s not like they really mean 110%.

    • David said on 3rd June 2014, 11:00

      Actually, any percentage is possible, when related to increase or decrease. As long as it is related to a (previous) figure, anything goes. If your confidence yesterday was 20%, and it now is 110%, then it actually stands at 22%. :)

    • Max Jacobson (@vettel1) said on 3rd June 2014, 16:19

      You can have a 200% increase in profits for example! but you cannot travel at 110% the speed of light, or operate at 110% of your maximum power output.

      • falken (@falken) said on 3rd June 2014, 23:02

        You can do both. The speed of light varies, for instance, so the speed in one material might be 110% (x1.1 faster) than in another. At ‘max power’ is really short hand for ‘max power, allowing Y% chance of surviving X miles, at air pressure and temperature K’. So at a different altitude you might have more than 100% power.

  3. Jay Menon (@jaymenon10) said on 3rd June 2014, 0:48

    I got two words for Toto Wolff: ROSS BRAWN…haha.. I just had to!!

    Merc must be kidding themselves. If they continue in the current vein, its going to implode. Having said that, their advantage is such that whatever happens, they will still win both the titles. But perhaps that all Merc are interested in? Win at all costs perhaps?

  4. HoHum (@hohum) said on 3rd June 2014, 0:58

    From David RBR Coulthard, comments attributed to virtually the entire team but only naming Christian Horner as a source, it seams that Christian will continue to flog the dead horse of F1 sound in his capacity as Bernies annointed one, this of course is a self fulfilling prophecy, the more the promoters of F1 publicise their view that F1 (which has been declining in popularity for some time) is even worse than it used to be the less chance there is that people who haven’t watched F1 before will decide to spend $500 to $1000 to go to a race or subscribe to a TV service.

    Watching the Monaco GP on TV I did notice that the harbour was not as full of yachts as it has been in past years like 2007 (when the cheap option of being anchored in the hbr. for 3 days cost $35,000 ) but I can assure you that yacht owners/charterers do not pay that kind of money to be deafened by the noise, rather they pay that sort of money to see and be seen by the good and the great on the other yachts attending, apart from the effects of the GFC I suspect that the prominence of yachts owned by Russian “Bizniss men”, oil rich princelings and arms dealers has rather taken the gloss off that aspect of attending. F1 is being driven in the wrong direction in pursuit of short term obscene profit margins, of which not enough is returned to the teams and the chickens are coming home to roost.

    • bull mello (@bullmello) said on 3rd June 2014, 1:48

      @hohum – What a poorly written article that was. The body of the article merely repeated the headline several times without any further expounding or actual evidence that any of the drivers are “unhappy” about anything let alone the trumped up sound non-issue. I would propose that all the drivers happiness or unhappiness in regards to F1 is based on winning, or not. The only ones still squawking about the sound are the ones who believe they have some sort of stake in it. (Speaking mostly of pundits and promoters here. Not referring to actual fans with sentimental feelings about certain F1 motor sounds.)

      Coulthard has sadly become little more than a puppet. I used to at least occasionally enjoy his commentary or reporting. Now all I can hear is the rather square bobble headed bouncing to the tune of RBR as the his words drivel out.

      • HoHum (@hohum) said on 3rd June 2014, 3:10

        @bullmello, I agree, a very contrived attempt to resurrect an issue past its sell-by-date.

      • anon said on 3rd June 2014, 18:49

        I agree that Coulthard’s comments seem to be clearly aiming to serve Red Bull and Bernie rather than the sport.

        As you rightly point out, Coulthard doesn’t actually give any evidence for the change in attendance figures he is claiming.
        Furthermore, the actual number of ticketed attendees is tiny – the circuit only has a maximum capacity of 37,000 (22,000 grandstand seats and 15,000 general admission tickets), which is vastly outnumbered by the number of non ticketed spectators (the weekend attendance figures are usually estimated to be about 200,000) – so just a small drop in ticket sales can look like an abnormally large reduction in sales.

        After all, if you look at the attendance figures for the races up until Monaco, the attendance figures are actually pretty steady. Race day in Melbourne saw 100,500 people in 2014, compared to 103,000 in 2013, and the overall 2014 race weekend saw 315,000 compared to 323,000 in 2013 – a pretty small change in figures, and it looks like most of that came on Saturday due to the poor weather.

        As for the Chinese GP, the attendance figures for 2013 and 2014 were essentially identical – 180,000 over the race weekend – whilst in Spain the attendance figures were 205,000 and 214,000 in 2014 and 2013 respectively for the race weekend. The only race weekend where the numbers dropped significantly was in the Malaysian GP, but many feel that was because the nation was distraught over the loss of MH370, so the race rather faded into the background.

        All in all, the figures suggest that, at most normal circuits, the attendance figures are actually holding up a lot better than Bernie or Red Bull are suggesting.
        I’d argue that the reason for a slight drop in sales this year is more likely to be related to Vettel’s domination in the latter half of the 2013 season – we saw a similar trend in 2005, where ticket sales slipped due to Schumacher’s strong 2004 season, whilst declining ticket sales in late 2011 were put down to Vettel wrapping the title up so early in that season.

    • Tricky (@tricky) said on 3rd June 2014, 12:42

      Yes – waste of time reading it. Former Formula One ace turned TV commentator David Coulthard (“ace”, really?) says Nico and Lewis are probably “a bit happier” – Lewis is giving interviews about how great this car is to drive compared to last year.

  5. davey said on 3rd June 2014, 1:02

    on david coulthard. he should shut up & get lost, im tired of hearing his voice on the bbc commentary, he’s just terrible with his constant dull, monotone voice & un-insightful nonsense.

    i am a big fan of ben edwards but i just cannot stand coulthard’s commentary, just waiting for our sky to be installed as i heard some stuff from croft & brundle & think there commentary is 1000x better than my coulthard.

    i am also fed up of this stupid whinging about the sound or the volume or whatever the gripe is. theres nothing wrong with it, the cars sound fine & sound loud enough. there is also nothing wrong with the racing, its been better this year than it has been for a while now & the cars are so much more fun to watch now that drivers actually have to drive them because there not glued to the track with the blown diffuser nonsense.

    also funny how mr coulthard is now all on the drivers side yet the past few years when they were complaining about the pirelli tyres he was saying they should shut up & deal with it, total hypocrisy!

    get david coulthard off my tv please!

    • JCost (@jcost) said on 3rd June 2014, 8:15

      BBC has a guy covering GP2, don’t his name who has a terrible voice but I actually like his commentary. As for DC, he’s not great but he’s not that bad either. Some drivers don’t like these cars because they do not perform well, I’ve heared Lewis saying W05 is the best car he’s ever driven…

      • Sharon H (@sharoncom) said on 3rd June 2014, 8:39

        Do you mean Sky’s GP2/3 commentator, Will Buxton?

        I tend to think of Buxton, Croft and Edwards as being a bit like Marmite (throw Murray Walker in there too). Personally, I like the enthusiasm and passion for the sport they bring.

    • Jamie hammond (@jdsunset) said on 3rd June 2014, 9:21

      DC’s endless comparisons of tracks to natural amphitheatres did it for me. I dont miss BBC coverage one bit and happily pay my 50 quid a month for the sky subscription which is excellent and very good value for money

    • PorscheF1 (@xtwl) said on 3rd June 2014, 9:46

      I would never go to Sky if I can watch on the BBC.

      • Tom (@11mcgratht) said on 3rd June 2014, 21:28

        Well said sir! I despise the way in which Mr Murdoch’s Sky empire muscled into F1 and stole all the best personnel from the BBC coverage. If I were to watch Sky coverage (which, by the way, for £50 isn’t always very good) i would feel sick at having robbed so many more people of their favorite BBC pundits. Sky, I’m afraid, is for classless people for enjoying flashing their wealth.

        • spankythewondermonkey (@spankythewondermonkey) said on 4th June 2014, 12:59

          wow, yet another “sky stole F1!” post.
          fact: the BBC could not afford to cover the entire F1 season.

          sky stepped in, and presumably with them not being a direct terrestrial competitor to the bbc, were welcomed.
          why people moved from the bbc to sky, i cannot answer, but presumably it came down to £’s whether that by BBC wanting to cut wages (as was happening to other employees at that time) or sky offering more, i don’t know.
          the BBC were most definitely not the wronged party in the whole sorry story.

  6. PeterG said on 3rd June 2014, 1:06

    The people who seem to think that the new power units & volume will turn people off.

    The monaco Gp TV ratings were up on both Sky & the BBC.
    Sky’s ratings were up 25%, BBC’s were up 7%.
    This years race was the 3rd highest rated Monaco Gp over the past decade (Only 2010/2011 were higher).

    • Paul (@frankjaeger) said on 3rd June 2014, 2:04

      Hmm that’s really interesting. I’m glad figures aren’t plummeting like some suggest. Do these stats have any source?

    • Rooney (@rojov123) said on 3rd June 2014, 3:53

      That is because the of the race between the Merc drivers and Marussia’s first point. The race is not influenced by the sound, but the “show” is.

    • Fer no.65 (@fer-no65) said on 3rd June 2014, 4:28

      Maybe that was because of all the build up after Saturday’s controvertial qualifying.

      The media goes frenzy with that kind of stuff, and everyone wants to know what’s going to happen, specially, as you mention, that’s british broadcasting and a brit was involved (and to the general view, unfairly beaten).

      So I’d not jump in the boat just that easily… Personally, I don’t like this new formula as a fan (the sounds are really a let down, but I rather have that than teams altering the sound, cuz that’s just as fake as DRS), but I understand that it’s kinda the future, and it’s all we have, like it or not…

  7. HoHum (@hohum) said on 3rd June 2014, 1:09

    Well there’s irony for you, a Ferrari dealer useing Renault engines in cars racing as Forza Rosso.

  8. OmarR-Pepper (@omarr-pepper) said on 3rd June 2014, 1:37

    I think FRR reminds me of HRT, don’t know why… :(

  9. Paul (@frankjaeger) said on 3rd June 2014, 2:06

    A 26 car grid would be brilliant. If Haas and FFR aren’t front runners, I hope they can add to the Caterham-Sauber-Marussia dynamic.

    Also means some talented rookies can grab a seat

    • Tom (@11mcgratht) said on 3rd June 2014, 21:32

      The grid has felt pretty empty for the last few years so hopefully these new teams should add a little spice and colour here and there

  10. Kiefer Hopkins (@kieferh4) said on 3rd June 2014, 3:17

    you know if something like a team is run by Colin Kolles, it’s going downhill fast. Look at HRT (even though they ran out of money and was just a crap team in general) but, I don’t think he has the capabilities to run a team. But that’s my opinion.

    • Optimaximal (@optimaximal) said on 3rd June 2014, 9:24

      @kieferh4 He has more nous that most people and is a fighter. The problem is, everyone comes to him because they expect him to run F1 teams on spit, shoelaces and string.

      • Kiefer Hopkins (@kieferh4) said on 3rd June 2014, 10:08

        yeah, I said HRT was a crap team that shoudn’t have gone on as long as it did, but the flip side to that is that he kept that team going for what, two years, on nothing but the smell of an oily rag, but then again, he put them in more strife than before, not delivering (that was because their car was slower than the Marussia’s though) the team wasn’t getting paid properly (or so I have heard) and he signed more drivers and burnt through what little budget they had in two years. But again, that’s my opinion.

    • Gordon (@gfreeman) said on 3rd June 2014, 10:01

      Don’t forget the fact that he tried to blackmail Toto Wolff.
      One of the more memorable mistakes he made before the demise of HRT was not guaranteeing a budget for Geoff Willis for the development of the car. To do something like that and consequently lose someone of his talent was foolish; though he may not be as highly rated as Newey, it was still a big mistake and could have made them more competitive. Willis is clearly helping Mercedes (along with others, obviously).

      • Kiefer Hopkins (@kieferh4) said on 3rd June 2014, 10:12

        but either way, the power-pack in that car was rubbish. I mean, any amount of development to that ‘thing’ that they called a car would’ve made no difference what so ever. And yes, obviously Adrian Newey is WAY better at what he does and he can do that because RBR have resources coming out of the windows of that joint. they get more money from Red Bull and all their other sponsors to create another three teams and make them front runners. But as I said, I have my opinions and doubts, and hey, he might just do the exact opposite and lead that team to a mid-field, possibly a close to front running team

  11. wsrgo (@wsrgo) said on 3rd June 2014, 3:46

    CoTD makes me wonder, is weight a factor why Perez is being able to run Hulkenberg close?

    • Sharon H (@sharoncom) said on 3rd June 2014, 8:33

      A few races ago Hulkenberg said that he was not running overweight and actually had some ballast. There will be a slight disadvantage when it comes to weight distribution with Hulkenberg having less ballast than Perez and being taller (higher CoG). When updates come along, the weight difference might start to become a factor.

      • anon said on 3rd June 2014, 19:00

        It only really seems to be the Ferrari powered teams that are struggling with being noticeably overweight, which seems to tie in with the rumours that Ferrari’s engine is badly overweight.

        The rumours from the German press in the pre-season testing phase was that, thanks to a new lightweight chassis design, Force India were able to get their car, even with Hulkenberg on board, pretty comfortably under the weight limit (there was talk of at least 10kg of ballast required).

        I suspect that the more likely reason why Perez is closer to Hulkenberg than might have been expected would be because Force India have been making some modifications to their suspension system over the past few races.
        They were running an interconnected system similar to the one Lotus and Mercedes use, but they have removed it in more recent races – it seems that Perez was struggling a little more than Hulkenberg to adapt to the interconnected suspension, so the change seems to have favoured him slightly more than Hulkenberg.

  12. hzh (@hzh00) said on 3rd June 2014, 4:08

    Raikkonen bemoans unlucky 2014: “there’s always been something going wrong in the races”.
    Isn’t that what Massa used to say many times when he was at Ferrari?! May be it’s some sort of permanent Ferrari’s 2nd driver’s luck.

  13. Irejag (@irejag) said on 3rd June 2014, 4:16

    There is not enough talk about how the best track on the calender is coming up this weekend!! I for one am hoping the Mercs don’t finish the race… If we want a good racing season then Red Bull needs to start catching up and they are going to need Mercedes to falter, at least a bit. Otherwise this season will be over before we even get half way to the end.

    • bharat (@bharat141) said on 3rd June 2014, 5:23

      It is not going to be easy for RB to catch mercs in Montreal because of the straights. I think it will be FI and Williams chasing the mercs because of the nature of the circuit and RBR and Ferrari would be battling for bottom half of the points positions given that Williams will not do the mistake they did in Bahrain by going for 3 stopper as I think it would be a one stopper for many teams based on the fact that 2014 tyres are harder and last year PdR could do 47 laps on the soft tyre he started his race with.

      • Tom (@11mcgratht) said on 3rd June 2014, 21:38

        I’m thoroughily enjoying this run of Mercedes dominance. Due to more races and points than ever before the Red Bull team is already catching the achievements of Lotus and Williams. That can’t be right! they’ve only been around for a few years anyway. If Hamilton could catch Vettel’s stats for wins and poles it could be really interesting by the end of their careers to see who has most.

  14. Robbie said on 3rd June 2014, 4:21

    I personally am fine with the sound, and I would be fine if it was changed too. I think there is a percentage who are not for the new sound, and DC, whether he bleeds RBR or not, is just expressing that side of the argument.

    As to drivers not liking the new experience, the new feel of the cars and how they drive, I do feel for them if they truly feel they are missing something that was special. There’s a chance that even NR and LH miss how the cars used to feel in terms of raw experience. Unfortunately I have heard BE say well in the past, it’s not his concern whether the drivers like it (whatever the rules or changes etc) or not.

    As DC points out, the ratings will do the talking, the fans and the bottom line will help dictate the direction F1 keeps striving for to keep market share. One of the constants in F1 is change. I suspect that the sound issue is not dead within F1 nor are they panicked and if a feasible change can be made that is an improvement, it can’t hurt. I doubt they’ll get them to scream though…they’re simply too different…so what will be good enough?

  15. Jason (@jason12) said on 3rd June 2014, 7:08

    13th F1 team….. as if Q1 is not crowded enough as it is.

    • Keith Collantine (@keithcollantine) said on 3rd June 2014, 7:55

      @jason12 It isn’t :-)

    • Girts (@girts) said on 3rd June 2014, 8:36

      I don’t think it’s really an issue. Porsche Carrera Cup Germany currently has 37 cars. The 2nd race of the current season took place at Oschersleben, which is only 3.7km long (~90s for those cars) and Q1 runs for 20 minutes. No problem.

      • Keith Collantine (@keithcollantine) said on 3rd June 2014, 8:46

        @girts The Formula Renault 2.0 Eurocup races I was commentating on last weekend had 40 cars – and that was two fewer than last year! But they were are Spa so they had a bit more room. Hard work learning to spot all those cars though :-)

        • Iestyn Davies (@fastiesty) said on 3rd June 2014, 12:50

          Amazing how well some series like Eurocup are doing, while a series like British F3 is still struggling to get a grid together, despite taking a year out and trying to cut costs..

    • Optimaximal (@optimaximal) said on 3rd June 2014, 9:42

      If anything, it means less lulls and more activity as everyone will want/need some clean running.

    • JackJ said on 3rd June 2014, 15:28

      I never understood why qualifying is limites to 1 hour. FP1, 2 and 3 are all 90 minutes, the race is even longer so why cap it at 1 hour for qualifying? More time could provide a less crowded track. Not that I think it’s crowded.

Add your comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

All comments must abide by the comment policy. Comments may be moderated.
Want to post off-topic? Head to the forum.
See the FAQ for more information.