Lewis Hamilton, Mercedes, Hungaroring, 2014

Hamilton stays ahead in second practice

2014 Hungarian Grand Prix second practicePosted on | Author Keith Collantine

Lewis Hamilton, Mercedes, Hungaroring, 2014Lewis Hamilton completed a successful Friday by ending the second practice session fastest as he had the first.

The Mercedes driver was over two-tenths of a second faster than team mate Nico Rosberg when the pair ran on the quicker soft tyres, and he enjoyed a similar margin on the medium compounds.

During the long runs at the end of the session Rosberg had to be told to use a lower gear in the first corner to guard against “engine damage”.

Drivers discovered the soft tyres were over one-and-a-half seconds quicker per lap than the harder medium compound. Sebastian Vettel was one of several drivers who found a few tenths more than that when he went third-quickest with a 1’25.111.

Fernando Alonso was fourth, almost a full second slower than Hamilton. He was separated from team mate Kimi Raikkonen by the McLaren of Kevin Magnussen.

Felipe Massa had a spin early in the session, damaging a set of tyres which forced Williams to change their long-runs plans in the final half-hour. He ended up tenth behind Daniel Ricciardo, the other Williams of Valtteri Bottas, and Jenson Button.

Pos. No. Driver Car Best lap Gap Laps
1 44 Lewis Hamilton Mercedes 1’24.482 38
2 6 Nico Rosberg Mercedes 1’24.720 0.238 38
3 1 Sebastian Vettel Red Bull-Renault 1’25.111 0.629 33
4 14 Fernando Alonso Ferrari 1’25.437 0.955 26
5 20 Kevin Magnussen McLaren-Mercedes 1’25.580 1.098 34
6 7 Kimi Raikkonen Ferrari 1’25.730 1.248 30
7 3 Daniel Ricciardo Red Bull-Renault 1’25.983 1.501 29
8 77 Valtteri Bottas Williams-Mercedes 1’25.999 1.517 37
9 22 Jenson Button McLaren-Mercedes 1’26.234 1.752 33
10 19 Felipe Massa Williams-Mercedes 1’26.402 1.920 18
11 26 Daniil Kvyat Toro Rosso-Renault 1’26.689 2.207 42
12 25 Jean-Eric Vergne Toro Rosso-Renault 1’26.703 2.221 37
13 27 Nico Hulkenberg Force India-Mercedes 1’26.789 2.307 39
14 99 Adrian Sutil Sauber-Ferrari 1’26.919 2.437 41
15 11 Sergio Perez Force India-Mercedes 1’27.013 2.531 39
16 13 Pastor Maldonado Lotus-Renault 1’27.019 2.537 40
17 8 Romain Grosjean Lotus-Renault 1’27.021 2.539 14
18 21 Esteban Gutierrez Sauber-Ferrari 1’27.480 2.998 32
19 10 Kamui Kobayashi Caterham-Renault 1’28.370 3.888 35
20 17 Jules Bianchi Marussia-Ferrari 1’28.469 3.987 26
21 4 Max Chilton Marussia-Ferrari 1’28.586 4.104 35
22 9 Marcus Ericsson Caterham-Renault 1’29.036 4.554 34

Image © Daimler/Hoch Zwei

24 comments on “Hamilton stays ahead in second practice”


    That’s my prediction.

    1. @vettel1: I would love to see Vettel ahead of Ricciardo but I’m sceptical. Let’s at least hope the car or the team doesn’t fail when it matters.

      1. Nah- Dan to beat Seb again for sure :)

        Seb is back with his driving style now, obviously needed to change his style to suit the new regs, but even the biggest Seb fans cant deny our Aussie boy Dan has done a pretty good job so far!!!

        1. Never understood “driving style” as an explanation for Seb’s woes. His car has generally been down on power compared to Daniel for most of the season. He’s usually slower, quite a bit slower, through the speed traps. This FP2 was one of the freakishly rare exceptions, for once SV was 3 kph faster through the traps than Daniel. I think that last happened in Malaysia.

          You don’t see these discrepancies between any other pair of drivers. Nando and Kimi have been within 1 kph of one another all season, and which one is faster flips back and fourth.

          1. That could be explained by downforce levels though. Vettel may be running higher rear wing levels generally in an attempt to recoup some of the lost rear downforce.

            But equally, there is the theory that Renault have been using Vettel’s car almost like a “test bed” for their upgrades, hence his well above average unreliability rates.

            Of course, we are all just speculating however.

          2. That could be explained by downforce levels though.

            No, it can’t. If it were downforce levels than (1) Seb would show high fuel consumption than Daniel, and (2) Seb would be quicker through downforce dependent sectors. Neither is true.

            If the “VET is having trouble with the new cars handling/lack of downforce” argument were true then I’d expect to see he and Daniel doing similar times through the “power sectors” of various circuits and Seb being slower in the “handling sectors”. The opposite is true. If you look at where DR gets his edge on SV its invariably by running up a big margin in the power sectors and not by his mastery of flinging the RB10 through the twisty bits.

          3. Teams/drivers who ran high downforce setups always paid a price in terms of top speed. That was a tradeoff with cornering speed. Under the new rules they pay an additional price in terms of higher fuel consumption and that’s forcing everyone, both within and across teams, to run similar downforce levels.

        2. David Thompson
          25th July 2014, 18:39

          Remember, everyone now has almost exactly the same fuel consumption – as close, from below, to 100 kg per race as possible. A car running higher downforce will have to lean out its fuel mixture to reach that goal. And the teams closely guard information on their fuel mixture settings, so anything anyone says about Ricciardo vs. Vettel on fuel consumption is bunk.

    2. No I disagree, I do think he has shown a turnaround since Monaco in that he has been closing on Ricciardo since then. Had it not been for Red Bull misjudging pit stop times, he would have beaten Ricciardo in Canada and Britain I think. Austria would just be skepticism.

      I have no problem admitting that @garns – I’ve been a fan of Ricciardo’s for a while now!

  2. where are thou Williams?

    Interesting results, the FRIC ban has certainly rearranged the cars strengths and weaknesses as illustrated last GP. Magnussen and McLaren might be back on track since the Aus GP. Excitinggggg.

    1. Williams are waiting for qualifying and race, where the pace matters.

      1. David Thompson
        25th July 2014, 18:45

        If Massa can keep out of his own way.

  3. Corrado (@)
    25th July 2014, 15:02

    Alonso always 1 of the drivers with the fewest number of laps, while the Mercedes duo amongst the guys with the most laps.

    1. David Thompson
      25th July 2014, 18:42

      Worries about engine/gearbox fragility and consequent grid penalties? Mercedes can bet that its cars will beat the rest of the field from deep on the grid.

  4. Still time for Rosberg/Mercedes to scan the Hamilton data and improve (just taking the Villeneuve ‘Lewis is there to improve Rosberg’ line here!) Just to complete Villeneuve’s thought: Vettel to Mercedes after Hamilton has done the Rosberg-training, any substance to that rumour?

    1. RaceProUK (@)
      25th July 2014, 15:12

      Hamilton still has a year left of his contract, and assuming Mercedes keep their form going into next year, I don’t see him switching teams any time soon.

      1. Neither did I, but I’m surprised and a bit non-plussed and somewhat suspicious about the Red Bull line here. Marko, Horner etc. seem very happy to be spinning out the story, wry smiles on faces, that Vettel is being sounded out by other teams, including Mercedes. Why would they even want to feed that rumour about their own driver? Seems strange. Maybe to unsettle Hamilton/Mercedes? Can’t quite work it out.

        1. I imagine it originated from Mercedes with the intention to light a fire under Hamilton’s management.

  5. Lewis looks particularly strong on his long runs on the soft tire, likely the preferred choice for the race.

    1. David Thompson
      25th July 2014, 18:44

      Well, of course. But only as long as it lasts.

  6. Could be hard for Hulkenberg to score again. I heard there is a chance of rain on Sunday, lets hope for it!

    1. I think Hulk can score points …If you look at german gp Practice 1&2 results they were 13th and 14th fastest…but on saturday they were much quicker…PLUS they have a lot of data to analyse today..

  7. David Thompson
    25th July 2014, 18:49

    “Rosberg had to be told to use a lower gear in the first corner to guard against ‘engine damage’.”
    Anyone know what that means? I know how overrevving can damage an engine, but not underrevving.

    1. harvesting putting strain while on the power?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

All comments are moderated. See the Comment Policy and FAQ for more.
If the person you're replying to is a registered user you can notify them of your reply using '@username'.