Russian Grand Prix track revealed in F1 2014 video lap

2014 Russian Grand Prix

Further details of the track which will hold the first Russian Grand Prix next month has been revealed with the first video of the circuit as it appears in the official Formula One game F1 2014.

The video shows Russian driver Daniil Kvyat lapping the circuit in his Toro Rosso.

Doubts have been raised over the race as Russia has been subject to increasingly tough economic sanctions from the United States and European Union due to the situation in Ukraine.

F1 2014 is due to be released by Codemasters on October 17th.

Pre-order F1 2014 and support F1 Fanatic

You can now order your copy of Codemasters’ latest Formula One game, F1 2014, which goes on sale in October. By buying your copy via the Amazon links below you can also help support F1 Fanatic:

F1 Fanatic earns a commission on products sold via the links to our affiliate partners above, however you are not charged any extra. See here for more information.

2014 Russian Grand Prix

Browse all 2014 Russian Grand Prix articles

Advert | Go Ad-free


50 comments on Russian Grand Prix track revealed in F1 2014 video lap

  1. Interesting video, shame that they couldn’t have stayed onboard with the same angle all lap long.

    • Michael Brown (@) said on 3rd September 2014, 14:21

      Yeah, I’m not find of switching camera angles every 3-5 seconds.

      • JeffreyJ said on 3rd September 2014, 17:01

        It’s a video game promo… It’s supposed to show how awesome the graphics are (whick they are btw) of the game.

        If you want you can youtube ‘sochi track’ and find a ton of full laps onboard mostly non-promo video game footage that random people uploaded

      • Yeah, that was hard to watch. I feel nauseous.

        The video rendering is pretty good, but the audio sounded atrocious.

  2. DavidS (@davids) said on 3rd September 2014, 14:10

    Valencia 2.0

  3. Oli (@dh1996) said on 3rd September 2014, 14:20

    Wow, the game looks awful. It’s like they don’t even try anymore. Ah well, maybe current gen F1 2015 will finally look anything like what CM promised for F1 2010 …

    • mattshaw85 (@mattshaw85) said on 3rd September 2014, 16:15

      Seems like a copy & paste job from previous years, with a few tweaks. Find the games pretty dull to be honest by contrast to the standards set by others with much more depth, admittedly codemasters are slightly held back by the licensing I think.

    • William Stuart (@williamstuart) said on 3rd September 2014, 16:45

      Do you mean “next gen F1 2015″? With next gen they will be able to have far more horsepower to compute the behaviour of the cars more accurately. The main thing I dislike about the current games is the arcade-y handling.

      • Oli (@dh1996) said on 3rd September 2014, 20:05

        Consoles are always called next-gen until their release. Xbox 360 and PS3 also were next-gen at some point ;)

        I do indeed mean the “new” consoles. My X1 is crying for a good racing game. Forza looks and drives amazing but there’s zero motivation. I really, really hope they get F1 2015 up to 60fps but I fear that they concentrate on other gimmicks and we’ll get a sub-720p, 30fps game that looks nice in screenshots. I still play F1 2013 every day (and sometimes 10/11/12) but I’ll skip the 2014 version or get it on steam after some mods have surfaced.

        About the licensing limits: I do remember the 1994 season “Pole Position” F1 manager that came with an official FIA licensing and you could cheat with illegal fuel/traction control and hope the officials don’t notice. Awesome game!

      • lawrence said on 3rd September 2014, 21:14

        The main thing I dislike about the current games is the arcade-y handling.

        Completely agree. And it’s not just driving. The whole game is setup as if I’m inserting a coin in the arcade and playing on game. The depth of game menus and customization of Geoff Crammond’s GP series was unparalleled. Plus community was great and there were some insanely good looking and accurate historic cars made by the community members.

  4. Mashiat (@mashiat) said on 3rd September 2014, 14:26

    Anybody else already thinking of F1 2015 as the ‘real’ F1 2014?

  5. Mashiat (@mashiat) said on 3rd September 2014, 14:30

    Looks just like Abu Dhabi. And that’s not a good thing. Why can’t they have good tracks, even recent ones, like Austin or even an Austria-like track?

  6. montreal95 (@montreal95) said on 3rd September 2014, 14:36

    What a pathetic video. I cannot express enough my dislike for the videogame videos that change the camera every 1-2 seconds. What on earth can be gained by a vid like that except strengthening my resolve never to buy their game as payback for the minute of misery they caused me? Rant over

  7. lawrence said on 3rd September 2014, 14:48

    Well, that was some useless video.
    It doesn’t have anything.
    1. It looks like crap graphic-vise and artistically (talking about directing).
    2. I have no clue how the track goes, so it doesn’t reveal anything either. Again, due to pathetic camera work. Why don’t they just give an onboard shot for these kind of videos so that we can see the track properly. That’s what everyone’s interested in after all. I couldn’t care less about a game that’s been absolutely stagnating since its first iteration, which itself was a big disappointment to begin with.

  8. Fer no.65 (@fer-no65) said on 3rd September 2014, 15:16

    Now, I’m not saying this is the worst circuit F1 has ever attended, but surely it stands out as one of the dullest.

    Sure, we’ve yet to see a race, but just looking at it, every single bit of the track looks exactly the same. Someone above said “Valencia 2.0″… I’d say Valencia 0.7 ! at least Valencia was fast and tight and you could see a corner and more or less distinguish it from the rest of the track (the bridge for instance).

    This one looks like WIP. A totally uninteresting place to race, and just a excuse to continue using the Olympic Park.

    F1 tracks should be made out of challenging corners, with a purpose at least. This one just fills a gap within a park… Not blaming Tilke (this time), nor the promoters, that probably got a good deal with Russia (if Russia wants to pay…), nor Russia, they probably need to use that place. But they could’ve chosen a better way, F1 is never going to stick if the track is this dull.

    It’s just SAD to see this happen, knowing FULL WELL that in 2, maybe 3 years, F1 will not return and that place is just going to be forgotten forever.

  9. kpcart said on 3rd September 2014, 15:33

    All the great tracks have TREES! this track has no trees, it looks so barren, like all these tilke tracks. also n undulations, you need undulations like Eau Rouge. this track “looks” dreadful, and will be rubbish to watch on tv. F1 should come to Bathurst in Australia. I was happy to hear Russia got a race track, but this is going to be just more monotonous modern f1 rubbish. F1 is shooting itself in the foot, the need to fire Tilke, why does one man have a monopoly of planning the f1 future, it is not right.

    • KeeleyObsessed (@keeleyobsessed) said on 3rd September 2014, 16:00

      Silverstone doesn’t have trees. I fail to see how the exclusion of something which for obvious reasons has to be outside the track parameters should impact on the track itself. I want to watch the cars go round on the track, not point and stare at the pretty scenery (which is the same problem I had with the proposed New Jersey track).

      • Tom (@11mcgratht) said on 3rd September 2014, 17:12

        No you’re absolutely right. Take Montreal, the track is already very good but is made an awesome spectacle because of its surroundings. It’s the same story with Monaco. Unless the track is exceptional, such as Silverstone, and manages to capture the imagination of the fans with its unique quirks (which, by the way, this absolutely does not with its 90 degree corner obsession) a track in the middle of nowhere is just about the dullest possible spectacle anyone in F1 could dream up.

        • KeeleyObsessed (@keeleyobsessed) said on 3rd September 2014, 19:18

          Take Bahrain, the last 2 races there have been big hitters. 2013’s race was voted best of the season in the ‘Rate the Race’ features. Abu Dhabi held a great race in 2012, as did Valencia. The surroundings of a circuit do not add nor take away from the quality of the racing on the track.

          As for this track, I’d rather wait until it’s had a race before I start criticising it.

          • matt90 (@matt90) said on 3rd September 2014, 23:16

            But Bahrain would indeed be thought of as a more interesting circuit if it had more interesting surroundings. There’s nothing to say a visually dull circuit won’t produce good racing- but it will still be a visually dull backdrop, and that matters to an awful lot of people. At least the desert setting gives Bahrain a somewhat unique quality, although being held at night then loses that. You may well have pointed out some great races- but you have missed that all those circuits are still disliked in spite of that thanks to both layout and appearance. Also, for those occasions when a race is dull, if not even the setting can liven it up then you are in for one of the most boring races. But if there is some beauty or interest it is easier to take pleasure in simply watching the cars.

    • Pete (@petey84) said on 3rd September 2014, 23:28

      Bathurst would be awesome but will never happen. Could you imagine a big accident up the hill? It would be quite difficult to clear. They would have to change the track that much in the name of ‘safety’ that it would lose all its character.
      This track (Sochi) I agree looks absolutely boring. I am hoping we don’t have to sit through to many races there

    • zimkazimka (@zimkazimka) said on 4th September 2014, 5:57

      I thought I saw some palm trees. Besides, the track is inside the Olympic park.

  10. Illusive (@illusive) said on 3rd September 2014, 15:34

    The tires have a glow to it, i hope with next gen consoles, they dont hold back on graphics.

  11. ECWDanSelby (@ecwdanselby) said on 3rd September 2014, 15:47

    Apart from the crappy Abu Dhabi style final sector, I stand by the fact this looks pretty darn fast!

  12. Mashiat (@mashiat) said on 3rd September 2014, 15:54

    0:51 For those who wanna see the onboard shot of the Toro Rosso.

  13. KeeleyObsessed (@keeleyobsessed) said on 3rd September 2014, 16:03

    If the EU and the US actually prohibit the Russian GP, what would happen? All the teams are based within the EU (Most in UK, Ferrari and Toro Rosso in Italy). So presumably they’d be forced to reconsider. This would therefore affect all the drivers (even ones like Massa, Gutierrez and Maldonado, as they won’t be able to race without the teams there to give the cars). I know that people will say that the contract stipulates that they have to be there for all the rounds, but does that include racing, and what happens if the EU and US step in big time to sanction or prohibit the race?

    • Sauber are based in Switzerland, not in the EU. Imagine if all the EU teams boycotted it and Sauber replaced Sutil with a non-EU driver for one race and went there as the sole team to collect 43 points, that would be hilarious, but of course it’s not going to happen. Also Caterham and Marussia are based in the UK but registered as Malaysian and Russian respectively, I wonder if that would make any difference in this theoretical scenario.

  14. petebaldwin (@petebaldwin) said on 3rd September 2014, 16:17

    I said a while ago when they first published teh circuit plans that this track looked really boring. That video does nothing to change my opinion of it!

    Luckily, in recent years, it’s the boring tracks that have thrown up the best races so fingers crossed!

  15. Osvaldas31 (@osvaldas31) said on 3rd September 2014, 16:19

    Did Russia occupied Valencia?

Add your comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

All comments must abide by the comment policy. Comments may be moderated.
Want to post off-topic? Head to the forum.
See the FAQ for more information.