Advertisement

Circuit information

Length: 5.303km
Race distance: 58 laps / 307.574km

Full throttle: 65%
Top speed: 303kph
Longest flat-out section: 10s / 735m
Right/left-hand corner: 10/6

Tyre wear: medium / low
Brake wear: high
Downforce level: high
Gearshifts per lap: 60

Source: BMW 2007

Tyres

2010 tyre compounds: hard, soft
2009 compounds: medium, super soft
2008 compounds: medium, soft

Average fuel use: 2.630kg/lap
Pit lane time loss: 19.6s (source: Williams)

Albert Park Grand Prix Circuit – track maps

Albert Park, Melbourne F1 circuit 2009 (click to enlarge)

Albert Park, Melbourne F1 circuit 2009 (click to enlarge)

2009 Australian Grand Prix information map

2009 Australian Grand Prix information map

Albert Park Grand Prix Circuit – aerial map

Albert Park, Melbourne articles

More articles about Albert Park, Melbourne

64 responses to Button wins for Brawn in spectacular start to season (Australian Grand Prix)

  1. dibble says:

    exellent race good to see f1 back.well done to brawngp and jb and lewis 3rd brilliant.bring on next weekend:)

  2. FF says:

    what a lucky set of points will these be for Lewis Ham

    • John H says:

      They weren’t lucky. Other cars broke down, fell off the track, crashed into each other or broke the rules.

      He and his car didn’t do any of these – so he deserves third place.

  3. SoLiD says:

    I think the scrap between Vettel and Kubica was nice… ok it ended in tears but a fight at the front between 2 great talents that won’t give way just like that… Got to love that.
    I do agree with Brundle, 50/50.

    Glad to follow F1 at BBC from this year :D

  4. SYM says:

    Lewis drove a superb race, keeping out of trouble and pushing hard when he needed, and making great use of KERS, in what is universally acknowledged to be an aerodynamically flawed car.
    3rd place totally deserved. He kept his head during SC, while Trulli fell off and, surprise surprise, tried to blame Lewis.
    Great drive from Jensen as well, soaking up the tremendous pressure through out the race. To me, he looked like a Champion.

    • pSynrg says:

      Totally agree SYM. The WDC making the absolute most possible out of a bad situation. Very impressive as always. Bit like Alonso towards the end of 2008.

  5. S Hughes says:

    I wonder what Button would have done in an MP4-24 which is universally recognised to be a dog. Oh yes, just look at last year for your answer. It was the car wot won it.

    • Striay says:

      Im sorry but last years Honda car does not prove button to be a “bad driver” as you put it, as his car was way off the pace and Barichello also struggled last year as well. Button is one of the best drivers out there who understands a lot about ‘technical’ stuff, and also drives extremely smoothly, which benefits the tires.

    • francois says:

      Jenson’s also shown he can out drive a horrible car to get decent results as well , look at what he did in some races in 2007.

      I do agree that was probably one of Lewis’s best drives in so much as he just put his head down and got on with the race without doing anything rash or trying too hard.He passed an impressive number of cars in the early stages with the help of his KERS.

    • Clare msj says:

      You can hardly compare this years Mclaren to last years Honda – Lewis wouldnt have done much better than Button did in that Honda last year – it was an awful car! This years Mclaren isnt awful, its just average.

      Plus you could argue that Lewis’ Mclaren helped him to the title too, just like Jenson’s Brawn is helping him this year – the car is always a contributor – no matter how good a driver is if you put him in a truly rubbish car he wont get the results

  6. frecon says:

    Charlie Whitting waiting 3 laps to put the SC on the track, and doing it just after Button pit stopped made me feel sick.

    Brawn GP and Button are fair winners, but this kind of decissions are not good for the sport.

    Futhermore, if you add the diffusor issue, with Renault and Red Bull asking in the past about similar diffusors and FIA answering in a negative way…

    It’s obvious for me that FIA is trying to break FOTA unity. Am I a conspiranoic?

  7. andy says:

    Well done jenson-barra.
    its great to see great sportsmanship rather than a certain person with “daddy” kissing his son goodbye like last years “tripe”
    JENSON TO WIN TITLE coultards right jenson is a world class driver,never had the equipment to do it.
    shuv it up em jens

  8. jilted john says:

    Your right andy,couldnt stand last year all the hype around hamilton.
    Jenson gets in quietly and does the job massive well done.
    By the way last years champ was SWISS not british!!!!!

    • frecon says:

      And today winner is from Monaco, not from UK ;)

    • Not the silly Switzerland thing again?

      The Swiss haven’t taken over Stevenage and Monaco hasn’t annexed Frome. They’re both British.

    • frecon says:

      Of course they are. In Spain we have the same comments. Alonso also pays taxes in switzerland, and most of the F1 drivers do it now and did it before.

      I was just kidding

    • F1Yankee says:

      if a business were to do this, via ofshore holding company (a mailbox in the bahamas), it would be deemed illegal. individuals are allowed to stick it to their home countries, and i find that despicable. in this context, the only thing worse are the olympic athletes that sold their nationality.

    • Matt says:

      If our tax laws didn’t penalise people for being successful……

    • Bernification says:

      F1 Yankee- all business does do this. Where have you been living?

  9. Hugo Bourgeois says:

    I wonder how long we’ll have to wait before we see Hamilton score points again :-)

    Nice to see Brawn GP (drivers, but also Ross Brawn obviously) perform so well!

    • Setroc says:

      I think we’ll have to wait for the diffuser issue to be resolved. Mclaren are surely one of the best equipped teams to quickly adapt and use it if it’s deemed legal.

      That said, even without the luck, Hamilton looked in pretty good form to finish 8th and snatch a point. And that’s having had a failed gearbox preventing him from taking part in Q2 in addition to being demoted 3 places on the grid. So maybe it’s not all bad for him.

  10. gory says:

    Thats not strictly true frecon,jenson spends more time in uk than hammy.
    i should know i live in his hometown frome!!
    hammy just a whiner and whinger anyway, doesnt like the photos being taken thats why he went to cuckoo clock land.

  11. theonlygayinthevillage says:

    Please please no that smirking cheshire cat branson (who cant even get broadband working right)
    DONT CHANGE THE NAME TO VIRGIN PLEASE GOD!!!!!!

    • Michel S. says:

      I find his doppelganger blonde twins more spooky, actually..

    • pSynrg says:

      Yeah, the blonde twins! Was that just cooked up to look like some garbage movie script “super business man saves the world”?
      He should just keep his stupid grinning mush off the screen. You don’t see the boss of RBS or Panansonic (for example) gurning round the grid with jail bait on each arm.
      Give Brawn the dosh alredy and bugger off Branson.

  12. Jess says:

    vettel handed a grid penlaty for what? racing hard or trying to complete the Race. Man F1 just could not leave it a lone.

    • Spud says:

      Yeah that was a great battle!!
      Neither man wanted to give up the place.
      Its unfortunate they both went out but thats racing!!!

      Next year we’ll probably see airbags to stop the cars hittin off one another LOL.

      Seriously thought leave the racing alone.

      Well done to Jenson and Rubens (an ex Jordan racer),
      And good to see Force India (ex Jordan) not dead last. I hope they do well this year.

      Great race anyway, more of the same please!!

  13. Eduardo Colombi says:

    the durability of the front wing was a big surprise for me. Barrichello crashed twice with it and did not lost it. his performance got a little worst but nothing that compromised his race.

    What a great race with lot of surpises, good for ones not that good for others, extremely exciting!

    For my surprise Lewis made an outstanding race with a doubting car, drove like a champ and deserved the 3rd place. Not a big fan of his driving but in this race it was really nice.

    • Phil says:

      Even more amazing is that Kova shunted Barichello’s rear at the start mangling the diffuser and robbing him of rear downforce.

      To bring the car in at all, let alone in 2nd place was an amazing feat and shows that Brawn was right in picking experience over the Senna name (which would have brought a lot of sponsorship by itself).

  14. el Diablo says:

    It’s interesting that Brawn are yet another team to take their first win with a 1-2. Jordan took a 1-2 at Belguim 98, as did BMW at Canada 08. Also, Stewart finished 1st and 3rd at the Nurburgring 99 and the old Honda team finished 1st and 4th at Hungary 06, though they had won before in the 60’s I think.

    I can’t wait for the rest of the season, even the next 3 races at three Tilkedromes should be better than usual now that the cars have KERS and the wrong tyres. Was it just me or did that race remind anyone of the tyre troubles back in most of the races in 2005?

    One more thing- as good as it is to see Button and Barrichello on the podium, how long before we all get bored of Brawn dominating?

  15. Mig@Golf says:

    After everything that was said and done to try to burry Vodafone McLaren Mercedes and the World Champion Lewis Hamilton in pre-season and before Australia GP, it was with great delight I saw Lewis taking home a deserved third place – a perfect race from the back to the front.

    It’s also with delight I saw double Brawn GP winners, even if I don’t really like the man (Ross), I like both drivers a lot – Button and Rubens.

    It was a pity for Heikki to retire so soon, since we was in a different fuel strategy and we will never know what that would do.

    About the last accident – I believe the blame is on Kubica and not Vettel, but those 80 year old guys behind that big table looking at a monitor know better…

    I think in the future what happened with Truli – overtaking a car with yellow flags -MUST BE handled on the spot and not after the race is over.

    If it’s a weight problem of some other irregularity, of course only after the cars are inspected, they can know, but what happened, we all saw…

    I guess some guys didn’t want another British driver on the podium… but I believe Ron Dennis already call Toyota Team Manager to ask for the trophy :) . It WILL go to McLaren Museum!

    About Ferrari, after hearing a lot that the past mistakes were not to be repeated, it looks bad – Kimmi had mechanical problem in Q1; Massa also during the race, and Kimmi hit the wall – resulting in either car finishing the inaugural Grand Prix of what looks it will be a great Season with more than 2 drivers fighting for the title and a lot of them fighting for race wins.

    About the FIA meeting, it won’t change a lot – if the damn things are OK, all teams will use them, if not, I don’t think the Browns will go from front row to last… as Rubbens said during the press conference, he was hit from behind (as hit other with the front left wing and still was second, so it’s not the all mighty magical exhaust that make them now the team to beat on the pack, at least for now.

    Can’t wait from next weekend!

    • I think in the future what happened with Truli – overtaking a car with yellow flags -MUST BE handled on the spot and not after the race is over.

      It happened about two laps before the end of the race. Turning around a decision that quickly isn’t easy, particularly when the TV cameras at the track seemed to miss both Hamilton passing Trulli and Trulli passing Hamilton.

      In an ideal world perhaps the team could have contacted race control and asked them what order the cars should be in. But that didn’t work out for McLaren at Spa last year (Whiting told them they fine were after Hamilton’s infamous pass, then changed his mind) and now Max Mosley has told the teams they aren’t supposed to do that any more.

    • Chris says:

      About the last accident – I believe the blame is on Kubica and not Vettel, but those 80 year old guys behind that big table looking at a monitor know better…

      Lol – that shot of Charlie Whiting and his army of officals ammused me as well. (Max obviously through it would show how professional and open and on the ball the officals are instead it just showed a room of ageing baboons) Also considering the number of officals in that room no wounder it takes for ever to make a decision.

  16. dmw says:

    The new rules appear to be vindicated. Racing was much closer than in years past. But he stewards are at it again. Penalty for Vettel but none for Barrichello wontonly causing the turn 1 wreck? The SC delay was inexplicable, as was the length of the caution period.

    Hamilton was definitely the drive of the race, period. How many aggressive, clean on-track passes did he pull off? I lost count. That was a Schumacher like drive—aggressive, mistake-free, maximizing the machinery, and bringing home the result.

    Massa, Raikkonnen and the team again showed the strategic brain-fade that cost them the WDC last year. Raikonnen is I’m afraid earning a reputation for poor driving under pressure and Massa has never done anything special with a mediocre car and I’m afraid he never will.

    I don’t think Brawn was all that invincible. Button and Barrichello did everything they needed to do to lose, and they had no major speed edge, but their closest pursuers were tripping over themselves and each other all day. Button never really got away from Vettel and BMW’s strategy would have really but Button under pressure. Branson better start the cash flowing because Redbull, McLaren, Ferrari have plenty of capital and infrastructure and Europe will be a different story if they don’t develop that car.

    • F1Yankee says:

      starting line drama?
      check
      first turn carnage?
      check
      tons of action?
      check
      close fights at the end of the race?
      check
      questionable officiating?
      check
      weirdness, like a 3-wheeler?
      check
      billionaires smiling like they’re….billionaires?
      check
      politics?
      check, duh

      although it’s early, the new rules produced a great race, no monsoon needed. i think it’s pretty conclusive that all this back and forth about kers and diffusers is just hot air. cars were running every possible combination, and nothing provided any driver with an overwhelming advantage. overall, the action was extremely close, even by modern standards.

      the sc delay is disappointing, but only a nut would believe it was held up so that button could pit. speed tv crew speculated the delay was due to the new pit timing system, although this doesn’t explain the length of the sc period.

  17. GeorgeK says:

    Way to go Jenson! Can’t wait to see how he’ll perform in the wet in a real race car.

    I think it’s unfortunate that there is such a disparity between tire compounds as it may have cost teams positions. Is it time to rid the sport of the mandatory use of the two compound rule? Isn’t this a hold over from the Michelin-Bridgestone tire wars?? Let teams use compounds available that suit their chassis setups.

    • Is it time to rid the sport of the mandatory use of the two compound rule? Isn’t this a hold over from the Michelin-Bridgestone tire wars?

      Quite the reverse actually. After the FIA ended the tyre war Bridgestone wanted a reason to keep tyres in the picture, so to speak, and so the rule was brought in for the first season without Michelin – 2007.

    • John H says:

      After watching the Williams terrible performance on the option tyre in the race, and with no real testing time to rectify this, I think it makes a lot of sense to let the teams use their own compound choice.

      It might make things less interesting in the race though!

  18. Daniel says:

    Supplying data to your future “Australian Grand Prix facts and stats”.

    Rubens Barrichello stepped on the podium driving for the fifth different team: Jordan (1994 Pacific Grand Prix, 1995 Canadian Grand Prix), Stewart (1997 Monaco Grand Prix, 1999 French Grand Prix, 1999 European Grand Prix, and other I can’t remember), Ferrari (dozens of times), Honda (2008 British Grand Prix) and Brawn (2009 Australian Grand Prix)…

    Can anyone remember another driver doing something similar?

    Also, it’s the second time he backs a british team-mate in a 1-2 finish that marks a team’s maiden win (1999 European Grand Prix, Johnny Herbert with a Stewart, 2009 Australian Grand Prix, Jenson Button with a Brawn).

  19. goofy says:

    “just one policeman surrounded by lots of bandits”

    jalousy all around

  20. STeVE says:

    Great opening to the season, Just a couple of things that confused me:

    Barrichello on turn one was not penalised?
    What happened to the tether on Kubica’s car? The tyre flew of like it was 1980 again, such a dangerous failing of this sort usually requires a investigation before the car can race again.

    Cant wait for next weekend though.

    • Phil says:

      If the force is too much the tether will give way, it’s simple physics.

      It will however reduce the velocity and that tyre didn’t seem to be going too fast TBH.

  21. Eduardo Colombi says:

    What happened to the tether on Kubica’s car? The tyre flew of like it was 1980 again, such a dangerous failing of this sort usually requires a investigation before the car can race again.

    think o too Steve, one of those flying tyres killed Ayrton Senna at Imola, another killed a steward at the track in Australia in an incedent with Villeneuve i think.

  22. Absolutely great!
    Edge of the seat television!
    This is a wake up call for the rest, watch out for the white…

    Bring on malaysia!!

    Cheers,

    Olaf

  23. Weasel says:

    I’m still trying to figure out why Vettel was not immediately black flagged for blatantly running his trike around the track with a front wheel hanging off, thereby potentially endangering other drivers? What was his team thinking and what was race control thinking by allowing him to continue doing it for so long?

  24. Dane says:

    The right driver won the 1st race, good on you Jenson. Though Im still unsure shy Barrichello didnt get a penalty for turn one. I have just found found out that Hamilton has now been bumped up to 3rd. I wish they wouldnt change the positions after the trophies have been handed out

  25. alan says:

    Firstly great race and well done brawn and co for their effort and belief in themseves when everyone including branson would not put any backing behind them – as for selfpromoting good guy branson – he flew across the world to say he wanted to tell F1 about saving fuel???
    other sponsers let their stickers do there talking – he should just shut it – he hasnt in all his other stunts thought on saving the planet – Brawn is the brains and driving force – Button and Barrichelo have given their loyalty over the months and deserve their places today.
    As for Lewis and Trulli? – a bit of luck backed up by good driving prove he is a very determined driver and that is what F1 needs – enjoyed the blog as well – gives that other dimension – ta all

  26. Clay says:

    As an Aussie I was obviously gutted when Webbo got punted out of contention on lap one, and I too ask the question why wasn’t Rubens penalised? Now lets say the same incident occured four months ago, and Mark’s car was red and Rubens car was silver…

    Look back at Japan ‘08. Lewis slides, all four wheels locked up, along the inside of the 2 Ferraris allowing neither to turn into turn 1 but not hitting anyone, yet gets a penalty. Rubens smacks into Webbo, turning him around and into Heidfeld and eventually Heikki, yet nothing happens.

    Gotta love consistency from the stewards…

  27. BRASIL Power says:

    Barrichello did Good…
    Hope that next time Massa and Piquet do the same…

  28. sayonaraman says:

    Great race although I still can’t get over Kubica/Vettel clash. We would witness an epic fight, with the Pole catching up Button and at least challenging him for the top spot on the very last corners of the race. The good part of it is that apparently BMW is a very fast car, able to match BRAWN’s true, racing pace.
    Lewis has been great. I don’t like the guy, but that was just great performance, one of those that define the true champions.
    So much has been said about Button, Barichello and BRAWN that I’ll just say yesterday they made history in the best possible manner. Bravo…

  29. Daniel says:

    Riccardo Patrese also scored podium finishes with five different teams:
    Arrows, Brabham, Alfa Romeo, Williams and Benneton

  30. Jay Menon says:

    I was pretty upset with Renault’s performance. Alonso looked like he no pace whatsoever, he did come out say he was unhappy with the car, particularly with KERS. His 5th place was very lucky. But he didn’t seem very concerned, based on his comments, they’re expecting better when the European races start, apparently they’ve got new bits coming..hope that works out well. It would be a shame if Alonso’s car cant push for podiums this year.

    As for Lewis, good race, although his intial moves seemed spectacular as he was on the super softs. I would like to go back a year a see what kind of comments Alonso got when he finished fourth last season at Melbourne, in a car that was absolutely rubbish. Lucky or deserved?

    • Juan says:

      Agreed, Alonso didnt seem to bothered..in my opinion, there car will develop early into the season and with a driver like Fernando..i still reckon he is going to take the Championship this yr.
      Well done Brawn GP..enjoy it while it lasts..i feel the others will catch up quick!!

    • Sumit says:

      Hello Freind,
      I am planing to book tickets for F1 racing in march. Can you please advice me your experiance regarding General stand, i mean do you enjoy in general stand? i am not looking to spend more that is why i need some advice.

      If you can advice me, please e mail me at sumitwadhwa78@gmail.com

      cheers
      sumit

  31. Jess says:

    Great Race, Two Brits on the podium no Red in the points. Good action and drama. What more could I ask for. SPEED dose great coverage in the USA for F1. Who’s ready for round two. BTW I am not buying that the diffuser is the only reason Brawn was good. It helps but they just flat out had a better car all around. Great Race

  32. KingHamilton says:

    WHAT A RACE

    and what a result for Brawn, over the moon for them!

  33. Martin Bell says:

    “A donut with no hole is a Danish” Go,go,go, Joseph!!!!!! Must go to bed now.

  34. Oliver says:

    Frecon
    I do agree with your statement about the safety car. Had the safety car come out earlier, Button would no doubt have pitted and come out well within the pack. The safety car was released when the car was already being cleared off the road and as such was pointless.

  35. PJA says:

    That was a good start to the season, a win for Brawn GP and Button, Hamilton making his way from the back of the grid to fourth (later third), in a car that everyone knows is bad at the moment, and Trulli confounding his critics say he is a good qualifier but poor racer by starting from the pit lane to get a podium, although he later lost it.

    The TV coverage seemed to miss Hamilton overtaking Trulli so when the commentators said Hamilton was third in final few laps behind the safety car I thought it must have been a computer error. It seems Hamilton thought his pass was illegal so let Trulli by, and unfortunately for Trulli it appears the penalties available to stewards meant that he was demoted to 12th.

    When the Toyotas were penalised after qualifying for a flexi wing what were they able to do to make the cars legal before the race, as I thought it might be something where they would need a whole new wing.

    Considering the protests about the diffusers the cars with the disputed diffusers didn’t exactly race off in the distance did they? If it is worth half a second a lap as some claim then if it could be fitted to the Red Bull Vettel would be totally dominant.

    What is worrying for F1 in general is the steward are still handing out penalties for things that even just a few years ago would have been classed as racing incidents, and some people have come to expect this as the norm.

    For the Vettal/Kubica coming together, I think that although Vettal may be more to blame overall it didn’t justify a penalty. But I have also seen people saying Barrichello should have been punished for what happened at the start, before Hamilton’s penalty at Fuji last year people would have classified this as a normal first corner incident, nothing more.

    Personally I don’t think the later start worked because of the light levels at that time of day. Button commented on it in the press conference about the glare, and on TV in some parts of the circuit it was hard to tell which car it was.

    On a final note, does anyone agree with me that the trophies for the Australian GP are the best ones around.

  36. A pretty decent race to start the season although some seriously dubious calls by the stewards and race directors.

    Its great to see Brawn GP’s success. My only wish is that it was still Honda but at least its still Rubens. I’ll be routing for him to take the title at the 17th attempt – now that would be a story!

    I have to say though, we’ve just witnessed one of the most blatant cases of the powers that be manipulating the results yet. After Nakajima crashed it was clearly a safety car situation but the call came over two laps later, literally as Button left the pitlane. Unless the FIA can come up with a credible story about why there was such a delay, then I find it hard to believe this wasn’t deliberate. In a world filled with redundancies and cutting back, how better to make the ultra-rich extravagance of Formula 1 more palatable to the public than a heartwarming story of the team that were effectively out of work coming back to win at their first attempt.

    Keith, what do you think?

    Furthermore, whats the point of introducing a medals system to ensure the drivers attack if they’re going penalised every time they battle? Somebody please explain the words ‘RACING INCIDENT’ to the FIA.

    Complaining aside, the cars seem to be an improvement. Its early to say whether they cars can follow each other more easily, but at least with slicks and lower downforce, they squirm, twitch and slide, just like racing cars should. Much more entertaining to watch. :)

  37. Obster says:

    The Kubica/Vettel crash is a hint of things to come if we get the “most wins=champion” points system.
    BMW felt Kubica was going to win.

  38. damonsmedley says:

    What an exciting race. The 2009 Australian Grand Prix will be remembered for a long time. Good action, shame it had to finsish under the pace car. It will be interesting to see if Brawn remain the team to beat throughout the rest of the season.

Leave a Reply

No swearing, insults, advertising or racial, sexual or similar discrimination allowed.

For more information see the F1Fanatic Comment Policy

Anti-Spam Protection by WP-SpamFree

Has your comment not appeared? Try waiting a moment and then refresh the page. If it still doesn't appear and you've checked your comment meets the terms of our comment policy then contact F1Fanatic with the details of your comment so we can look into it.

If you wish to complain about a comment please contact the editor directly.