Thanks for the freedback so far everyone though for the most part it seems to be on technical stuff rather than the articles themselves. All useful though.
@girts
I’ve been asked about a podcast before and while I’d like to do one, the cost involving in producing one to a worthwhile standard would be high and it would be difficult to raise revenue from it. Most likely it would require sponsorship. Without that I can’t see it happening I’m afraid.
Points atken about the quizzes, I’ll bear it in mind for future ones.
@verstappen @daniel-chico @Electrolite
Some useful points from all of you, particularly on how to make it easier for readers to make sure they haven’t missed anything.
@sato113
The ‘lap 1 positions gained/lost’ table went because I needed to reduce the amount of time spent on post-race analysis (see here: Race weekend articles on F1 Fanatic in 2012) and it basically duplicates information that’s already in the lap chart.
The yearly average lap one position change is available in statistics, I may look into adding race-by-race data there:
Position change on lap one
@brad-ferrari There are next/previous image options underneath every picture. See here:
http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/2012/08/06/f1-fanatic-roundup-068/david-coulthard-action-10/
@squaregoldfish
One thing that gets me every time on the round-ups – the quotes from the articles you use are frequently nothing to do with the headlines of those articles.
A fair point, though that’s because I sometimes consider the quote I’ve used to be more interesting than what the sub-editor for the publication in question has highlighted in the headline. I’ll have a think about a more elegant way of doing this.
@snowman Yes we definitely need a clear distinction between ‘qualifying results’ and ‘starting order’.
