F1

Daftest F1 Rule?

Viewing 9 posts - 1 through 9 (of 9 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • 28th July 2011, 21:04 at 9:04 pm #129825
    Ratboy
    Keymaster

    in all the years of F1 what do you think to of been the daftest/worse rule that the FIA has implemented?

    I will add my own later as i’m still working on it but how about you all?

    28th July 2011, 21:34 at 9:34 pm #175420
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    The use two tyre compounds rule :3

    28th July 2011, 21:43 at 9:43 pm #175421
    Tom L.
    Participant

    Not strictly a rule, but taking away Yuji Ide’s superlicence seemed counterproductive to their aim of “improving the spectacle”!

    28th July 2011, 21:59 at 9:59 pm #175422
    JustAnF1Fanatic
    Participant

    i dont mind the both types of tyre, but starting on quali tires i dont like

    29th July 2011, 6:22 at 6:22 am #175423
    Prisoner Monkeys
    Participant

    Daftest rule?

    Anyone who lodges a protest against Ferrari automatically loses, while any protest lodged by Ferrari automatically wins.

    taking away Yuji Ide’s superlicence seemed counterproductive to their aim of “improving the spectacle”

    Ide was racing in 2006. “Improving the show” didn’t become the party line until about 2008-09.

    29th July 2011, 7:49 at 7:49 am #175424
    Red Andy
    Participant

    At the moment, it’s the two-compounds-per-race rule.

    Historically it was single-lap qualifying. What a shower.

    29th July 2011, 7:53 at 7:53 am #175425
    Icthyes
    Participant

    Engine freeze. Did it really save any money? Seems to me they just ploughed the same money into aero packages instead.

    29th July 2011, 9:42 at 9:42 am #175426
    Dan Thorn
    Participant

    The compound qualifying format used for the first half of 2005. Terrible.

    29th July 2011, 12:35 at 12:35 pm #175427
    Anonymous
    Inactive

    shaing tv coverage with sky tv

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 9 posts - 1 through 9 (of 9 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.