Group Admins

  • Profile picture of Keith Collantine

Group Mods

  • Profile picture of damonsmedley
  • Profile picture of Bradley Downton

F1

Public Group active 11 hours, 46 minutes ago

F1 discussion

Driver's Wearing Jewelry?

This topic contains 8 replies, has 8 voices, and was last updated by Profile photo of Nixon Nixon 3 years, 7 months ago.

Viewing 9 posts - 1 through 9 (of 9 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #129210
    Profile photo of narboza22
    narboza22
    Participant

    I may be remembering completely incorrectly here, but I thought last year or two years ago when Hamilton got his ear pierced there was controversy (this being F1) about whether drivers were allowed to wear jewelry while in the car. In qualifying, Massa has a wedding ring on while in the car, are these exempt or something?

    Here’s a screenshot of it: http://i55.tinypic.com/2hs6iz8.jpg

    #166427
    Profile photo of Prisoner Monkeys
    Prisoner Monkeys
    Participant

    Drivers cannot wear jewelry that might impede rescue workers. In the case of Hamilton, his fireproof balaclava might have gotten caught on his ear rings in an accident where medical personnel might need to get his balaclava off quickly. Massa’s accident and injury in Hungary 2009 is the perfect example of just such an incident. Necklaces are another example of jewelry that is banned.

    On the other hand, wedding rings are very difficult to get off. The driver’s gloves won’t catch of them, and it’s unlikely that they would get in the way of anything else.

    #166428
    Profile photo of narboza22
    narboza22
    Participant

    I see, that makes sense.

    #166429
    Profile photo of Adam Tate
    Adam Tate
    Participant

    While wedding rings are perfectly acceptable, I don’t know why a driver would want to wear any extra jewelery.

    I used to cross country, and track. Before every race we would always take off all our jewelry, go to the bathroom, do anything we could to be just that little bit lighter and faster.

    With F1 taking things to the extreme in terms of lightness and speed, I am surprised that they do not do the same.

    #166430
    Profile photo of Alianora La Canta
    Alianora La Canta
    Participant

    The other reason jewelry is mostly banned is due to fire risk (not because they’re flammable but because metal conducts heat a lot better than fireproof clothing).

    Even before jewelry was banned, Renault had an engineer who had “check drivers are not wearing their watches before entering the car” on the job list because they calculated that a typical watch (of 40g) was worth two-thousandths of a second.

    #166431
    Profile photo of Movement
    Movement
    Member

    Well personally I think that the most important reason for not wearing Jewelry is that as a man, you look like an idiot with it on! I can more or less accept a wedding ring…but even that is not entirely necessary, and I am not planning to wear one!

    #166432
    Profile photo of Calum
    Calum
    Participant

    You don’t need any wristwear – you get a free watch at the end of the race!!

    #166433
    Profile photo of wigster
    wigster
    Participant

    Felipe Massas ring is nothing compared to the bling you see the athletes on tv wearing who run the 100 metres. It must weigh them down and cant help their aero eiffency, and must be a disadvantage when the sprints are decided by thousandths of a second. In comparison his ring adds almost no weight, and it could have some emotional significance to him which he may claim actually helps make him faster.

    #166434
    Profile photo of Nixon
    Nixon
    Participant

    wigster right, confidence is extremely important in any type of sport. But i cant believe how runners were those gold necklaces, first their heavy and they might get hurt.

Viewing 9 posts - 1 through 9 (of 9 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.