Formula One Management – What would you do? (21 posts)

  • Profile picture of Prisoner Monkeys Prisoner Monkeys said 10 months, 3 weeks ago:

    The idea that they can copyright that is ridiculous.

    Nevertheless, it’s the law. FOM own the footage broadcast as part of each race.

  • Profile picture of Girts Girts said 10 months, 2 weeks ago:

    Thanks for starting this topic @dan8 , it’s actually a very interesting one as most likely there will be some changes in FOM over the next years and we’re talking about the sport’s general direction.

    The problem with most of the proposed changes is that they would mean less money for FOM and I’m not sure if I wanted that if I was the head of the organisation :) For instance, Abu Dhabi might not be popular among the fans but, as far as I know, it pays a much higher race hosting fee than Spa or Monaco.

    I also believe that F1 is as prestige and fascinating as it is now because of the way it’s been run during the last decades and making it too fan-friendly wouldn’t necessarily increase its attraction more. But I agree that some changes would really be welcome like more active presence on the social media, less strict approach to the copyright issues (I’m not a fan of piracy though) and I also agree that the old, traditional circuits need some extra ‘protection’.

    I’m not sure if I agree with 8) as fans are too different and I think it would be hard to form a representative fans’ association. Nevertheless, it’s important that the FOM doesn’t focus only on the casual fans and remember the real fanatics when making decisions on the sport’s future, too. As for 9), I’m against it. Don’t get me wrong, I spend 100 times more time on F1F than I do on F1.com but I just think that fans zone and the official zone should be seperated on the web, too.

  • Profile picture of Dan8 Dan8 said 10 months ago:

    Thanks for your thoughts @girts and sorry I did not reply earlier.

    Whatever happens with FOM depends on whoever takes over after Bernie retires, if he ever does.

    The one point I made that I really hope is implemented is the extra protection for the traditional circuits, I do not like the idea of having more “tilkedromes” than classic venues.

    The idea about the fans association was not the best idea after all, I have realised it is very hard to listen to what the fans want as they’re views are different. Maybe FOM should listen to the drivers views more instead, as they do seem to prefer the classic races, but I believe the GPDA already does that.

    Its all a balance between the money and the enjoyment of the sport. Money seems to be winning at the moment.

  • Profile picture of MazdaChris MazdaChris said 10 months ago:

    It’s a tough call. As someone else said, it’d be nice to have a sort of utopian wishlist where the best tracks could host for free, and all fans would be able to attend races for a nominal fee, and TV coverage would be totally unrestricted, while at the same time giving a much wider level of access to the track and technical features. Yeah that’d be great, but it’s not in the slightest bit possible in a world where money exists.

    In my opinion, the first, and most important thing, would be to considerably reduce the amount of money taken out of the sport by the CRH and his partners. Partners who do literally nothing in relation to the sport other than cream off the money. This would mean either more money for the teams, or reduced hosting fees for the circuits, allowing better investment into facilities and reducing ticket prices.

    While I do like the idea of free to air coverage, I actually think that the model in the Uk isn’t a bad one. I’d take it a little further though, and say that in each country, one TV channel can have the rights to the FOM video feeds, which will include access to all the races and every session, plus all of the support races. This will be on a subscription channel (most likely, but not necessarily Sky. Eurosport, Speed TV, etc, may all be viable). I’d establish media areas around the circuit for a number of other broadcasters to put their own cameras up and broadcast their own feed from a number (not all) of races in the season, for a nominal fee. The more races they want to broadcast, the more they’d need to pay. A reduced rate would be offered to those just putting out highlights shows.

    With a reduced level of involvement from the commercial partners of the CRH, this would free up the possibility of opening up other avenues of advertising revenue. FOM are well known for their harsh stance on non approved advertising around circuits, not to mention hospitality areas. I’d open it up so that the teams and the circuits would be responsible for organising plenty of hospitality and media areas around the track where they can advertise their products. Similar to ‘the village’ at Le Mans, where you have all sorts of stands showing off the various manufacturers and commercial partners. It means that there is more incentive for the sponsors of the teams, since they will get increased exposure, and it’ll give something extra for the fans to see and do over a race weekend. I’d then make sure that a certain percentage of the advertising space at the track (billboard, etc) is set aside for various commercial partners of the teams, rather than the main sponsor of the race. These spots would be sold at a very high price, but would offer the opportunity for significant commercial exposure.

    The FOM feed would then be significantly expanded to include much more information and interactivity, such as live telemetry, continuous radio transmissions when watching in-car feeds, and so on. To give some extra value to those paying for the full service with the pay-per-view broadcasters.

    There are many other changes I’d make, but the crux is to offer more value for those buying into the sports, to encourage greater investment, and give a sense of improved returns for that investment. The current business model for all of the money for the sport coming from hosting fees and broadcast rights, with a large chunk of the money siphoned off and never reinvested, is totally unsustainable.

  • Profile picture of Keith Collantine Keith Collantine said 10 months ago:

    I’d certainly get someone to subtitle Ferrari’s radio messages.

    Given that someone must be approving them for broadcast in the first place, and must therefore understand what’s being said, surely they could offer a translation?

    I see they have started subtitling the team radio messages in the post-race video highlights recently.

    This is just the tip of the iceberg of course…

  • Profile picture of Prisoner Monkeys Prisoner Monkeys said 10 months ago:

    Maybe they could subtitle all radio messages. Sometimes they are quite difficult to hear, even when the team and driver are speaking English.

    On the other hand, subtitling would take time. The messages are already on a delay, so as to filter out anything that should not be heard, but it would probably take even longer to produce a translation if necessary. And what insight do we really get? When Alonso was talking with the team, they were simply saying that everything was okay. Personally, I think that’s a brilliant tactical ploy, and it’s been very effective in the past. When Alonso was leading in Canada, I think a lot of the excitement came down to the way nobody except Ferrari really knew what was going on with Alonso’s car. I think a lot of that would have been lost if the messages had been translated and subtitled.

You need to log in to create and reply to topics. You can log in with your F1 Fanatic account here or sign up for an F1 Fanatic account here.

Advert | Go Ad-free