For all the non believers, there are thousands of pilots, architects, engineers, firefighters, police, and military personal who do not agree with you.
Likewise, if you’re a Windows or OSX user, I can say “A LOT of people disagree that the 2 leading desktop OSes are better than Haiku, or perhaps GNU/Linux, or BSD“, but you’ll stay with Windows. Am I supposed to now call you a non-believer? A conformist? No, quite frankly I don’t think I should.
Again, exactly how are you a bringer of truth when all you say is ad populum, ad hominem and appeal to accomplishment?
Likewise (“Oh, wait! I forgot to look at what the title of this thread is!” seriously, take a look at it now :p), if you disagree with what Minardi said about the TC, then you’re not suddenly an RBR-loving conformist or anything like that – and anybody agreeing with Giancarlo (about the TC, of course!) isn’t an RBR-hating conformist(note that I’m not using this paragraph to really argue against a specific post here, I’m just adding a note).
Having said that, let’s move half (probably more, actually) of this thread into somewhere in the off-topic section, and pray to God that the F1F servers don’t get overloaded.
Tell me, ‘if you look at x, you must come to the conclusion y, if not, you are a sheep’ doesn’t sound very scientific, does it?
It is scientific – albeit in that it shows how the human brain works: What is said by the one who is perceived as the leader is what is perceived by another one’s brain to be true :p
As for whether or not Mr.Marko’s team is using KERS as TC….
Perhaps Newey is thinking,”What? KERS for TC? Let me try it! Whoever thought of it must be very clever!”
And in a few months the media will [perhaps] say “It’s true, Newey uses KERS for TC”, when in reality he got the idea from whoever the “conspiracy theorist” was. Imagine what that will be like!