Vettel’s speed compared to other WDCs (50 posts)

  • Profile picture of mnmracer mnmracer said 6 months ago:

    @freelittlebirds
    So your entire hypothesis is based on “Hamilton – no comment necessary”.
    That’s not a very strong basis.

  • Profile picture of mnmracer mnmracer said 6 months ago:

    “Obviously, what Sebastian’s been fantastic at in the past is: putting it on pole, making enough of a gap … and staying there,” Newey said. “That way, the straight-line speed weakness cannot be exploited.”

    Newey has helped Nigel Mansell, Alain Prost, Damon Hill, Jacques Villeneuve, Mika Hakkinen and Vettel to world championships, but says he doesn’t like to compare the many greats with whom he’s worked. “But the thing you can say about Sebastian is:

    he’s a clever guy, he thinks about it a lot, learns from his mistakes, will often be there late in the evening, looking through the data, working with the engineers, looking at the onboard [video footage] of himself and comparing it to the other drivers,” Newey told Sky. “So he tries to use every bit of information that’s available to him. And I think that is something that I have seen in some of the other great drivers I’ve been privileged to work with – that’s a common theme.”

  • Profile picture of raymondu999 raymondu999 said 6 months ago:

    @freelittlebirds yep – no qualms there. But let’s go with your line of reasoning. In what way is Alonso/Hamilton a known quantity? Hamilton is a known, relative to Alonso. Alonso is a known… relative to Trulli, Fisichella, etc.

    See where I’m going with this?

    I’m not slating Alonso – I’m saying that there are times when you have to ask “ok – how DO we know?” Alonso is undoubtedly a top driver. But if he was the benchmark for Hamilton, who was the benchmark for him?

    For example if you’re going to take early F1 results, then in 2004 Trulli was ahead of Alonso in the standings. But then again I don’t believe for a moment that Alonso (at least the Alonso of today) is a lesser driver than Trulli.

    Without an inside eye – a part of it will undoubtedly be, for lack of a better word – black magic. Mind you if we did have an inside eye that could change a lot of things. In terms of which drivers maximise a car’s grip – there are certain parameters you could indeed measure on telemetry, and pretty definitively see whether or not a driver was close to the limit (though you cannot see if, for example, the driver is missing a trick by using the wrong racing line, or not missing the correct bumps etc)

    A part of it will undoubtedly be nothing more than through reputation.

  • Profile picture of raymondu999 raymondu999 said 6 months ago:

    After a fashion – you also have to trust the judgment of these people on the inside. They have a lot more access to data than we do – and they have a lot better info to make judgment from.

  • Profile picture of Michael Michael said 6 months ago:

    @mnmracer – Thanks for the info about the karts.

    Does everyone agree about the following points on Vettel’s pre-F1 career:

    1. He was fast in karting and had speed early on.
    2. He dominated in one season of Formula BMW ADAC.
    3 He did well in Formula 3 but he didn’t live up to expectations.
    4. He did well in Formula Renault 3.5 but again didn’t really live up to expectations.

    Conclusion
    Vettel’s an early bloomer. His pre-F1 career was very good but he didn’t perform as expected in the early series. He didn’t perform horribly either.

    The Race of Champions, did Vettel and Schumacher compete against a team anywhere as good as theirs? Button and Hamilton would have been a comparable team.

  • Profile picture of mnmracer mnmracer said 6 months ago:

    In FR3.5 he drove 10 races scattered across two years. In those 10 races -in which he debuted with a second place followed by a race win- he won 2 races, 2 poles, 6 podiums and 9 point finishes (and a near career-ending DNF).

    Not sure how you arrive at “didn’t really live up to expectations”.

    As for Formula 3, how do you compare his results if he is one of few drivers to drive in three massively different series at the same time? If you spent all your time in a Formula 3 car, would that not give you a head-start to someone who’s used to driving GP2-level and Formula 1 cars every other weekend?

  • Profile picture of Dizzy-A Dizzy-A said 6 months ago:

    I basically agree with @raymondu999 on known quantities. Remember that Alonso was also widely regarded the best driver in F1 before being teammates with Hamilton. Back then he had been teammates with only Marques, Trulli and Fisichella, (and beat them all, with the exception of Trulli in 2004). He had simply maximised the opportunities he was presented with, which is ALL you can ask from any driver, in the history of the sport, much like Vettel now.

  • Profile picture of Michael Michael said 6 months ago:

    @raymondu999

    You make a good point because so far most folks view 2007 as the year that Hamilton exploded and rivaled Alonso. But history WILL show 2007 allowed both drivers to show that they were almost equal. Alonso’s fans can use that as their best defense of Alonso.

    Everyone will use the Hamilton card to defend their skill in F1. Even Vettel can point to yesterday and make a valid claim that he’s the 2nd fastest driver in F1 ahead of Alonso and Raikonnen. Who can dispute that?

  • Profile picture of raymondu999 raymondu999 said 6 months ago:

    @freelittlebirds I am unable to disagree with your comment given that I don’t follow the junior categories as much. But wasn’t he leading FR3.5 before he was pulled out before the season’s end? To move into Toro Rosso, a la Alguersuari?

    I don’t think Vettel’s an early bloomer to be honest. If anything he’s a late bloomer, as @mnmracer was talking about in his Valencia 2008 experience.

    Hamilton doesn’t drive in ROC. But Vettel in the ROC buggy is absolutely stunning to watch.

    For what it’s worth here is Vettel vs Button. Button spun on lap 2, but over such a short lap, it’s stunning that Vettel was already able to pull such a gap.

    Here’s in whole:
    Nations Cup

    Drivers Cup

  • Profile picture of Michael Michael said 6 months ago:

    @mnmracer – I agree in Renault 3.5 he was closer than Formula 3 but still given his Red Bull results and previous results, wouldn’t you say he should have won more races in 2007 when he won just one? I expected more wins from him given his previous results and his Red Bull results.

  • Profile picture of Michael Michael said 6 months ago:

    @raymondu999

    After a fashion – you also have to trust the judgment of these people on the inside. They have a lot more access to data than we do – and they have a lot better info to make judgment from.

    Agreed but there have been an equal amount of comments from other people questioning Vettel’s abilities. So yes, Vettel has support especially from the Red Bull/Torro Rosso camp and from German fans but he has an incredible number of detractors.

    AFAIK, no one has questioned Senna’s or Clark’s speed. No one is questioning Alonso’s or Hamilton’s speed. Vettel’s speed is the question and where there is smoke, there is usually fire.

  • Profile picture of mnmracer mnmracer said 6 months ago:

    @freelittlebirds
    You’re not answering my question on a young unexperienced driver having to divide his learning curve over three completely different cars.

    Considering you (rightfuly) are so impressed with Lewis’ results, let’s compare both their first 10 races at the top level junior formulae:
    Vettel: 1, 2, 2 (later DNF), 5, 3, 1, 6, 4, 2, 3
    Hamilton: 2, 6, 4 (later DSQ), 10, 1, 1, 2, 1, 1
    Giving points for that, that would put Hamilton at 57 points, with Vettel at 52 points. Hardly a world-shocking difference.

  • Profile picture of raymondu999 raymondu999 said 6 months ago:

    @freelittlebirds No one questions Senna/Clark NOW – but on the day? There were – just that it’s a sad truth of life that artists are rarely fully appreciated until after their passing.

    Case in point – Michael Jackson. After his death a lot of people started listening to his music and calling him a genius. All the talk of molestation etc was forgotten, pretty much.

    I know people who insist that Bellof is much quicker than Senna for example.

    I’m NOT saying Clark/Senna are slow. But come back in 20-30 years and see what people are saying then. There will be a lot less detractors – I guarantee you.

  • Profile picture of mnmracer mnmracer said 6 months ago:

    @freelittlebirds

    Agreed but there have been an equal amount of comments from other people questioning Vettel’s abilities. So yes, Vettel has support especially from the Red Bull/Torro Rosso camp and from German fans but he has an incredible number of detractors.

    Not sure what detractors you speak of, but you might have missed
    - BBC repeatedly saying how he has proven himself
    - Brundle mocking people that say he can’t overtake
    - team-bosses voting him top 2 driver of the year since 2009 (best in 2010, yes, over Alonso)
    - Autosport awards left and right
    - Stirling Moss comparing him to Fangio
    - Peter Sauber praising his intelligence as a driver
    - Formula One drivers voting him 29th best driver of all time after his 2009 season (i.e., before he went and broke records left and right)
    - Every other F1 website owner being favorable over his skills

  • Profile picture of mnmracer mnmracer said 6 months ago:

    @raymondu999
    Good point, this video might be interesting for @freelittlebirds

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pdCWDSpwv9U

You need to log in to create and reply to topics. You can log in with your F1 Fanatic account here or sign up for an F1 Fanatic account here.

Advert | Go Ad-free