Who is Currenlty the Quickest driver in F1? (57 posts)

  • Profile picture of ob1kenobi.23 ob1kenobi.23 said 1 year, 7 months ago:

    Mark has beaten all his team mates till now, including Fernando & Nico.
    He has also qualified some dogs at the pointy end of the grid so his speed is not in question.
    It was Mark who said, when Jenson got a good car he had Rubens as a team mate, when I got a good car I had Seb.
    So if using Mark as a benchmark then Seb must be exceptional.

  • Profile picture of raymondu999 raymondu999 said 1 year, 7 months ago:

    Sorry ob1; was Mark teammate to Fernando in another formula? I don’t remember them being F1 teammates…

  • Profile picture of ob1kenobi.23 ob1kenobi.23 said 1 year, 7 months ago:

    Sorry Raymondu99, it was a low blow, not proud.
    In his first season in F3000 he finished 4th, Mark was 3rd, but the anti Seb people are always saying how Paul Di Resta beat him in alower formula so I thought I might use some of their reasoning.
    I know this does’nt make them team mates but it is a spec formula.
    I still think Mark is a lot quicker than he is being given credit for.

  • Profile picture of raymondu999 raymondu999 said 1 year, 7 months ago:

    Yes; I remember their 2000 F3000 season; just didn’t remember them being F1 teammates…

  • Profile picture of bearforce1 bearforce1 said 1 year, 7 months ago:

    Vettel reigns supreme.

    Vettel makes it all look so easy. All masters make their trades look effortless whether they be musicians or race drivers. He is just so smooth and precise.

    I think the telling thing is that he is soooo good and makes it look way to easy that people just can’t believe or won’t accept how great he is. People are like “it just has to be the car no one is that good”

  • Profile picture of filippinator filippinator said 1 year, 7 months ago:

    Uh, i forgot Di Resta beated Vettel in F3! haha
    anyway, opinions, raymondu.
    You keep yours, I keep mine.
    It’s no Vettel’s fault if in Monza 2008 all top drivers were out of contention. Nor it’s his fault if RBR has no rival in 2010-2011. Simply, to me, Vettel has still to show he can win with a “normal” racecar in “normal” conditions. Hamilton has yet shown that.

  • Profile picture of mnmracer mnmracer said 1 year, 7 months ago:

    Hamilton has 25% (1 in 4) ‘normal wins’, while Vettel has 21% (1 in 4.75) ‘normal wins’; in statistics, certainly with only 16 and 19 wins to go by, that is called negligible.

    Going by the standards Filippinator has set for a normal win, I’ve made a comparison between Lewis Hamilton’s wins and Sebastian Vettel’s wins. So ‘adventage wins’ are races (by Filippinator’s standards) that have been won…
    - in a wet or partially wet race
    - in a car 0.3 seconds faster in qualifying, disregarding the team mates’ pace
    - by contenders retiring, unless he was already faster in the race before they retired

    If we would actually take the pace of the team mate as a standard for the car’s speed, both would have had more ‘normal wins’.
    This also disregards whether or not a competitor’s car had a faster race pace, which also adds more ‘normal wins’ to both.

    //////////////////////////////////
    //////////////////////////////////
    Lewis Hamilton – wins in fastest car
    * Canada 2007: half a second faster in quali than anyone else
    * United States 2007: McLaren half a second faster than Ferrari’s
    * Hungary 2007: McLaren over fastest car by half a second
    * Australia 2008: McLaren half a second faster than Massa
    * China 2008: McLaren almost half a second faster than Ferrari’s
    * Singapore 2009: McLaren fastest car by half a second

    Lewis Hamilton – wins in special conditions
    * Japan 2007: rain, rain, rain
    * Monaco 2008: drying race, lost lots of time in the dry
    * England 2008: rain, later drying, Ferrari’s were nowhere in wet
    * Turkey 2010: would not have won if not for the Red Bull crash
    * Belgium 2010: drying race
    * China 2011: drying race, tire advantage

    Lewis Hamilton – ‘normal’ wins (25%)
    * Germany 2008
    * Hungary 2009
    * Canada 2010
    * Germany 2011

    //////////////////////////////////
    //////////////////////////////////

    Sebastian Vettel – wins in fastest car
    * England 2009: almost half a second faster in quali
    * Valencia 2010: almost half a second faster in quali
    * Japan 2010: almost half a second faster in quali
    * Australia 2011: almost a second faster in quali
    * Turkey 2011: half a second faster in quali
    * Monaco 2011: almost half a second faster in quali
    * Valencia 2011: almost half a second faster in quali
    * Belgium 2011: half a second faster in quali
    * Italy 2011: half a second faster in quali
    * Singapore 2011: almost half a second faster in quali

    Sebastian Vettel – wins in special conditions
    * Italy 2008: rain, rain, rain
    * China 2009: rain
    * Malaysia 2010: rain in qualifying
    * Brazil 2010: rain in qualifying

    Sebastian Vettel – ‘normal’ wins (21%)
    * Japan 2009
    * Abu Dhabi 2009
    * Malaysia 2011
    * Spain 2011

  • Profile picture of filippinator filippinator said 1 year, 7 months ago:

    haha nice stats! LOL
    Glad you have so much time to waste (by my standard of wasting time, of course)!
    But pretty useless.. I don’t like stats so much, I wrote what I think, and I made my own impressions just watching races.. (F1 and other cathegories)..
    Anyway, I obviously have FULL RESPECT for anyone thinking Vettel is quicker, or Alonso is quicker or even D’Ambrosio is quicker.
    But still have my own idea.

  • Profile picture of Asanator Asanator said 1 year, 7 months ago:

    Hi Flippinator,

    Your point 1 is not strictly true, In 2008 Hamilton won the championship in the Best car ‘in the wet’ in a year that was one of the wettest in F1 history. The Ferrari was fastest in the dry and useless in the wet due problems with tyre temperatures.

  • Profile picture of VettelS VettelS said 1 year, 7 months ago:

    In identical cars and over a single lap, I believe that Vettel would be fastest.

    However, starting from the same grid position, I’m not sure who would be fastest over a full race distance. I’d like to think it would be Vettel, however I feel that Alonso’s experience would help him to have a cleaner and more consistent race.

  • Profile picture of raymondu999 raymondu999 said 1 year, 7 months ago:

    In qualifying, I would think Vettel would still be on pole. If you’re talking of having a clear track and having drivers go on a race-distance time attack, (almost like rallying) I’m also certain that would still be Vettel.

  • Profile picture of 91jb12 91jb12 said 1 year, 7 months ago:

    For me its a toss up between Hamilton and Vettel, but I’m biased so I’d say 55-45 Vettels favour if the were up against eachother in the same car. Alonso has had some very strong laps and i think he is beating his teammate by one of the bigger margains (slightly bigger than the average gap from Vettel to Webber)
    In a race though, I’d have to say Alonso and Vettel come off 3rd best of the ‘big 3′ in this department but i am sure he will get better.

You need to log in to create and reply to topics. You can log in with your F1 Fanatic account here or sign up for an F1 Fanatic account here.

Advert | Go Ad-free