Williams FW33 – My improved livery

This topic contains 6 replies, has 7 voices, and was last updated by Profile photo of gabal gabal 6 years, 4 months ago.

Viewing 7 posts - 1 through 7 (of 7 total)

  • Author


  • #128958

    Profile photo of Grace


    Moving 2 logos around, instantly (in my eyes) makes a rather dreary livery look a whole lot better, and fully maximises the Rothmans lines.



    Profile photo of ajokay

    Considering AT&T are the title sponsor, they’ve never had terribly prominent logos on the car, which you think they’d do, as title sponsors rarely get name dropped other than with interviews with members of the team.


    Profile photo of cubejam


    Sponsors pay for what they get. AT&T don’t pay to have their logo on the sidepod, they pay to have their name in the title.

    They all pay for a spot on the car. Remember when Renault launched in 2010? They had lots of blank spaces, they could have covered those over with their existing sponsors but they didn’t because that would scare sponsors away.

    They’d think “Someone already has that spot, there’s no point investing”

    If you keep the space open, sponsors will come and look… we could have our logo there.


    Profile photo of TommyB


    Much better. Here’s an improvement I did to the nose.


    Still don’t get why they didn’t do this. The nose looks messy in my opinion.


    Profile photo of sw6569


    I’m not sure I agree. I think the nose looks good as it is – it doesn’t look like a rothmans nose, but it looks good I think.

    Then again, i’m in love with the williams livery so perhaps i’m not seeing things clearly :)


    Profile photo of Icthyes


    I was thinking the same thing about the nose, Tommy, looks pretty good there.


    Profile photo of gabal


    I liked the all-blue nose better but I would have gone with blue all the way and lose even the white top of the nose.

Viewing 7 posts - 1 through 7 (of 7 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.