Forum Replies Created
23rd March 2015, 0:08 at 12:08 am #294933
Well-spotted and yes, it might be a brief cut-out, I think. It definitely feels like one by ear.
It might also have been the moment that caused his fuel reading going awry a bit later on.
Although, in a wider context, we all knew since testing concluded that the Mercedes still has a mileage/failure ratio that is average at best. So it’s not that big of a surprise to see them having glitches here and there. I think it’ll be rather similar to last year; no wonder Seb talks that much about the importance of being there in 3rd place – it’s to be able to capitalise once (and rather not ‘if’) something goes very wrong at Mercedes.20th March 2015, 9:52 at 9:52 am #294833
I don’t like they ditched the slanted sides – they used to form quite a synergy with the F1 logo and give the viewer a sense of movement overall, which is never a bad thing in the fastest single-seater motorsport category. Now it’s too static. Even slightly rounded edges would be better.
I also don’t like how it’s now the font that gets green or orange as per it’s an advantage or deficit the driver has – I think the older style, when it was the background getting the distinctive look, was much easier to spot. The background revealed if it’s an advantage or a deficit and then the font conveyed the amount of that advantage/deficit. Now it’s the font that carries all the information and it’s a bit overwhelmed, I think.
Finally, I also don’t like that everything is in a different place now. Not just the lap/session counter, but even the name/flag/time/gap rectangle is just way differently arranged and it’s that much harder to catch the thing you need the most quickly. You just need that split-second of time which could be best described as ‘oh, you’re not here, where are you then?’.
At least the constantly present standings column on the left and the rolling standings on the bottom made a return by quali after missing FP1 and FP2…
My biggest issue with the new style is, however, exactly that – that it’s just a new style and with no improvement in or addition to the data displayed. Overall, I’m disappointed.16th March 2015, 22:19 at 10:19 pm #294621
I have to say there were rather few actual on-track overtakes during Sunday’s race. Horrible.
As the straights were always this short in Melbourne and so DRS was always going to be less helpful here, I think this primarily has to do with the tyres.
The soft-medium allocation was way too hard for the track allowing for quite easy one-stop strategies which in turn killed strategic varieties. The aim should always be a situation in which two strategies are almost equally good and – as it must be extremely hard to nail – two stops at the very least to allow for more varied tyre sequences. And more varied strategies = larger pace differences = more overtakes.16th March 2015, 22:12 at 10:12 pm #294620
Perez on Button – kidding, I’d go for Raikkonen on Sainz on the outside of T9 on lap… 10-ish.15th March 2015, 11:36 at 11:36 am #294481
As much as I’m not fond of Rosberg (I think he’s pretty much the definition of a smart, but not very intelligent person, the way he comes across, e. g. in his counter-jibe later on during the above presser, which is quite revealing of his personality), I think he seriously meant what he said up there. He’s a guy who does things ‘by the book’ and his words describe things that are generally considered desirable ‘by the book’.27th February 2015, 20:35 at 8:35 pm #293170
I lasted 40 seconds – and also with a knack for quality electronic music.
Hitting a somewhat more humorous note, I was sure hoping it would not be Rammstein’s Benzin…16th February 2015, 9:08 at 9:08 am #292205
I think Kvyat and Ricciardo will be closely matched, @blockwall2. What’s more, I expect Kvyat to be slightly ahead come the end of the year. I remember some STR guy saying that while he found Ricciardo to be very good when they’ve worked together, Kvyat seemed to be on another level.
Having said that, I also think Valtteri Bottas will be the next new winner (in 2015 so in a Williams), but it’s definitely between him and Kvyat with more or less equal chances.11th February 2015, 10:01 at 10:01 am #291995
Thanks for the additional info, @hunocsi.
I wouldn’t have thought the newly-opened space will be filled again, lol. But seemingly that’s what they plan with that northern section also getting the enlargement the southern section got in 2003.
It is yet another scenery change then, like that building on the seaside after the tunnel was.10th February 2015, 22:21 at 10:21 pm #291988
Even if it’s roadworks, they’d be silly to block off that huge new area come the GP. Or create a pedestrian island to block it off permanently.
So basically, I’m on the opposite – I assume it’ll affect circuit layout (in terms of run-off, most likely), until I hear otherwise.21st January 2015, 13:15 at 1:15 pm #290664
I think we will only be able to tell retrospectively.
I mean, I think a useful tool for this might be counting the past AND future world champions of any given past season. E. g. I remember when F1 Racing published an article of a year (I can’t remember which year it was) when 8 (!) world champions competed against each other, past and future.
Edit: Here’s the data of the most recent times.
Please take into account that the closer we are to present year the more this tool progressively distorts results. As such, we may indeed find that one of the 2011-2015 years will become the best (2012-13 are the strongest candidates with Ricciardo then Bottas on the map – but Schumacher retiring for the latter -, 2016-17 may also be in play if Alonso and Button stay) in the future.19th January 2015, 19:02 at 7:02 pm #290579
Looks absolutely badass and – I guess thanks to the BOP approach – it can be actually that different from the rest, not just in terms of engine formula (all are different), but engine placement as well.
Very nice find, thank you. :)13th January 2015, 13:00 at 1:00 pm #290259
@craig-o @fastiesty On a sidenote, McLaren actually used these name decals in the whole second half of 2005, not just on the non-tobacco race weekends (see the Hungarian GP, for example, others were with tobacco sponsorship, but not McLaren). That must be, I think, because they seemed to end their West sponsorship a bit earlier than expected (after the German GP, judging by the decals).12th January 2015, 23:35 at 11:35 pm #290248
@pH Thank you for the historical perspective, it really adds dimension to the topic.11th January 2015, 16:30 at 4:30 pm #290218
@f1fanf1fan It’s because a maximum of two-digit number takes less space than a name (or it could be larger on an area of the same size). …And then there’s this year’s Williams issue, yeah.
I wonder if someone out of the real decision-makers actually stumble upon this topic before the start of the season (or even in-season).11th January 2015, 14:43 at 2:43 pm #290214
@sam3110 I think either the sidepod or the engine cover will do – one clearly visible and large area is enough also taking into account that we would strip the (remaining) sponsors from one of the most, if not the most coveted space on the car.
Also, if I were a rule-maker, I’d prescribe the size of the number only and leave its design to the team designers (bar, perhaps, that there must be a uniform black outline to the number – with a prescribed thinkness – to avoid the loophole of a team choosing the background colour as its font colour and simply make the “number” invisible). I think this is important.